Berkley idiots...
 

On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 20:20:09 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 2/2/17 8:12 PM, wrote:

Harry will really have a hard time differentiating between the
annexing of the west bank and the russians annexing Crimea.
If there is a difference, it would be that the eastern Europeans who
came down from Poland and Belarus to occupy Palestine, had no cultural
history there. (whereas the russians have had cultural connections in
Crimea for many generations)
The only claim the "Israelis" have is based on a promise from "their
imaginary friend" in that "fairy tale" he is so intent on ridiculing
in every other context.


The Jewish people have no cultural history in Israel? Really? Now that
is a funny claim on your part.

You of all people are suddenly giving credence to the bible? (Torah)
That is a religious connection, not the culture of the people in
Eastern Europe. Few if any of them could find an ancestor that even
knew anyone in Palestine in 1945.
I have a far deeper cultural connection in Ireland, UK and Germany but
it doesn't mean I can take property there by force and say god gave it
to me. Even the US Army gave Germany back after they shed blood taking
it away from the nazis. If the Jewish people needed a homeland, we
should have carved them out a nice spot there. The truth is that was
not politically possible so the europeans used racist logic to say,
those brown people in Palestine are just sub human "wogs" who had no
rights. We will take their land. It is still going on.

Berkley idiots...
 

On 2/2/17 11:08 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 20:20:09 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 2/2/17 8:12 PM, wrote:

Harry will really have a hard time differentiating between the
annexing of the west bank and the russians annexing Crimea.
If there is a difference, it would be that the eastern Europeans who
came down from Poland and Belarus to occupy Palestine, had no cultural
history there. (whereas the russians have had cultural connections in
Crimea for many generations)
The only claim the "Israelis" have is based on a promise from "their
imaginary friend" in that "fairy tale" he is so intent on ridiculing
in every other context.


The Jewish people have no cultural history in Israel? Really? Now that
is a funny claim on your part.

You of all people are suddenly giving credence to the bible? (Torah)
That is a religious connection, not the culture of the people in
Eastern Europe. Few if any of them could find an ancestor that even
knew anyone in Palestine in 1945.
I have a far deeper cultural connection in Ireland, UK and Germany but
it doesn't mean I can take property there by force and say god gave it
to me. Even the US Army gave Germany back after they shed blood taking
it away from the nazis. If the Jewish people needed a homeland, we
should have carved them out a nice spot there. The truth is that was
not politically possible so the europeans used racist logic to say,
those brown people in Palestine are just sub human "wogs" who had no
rights. We will take their land. It is still going on.


I suggest you research the concept of "cultural history," since it seems
apparent you don't know what it means.

Berkley idiots...
 

On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 07:08:54 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 2/2/17 11:08 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 20:20:09 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 2/2/17 8:12 PM, wrote:

Harry will really have a hard time differentiating between the
annexing of the west bank and the russians annexing Crimea.
If there is a difference, it would be that the eastern Europeans who
came down from Poland and Belarus to occupy Palestine, had no cultural
history there. (whereas the russians have had cultural connections in
Crimea for many generations)
The only claim the "Israelis" have is based on a promise from "their
imaginary friend" in that "fairy tale" he is so intent on ridiculing
in every other context.


The Jewish people have no cultural history in Israel? Really? Now that
is a funny claim on your part.

You of all people are suddenly giving credence to the bible? (Torah)
That is a religious connection, not the culture of the people in
Eastern Europe. Few if any of them could find an ancestor that even
knew anyone in Palestine in 1945.
I have a far deeper cultural connection in Ireland, UK and Germany but
it doesn't mean I can take property there by force and say god gave it
to me. Even the US Army gave Germany back after they shed blood taking
it away from the nazis. If the Jewish people needed a homeland, we
should have carved them out a nice spot there. The truth is that was
not politically possible so the europeans used racist logic to say,
those brown people in Palestine are just sub human "wogs" who had no
rights. We will take their land. It is still going on.


I suggest you research the concept of "cultural history," since it seems
apparent you don't know what it means.

Ah, but the Meister Krausescheiße Koch knows all, eh?

Berkley idiots...
 

