![]() |
|
Early bedtime?
Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 3/24/2017 10:38 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 3/24/17 10:35 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 3/24/2017 10:15 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 3/24/17 10:03 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 3/24/2017 9:44 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 3/24/17 7:51 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 3/23/2017 2:23 PM, wrote: On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 10:42:59 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: 11:39 AMKeyser Soze - show quoted text - I'm sure Fretwell will be delighted to serve as your medical advisor, and at no co$t either, except perhaps your life. .... Can't be much worse than the people who get payed well to perform unnecessary procedures. In just about any other context, Harry would be complaining about the "pay for service" model of American health care. It is amazing how he can work both sides of the table so well but I guess it is natural for a person who pimps government unions. A few months ago (at the recommendation of a couple of veteran friends) I applied for health care services through the VA. I haven't had a primary care physician for a while (he unfortunately died at a young age of leukemia) so I was basically starting from scratch. Turns out *all* vets are eligible for health care through the VA as long as they served at least 24 months and have an honorable discharge. There is a means test of sorts but some forms of income are not considered, nor are your bank accounts and your income only contributes to the determination of what priority classification you are eligible for. There are 8 classifications, 1 being the highest, 8 the lowest. You could be a multi billionaire but if you are an honorably discharged vet, you will still qualify, although probably in the lowest (8) priority classification. So, the VA sent me a letter welcoming me and sent a booklet that is personalized for what types of services, hospitalization, checkups, tests, etc. that I am eligible for. In total, I have better coverage by far than I had under the Blue Cross policy that we used to pay $1,400 a month for. I even have coverage for nursing home expenses and/or full time home nursing services if the day ever comes that I need them. The VA assigned a primary care physician in a VA clinic that is about 5 miles from my house. I've had three appointments so far, including full blood work, colon-rectal cancer tests and other tests to establish a baseline. The doc spent over an hour with me at the first appointment getting background data, etc. BTW ... related to a recent thread here ... one of the questions was if I had guns in the house and, if so, are they secure. Anyway, the only thing wrong with me is slightly elevated blood pressure. Doc said it's not "horrible" but prescribed some meds to get it a bit lower. I don't like taking meds and I know that once I get more physically active once the cold and snow stops my BP will drop but in the meantime I'll take the meds. My only out of pocket cost is an $8 co-payment for a 90 day supply of the pills. If I need to be hospitalized for some reason there is a $97 per day co-payment for the first 21 days. After that, there is no payments by me. No co-payments for doc visits, checkups, tests, etc. The VA is totally independent from Medicare and the VA does not charge Medicare for services. I am seriously thinking about dropping Part B and it's cost and dropping the gap insurance policy I have for Part B through Tufts. I don't need them if I use the VA for health care which will save me about $350 a month. Bottom line is: The VA isn't a health insurance program. It's a health care program. The Boston area VA (which governs the facilities I use) is the highest rated VA health car are in the nation. So far, I have been very impressed. So, shifting the burden is ok for a Republican, even a wealthy one. Figures. Using benefits that the government says I earned is "shifting the burden" in your eyes? I figured this would **** you off. No, it just illustrates something else that is wrong with our health care system. If you suffered a serious battle injury or debilitating injury while in the service, I see nothing wrong with providing you with good healthcare at no cost for the recovery, even a lifelong recovery, for that problem or problems. Why should the VA pay for treatment of your HBP, especially since any sort of means test would indicate you can afford to buy private health insurance or pay for a private doctor without any difficulty. Truthfully, I always thought you had to have a major service related disability or be a retired "lifer" in order to qualify for VA health care. Apparently for many years that was true. However the policy changed when the VA/TriCare system was reorganized many years ago. The VA now encourages vets to apply. There *is* a means test however I still qualify for certain health care services, more so than I expected. I had a minor, service related injury however I don't think it factored into what category I was placed because it is not a disability in any way. I had two reasons to post about this. One was to let other vets know who may not realize that they are eligible. The second reason was because I knew it would **** you off. It doesn't "**** me off." It just points out yet another inequity in our health care system. I agree that our health care system sucks. I've been fortunate to have been very healthy over the years and have not needed any extensive health care services. However, I realized something was really screwed up when I had a routine stress test done a few years ago and the hospital charged the insurance company $14,000. Made me start thinking about it. Hey, you have always been a proponent of "free health care" for everyone, managed by the federal government, much like the socialist European countries you so admire. I am just trying to make your wish come true. :-) I favor a modified single payer system, not free health care. My nuclear stress test a few years ago was $4700. -- Posted with my iPhone 7+. |
Early bedtime?
