Berkley idiots...
 

On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 20:20:09 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 2/2/17 8:12 PM, wrote:

Harry will really have a hard time differentiating between the
annexing of the west bank and the russians annexing Crimea.
If there is a difference, it would be that the eastern Europeans who
came down from Poland and Belarus to occupy Palestine, had no cultural
history there. (whereas the russians have had cultural connections in
Crimea for many generations)
The only claim the "Israelis" have is based on a promise from "their
imaginary friend" in that "fairy tale" he is so intent on ridiculing
in every other context.


The Jewish people have no cultural history in Israel? Really? Now that
is a funny claim on your part.

You of all people are suddenly giving credence to the bible? (Torah)
That is a religious connection, not the culture of the people in
Eastern Europe. Few if any of them could find an ancestor that even
knew anyone in Palestine in 1945.
I have a far deeper cultural connection in Ireland, UK and Germany but
it doesn't mean I can take property there by force and say god gave it
to me. Even the US Army gave Germany back after they shed blood taking
it away from the nazis. If the Jewish people needed a homeland, we
should have carved them out a nice spot there. The truth is that was
not politically possible so the europeans used racist logic to say,
those brown people in Palestine are just sub human "wogs" who had no
rights. We will take their land. It is still going on.

Berkley idiots...
 

On 2/2/17 11:08 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 20:20:09 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 2/2/17 8:12 PM, wrote:

Harry will really have a hard time differentiating between the
annexing of the west bank and the russians annexing Crimea.
If there is a difference, it would be that the eastern Europeans who
came down from Poland and Belarus to occupy Palestine, had no cultural
history there. (whereas the russians have had cultural connections in
Crimea for many generations)
The only claim the "Israelis" have is based on a promise from "their
imaginary friend" in that "fairy tale" he is so intent on ridiculing
in every other context.


The Jewish people have no cultural history in Israel? Really? Now that
is a funny claim on your part.

You of all people are suddenly giving credence to the bible? (Torah)
That is a religious connection, not the culture of the people in
Eastern Europe. Few if any of them could find an ancestor that even
knew anyone in Palestine in 1945.
I have a far deeper cultural connection in Ireland, UK and Germany but
it doesn't mean I can take property there by force and say god gave it
to me. Even the US Army gave Germany back after they shed blood taking
it away from the nazis. If the Jewish people needed a homeland, we
should have carved them out a nice spot there. The truth is that was
not politically possible so the europeans used racist logic to say,
those brown people in Palestine are just sub human "wogs" who had no
rights. We will take their land. It is still going on.


I suggest you research the concept of "cultural history," since it seems
apparent you don't know what it means.

Berkley idiots...
 

On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 07:08:54 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 2/2/17 11:08 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 20:20:09 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 2/2/17 8:12 PM, wrote:

Harry will really have a hard time differentiating between the
annexing of the west bank and the russians annexing Crimea.
If there is a difference, it would be that the eastern Europeans who
came down from Poland and Belarus to occupy Palestine, had no cultural
history there. (whereas the russians have had cultural connections in
Crimea for many generations)
The only claim the "Israelis" have is based on a promise from "their
imaginary friend" in that "fairy tale" he is so intent on ridiculing
in every other context.


The Jewish people have no cultural history in Israel? Really? Now that
is a funny claim on your part.

You of all people are suddenly giving credence to the bible? (Torah)
That is a religious connection, not the culture of the people in
Eastern Europe. Few if any of them could find an ancestor that even
knew anyone in Palestine in 1945.
I have a far deeper cultural connection in Ireland, UK and Germany but
it doesn't mean I can take property there by force and say god gave it
to me. Even the US Army gave Germany back after they shed blood taking
it away from the nazis. If the Jewish people needed a homeland, we
should have carved them out a nice spot there. The truth is that was
not politically possible so the europeans used racist logic to say,
those brown people in Palestine are just sub human "wogs" who had no
rights. We will take their land. It is still going on.


I suggest you research the concept of "cultural history," since it seems
apparent you don't know what it means.

Ah, but the Meister Krausescheiße Koch knows all, eh?

Berkley idiots...
 

On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 07:08:54 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 2/2/17 11:08 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 20:20:09 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 2/2/17 8:12 PM, wrote:

Harry will really have a hard time differentiating between the
annexing of the west bank and the russians annexing Crimea.
If there is a difference, it would be that the eastern Europeans who
came down from Poland and Belarus to occupy Palestine, had no cultural
history there. (whereas the russians have had cultural connections in
Crimea for many generations)
The only claim the "Israelis" have is based on a promise from "their
imaginary friend" in that "fairy tale" he is so intent on ridiculing
in every other context.


The Jewish people have no cultural history in Israel? Really? Now that
is a funny claim on your part.

