![]() |
Google ad
I didn't see it but apparently one of the SB commercials was for
the "Google Home" thing that responds to verbal commands. In the ad a family comes home and says "Ok Google" and gave it some command like "turn the lights on" or something. A bunch of Google Home devices in viewers' homes responded to the command in the advertisement. Funny. |
Google ad
On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 10:37:39 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:
I didn't see it but apparently one of the SB commercials was for the "Google Home" thing that responds to verbal commands. In the ad a family comes home and says "Ok Google" and gave it some command like "turn the lights on" or something. A bunch of Google Home devices in viewers' homes responded to the command in the advertisement. Funny. Thanks. I saw that ad and had no idea what it was about. |
Google ad
On 2/6/2017 10:43 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 10:37:39 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: I didn't see it but apparently one of the SB commercials was for the "Google Home" thing that responds to verbal commands. In the ad a family comes home and says "Ok Google" and gave it some command like "turn the lights on" or something. A bunch of Google Home devices in viewers' homes responded to the command in the advertisement. Funny. Thanks. I saw that ad and had no idea what it was about. My Google Home system didn't respond because it's unplugged. Just don't tell my daughter. |
Google ad
On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 10:47:38 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 2/6/2017 10:43 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote: On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 10:37:39 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: I didn't see it but apparently one of the SB commercials was for the "Google Home" thing that responds to verbal commands. In the ad a family comes home and says "Ok Google" and gave it some command like "turn the lights on" or something. A bunch of Google Home devices in viewers' homes responded to the command in the advertisement. Funny. Thanks. I saw that ad and had no idea what it was about. My Google Home system didn't respond because it's unplugged. Just don't tell my daughter. :) |
Google ad
On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 10:47:38 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: On 2/6/2017 10:43 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote: On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 10:37:39 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: I didn't see it but apparently one of the SB commercials was for the "Google Home" thing that responds to verbal commands. In the ad a family comes home and says "Ok Google" and gave it some command like "turn the lights on" or something. A bunch of Google Home devices in viewers' homes responded to the command in the advertisement. Funny. Thanks. I saw that ad and had no idea what it was about. My Google Home system didn't respond because it's unplugged. Just don't tell my daughter. My Echo is still in the shrink wrap. It was supposed to run the TV but once I looked into it, not so much, unless you buy an Amazon Fire stick. |
Google ad
|
Google ad
Mr. Luddite wrote:
I didn't see it but apparently one of the SB commercials was for the "Google Home" thing that responds to verbal commands. In the ad a family comes home and says "Ok Google" and gave it some command like "turn the lights on" or something. A bunch of Google Home devices in viewers' homes responded to the command in the advertisement. Funny. Our dishes are VERY clean now... |
Google ad
On Mon, 06 Feb 2017 19:00:26 -0500, wrote:
On Mon, 06 Feb 2017 14:29:36 -0500, Poco Deplorevole wrote: On Mon, 06 Feb 2017 12:03:39 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 10:47:38 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/6/2017 10:43 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote: On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 10:37:39 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: I didn't see it but apparently one of the SB commercials was for the "Google Home" thing that responds to verbal commands. In the ad a family comes home and says "Ok Google" and gave it some command like "turn the lights on" or something. A bunch of Google Home devices in viewers' homes responded to the command in the advertisement. Funny. Thanks. I saw that ad and had no idea what it was about. My Google Home system didn't respond because it's unplugged. Just don't tell my daughter. My Echo is still in the shrink wrap. It was supposed to run the TV but once I looked into it, not so much, unless you buy an Amazon Fire stick. I ordered the Fire Stick this morning. Will try installing Kodi on it. Daughter tells me that's the thing to do. I have one smart TV and PCs connected to the others so I have not figured out what the stick will do for me. Originally I thought the Echo would talk to the smart TV but it seems not. My wife wants it but I have no problem running any of them with the existing devices. I got a Bose Solo 15 for Christmas, convincing my wife that it would look nicer and sound better than what we had for a TV sound system. So I took what we had, a Bose Lifestyle 25, and hooked it up to my computer. Now I get some pretty decent sound out of this thing. |