On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 10:55:40 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: Mr. Luddite wrote: On 3/24/2017 10:38 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 3/24/17 10:35 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 3/24/2017 10:15 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 3/24/17 10:03 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 3/24/2017 9:44 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 3/24/17 7:51 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 3/23/2017 2:23 PM, wrote: On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 10:42:59 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: 11:39 AMKeyser Soze - show quoted text - I'm sure Fretwell will be delighted to serve as your medical advisor, and at no co$t either, except perhaps your life. .... Can't be much worse than the people who get payed well to perform unnecessary procedures. In just about any other context, Harry would be complaining about the "pay for service" model of American health care. It is amazing how he can work both sides of the table so well but I guess it is natural for a person who pimps government unions. A few months ago (at the recommendation of a couple of veteran friends) I applied for health care services through the VA. I haven't had a primary care physician for a while (he unfortunately died at a young age of leukemia) so I was basically starting from scratch. Turns out *all* vets are eligible for health care through the VA as long as they served at least 24 months and have an honorable discharge. There is a means test of sorts but some forms of income are not considered, nor are your bank accounts and your income only contributes to the determination of what priority classification you are eligible for. There are 8 classifications, 1 being the highest, 8 the lowest. You could be a multi billionaire but if you are an honorably discharged vet, you will still qualify, although probably in the lowest (8) priority classification. So, the VA sent me a letter welcoming me and sent a booklet that is personalized for what types of services, hospitalization, checkups, tests, etc. that I am eligible for. In total, I have better coverage by far than I had under the Blue Cross policy that we used to pay $1,400 a month for. I even have coverage for nursing home expenses and/or full time home nursing services if the day ever comes that I need them. The VA assigned a primary care physician in a VA clinic that is about 5 miles from my house. I've had three appointments so far, including full blood work, colon-rectal cancer tests and other tests to establish a baseline. The doc spent over an hour with me at the first appointment getting background data, etc. BTW ... related to a recent thread here ... one of the questions was if I had guns in the house and, if so, are they secure. Anyway, the only thing wrong with me is slightly elevated blood pressure. Doc said it's not "horrible" but prescribed some meds to get it a bit lower. I don't like taking meds and I know that once I get more physically active once the cold and snow stops my BP will drop but in the meantime I'll take the meds. My only out of pocket cost is an $8 co-payment for a 90 day supply of the pills. If I need to be hospitalized for some reason there is a $97 per day co-payment for the first 21 days. After that, there is no payments by me. No co-payments for doc visits, checkups, tests, etc. The VA is totally independent from Medicare and the VA does not charge Medicare for services. I am seriously thinking about dropping Part B and it's cost and dropping the gap insurance policy I have for Part B through Tufts. I don't need them if I use the VA for health care which will save me about $350 a month. Bottom line is: The VA isn't a health insurance program. It's a health care program. The Boston area VA (which governs the facilities I use) is the highest rated VA health car are in the nation. So far, I have been very impressed. So, shifting the burden is ok for a Republican, even a wealthy one. Figures. Using benefits that the government says I earned is "shifting the burden" in your eyes? I figured this would **** you off. No, it just illustrates something else that is wrong with our health care system. If you suffered a serious battle injury or debilitating injury while in the service, I see nothing wrong with providing you with good healthcare at no cost for the recovery, even a lifelong recovery, for that problem or problems. Why should the VA pay for treatment of your HBP, especially since any sort of means test would indicate you can afford to buy private health insurance or pay for a private doctor without any difficulty. Truthfully, I always thought you had to have a major service related disability or be a retired "lifer" in order to qualify for VA health care. Apparently for many years that was true. However the policy changed when the VA/TriCare system was reorganized many years ago. The VA now encourages vets to apply. There *is* a means test however I still qualify for certain health care services, more so than I expected. I had a minor, service related injury however I don't think it factored into what category I was placed because it is not a disability in any way. I had two reasons to post about this. One was to let other vets know who may not realize that they are eligible. The second reason was because I knew it would **** you off. It doesn't "**** me off." It just points out yet another inequity in our health care system. I agree that our health care system sucks. I've been fortunate to have been very healthy over the years and have not needed any extensive health care services. However, I realized something was really screwed up when I had a routine stress test done a few years ago and the hospital charged the insurance company $14,000. Made me start thinking about it. Hey, you have always been a proponent of "free health care" for everyone, managed by the federal government, much like the socialist European countries you so admire. I am just trying to make your wish come true. :-) I favor a modified single payer system, not free health care. My nuclear stress test a few years ago was $4700. === Single payer? Well, so much for freedom of choice, apparently not important to you. This country was founded on the principle of individual freedoms and it has served well for over 200 years. Why would you want to muck that up? |
Early bedtime?
On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 09:58:58 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote: In just about any other context, Harry would be complaining about the "pay for service" model of American health care. Yet another figment of your imagination. Why would I object to fee for service? My bad. I forgot you have a fiscal interest in the fee for service model. Most of your brethren in the "single payer" camp blame fee for service as the cause of higher costs (and they may be right). It incentives unnecessary tests and procedures. They like the UK model where doctors are salaried workers., It's your responsibility to pick the right doctors and other medical providers. Obviously, you didn't. You can only choose from what is available and who your insurance has a contract with. In the case of my wrists they were the highest rated people in town. |
Early bedtime?
9:36 AMKeyser Söze
On 3/24/17 10:28 AM, Tim wrote: On Friday, March 24, 2017 at 8:44:53 AM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote: On 3/24/17 7:51 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 3/23/2017 2:23 PM, wrote: On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 10:42:59 -0700 (PDT), Tim - show quoted text - Apparently you don't know what the term means. ...... Apparently I do Harry. I see you "shifting" here almost daily. |
Early bedtime?