On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 07:08:54 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 2/2/17 11:08 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 20:20:09 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 2/2/17 8:12 PM, wrote:

Harry will really have a hard time differentiating between the
annexing of the west bank and the russians annexing Crimea.
If there is a difference, it would be that the eastern Europeans who
came down from Poland and Belarus to occupy Palestine, had no cultural
history there. (whereas the russians have had cultural connections in
Crimea for many generations)
The only claim the "Israelis" have is based on a promise from "their
imaginary friend" in that "fairy tale" he is so intent on ridiculing
in every other context.


The Jewish people have no cultural history in Israel? Really? Now that
is a funny claim on your part.

You of all people are suddenly giving credence to the bible? (Torah)
That is a religious connection, not the culture of the people in
Eastern Europe. Few if any of them could find an ancestor that even
knew anyone in Palestine in 1945.
I have a far deeper cultural connection in Ireland, UK and Germany but
it doesn't mean I can take property there by force and say god gave it
to me. Even the US Army gave Germany back after they shed blood taking
it away from the nazis. If the Jewish people needed a homeland, we
should have carved them out a nice spot there. The truth is that was
not politically possible so the europeans used racist logic to say,
those brown people in Palestine are just sub human "wogs" who had no
rights. We will take their land. It is still going on.


I suggest you research the concept of "cultural history," since it seems
apparent you don't know what it means.

I guess it is just your jewish upbringing that makes you think that if
you adopt a religion, you also inherit land 1500 miles away where that
religion has some roots.
I guess if I decide to say I worship Kane, Ku, Lono and Kanaloa, I can
go to Hawaii and stake a claim to a few acres on the beach in Maui.
I will tell them it is my cultural history.

Berkley idiots...
 

On 2/3/17 12:22 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 07:08:54 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 2/2/17 11:08 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 20:20:09 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 2/2/17 8:12 PM, wrote:

Harry will really have a hard time differentiating between the
annexing of the west bank and the russians annexing Crimea.
If there is a difference, it would be that the eastern Europeans who
came down from Poland and Belarus to occupy Palestine, had no cultural
history there. (whereas the russians have had cultural connections in
Crimea for many generations)
The only claim the "Israelis" have is based on a promise from "their
imaginary friend" in that "fairy tale" he is so intent on ridiculing
in every other context.


The Jewish people have no cultural history in Israel? Really? Now that
is a funny claim on your part.

You of all people are suddenly giving credence to the bible? (Torah)
That is a religious connection, not the culture of the people in
Eastern Europe. Few if any of them could find an ancestor that even
knew anyone in Palestine in 1945.
I have a far deeper cultural connection in Ireland, UK and Germany but
it doesn't mean I can take property there by force and say god gave it
to me. Even the US Army gave Germany back after they shed blood taking
it away from the nazis. If the Jewish people needed a homeland, we
should have carved them out a nice spot there. The truth is that was
not politically possible so the europeans used racist logic to say,
those brown people in Palestine are just sub human "wogs" who had no
rights. We will take their land. It is still going on.


I suggest you research the concept of "cultural history," since it seems
apparent you don't know what it means.

I guess it is just your jewish upbringing that makes you think that if
you adopt a religion, you also inherit land 1500 miles away where that
religion has some roots.
I guess if I decide to say I worship Kane, Ku, Lono and Kanaloa, I can
go to Hawaii and stake a claim to a few acres on the beach in Maui.
I will tell them it is my cultural history.


So, you don't know cultural history or even history. Not a news flash.

Berkley idiots...
 

On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 12:38:57 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 2/3/17 12:22 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 07:08:54 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 2/2/17 11:08 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 20:20:09 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 2/2/17 8:12 PM, wrote:

Harry will really have a hard time differentiating between the
annexing of the west bank and the russians annexing Crimea.
If there is a difference, it would be that the eastern Europeans who
came down from Poland and Belarus to occupy Palestine, had no cultural
history there. (whereas the russians have had cultural connections in
Crimea for many generations)
The only claim the "Israelis" have is based on a promise from "their
imaginary friend" in that "fairy tale" he is so intent on ridiculing
in every other context.


The Jewish people have no cultural history in Israel? Really? Now that
is a funny claim on your part.