Google ad
On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 08:06:46 -0500, Poco Deplorevole
wrote: On Mon, 06 Feb 2017 19:00:26 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 06 Feb 2017 14:29:36 -0500, Poco Deplorevole wrote: On Mon, 06 Feb 2017 12:03:39 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 10:47:38 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/6/2017 10:43 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote: On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 10:37:39 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: I didn't see it but apparently one of the SB commercials was for the "Google Home" thing that responds to verbal commands. In the ad a family comes home and says "Ok Google" and gave it some command like "turn the lights on" or something. A bunch of Google Home devices in viewers' homes responded to the command in the advertisement. Funny. Thanks. I saw that ad and had no idea what it was about. My Google Home system didn't respond because it's unplugged. Just don't tell my daughter. My Echo is still in the shrink wrap. It was supposed to run the TV but once I looked into it, not so much, unless you buy an Amazon Fire stick. I ordered the Fire Stick this morning. Will try installing Kodi on it. Daughter tells me that's the thing to do. I have one smart TV and PCs connected to the others so I have not figured out what the stick will do for me. Originally I thought the Echo would talk to the smart TV but it seems not. My wife wants it but I have no problem running any of them with the existing devices. I got a Bose Solo 15 for Christmas, convincing my wife that it would look nicer and sound better than what we had for a TV sound system. So I took what we had, a Bose Lifestyle 25, and hooked it up to my computer. Now I get some pretty decent sound out of this thing. We both have nice PC speaker sets with the sub woof by our chairs hooked to the TV. My wife has a Bose and mine is Creative. Combined with the big screen, it does enhance the movie experience. Most of the time we just use the TV sound tho. |
Google ad
On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 12:55:47 -0500, wrote:
On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 08:06:46 -0500, Poco Deplorevole wrote: On Mon, 06 Feb 2017 19:00:26 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 06 Feb 2017 14:29:36 -0500, Poco Deplorevole wrote: On Mon, 06 Feb 2017 12:03:39 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 10:47:38 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/6/2017 10:43 AM, Poco Deplorevole wrote: On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 10:37:39 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: I didn't see it but apparently one of the SB commercials was for the "Google Home" thing that responds to verbal commands. In the ad a family comes home and says "Ok Google" and gave it some command like "turn the lights on" or something. A bunch of Google Home devices in viewers' homes responded to the command in the advertisement. Funny. Thanks. I saw that ad and had no idea what it was about. My Google Home system didn't respond because it's unplugged. Just don't tell my daughter. My Echo is still in the shrink wrap. It was supposed to run the TV but once I looked into it, not so much, unless you buy an Amazon Fire stick. I ordered the Fire Stick this morning. Will try installing Kodi on it. Daughter tells me that's the thing to do. I have one smart TV and PCs connected to the others so I have not figured out what the stick will do for me. Originally I thought the Echo would talk to the smart TV but it seems not. My wife wants it but I have no problem running any of them with the existing devices. I got a Bose Solo 15 for Christmas, convincing my wife that it would look nicer and sound better than what we had for a TV sound system. So I took what we had, a Bose Lifestyle 25, and hooked it up to my computer. Now I get some pretty decent sound out of this thing. We both have nice PC speaker sets with the sub woof by our chairs hooked to the TV. My wife has a Bose and mine is Creative. Combined with the big screen, it does enhance the movie experience. Most of the time we just use the TV sound tho. I had this system for the PC, and it sounded good for a PC system: https://www.amazon.com/Logitech-Z-23.../dp/B0002SQ2P2 But the Bose system kinda blows it away. |