wrote:
On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 10:55:40 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Mr. Luddite wrote: On 3/24/2017 10:38 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 3/24/17 10:35 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 3/24/2017 10:15 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 3/24/17 10:03 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 3/24/2017 9:44 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 3/24/17 7:51 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 3/23/2017 2:23 PM, wrote: On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 10:42:59 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: 11:39 AMKeyser Soze - show quoted text - I'm sure Fretwell will be delighted to serve as your medical advisor, and at no co$t either, except perhaps your life. .... Can't be much worse than the people who get payed well to perform unnecessary procedures. In just about any other context, Harry would be complaining about the "pay for service" model of American health care. It is amazing how he can work both sides of the table so well but I guess it is natural for a person who pimps government unions. A few months ago (at the recommendation of a couple of veteran friends) I applied for health care services through the VA. I haven't had a primary care physician for a while (he unfortunately died at a young age of leukemia) so I was basically starting from scratch. Turns out *all* vets are eligible for health care through the VA as long as they served at least 24 months and have an honorable discharge. There is a means test of sorts but some forms of income are not considered, nor are your bank accounts and your income only contributes to the determination of what priority classification you are eligible for. There are 8 classifications, 1 being the highest, 8 the lowest. You could be a multi billionaire but if you are an honorably discharged vet, you will still qualify, although probably in the lowest (8) priority classification. So, the VA sent me a letter welcoming me and sent a booklet that is personalized for what types of services, hospitalization, checkups, tests, etc. that I am eligible for. In total, I have better coverage by far than I had under the Blue Cross policy that we used to pay $1,400 a month for. I even have coverage for nursing home expenses and/or full time home nursing services if the day ever comes that I need them. The VA assigned a primary care physician in a VA clinic that is about 5 miles from my house. I've had three appointments so far, including full blood work, colon-rectal cancer tests and other tests to establish a baseline. The doc spent over an hour with me at the first appointment getting background data, etc. BTW ... related to a recent thread here ... one of the questions was if I had guns in the house and, if so, are they secure. Anyway, the only thing wrong with me is slightly elevated blood pressure. Doc said it's not "horrible" but prescribed some meds to get it a bit lower. I don't like taking meds and I know that once I get more physically active once the cold and snow stops my BP will drop but in the meantime I'll take the meds. My only out of pocket cost is an $8 co-payment for a 90 day supply of the pills. If I need to be hospitalized for some reason there is a $97 per day co-payment for the first 21 days. After that, there is no payments by me. No co-payments for doc visits, checkups, tests, etc. The VA is totally independent from Medicare and the VA does not charge Medicare for services. I am seriously thinking about dropping Part B and it's cost and dropping the gap insurance policy I have for Part B through Tufts. I don't need them if I use the VA for health care which will save me about $350 a month. Bottom line is: The VA isn't a health insurance program. It's a health care program. The Boston area VA (which governs the facilities I use) is the highest rated VA health car are in the nation. So far, I have been very impressed. So, shifting the burden is ok for a Republican, even a wealthy one. Figures. Using benefits that the government says I earned is "shifting the burden" in your eyes? I figured this would **** you off. No, it just illustrates something else that is wrong with our health care system. If you suffered a serious battle injury or debilitating injury while in the service, I see nothing wrong with providing you with good healthcare at no cost for the recovery, even a lifelong recovery, for that problem or problems. Why should the VA pay for treatment of your HBP, especially since any sort of means test would indicate you can afford to buy private health insurance or pay for a private doctor without any difficulty. Truthfully, I always thought you had to have a major service related disability or be a retired "lifer" in order to qualify for VA health care. Apparently for many years that was true. However the policy changed when the VA/TriCare system was reorganized many years ago. The VA now encourages vets to apply. There *is* a means test however I still qualify for certain health care services, more so than I expected. I had a minor, service related injury however I don't think it factored into what category I was placed because it is not a disability in any way. I had two reasons to post about this. One was to let other vets know who may not realize that they are eligible. The second reason was because I knew it would **** you off. It doesn't "**** me off." It just points out yet another inequity in our health care system. I agree that our health care system sucks. I've been fortunate to have been very healthy over the years and have not needed any extensive health care services. However, I realized something was really screwed up when I had a routine stress test done a few years ago and the hospital charged the insurance company $14,000. Made me start thinking about it. Hey, you have always been a proponent of "free health care" for everyone, managed by the federal government, much like the socialist European countries you so admire. I am just trying to make your wish come true. :-) I favor a modified single payer system, not free health care. My nuclear stress test a few years ago was $4700. === Single payer? Well, so much for freedom of choice, apparently not important to you. This country was founded on the principle of individual freedoms and it has served well for over 200 years. Why would you want to muck that up? Medicare is single payer and there is plenty of choice. -- Posted with my iPhone 7+. |
Early bedtime?
On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 10:35:08 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: Truthfully, I always thought you had to have a major service related disability or be a retired "lifer" in order to qualify for VA health care. Apparently for many years that was true. However the policy changed when the VA/TriCare system was reorganized many years ago. The VA now encourages vets to apply. This is just an example of government empire building. Bureaucrats keep score by how much they can expand their patch. The bigger your budget, the more money you can make because you swing a bigger political stick. I tend to agree with Harry on this. Traditionally these benefits were for people who were impacted by their service, either from injury or simply that fact that this was their career and it is part of their pension benefit. It is getting ridiculous at a time when the government is drowning in debt and most of this is entitlements, we need to look a little harder at who we are giving the money to. Now I hear they are talking about expanding VA benefits to bad paper discharges. The second reason was because I knew it would **** you off. I guess that makes it all worthwhile ;-) |
Early bedtime?