You of all people are suddenly giving credence to the bible? (Torah)
That is a religious connection, not the culture of the people in
Eastern Europe. Few if any of them could find an ancestor that even
knew anyone in Palestine in 1945.
I have a far deeper cultural connection in Ireland, UK and Germany but
it doesn't mean I can take property there by force and say god gave it
to me. Even the US Army gave Germany back after they shed blood taking
it away from the nazis. If the Jewish people needed a homeland, we
should have carved them out a nice spot there. The truth is that was
not politically possible so the europeans used racist logic to say,
those brown people in Palestine are just sub human "wogs" who had no
rights. We will take their land. It is still going on.


I suggest you research the concept of "cultural history," since it seems
apparent you don't know what it means.

I guess it is just your jewish upbringing that makes you think that if
you adopt a religion, you also inherit land 1500 miles away where that
religion has some roots.
I guess if I decide to say I worship Kane, Ku, Lono and Kanaloa, I can
go to Hawaii and stake a claim to a few acres on the beach in Maui.
I will tell them it is my cultural history.

Berkley idiots...
 

On 2/3/17 12:22 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 07:08:54 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 2/2/17 11:08 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 20:20:09 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 2/2/17 8:12 PM, wrote:

Harry will really have a hard time differentiating between the
annexing of the west bank and the russians annexing Crimea.
If there is a difference, it would be that the eastern Europeans who
came down from Poland and Belarus to occupy Palestine, had no cultural
history there. (whereas the russians have had cultural connections in
Crimea for many generations)
The only claim the "Israelis" have is based on a promise from "their
imaginary friend" in that "fairy tale" he is so intent on ridiculing
in every other context.


The Jewish people have no cultural history in Israel? Really? Now that
is a funny claim on your part.

You of all people are suddenly giving credence to the bible? (Torah)
That is a religious connection, not the culture of the people in
Eastern Europe. Few if any of them could find an ancestor that even
knew anyone in Palestine in 1945.
I have a far deeper cultural connection in Ireland, UK and Germany but
it doesn't mean I can take property there by force and say god gave it
to me. Even the US Army gave Germany back after they shed blood taking
it away from the nazis. If the Jewish people needed a homeland, we
should have carved them out a nice spot there. The truth is that was
not politically possible so the europeans used racist logic to say,
those brown people in Palestine are just sub human "wogs" who had no
rights. We will take their land. It is still going on.


I suggest you research the concept of "cultural history," since it seems
apparent you don't know what it means.

I guess it is just your jewish upbringing that makes you think that if
you adopt a religion, you also inherit land 1500 miles away where that
religion has some roots.
I guess if I decide to say I worship Kane, Ku, Lono and Kanaloa, I can
go to Hawaii and stake a claim to a few acres on the beach in Maui.
I will tell them it is my cultural history.


So, you don't know cultural history or even history. Not a news flash.

Berkley idiots...
 

On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 12:38:57 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 2/3/17 12:22 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 07:08:54 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 2/2/17 11:08 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 20:20:09 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 2/2/17 8:12 PM, wrote:

Harry will really have a hard time differentiating between the
annexing of the west bank and the russians annexing Crimea.
If there is a difference, it would be that the eastern Europeans who
came down from Poland and Belarus to occupy Palestine, had no cultural
history there. (whereas the russians have had cultural connections in
Crimea for many generations)
The only claim the "Israelis" have is based on a promise from "their
imaginary friend" in that "fairy tale" he is so intent on ridiculing
in every other context.


The Jewish people have no cultural history in Israel? Really? Now that
is a funny claim on your part.

You of all people are suddenly giving credence to the bible? (Torah)
That is a religious connection, not the culture of the people in
Eastern Europe. Few if any of them could find an ancestor that even
knew anyone in Palestine in 1945.
I have a far deeper cultural connection in Ireland, UK and Germany but
it doesn't mean I can take property there by force and say god gave it
to me. Even the US Army gave Germany back after they shed blood taking
it away from the nazis. If the Jewish people needed a homeland, we
should have carved them out a nice spot there. The truth is that was
not politically possible so the europeans used racist logic to say,
those brown people in Palestine are just sub human "wogs" who had no
rights. We will take their land. It is still going on.


I suggest you research the concept of "cultural history," since it seems
apparent you don't know what it means.

I guess it is just your jewish upbringing that makes you think that if
you adopt a religion, you also inherit land 1500 miles away where that
religion has some roots.
I guess if I decide to say I worship Kane, Ku, Lono and Kanaloa, I can
go to Hawaii and stake a claim to a few acres on the beach in Maui.
I will tell them it is my cultural history.


So, you don't know cultural history or even history. Not a news flash.

Cultural history is a lot deeper than identifying as a Jew for 2
generations and that seems to be the only requirement to get the right
of return. How is it "return" if you have no ancestors who ever lived
there?
This seems to be the only time you think religion has any validity at
all and it simply amazes me the lengths you think that "fairy tale"
empowers people.

Berkley idiots...
 

Keyser Soze wrote:
On 2/3/17 12:22 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 07:08:54 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 2/2/17 11:08 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 20:20:09 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 2/2/17 8:12 PM, wrote:

Harry will really have a hard time differentiating between the
annexing of the west bank and the russians annexing Crimea.
If there is a difference, it would be that the eastern Europeans who
came down from Poland and Belarus to occupy Palestine, had no cultural
history there. (whereas the russians have had cultural connections in
Crimea for many generations)
The only claim the "Israelis" have is based on a promise from "their
imaginary friend" in that "fairy tale" he is so intent on ridiculing
in every other context.