Google ad
On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 13:10:47 -0500, Poco Deplorevole
wrote: On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 12:55:47 -0500, wrote: On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 08:06:46 -0500, Poco Deplorevole wrote: On Mon, 06 Feb 2017 19:00:26 -0500, wrote: I got a Bose Solo 15 for Christmas, convincing my wife that it would look nicer and sound better than what we had for a TV sound system. So I took what we had, a Bose Lifestyle 25, and hooked it up to my computer. Now I get some pretty decent sound out of this thing. We both have nice PC speaker sets with the sub woof by our chairs hooked to the TV. My wife has a Bose and mine is Creative. Combined with the big screen, it does enhance the movie experience. Most of the time we just use the TV sound tho. I had this system for the PC, and it sounded good for a PC system: https://www.amazon.com/Logitech-Z-23.../dp/B0002SQ2P2 But the Bose system kinda blows it away. Bose has it's own sound. There are people who don't think it is "true", others think it is the best. After 30 years working in a computer room I have a notch in my hearing that takes out a lot of the spectrum so I am not the best judge. There are some very capable "PC Speaker" systems tho. I have a bunch of them around here that I have collected over the years. I am thinking about putting a sub woof back in my car. I took the one I had out when I switched from a PC based MP3 player to a dash mounted unit but the speakers in the car still are not good in the low frequencies, As long as you are playing "oldies" mixed to play best on the AM radio it is not an issue but newer music is mixed for sub woofers. That even seems to be true of the album version of old songs. I have a pretty good mix I put together to test sound system. "Video" by India Arie may be as good a sub woof test as anything. They come in about 30 seconds into the song with a base drum beat that overwhelms a stock car speaker system but will rattle the windows in the car next to you if you have a sub woof cranked up. OTOH a Motown recording with a strong base beat like "Papa was a rolling stone" still plays well on the stock car speakers and the sub woof does not change it all that much even in the remixed CD version. If you are playing early 60s stuff you quickly realize those sounds are simply not there. I think that Brill Building crap was mixed to play well on the phone. |
Google ad
On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 13:44:17 -0500, wrote:
On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 13:10:47 -0500, Poco Deplorevole wrote: On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 12:55:47 -0500, wrote: On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 08:06:46 -0500, Poco Deplorevole wrote: On Mon, 06 Feb 2017 19:00:26 -0500, wrote: I got a Bose Solo 15 for Christmas, convincing my wife that it would look nicer and sound better than what we had for a TV sound system. So I took what we had, a Bose Lifestyle 25, and hooked it up to my computer. Now I get some pretty decent sound out of this thing. We both have nice PC speaker sets with the sub woof by our chairs hooked to the TV. My wife has a Bose and mine is Creative. Combined with the big screen, it does enhance the movie experience. Most of the time we just use the TV sound tho. I had this system for the PC, and it sounded good for a PC system: https://www.amazon.com/Logitech-Z-23.../dp/B0002SQ2P2 But the Bose system kinda blows it away. Bose has it's own sound. There are people who don't think it is "true", others think it is the best. After 30 years working in a computer room I have a notch in my hearing that takes out a lot of the spectrum so I am not the best judge. There are some very capable "PC Speaker" systems tho. I have a bunch of them around here that I have collected over the years. I am thinking about putting a sub woof back in my car. I took the one I had out when I switched from a PC based MP3 player to a dash mounted unit but the speakers in the car still are not good in the low frequencies, As long as you are playing "oldies" mixed to play best on the AM radio it is not an issue but newer music is mixed for sub woofers. That even seems to be true of the album version of old songs. I have a pretty good mix I put together to test sound system. "Video" by India Arie may be as good a sub woof test as anything. They come in about 30 seconds into the song with a base drum beat that overwhelms a stock car speaker system but will rattle the windows in the car next to you if you have a sub woof cranked up. OTOH a Motown recording with a strong base beat like "Papa was a rolling stone" still plays well on the stock car speakers and the sub woof does not change it all that much even in the remixed CD version. If you are playing early 60s stuff you quickly realize those sounds are simply not there. I think that Brill Building crap was mixed to play well on the phone. In the car or truck I'm usually listening to Bluegrass or news, so there's no need for bass. My hearing loss is at the high frequencies, so the less bass being produced the better if I'm trying to understand words. With classical, which is what I use the computer system for, I don't need to worry about words. I don't allow opera to be played on my system, unless it's the 'Grand March' from 'Aida'. That's OK. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VjNMT9oKVJQ |
Google ad
On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 13:44:17 -0500, wrote:
On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 13:10:47 -0500, Poco Deplorevole wrote: On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 12:55:47 -0500, wrote: On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 08:06:46 -0500, Poco Deplorevole wrote: On Mon, 06 Feb 2017 19:00:26 -0500, wrote: I got a Bose Solo 15 for Christmas, convincing my wife that it would look nicer and sound better than what we had for a TV sound system. So I took what we had, a Bose Lifestyle 25, and hooked it up to my computer. Now I get some pretty decent sound out of this thing. We both have nice PC speaker sets with the sub woof by our chairs hooked to the TV. My wife has a Bose and mine is Creative. Combined with the big screen, it does enhance the movie experience. Most of the time we just use the TV sound tho. I had this system for the PC, and it sounded good for a PC system: https://www.amazon.com/Logitech-Z-23.../dp/B0002SQ2P2 But the Bose system kinda blows it away. Bose has it's own sound. There are people who don't think it is "true", others think it is the best. After 30 years working in a computer room I have a notch in my hearing that takes out a lot of the spectrum so I am not the best judge. There are some very capable "PC Speaker" systems tho. I have a bunch of them around here that I have collected over the years. I am thinking about putting a sub woof back in my car. I took the one I had out when I switched from a PC based MP3 player to a dash mounted unit but the speakers in the car still are not good in the low frequencies, As long as you are playing "oldies" mixed to play best on the AM radio it is not an issue but newer music is mixed for sub woofers. That even seems to be true of the album version of old songs. I have a pretty good mix I put together to test sound system. "Video" by India Arie may be as good a sub woof test as anything. They come in about 30 seconds into the song with a base drum beat that overwhelms a stock car speaker system but will rattle the windows in the car next to you if you have a sub woof cranked up. OTOH a Motown recording with a strong base beat like "Papa was a rolling stone" still plays well on the stock car speakers and the sub woof does not change it all that much even in the remixed CD version. If you are playing early 60s stuff you quickly realize those sounds are simply not there. I think that Brill Building crap was mixed to play well on the phone. Here's another goodie. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBlQZyTF_LY |
Google ad
On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 13:10:47 -0500, Poco Deplorevole wrote: On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 12:55:47 -0500, wrote: On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 08:06:46 -0500, Poco Deplorevole wrote: On Mon, 06 Feb 2017 19:00:26 -0500, wrote: I got a Bose Solo 15 for Christmas, convincing my wife that it would look nicer and sound better than what we had for a TV sound system. So I took what we had, a Bose Lifestyle 25, and hooked it up to my computer. Now I get some pretty decent sound out of this thing. We both have nice PC speaker sets with the sub woof by our chairs hooked to the TV. My wife has a Bose and mine is Creative. Combined with the big screen, it does enhance the movie experience. Most of the time we just use the TV sound tho. I had this system for the PC, and it sounded good for a PC system: https://www.amazon.com/Logitech-Z-23.../dp/B0002SQ2P2 But the Bose system kinda blows it away. "Bose has it's own sound. There are people who don't think it is "true", others think it is the best. After 30 years working in a computer room I have a notch in my hearing that takes out a lot of the spectrum so I am not the best judge. There are some very capable "PC Speaker" systems tho. I have a bunch of them around here that I have collected over the years. I am thinking about putting a sub woof back in my car. I took the one I had out when I switched from a PC based MP3 player to a dash mounted unit