On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 10:55:40 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: I had a routine stress test done a few years ago and the hospital charged the insurance company $14,000. Made me start thinking about it. My nuclear stress test a few years ago was $4700. I guess this was a more involved test than what I got. They just had me hooked up to an EKG and had me go up and down a little step box, right there in the office with the little blonde girl who works for doc running the machine. It was just part of a wellness physical. It was essentially the same as the one I did at Georgetown in 1961-2 when they thought I had a heart murmur. (I was in a study) I wish I had the tape from my test at 13 to compare to me at 70. |
Early bedtime?
On 3/24/17 12:57 PM, justan wrote:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 3/24/17 10:28 AM, Tim wrote: On Friday, March 24, 2017 at 8:44:53 AM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote: On 3/24/17 7:51 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 3/23/2017 2:23 PM, wrote: On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 10:42:59 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: 11:39 AMKeyser Soze - show quoted text - I'm sure Fretwell will be delighted to serve as your medical advisor, and at no co$t either, except perhaps your life. .... Can't be much worse than the people who get payed well to perform unnecessary procedures. In just about any other context, Harry would be complaining about the "pay for service" model of American health care. It is amazing how he can work both sides of the table so well but I guess it is natural for a person who pimps government unions. A few months ago (at the recommendation of a couple of veteran friends) I applied for health care services through the VA. I haven't had a primary care physician for a while (he unfortunately died at a young age of leukemia) so I was basically starting from scratch. Turns out *all* vets are eligible for health care through the VA as long as they served at least 24 months and have an honorable discharge. There is a means test of sorts but some forms of income are not considered, nor are your bank accounts and your income only contributes to the determination of what priority classification you are eligible for. There are 8 classifications, 1 being the highest, 8 the lowest. You could be a multi billionaire but if you are an honorably discharged vet, you will still qualify, although probably in the lowest (8) priority classification. So, the VA sent me a letter welcoming me and sent a booklet that is personalized for what types of services, hospitalization, checkups, tests, etc. that I am eligible for. In total, I have better coverage by far than I had under the Blue Cross policy that we used to pay $1,400 a month for. I even have coverage for nursing home expenses and/or full time home nursing services if the day ever comes that I need them. The VA assigned a primary care physician in a VA clinic that is about 5 miles from my house. I've had three appointments so far, including full blood work, colon-rectal cancer tests and other tests to establish a baseline. The doc spent over an hour with me at the first appointment getting background data, etc. BTW ... related to a recent thread here ... one of the questions was if I had guns in the house and, if so, are they secure. Anyway, the only thing wrong with me is slightly elevated blood pressure. Doc said it's not "horrible" but prescribed some meds to get it a bit lower. I don't like taking meds and I know that once I get more physically active once the cold and snow stops my BP will drop but in the meantime I'll take the meds. My only out of pocket cost is an $8 co-payment for a 90 day supply of the pills. If I need to be hospitalized for some reason there is a $97 per day co-payment for the first 21 days. After that, there is no payments by me. No co-payments for doc visits, checkups, tests, etc. The VA is totally independent from Medicare and the VA does not charge Medicare for services. I am seriously thinking about dropping Part B and it's cost and dropping the gap insurance policy I have for Part B through Tufts. I don't need them if I use the VA for health care which will save me about $350 a month. Bottom line is: The VA isn't a health insurance program. It's a health care program. The Boston area VA (which governs the facilities I use) is the highest rated VA health car are in the nation. So far, I have been very impressed. So, shifting the burden is ok for a Republican, even a wealthy one. Figures. Don't be cynical Harry. Nobody shifted anything and you know it. Apparently you don't know what the term means. The burden of taking care of veterans is a privlege real Americans are happy to bear. Want to talk about draft dodgers and tax evaders? I fully support taking care of vets who suffered injuries or illnesses that were service-related. |
Early bedtime?
|
Early bedtime?
On 3/24/17 1:02 PM, justan wrote:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 3/23/17 2:23 PM, wrote: On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 10:42:59 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: 11:39 AMKeyser Soze - show quoted text - I'm sure Fretwell will be delighted to serve as your medical advisor, and at no co$t either, except perhaps your life. .... Can't be much worse than the people who get payed well to perform unnecessary procedures. In just about any other context, Harry would be complaining about the "pay for service" model of American health care. Yet another figment of your imagination. Why would I object to fee for service? The PPO I use is based upon that model, and I pay for those services via my health insurance premiums and a reasonable co-pay. It is a little humorous that virtually every time you claim you know what I am thinking, you are wrong. It isn't my fault that you posted a personal experience of yours in which the original care and recommendations weren't what you needed. Perhaps you should spend more time picking the right physicians. A couple of years ago, I went to see my doc because I felt awful, with a fever and a cough and as soon as I got into the exam room and she came in, she said, "you're going down to the ER right now for immediate tests because I think you have pneumonia and the hospital will give me test results in less than an hour, and our lab here in the office takes at least a half a day." Well, she was right...pneumonia...so I was given the right meds and put on an IV. It's your responsibility to pick the right doctors and other medical providers. Obviously, you didn't. You can avoid pneumonia with a healthy lifestyle including regular exercise. Anout the only exercise you get is climbing the stairs to clean the wifes pets litter boxes. Both your points are moronic. As for the second point, I go to a local gym three times a week and spend 90 minutes on the treadmill, rowing machine, arm machine and stairmaster. |
Early bedtime?