You of all people are suddenly giving credence to the bible? (Torah)
That is a religious connection, not the culture of the people in
Eastern Europe. Few if any of them could find an ancestor that even
knew anyone in Palestine in 1945.
I have a far deeper cultural connection in Ireland, UK and Germany but
it doesn't mean I can take property there by force and say god gave it
to me. Even the US Army gave Germany back after they shed blood taking
it away from the nazis. If the Jewish people needed a homeland, we
should have carved them out a nice spot there. The truth is that was
not politically possible so the europeans used racist logic to say,
those brown people in Palestine are just sub human "wogs" who had no
rights. We will take their land. It is still going on.


I suggest you research the concept of "cultural history," since it seems
apparent you don't know what it means.

I guess it is just your jewish upbringing that makes you think that if
you adopt a religion, you also inherit land 1500 miles away where that
religion has some roots.
I guess if I decide to say I worship Kane, Ku, Lono and Kanaloa, I can
go to Hawaii and stake a claim to a few acres on the beach in Maui.
I will tell them it is my cultural history.


So, you don't know cultural history or even history. Not a news flash.

Cultural history is a lot deeper than identifying as a Jew for 2
generations and that seems to be the only requirement to get the right
of return. How is it "return" if you have no ancestors who ever lived
there?
This seems to be the only time you think religion has any validity at
all and it simply amazes me the lengths you think that "fairy tale"
empowers people.

Berkley idiots...
 

Keyser Soze wrote:
On 2/3/17 12:22 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 07:08:54 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 2/2/17 11:08 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 20:20:09 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 2/2/17 8:12 PM, wrote:

Harry will really have a hard time differentiating between the
annexing of the west bank and the russians annexing Crimea.
If there is a difference, it would be that the eastern Europeans who
came down from Poland and Belarus to occupy Palestine, had no cultural
history there. (whereas the russians have had cultural connections in
Crimea for many generations)
The only claim the "Israelis" have is based on a promise from "their
imaginary friend" in that "fairy tale" he is so intent on ridiculing
in every other context.


The Jewish people have no cultural history in Israel? Really? Now that
is a funny claim on your part.

You of all people are suddenly giving credence to the bible? (Torah)
That is a religious connection, not the culture of the people in
Eastern Europe. Few if any of them could find an ancestor that even
knew anyone in Palestine in 1945.
I have a far deeper cultural connection in Ireland, UK and Germany but
it doesn't mean I can take property there by force and say god gave it
to me. Even the US Army gave Germany back after they shed blood taking
it away from the nazis. If the Jewish people needed a homeland, we
should have carved them out a nice spot there. The truth is that was
not politically possible so the europeans used racist logic to say,
those brown people in Palestine are just sub human "wogs" who had no
rights. We will take their land. It is still going on.


I suggest you research the concept of "cultural history," since it seems
apparent you don't know what it means.

I guess it is just your jewish upbringing that makes you think that if
you adopt a religion, you also inherit land 1500 miles away where that
religion has some roots.
I guess if I decide to say I worship Kane, Ku, Lono and Kanaloa, I can
go to Hawaii and stake a claim to a few acres on the beach in Maui.
I will tell them it is my cultural history.


So, you don't know cultural history or even history. Not a news flash.


Since my great grandfather was scotch-Irish I could go back to the isles
and claim a bunch of land, as we Scotch were forcibly removed to Ireland?
And was a lot less years ago.

Berkley idiots...
 

Bill
- show quoted text -
"Since my great grandfather was scotch-Irish I could go back to the isles
and claim a bunch of land, as we Scotch were forcibly removed to Ireland?
And was a lot less years ago."


Say what?
"Scotch" is the drink.....the people are Scots.

Berkley idiots...
 

On 2/3/17 1:58 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 12:38:57 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 2/3/17 12:22 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 07:08:54 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 2/2/17 11:08 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 20:20:09 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 2/2/17 8:12 PM, wrote:

Harry will really have a hard time differentiating between the
annexing of the west bank and the russians annexing Crimea.
If there is a difference, it would be that the eastern Europeans who
came down from Poland and Belarus to occupy Palestine, had no cultural
history there. (whereas the russians have had cultural connections in
Crimea for many generations)
The only claim the "Israelis" have is based on a promise from "their
imaginary friend" in that "fairy tale" he is so intent on ridiculing
in every other context.


The Jewish people have no cultural history in Israel? Really? Now that
is a funny claim on your part.