but the speakers in the car still are not good in the low frequencies, As long as you are playing "oldies" mixed to play best on the AM radio it is not an issue but newer music is mixed for sub woofers. That even seems to be true of the album version of old songs. I have a pretty good mix I put together to test sound system. "Video" by India Arie may be as good a sub woof test as anything. They come in about 30 seconds into the song with a base drum beat that overwhelms a stock car speaker system but will rattle the windows in the car next to you if you have a sub woof cranked up. OTOH a Motown recording with a strong base beat like "Papa was a rolling stone" still plays well on the stock car speakers and the sub woof does not change it all that much even in the remixed CD version. If you are playing early 60s stuff you quickly realize those sounds are simply not there. I think that Brill Building crap was mixed to play well on the phone." That big hit a couple of years ago by 'Milky Chase' required a half decent base system to sound good. Quite a difference when the base kicked in. |
Google ad
On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 13:22:53 -0800 (PST), True North wrote:
On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 13:10:47 -0500, Poco Deplorevole wrote: On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 12:55:47 -0500, wrote: On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 08:06:46 -0500, Poco Deplorevole wrote: On Mon, 06 Feb 2017 19:00:26 -0500, wrote: I got a Bose Solo 15 for Christmas, convincing my wife that it would look nicer and sound better than what we had for a TV sound system. So I took what we had, a Bose Lifestyle 25, and hooked it up to my computer. Now I get some pretty decent sound out of this thing. We both have nice PC speaker sets with the sub woof by our chairs hooked to the TV. My wife has a Bose and mine is Creative. Combined with the big screen, it does enhance the movie experience. Most of the time we just use the TV sound tho. I had this system for the PC, and it sounded good for a PC system: https://www.amazon.com/Logitech-Z-23.../dp/B0002SQ2P2 But the Bose system kinda blows it away. "Bose has it's own sound. There are people who don't think it is "true", others think it is the best. After 30 years working in a computer room I have a notch in my hearing that takes out a lot of the spectrum so I am not the best judge. There are some very capable "PC Speaker" systems tho. I have a bunch of them around here that I have collected over the years. I am thinking about putting a sub woof back in my car. I took the one I had out when I switched from a PC based MP3 player to a dash mounted unit but the speakers in the car still are not good in the low frequencies, As long as you are playing "oldies" mixed to play best on the AM radio it is not an issue but newer music is mixed for sub woofers. That even seems to be true of the album version of old songs. I have a pretty good mix I put together to test sound system. "Video" by India Arie may be as good a sub woof test as anything. They come in about 30 seconds into the song with a base drum beat that overwhelms a stock car speaker system but will rattle the windows in the car next to you if you have a sub woof cranked up. OTOH a Motown recording with a strong base beat like "Papa was a rolling stone" still plays well on the stock car speakers and the sub woof does not change it all that much even in the remixed CD version. If you are playing early 60s stuff you quickly realize those sounds are simply not there. I think that Brill Building crap was mixed to play well on the phone." That big hit a couple of years ago by 'Milky Chase' required a half decent base system to sound good. Quite a difference when the base kicked in. The base of what? |
Google ad
Poco Deplorevole wrote:
On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 13:22:53 -0800 (PST), True North wrote: On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 13:10:47 -0500, Poco Deplorevole wrote: On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 12:55:47 -0500, wrote: On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 08:06:46 -0500, Poco Deplorevole wrote: On Mon, 06 Feb 2017 19:00:26 -0500, wrote: I got a Bose Solo 15 for Christmas, convincing my wife that it would look nicer and sound better than what we had for a TV sound system. So I took what we had, a Bose Lifestyle 25, and hooked it up to my computer. Now I get some pretty decent sound out of this thing. We both have nice PC speaker sets with the sub woof by our chairs hooked to the TV. My wife has a Bose and mine is Creative. Combined with the big screen, it does enhance the movie experience. Most of the time we just use the TV sound tho. I had this system for the PC, and it sounded good for a PC system: https://www.amazon.com/Logitech-Z-23.../dp/B0002SQ2P2 