On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 12:31:20 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: Medicare is single payer and there is plenty of choice. How is medicare single payer when you need at least 2 more private carrier policies? Then there are the Advantage programs (privatized MC) |
Early bedtime?
On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 13:17:00 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote: On 3/24/17 12:58 PM, wrote: On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 10:55:40 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: I had a routine stress test done a few years ago and the hospital charged the insurance company $14,000. Made me start thinking about it. My nuclear stress test a few years ago was $4700. I guess this was a more involved test than what I got. They just had me hooked up to an EKG and had me go up and down a little step box, right there in the office with the little blonde girl who works for doc running the machine. It was just part of a wellness physical. It was essentially the same as the one I did at Georgetown in 1961-2 when they thought I had a heart murmur. (I was in a study) I wish I had the tape from my test at 13 to compare to me at 70. Mine was a colossal pain in the ass. First, I was injected with isotopes and sat on a torture chair while some sort of radiation reading camera whirled slowly around me. Then I was up on a treadmill until I was ready to pass out, died, or completed the test. Then I rested for 30 minutes and was back up on the chair with the whirling camera. To increase my anxiety during the treadmill portion, the doc told me ( I was looking out the window) that he was sure my mother in law was walking down the medical campus. I guess they think you have more heart problems than me. Mine was just an expansion of the normal Medicare wellness exam. I end up getting 2 every year. My doc does a better exam than the minimal "house call" UHC requires. That is some woman who is really incompetent. |
Early bedtime?
On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 13:20:32 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote: I go to a local gym three times a week and spend 90 minutes on the treadmill, rowing machine, arm machine and stairmaster. I just build another tiki bar ;-) Mixing and placing 1000 pounds of concrete like I did the other day is a little bit of a workout. |
Early bedtime?
On 3/24/2017 1:17 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 3/24/17 12:58 PM, wrote: On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 10:55:40 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: I had a routine stress test done a few years ago and the hospital charged the insurance company $14,000. Made me start thinking about it. My nuclear stress test a few years ago was $4700. I guess this was a more involved test than what I got. They just had me hooked up to an EKG and had me go up and down a little step box, right there in the office with the little blonde girl who works for doc running the machine. It was just part of a wellness physical. It was essentially the same as the one I did at Georgetown in 1961-2 when they thought I had a heart murmur. (I was in a study) I wish I had the tape from my test at 13 to compare to me at 70. Mine was a colossal pain in the ass. First, I was injected with isotopes and sat on a torture chair while some sort of radiation reading camera whirled slowly around me. Then I was up on a treadmill until I was ready to pass out, died, or completed the test. Then I rested for 30 minutes and was back up on the chair with the whirling camera. To increase my anxiety during the treadmill portion, the doc told me ( I was looking out the window) that he was sure my mother in law was walking down the medical campus. Mine was similar except I laid on a table that transported the patient into the Xray machine, similar to a MRI machine. Was told to lay perfectly still while the x-ray thing moved all around taking pictures from every possible angle. Took about 15 minutes to take all the pictures. Then, they rolled me down to a room where a cardiologist was waiting. I noticed a treadmill in the room but the doc said he was going to inject something in my arm that would allow him to control my heart rate. I looked again over at the treadmill and it's emergency off knob about knee high and told him I'd rather do the treadmill. I didn't like the idea of a doc artificially controlling how fast or burdened my heart rate was because a guy I knew *died* in the middle of a stress test due to a massive heart attack. I wanted to be in control, not the doc. He agreed but warned me that if I didn't get my heart rate up to a certain level the test results would not be as accurate. No problem. I huffed and puffed and made sure I exceeded the heart rate he required. (I think it was something like 160 BPM). Then, the injection of the isotopes again and back into the machine for another 15 minute x-ray session. Good news was that they found no blockages or obstructions. Bad news was I had to give up high test coffee. |
Early bedtime?
On 3/24/2017 1:56 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 13:17:00 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 3/24/17 12:58 PM, wrote: On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 10:55:40 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: I had a routine stress test done a few years ago and the hospital charged the insurance company $14,000. Made me start thinking about it. My nuclear stress test a few years ago was $4700. I guess this was a more involved test than what I got. They just had me hooked up to an EKG and had me go up and down a little step box, right there in the office with the little blonde girl who works for doc running the machine. It was just part of a wellness physical. It was essentially the same as the one I did at Georgetown in 1961-2 when they thought I had a heart murmur. (I was in a study) I wish I had the tape from my test at 13 to compare to me at 70. Mine was a colossal pain in the ass. First, I was injected with isotopes and sat on a torture chair while some sort of radiation reading camera whirled slowly around me. Then I was up on a treadmill until I was ready to pass out, died, or completed the test. Then I rested for 30 minutes and was back up on the chair with the whirling camera. To increase my anxiety during the treadmill portion, the doc told me ( I was looking out the window) that he was sure my mother in law was walking down the medical campus. I guess they think you have more heart problems than me. Mine was just an expansion of the normal Medicare wellness exam. I end up getting 2 every year. My doc does a better exam than the minimal "house call" UHC requires. That is some woman who is really incompetent. The nuclear stress test that Harry and I described identifies blockages or the beginning of blockages that can cause a sudden and silent heart attack. You are also connected to an EKG during the test to see how the old ticker is firing under a heavy (stress) load. The treadmill speed and incline is slowing increased until you are forced to call it quits. The test you described really says your heart is firing normally under a minor load but doesn't tell you anything about potential blockages. |
Early bedtime?