You of all people are suddenly giving credence to the bible? (Torah)
That is a religious connection, not the culture of the people in
Eastern Europe. Few if any of them could find an ancestor that even
knew anyone in Palestine in 1945.
I have a far deeper cultural connection in Ireland, UK and Germany but
it doesn't mean I can take property there by force and say god gave it
to me. Even the US Army gave Germany back after they shed blood taking
it away from the nazis. If the Jewish people needed a homeland, we
should have carved them out a nice spot there. The truth is that was
not politically possible so the europeans used racist logic to say,
those brown people in Palestine are just sub human "wogs" who had no
rights. We will take their land. It is still going on.


I suggest you research the concept of "cultural history," since it seems
apparent you don't know what it means.

I guess it is just your jewish upbringing that makes you think that if
you adopt a religion, you also inherit land 1500 miles away where that
religion has some roots.
I guess if I decide to say I worship Kane, Ku, Lono and Kanaloa, I can
go to Hawaii and stake a claim to a few acres on the beach in Maui.
I will tell them it is my cultural history.


So, you don't know cultural history or even history. Not a news flash.

Cultural history is a lot deeper than identifying as a Jew for 2
generations and that seems to be the only requirement to get the right
of return. How is it "return" if you have no ancestors who ever lived
there?
This seems to be the only time you think religion has any validity at
all and it simply amazes me the lengths you think that "fairy tale"
empowers people.


Perhaps you should study that law of return.

Berkley idiots...
 

On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 14:51:15 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

So, you don't know cultural history or even history. Not a news flash.

Cultural history is a lot deeper than identifying as a Jew for 2
generations and that seems to be the only requirement to get the right
of return. How is it "return" if you have no ancestors who ever lived
there?
This seems to be the only time you think religion has any validity at
all and it simply amazes me the lengths you think that "fairy tale"
empowers people.


Perhaps you should study that law of return.

I have searched through international law and I come up empty.
It only seems to exist in that "fairy tale" you are usually quick to
ridicule.
Zionist Jews seem to be the only ones who believe that. I know some
who think it is as dumb as I do but they are reform.

If you strictly adhere to cultural history, you have to accept slavery
in the American south and apart hied in southern Africa. You already
accept it in Palestine and that particular brand of apart hied is only
50 years old. If Israel would simply pull back to the pre 67 borders a
lot of this strife would go away.

Berkley idiots...
 

True North wrote:
Bill
- show quoted text -
"Since my great grandfather was scotch-Irish I could go back to the isles
and claim a bunch of land, as we Scotch were forcibly removed to Ireland?
And was a lot less years ago."


Say what?
"Scotch" is the drink.....the people are Scots.


I am sorry. Sorry, you are too stupid to parse the meaning.

Berkley idiots...
 

Bill
- hide quoted text -
True North wrote:
Bill
- show quoted text -
"Since my great grandfather was scotch-Irish I could go back to the isles
and claim a bunch of land, as we Scotch were forcibly removed to Ireland?
And was a lot less years ago."


Say what?
"Scotch" is the drink.....the people are Scots.


I am sorry. Â*Sorry, you are too stupid to parse the meaning.


Yes...you are one sorry individual.
I'm also sorry you don't know the difference between scotch and Scots...or Scottish people, especially when you claim to have Scottish blood in your background. Your ancestors would probably throw you in the loc.

Berkley idiots...
 

me
Bill
- hide quoted text -
- show quoted text -
"Yes...you are one sorry individual.
I'm also sorry you don't know the difference between scotch and Scots...or Scottish people, especially when you claim to have Scottish blood in your background. Â*Your ancestors would probably throw you in the loc."


....make that throw you in the loch.

Berkley idiots...
 

True North wrote:
Bill
- hide quoted text -
True North wrote:
Bill
- show quoted text -
"Since my great grandfather was scotch-Irish I could go back to the isles
and claim a bunch of land, as we Scotch were forcibly removed to Ireland?
And was a lot less years ago."


Say what?
"Scotch" is the drink.....the people are Scots.


I am sorry. Â*Sorry, you are too stupid to parse the meaning.


Yes...you are one sorry individual.
I'm also sorry you don't know the difference between scotch and
Scots...or Scottish people, especially when you claim to have Scottish
blood in your background. Your ancestors would probably throw you in the loc.


Well. They may. But if you were there first, I say you may have cleaned
it, as you did that for a career.

Berkley idiots...
 