But the Bose system kinda blows it away. "Bose has it's own sound. There are people who don't think it is "true", others think it is the best. After 30 years working in a computer room I have a notch in my hearing that takes out a lot of the spectrum so I am not the best judge. There are some very capable "PC Speaker" systems tho. I have a bunch of them around here that I have collected over the years. I am thinking about putting a sub woof back in my car. I took the one I had out when I switched from a PC based MP3 player to a dash mounted unit but the speakers in the car still are not good in the low frequencies, As long as you are playing "oldies" mixed to play best on the AM radio it is not an issue but newer music is mixed for sub woofers. That even seems to be true of the album version of old songs. I have a pretty good mix I put together to test sound system. "Video" by India Arie may be as good a sub woof test as anything. They come in about 30 seconds into the song with a base drum beat that overwhelms a stock car speaker system but will rattle the windows in the car next to you if you have a sub woof cranked up. OTOH a Motown recording with a strong base beat like "Papa was a rolling stone" still plays well on the stock car speakers and the sub woof does not change it all that much even in the remixed CD version. If you are playing early 60s stuff you quickly realize those sounds are simply not there. I think that Brill Building crap was mixed to play well on the phone." That big hit a couple of years ago by 'Milky Chase' required a half decent base system to sound good. Quite a difference when the base kicked in. The base of what? I looked ahead before I responded. He needs to lay off the netcop thing until he learns to spell/type perfectly all of the time. |
Google ad
Poco Deplorevole
- show quoted text - "The base of what?" The Ace of Base...who else? |
Google ad
wrote:
On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 19:27:52 -0500 (EST), justan wrote: True North Wrote in message: On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 13:10:47 -0500, Poco Deplorevole wrote: On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 12:55:47 -0500, wrote: On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 08:06:46 -0500, Poco Deplorevole wrote: On Mon, 06 Feb 2017 19:00:26 -0500, wrote: I got a Bose Solo 15 for Christmas, convincing my wife that it would look nicer and sound better than what we had for a TV sound system. So I took what we had, a Bose Lifestyle 25, and hooked it up to my computer. Now I get some pretty decent sound out of this thing. We both have nice PC speaker sets with the sub woof by our chairs hooked to the TV. My wife has a Bose and mine is Creative. Combined with the big screen, it does enhance the movie experience. Most of the time we just use the TV sound tho. I had this system for the PC, and it sounded good for a PC system: https://www.amazon.com/Logitech-Z-23.../dp/B0002SQ2P2 But the Bose system kinda blows it away. "Bose has it's own sound. There are people who don't think it is "true", others think it is the best. After 30 years working in a computer room I have a notch in my hearing that takes out a lot of the spectrum so I am not the best judge. There are some very capable "PC Speaker" systems tho. I have a bunch of them around here that I have collected over the years. I am thinking about putting a sub woof back in my car. I took the one I had out when I switched from a PC based MP3 player to a dash mounted unit but the speakers in the car still are not good in the low frequencies, As long as you are playing "oldies" mixed to play best on the AM radio it is not an issue but newer music is mixed for sub woofers. That even seems to be true of the album version of old songs. I have a pretty good mix I put together to test sound system. "Video" by India Arie may be as good a sub woof test as anything. They come in about 30 seconds into the song with a base drum beat that overwhelms a stock car speaker system but will rattle the windows in the car next to you if you have a sub woof cranked up. OTOH a Motown recording with a strong base beat like "Papa was a rolling stone" still plays well on the stock car speakers and the sub woof does not change it all that much even in the remixed CD version. If you are playing early 60s stuff you quickly realize those sounds are simply not there. I think that Brill Building crap was mixed to play well on the phone." That big hit a couple of years ago by 'Milky Chase' required a half decent base system to sound good. Quite a difference when the base kicked in. Milky Chase? I don't think it made it to the US Milky ChaNce? The idiot screwed that up, too? WAFM. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:57 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com