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 3/24/17 10:03 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 3/24/2017 9:44 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 3/24/17 7:51 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 3/23/2017 2:23 PM, wrote: On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 10:42:59 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: 11:39 AMKeyser Soze - show quoted text - I'm sure Fretwell will be delighted to serve as your medical advisor, and at no co$t either, except perhaps your life. .... Can't be much worse than the people who get payed well to perform unnecessary procedures. In just about any other context, Harry would be complaining about the "pay for service" model of American health care. It is amazing how he can work both sides of the table so well but I guess it is natural for a person who pimps government unions. A few months ago (at the recommendation of a couple of veteran friends) I applied for health care services through the VA. I haven't had a primary care physician for a while (he unfortunately died at a young age of leukemia) so I was basically starting from scratch. Turns out *all* vets are eligible for health care through the VA as long as they served at least 24 months and have an honorable discharge. There is a means test of sorts but some forms of income are not considered, nor are your bank accounts and your income only contributes to the determination of what priority classification you are eligible for. There are 8 classifications, 1 being the highest, 8 the lowest. You could be a multi billionaire but if you are an honorably discharged vet, you will still qualify, although probably in the lowest (8) priority classification. So, the VA sent me a letter welcoming me and sent a booklet that is personalized for what types of services, hospitalization, checkups, tests, etc. that I am eligible for. In total, I have better coverage by far than I had under the Blue Cross policy that we used to pay $1,400 a month for. I even have coverage for nursing home expenses and/or full time home nursing services if the day ever comes that I need them. The VA assigned a primary care physician in a VA clinic that is about 5 miles from my house. I've had three appointments so far, including full blood work, colon-rectal cancer tests and other tests to establish a baseline. The doc spent over an hour with me at the first appointment getting background data, etc. BTW ... related to a recent thread here ... one of the questions was if I had guns in the house and, if so, are they secure. Anyway, the only thing wrong with me is slightly elevated blood pressure. Doc said it's not "horrible" but prescribed some meds to get it a bit lower. I don't like taking meds and I know that once I get more physically active once the cold and snow stops my BP will drop but in the meantime I'll take the meds. My only out of pocket cost is an $8 co-payment for a 90 day supply of the pills. If I need to be hospitalized for some reason there is a $97 per day co-payment for the first 21 days. After that, there is no payments by me. No co-payments for doc visits, checkups, tests, etc. The VA is totally independent from Medicare and the VA does not charge Medicare for services. I am seriously thinking about dropping Part B and it's cost and dropping the gap insurance policy I have for Part B through Tufts. I don't need them if I use the VA for health care which will save me about $350 a month. Bottom line is: The VA isn't a health insurance program. It's a health care program. The Boston area VA (which governs the facilities I use) is the highest rated VA health car are in the nation. So far, I have been very impressed. So, shifting the burden is ok for a Republican, even a wealthy one. Figures. Using benefits that the government says I earned is "shifting the burden" in your eyes? I figured this would **** you off. No, it just illustrates something else that is wrong with our health care system. If you suffered a serious battle injury or debilitating injury while in the service, I see nothing wrong with providing you with good healthcare at no cost for the recovery, even a lifelong recovery, for that problem or problems. Why should the VA pay for treatment of your HBP, especially since any sort of means test would indicate you can afford to buy private health insurance or pay for a private doctor without any difficulty. You are a tax dodger. Your opinion is meaningless. |
Early bedtime?
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 3/24/17 12:57 PM, justan wrote: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 3/24/17 10:28 AM, Tim wrote: On Friday, March 24, 2017 at 8:44:53 AM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote: On 3/24/17 7:51 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 3/23/2017 2:23 PM, wrote: On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 10:42:59 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: 11:39 AMKeyser Soze - show quoted text - I'm sure Fretwell will be delighted to serve as your medical advisor, and at no co$t either, except perhaps your life. .... Can't be much worse than the people who get payed well to perform unnecessary procedures. In just about any other context, Harry would be complaining about the "pay for service" model of American health care. It is amazing how he can work both sides of the table so well but I guess it is natural for a person who pimps government unions. A few months ago (at the recommendation of a couple of veteran friends) I applied for health care services through the VA. I haven't had a primary care physician for a while (he unfortunately died at a young age of leukemia) so I was basically starting from scratch. Turns out *all* vets are eligible for health care through the VA as long as they served at least 24 months and have an honorable discharge. There is a means test of sorts but some forms of income are not considered, nor are your bank accounts and your income only contributes to the determination of what priority classification you are eligible for. There are 8 classifications, 1 being the highest, 8 the lowest. You could be a multi billionaire but if you are an honorably discharged vet, you will still qualify, although probably in the lowest (8) priority classification. So, the VA sent me a letter welcoming me and sent a booklet that is personalized for what types of services, hospitalization, checkups, tests, etc. that I am eligible for. In total, I have better coverage by far than I had under the Blue Cross policy that we used to pay $1,400 a month for. I even have coverage for nursing home expenses and/or full time home nursing services if the day ever comes that I need them. The VA assigned a primary care physician in a VA clinic that is about 5 miles from my house. I've had three appointments so far, including full blood work, colon-rectal cancer tests and other tests to establish a baseline. The doc spent over an hour with me at the first appointment getting background data, etc. BTW ... related to a recent thread here ... one of the questions was if I had guns in the house and, if so, are they secure. Anyway, the only thing wrong with me is slightly elevated blood pressure. Doc said it's not "horrible" but prescribed some meds to get it a bit lower. I don't like taking meds and I know that once I get more physically active once the cold and snow stops my BP will drop but in the meantime I'll take the meds. My only out of pocket cost is an $8 co-payment for a 90 day supply of the pills. If I need to be hospitalized for some reason there is a $97 per day co-payment for the first 21 days. After that, there is no payments by me. No co-payments for doc visits, checkups, tests, etc. The VA is totally independent from Medicare and the VA does not charge Medicare for services. I am seriously thinking about dropping Part B and it's cost and dropping the gap insurance policy I have for Part B through Tufts. I don't need them if I use the VA for health care which will save me about $350 a month. Bottom line is: The VA isn't a health insurance program. It's a health care program. The Boston area VA (which governs the facilities I use) is the highest rated VA health car are in the nation. So far, I have been very impressed. So, shifting the burden is ok for a Republican, even a wealthy one. Figures. Don't be cynical Harry. Nobody shifted anything and you know it. Apparently you don't know what the term means. The burden of taking care of veterans is a privlege real Americans are happy to bear. Want to talk about draft dodgers and tax evaders? I fully support taking care of vets who suffered injuries or illnesses that were service-related. What about those who "only" risked their lives your your lying, deadbeat, ass for little pay, months from home, while not working for an employer with health benefits. For someone who doesn't like to pay their income taxes you have a lot to say about other people's money. |
Early bedtime?