True North wrote:
me
Bill
- hide quoted text -
- show quoted text -
"Yes...you are one sorry individual.
I'm also sorry you don't know the difference between scotch and
Scots...or Scottish people, especially when you claim to have Scottish
blood in your background. Â*Your ancestors would probably throw you in the loc."


...make that throw you in the loch.


I could parse the meaning in your first iteration.

Berkley idiots...
 

On 2/3/17 3:25 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 14:51:15 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

So, you don't know cultural history or even history. Not a news flash.

Cultural history is a lot deeper than identifying as a Jew for 2
generations and that seems to be the only requirement to get the right
of return. How is it "return" if you have no ancestors who ever lived
there?
This seems to be the only time you think religion has any validity at
all and it simply amazes me the lengths you think that "fairy tale"
empowers people.


Perhaps you should study that law of return.

I have searched through international law and I come up empty.
It only seems to exist in that "fairy tale" you are usually quick to
ridicule.
Zionist Jews seem to be the only ones who believe that. I know some
who think it is as dumb as I do but they are reform.

If you strictly adhere to cultural history, you have to accept slavery
in the American south and apart hied in southern Africa. You already
accept it in Palestine and that particular brand of apart hied is only
50 years old. If Israel would simply pull back to the pre 67 borders a
lot of this strife would go away.


Wouldn't you prefer it if the Arabs would simply push the Jews into the Med?

Berkley idiots...
 

Keyser Soze wrote:
On 2/3/17 3:25 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 14:51:15 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

So, you don't know cultural history or even history. Not a news flash.

Cultural history is a lot deeper than identifying as a Jew for 2
generations and that seems to be the only requirement to get the right
of return. How is it "return" if you have no ancestors who ever lived
there?
This seems to be the only time you think religion has any validity at
all and it simply amazes me the lengths you think that "fairy tale"
empowers people.


Perhaps you should study that law of return.

I have searched through international law and I come up empty.
It only seems to exist in that "fairy tale" you are usually quick to
ridicule.
Zionist Jews seem to be the only ones who believe that. I know some
who think it is as dumb as I do but they are reform.

If you strictly adhere to cultural history, you have to accept slavery
in the American south and apart hied in southern Africa. You already
accept it in Palestine and that particular brand of apart hied is only
50 years old. If Israel would simply pull back to the pre 67 borders a
lot of this strife would go away.


Wouldn't you prefer it if the Arabs would simply push the Jews into the Med?



Jews and Palestinians lived successfully together in the Middle East up
till the late 1940's. Jews who could prove ancestry of land ownership in
the region. Seems as if the Palestinians have the same rights as those
people in Israel to fight for the land. Seems as if might makes right in
the region, at least in your reasoning.

Berkley idiots...
 

Kalif Swill guzzles...

"Well. They may. Â*But if you were there first, I say you may have cleaned
it, as you did that for a career."


Huh? Cleaned what?

Berkley idiots...
 

True North wrote:
me
Bill
- hide quoted text -
- show quoted text -
"Yes...you are one sorry individual.
I'm also sorry you don't know the difference between scotch and Scots...or Scottish people, especially when you claim to have Scottish blood in your background. Your ancestors would probably throw you in the loc."


...make that throw you in the loch.

Yes, please do. Get it right the first time, dummy.

Berkley idiots...
 

True North wrote:
Kalif Swill guzzles...

"Well. They may. But if you were there first, I say you may have cleaned
it, as you did that for a career."


Huh? Cleaned what?

Yes.

Berkley idiots...
 

True North wrote:
Kalif Swill guzzles...

"Well. They may. Â*But if you were there first, I say you may have cleaned
it, as you did that for a career."


Huh? Cleaned what?


Alsheimer? Forgot you posted about the "loc" "loch"?

Berkley idiots...
 

On 2/3/17 10:12 PM, Bill wrote:
True North wrote:
Kalif Swill guzzles...

"Well. They may. But if you were there first, I say you may have cleaned
it, as you did that for a career."


Huh? Cleaned what?


Alsheimer? Forgot you posted about the "loc" "loch"?



Spell much, Bilious? You planning to comment again about the
spelling/grammar of others? Alsheimer, eh?

Berkley idiots...
 

On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 21:05:16 -0000 (UTC), Bill
wrote:

True North wrote:
Bill
- show quoted text -
"Since my great grandfather was scotch-Irish I could go back to the isles
and claim a bunch of land, as we Scotch were forcibly removed to Ireland?
And was a lot less years ago."