The Jewish people have no cultural history in Israel? Really? Now that
is a funny claim on your part.

You of all people are suddenly giving credence to the bible? (Torah)
That is a religious connection, not the culture of the people in
Eastern Europe. Few if any of them could find an ancestor that even
knew anyone in Palestine in 1945.
I have a far deeper cultural connection in Ireland, UK and Germany but
it doesn't mean I can take property there by force and say god gave it
to me. Even the US Army gave Germany back after they shed blood taking
it away from the nazis. If the Jewish people needed a homeland, we
should have carved them out a nice spot there. The truth is that was
not politically possible so the europeans used racist logic to say,
those brown people in Palestine are just sub human "wogs" who had no
rights. We will take their land. It is still going on.


I suggest you research the concept of "cultural history," since it seems
apparent you don't know what it means.

I guess it is just your jewish upbringing that makes you think that if
you adopt a religion, you also inherit land 1500 miles away where that
religion has some roots.
I guess if I decide to say I worship Kane, Ku, Lono and Kanaloa, I can
go to Hawaii and stake a claim to a few acres on the beach in Maui.
I will tell them it is my cultural history.


So, you don't know cultural history or even history. Not a news flash.


Since my great grandfather was scotch-Irish I could go back to the isles
and claim a bunch of land, as we Scotch were forcibly removed to Ireland?
And was a lot less years ago.

Berkley idiots...
 

Bill
- show quoted text -
"Since my great grandfather was scotch-Irish I could go back to the isles
and claim a bunch of land, as we Scotch were forcibly removed to Ireland?
And was a lot less years ago."


Say what?
"Scotch" is the drink.....the people are Scots.

Berkley idiots...
 

On 2/3/17 1:58 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 12:38:57 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 2/3/17 12:22 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 07:08:54 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 2/2/17 11:08 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 20:20:09 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 2/2/17 8:12 PM, wrote:

Harry will really have a hard time differentiating between the
annexing of the west bank and the russians annexing Crimea.
If there is a difference, it would be that the eastern Europeans who
came down from Poland and Belarus to occupy Palestine, had no cultural
history there. (whereas the russians have had cultural connections in
Crimea for many generations)
The only claim the "Israelis" have is based on a promise from "their
imaginary friend" in that "fairy tale" he is so intent on ridiculing
in every other context.


The Jewish people have no cultural history in Israel? Really? Now that
is a funny claim on your part.

You of all people are suddenly giving credence to the bible? (Torah)
That is a religious connection, not the culture of the people in
Eastern Europe. Few if any of them could find an ancestor that even
knew anyone in Palestine in 1945.
I have a far deeper cultural connection in Ireland, UK and Germany but
it doesn't mean I can take property there by force and say god gave it
to me. Even the US Army gave Germany back after they shed blood taking
it away from the nazis. If the Jewish people needed a homeland, we
should have carved them out a nice spot there. The truth is that was
not politically possible so the europeans used racist logic to say,
those brown people in Palestine are just sub human "wogs" who had no
rights. We will take their land. It is still going on.


I suggest you research the concept of "cultural history," since it seems
apparent you don't know what it means.

I guess it is just your jewish upbringing that makes you think that if
you adopt a religion, you also inherit land 1500 miles away where that
religion has some roots.
I guess if I decide to say I worship Kane, Ku, Lono and Kanaloa, I can
go to Hawaii and stake a claim to a few acres on the beach in Maui.
I will tell them it is my cultural history.


So, you don't know cultural history or even history. Not a news flash.

Cultural history is a lot deeper than identifying as a Jew for 2
generations and that seems to be the only requirement to get the right
of return. How is it "return" if you have no ancestors who ever lived
there?
This seems to be the only time you think religion has any validity at
all and it simply amazes me the lengths you think that "fairy tale"
empowers people.


Perhaps you should study that law of return.

Berkley idiots...
 

On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 14:51:15 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

So, you don't know cultural history or even history. Not a news flash.

Cultural history is a lot deeper than identifying as a Jew for 2
generations and that seems to be the only requirement to get the right
of return. How is it "return" if you have no ancestors who ever lived
there?
This seems to be the only time you think religion has any validity at
all and it simply amazes me the lengths you think that "fairy tale"
empowers people.


Perhaps you should study that law of return.

I have searched through international law and I come up empty.
It only seems to exist in that "fairy tale" you are usually quick to
ridicule.
Zionist Jews seem to be the only ones who believe that. I know some
who think it is as dumb as I do but they are reform.

If you strictly adhere to cultural history, you have to accept slavery
in the American south and apart hied in southern Africa. You already
accept it in Palestine and that particular brand of apart hied is only
50 years old. If Israel would simply pull back to the pre 67 borders a
lot of this strife would go away.