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 3/24/17 12:58 PM, wrote: On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 10:55:40 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: I had a routine stress test done a few years ago and the hospital charged the insurance company $14,000. Made me start thinking about it. My nuclear stress test a few years ago was $4700. I guess this was a more involved test than what I got. They just had me hooked up to an EKG and had me go up and down a little step box, right there in the office with the little blonde girl who works for doc running the machine. It was just part of a wellness physical. It was essentially the same as the one I did at Georgetown in 1961-2 when they thought I had a heart murmur. (I was in a study) I wish I had the tape from my test at 13 to compare to me at 70. Mine was a colossal pain in the ass. First, I was injected with isotopes and sat on a torture chair while some sort of radiation reading camera whirled slowly around me. Then I was up on a treadmill until I was ready to pass out, died, or completed the test. Then I rested for 30 minutes and was back up on the chair with the whirling camera. To increase my anxiety during the treadmill portion, the doc told me ( I was looking out the window) that he was sure my mother in law was walking down the medical campus. Anxiety? It's nothing. I had one this year. Piece of cake. You must be in really bad shape if that treadmill was so bad. They only let you walk/jog until you reach a rather low heart rate. |
Early bedtime?
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 3/24/17 1:02 PM, justan wrote: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 3/23/17 2:23 PM, wrote: On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 10:42:59 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: 11:39 AMKeyser Soze - show quoted text - I'm sure Fretwell will be delighted to serve as your medical advisor, and at no co$t either, except perhaps your life. .... Can't be much worse than the people who get payed well to perform unnecessary procedures. In just about any other context, Harry would be complaining about the "pay for service" model of American health care. Yet another figment of your imagination. Why would I object to fee for service? The PPO I use is based upon that model, and I pay for those services via my health insurance premiums and a reasonable co-pay. It is a little humorous that virtually every time you claim you know what I am thinking, you are wrong. It isn't my fault that you posted a personal experience of yours in which the original care and recommendations weren't what you needed. Perhaps you should spend more time picking the right physicians. A couple of years ago, I went to see my doc because I felt awful, with a fever and a cough and as soon as I got into the exam room and she came in, she said, "you're going down to the ER right now for immediate tests because I think you have pneumonia and the hospital will give me test results in less than an hour, and our lab here in the office takes at least a half a day." Well, she was right...pneumonia...so I was given the right meds and put on an IV. It's your responsibility to pick the right doctors and other medical providers. Obviously, you didn't. You can avoid pneumonia with a healthy lifestyle including regular exercise. Anout the only exercise you get is climbing the stairs to clean the wifes pets litter boxes. Both your points are moronic. As for the second point, I go to a local gym three times a week and spend 90 minutes on the treadmill, rowing machine, arm machine and stairmaster. Bull****. You couldn't stand 10 minutes on the treadmill for your stress test. |
Early bedtime?
On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 20:47:07 -0400, Alex wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote: On 3/24/17 1:02 PM, justan wrote: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 3/23/17 2:23 PM, wrote: On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 10:42:59 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: 11:39 AMKeyser Soze - show quoted text - I'm sure Fretwell will be delighted to serve as your medical advisor, and at no co$t either, except perhaps your life. .... Can't be much worse than the people who get payed well to perform unnecessary procedures. In just about any other context, Harry would be complaining about the "pay for service" model of American health care. Yet another figment of your imagination. Why would I object to fee for service? The PPO I use is based upon that model, and I pay for those services via my health insurance premiums and a reasonable co-pay. It is a little humorous that virtually every time you claim you know what I am thinking, you are wrong. It isn't my fault that you posted a personal experience of yours in which the original care and recommendations weren't what you needed. Perhaps you should spend more time picking the right physicians. A couple of years ago, I went to see my doc because I felt awful, with a fever and a cough and as soon as I got into the exam room and she came in, she said, "you're going down to the ER right now for immediate tests because I think you have pneumonia and the hospital will give me test results in less than an hour, and our lab here in the office takes at least a half a day." Well, she was right...pneumonia...so I was given the right meds and put on an IV. It's your responsibility to pick the right doctors and other medical providers. Obviously, you didn't. You can avoid pneumonia with a healthy lifestyle including regular exercise. Anout the only exercise you get is climbing the stairs to clean the wifes pets litter boxes. Both your points are moronic. As for the second point, I go to a local gym three times a week and spend 90 minutes on the treadmill, rowing machine, arm machine and stairmaster. Bull****. You couldn't stand 10 minutes on the treadmill for your stress test. How could you possibly doubt the truth of something Harry said? |
Early bedtime?