Say what?
"Scotch" is the drink.....the people are Scots.


I am sorry. Sorry, you are too stupid to parse the meaning.

Any real scotsman will slap you for that.

Berkley idiots...
 

On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 14:04:08 -0800 (PST), True North
wrote:

me
Bill
- hide quoted text -
- show quoted text -
"Yes...you are one sorry individual.
I'm also sorry you don't know the difference between scotch and Scots...or Scottish people, especially when you claim to have Scottish blood in your background. Â*Your ancestors would probably throw you in the loc."


...make that throw you in the loch.

I thought you referring to the LOC (AKA the Library of Congress)

Berkley idiots...
 

On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 19:12:51 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 2/3/17 3:25 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 14:51:15 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

So, you don't know cultural history or even history. Not a news flash.

Cultural history is a lot deeper than identifying as a Jew for 2
generations and that seems to be the only requirement to get the right
of return. How is it "return" if you have no ancestors who ever lived
there?
This seems to be the only time you think religion has any validity at
all and it simply amazes me the lengths you think that "fairy tale"
empowers people.


Perhaps you should study that law of return.

I have searched through international law and I come up empty.
It only seems to exist in that "fairy tale" you are usually quick to
ridicule.
Zionist Jews seem to be the only ones who believe that. I know some
who think it is as dumb as I do but they are reform.

If you strictly adhere to cultural history, you have to accept slavery
in the American south and apart hied in southern Africa. You already
accept it in Palestine and that particular brand of apart hied is only
50 years old. If Israel would simply pull back to the pre 67 borders a
lot of this strife would go away.


Wouldn't you prefer it if the Arabs would simply push the Jews into the Med?

Maybe some of them could move back to where they migrated from but the
real issue is they are still coming and pushing out farther into the
disputed territory. (AKA lebensraum in the 30s and 40s)
It is ironic that they are becoming the people they were supposed to
be moving to get away from.

Berkley idiots...
 

On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 7:37:03 PM UTC-8, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 2/3/17 10:12 PM, Bill wrote:
True North wrote:
Kalif Swill guzzles...

"Well. They may. But if you were there first, I say you may have cleaned
it, as you did that for a career."


Huh? Cleaned what?


Alsheimer? Forgot you posted about the "loc" "loch"?



Spell much, Bilious? You planning to comment again about the
spelling/grammar of others? Alsheimer, eh?

So what, if I spelled it "lier or liar" would you correct me?
Eh?
No of course not because you're a gutless pos liberal that never paid your taxes and live behind your wifes skirt, You think the world owes you everything after you burned your fathers estate/fortune. Whatever that might be.
You spend 24/7 ****ting on anyone who did.

Your passion in life seems to be to crap on those who've excelled in life.

Berkley idiots...
 

No, Swill was claiming to be part Scottish so I was referring to a lake by the Scottish term.
We have a number of lakes called lochs around here....after all Nova Scotia is Latin for New Scotland and we take our Scottish heritage seriously.

Berkley idiots...
 

On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 21:34:06 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 7:37:03 PM UTC-8, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 2/3/17 10:12 PM, Bill wrote:
True North wrote:
Kalif Swill guzzles...

"Well. They may. But if you were there first, I say you may have cleaned
it, as you did that for a career."


Huh? Cleaned what?


Alsheimer? Forgot you posted about the "loc" "loch"?



Spell much, Bilious? You planning to comment again about the
spelling/grammar of others? Alsheimer, eh?

So what, if I spelled it "lier or liar" would you correct me?
Eh?
No of course not because you're a gutless pos liberal that never paid your taxes and live behind your wifes skirt, You think the world owes you everything after you burned your fathers estate/fortune. Whatever that might be.
You spend 24/7 ****ting on anyone who did.

Your passion in life seems to be to crap on those who've excelled in life.

Well, I'll have to admit that was pretty well said.

Haven't heard about our South American buddy. What's happening?

Berkley idiots...
 

True North wrote:
No, Swill was claiming to be part Scottish so I was referring to a lake
by the Scottish term.
We have a number of lakes called lochs around here....after all Nova
Scotia is Latin for New Scotland and we take our Scottish heritage seriously.


Nope, you were the one who misspelled the word. Since you were a janitor
for life, figured you might clean up the waterway.