On 3/23/2017 12:36 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 12:46:14 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 3/23/17 11:47 AM, wrote: You got lucky. There are plenty of quacks in the medical profession. They told my wife she needed an emergency appendectomy. This was not the laparoscope deal, it was a cut you open and look around thing. She ended up with a scar that looks like she lost a sword fight and it took a year of rehab. They did not find anything wrong. oops sorry, but good news, your insurance covered it. (back when insurance covered stuff) I have already told you all about the easter egg hunt they went through my insurance coverage on for my wrists, turns out nothing there either. (One PT session where the girl told me to do what the doctors told me not to do) Doctors seem to just keep doing stuff as long as your insurance will pay. My GP sent me to an orthopedic surgeon, a damned good one, to further investigate my wrist problems. He was very careful with tests and x-rays, and also sent me to a good rheumatologist for co-consult, and who ran a series of different blood tests. They concurred on carpal tunnel rather than a couple of immune diseases and while they were deciding, I took some steroids. I had one wrist/palm done and then the other, first class surgery, and I've enjoyed a great recovery. I'm sure my health insurance was hit hard, but my out of pockets were limited to $10 for each doctor's visit and a total of $400 for both surgeries. That's why I pay for the good insurance. Oh...and the insurance covered OT afterwards for both wrists. I trust my doctors. In my case I ended up with 2 MRIs, a bunch of blood tests and enough X rays to light up a small city. I had 3 different kind of braces/cuffs, Prednisone, Dichlofenac, Ibuprophen, Naproxen and finally a prescription for Methotrexate that I threw in the trash as soon as I read the warning pamphlet. (the others are pretty scary too) When I went back to the sports doctor who started this mess he sent me to the PT girl. She said I should throw away all of the braces, stop the drugs and do all the things that they told me not to do. In a week I was cured. Looking at my EOBs, these *******s bled my insurance for over $100,000 for over a year and never fixed a thing. The $50 an hour PT girl could have fixed me on day one. The rheumatologist that gave me the Methotrexate was the biggest quack of all. He did not do any tests, looked over the records and sent me on my way with a diagnosis of Psoriatic Arthritis because his only other thing would have been Rheumatic Arthritis and that was already eliminated by the RH factor test. I knew how that one was going to come out as soon as I read the posters in his waiting room. It was the only two bullets in his gun. I have already said the doctors I knew in DC were much better than the ones down here and I did have a wife inside the tent to warn me off of the quacks up there. There were plenty of them. All the people she worked for could do was deny privileges and that was not as easy as it should be. There was a (PSRO) meeting once a week to discuss how the hospital could side step malpractice suits and mitigate the damages if they couldn't. Listening to the recap of that meeting was depressing. Here's article that compares the results of physical therapy and surgery for carpal tunnel.. Try PT first. http://www.webmd.com/pain-management...src=RSS_PUBLIC |
Early bedtime?
Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 20:47:07 -0400, Alex wrote: Keyser Soze wrote: On 3/24/17 1:02 PM, justan wrote: Keyser Soze Wrote in message: On 3/23/17 2:23 PM, wrote: On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 10:42:59 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: 11:39 AMKeyser Soze - show quoted text - I'm sure Fretwell will be delighted to serve as your medical advisor, and at no co$t either, except perhaps your life. .... Can't be much worse than the people who get payed well to perform unnecessary procedures. In just about any other context, Harry would be complaining about the "pay for service" model of American health care. Yet another figment of your imagination. Why would I object to fee for service? The PPO I use is based upon that model, and I pay for those services via my health insurance premiums and a reasonable co-pay. It is a little humorous that virtually every time you claim you know what I am thinking, you are wrong. It isn't my fault that you posted a personal experience of yours in which the original care and recommendations weren't what you needed. Perhaps you should spend more time picking the right physicians. A couple of years ago, I went to see my doc because I felt awful, with a fever and a cough and as soon as I got into the exam room and she came in, she said, "you're going down to the ER right now for immediate tests because I think you have pneumonia and the hospital will give me test results in less than an hour, and our lab here in the office takes at least a half a day." Well, she was right...pneumonia...so I was given the right meds and put on an IV. It's your responsibility to pick the right doctors and other medical providers. Obviously, you didn't. You can avoid pneumonia with a healthy lifestyle including regular exercise. Anout the only exercise you get is climbing the stairs to clean the wifes pets litter boxes. Both your points are moronic. As for the second point, I go to a local gym three times a week and spend 90 minutes on the treadmill, rowing machine, arm machine and stairmaster. Bull****. You couldn't stand 10 minutes on the treadmill for your stress test. How could you possibly doubt the truth of something Harry said? It's easiest to assume it's BS from the start. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:18 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com