![]() |
Harry! You were there...is this true?
https://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net...88&oe=59028A1F
or: http://tinyurl.com/hyt5zxh Just think, without Facebook we'd never have seen such wisdom. |
Harry! You were there...is this true?
8:31 AMPoco Deplorevole
https://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net...88&oe=59028A1F or: http://tinyurl.com/hyt5zxh Just think, without Facebook we'd never have seen such wisdom. ...... Makes sense to me. I wonder how many of those people actually voted? |
Harry! You were there...is this true?
On Sunday, January 22, 2017 at 12:27:13 PM UTC-5, Tim wrote:
8:31 AMPoco Deplorevole https://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net...88&oe=59028A1F or: http://tinyurl.com/hyt5zxh Just think, without Facebook we'd never have seen such wisdom. ..... Makes sense to me. I wonder how many of those people actually voted? It's just a bunch of malcontents who wanted a woman, any woman, in the white house. They would have settled for Hilly even with her scandals, lies, and crookedness. Simply because she is a woman. If they had a cogent message it might have been more convincing. As it was, it was simply flailing about, and life will go on. |
Harry! You were there...is this true?
On 1/22/2017 1:34 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2017 at 12:27:13 PM UTC-5, Tim wrote: 8:31 AMPoco Deplorevole https://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net...88&oe=59028A1F or: http://tinyurl.com/hyt5zxh Just think, without Facebook we'd never have seen such wisdom. ..... Makes sense to me. I wonder how many of those people actually voted? It's just a bunch of malcontents who wanted a woman, any woman, in the white house. They would have settled for Hilly even with her scandals, lies, and crookedness. Simply because she is a woman. If they had a cogent message it might have been more convincing. As it was, it was simply flailing about, and life will go on. I agree with you. The reason for the high gain reaction is because it was assumed that Hillary had this election in the bag, even up to election night when the returns first started coming in. Harry was predicting a "significant" victory by Hillary and thought the Senate could very well go Democratic as well. A lot of people were fooled, including me. |
Harry! You were there...is this true?
On Sun, 22 Jan 2017 13:56:39 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 1/22/2017 1:34 PM, Its Me wrote: On Sunday, January 22, 2017 at 12:27:13 PM UTC-5, Tim wrote: 8:31 AMPoco Deplorevole https://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net...88&oe=59028A1F or: http://tinyurl.com/hyt5zxh Just think, without Facebook we'd never have seen such wisdom. ..... Makes sense to me. I wonder how many of those people actually voted? It's just a bunch of malcontents who wanted a woman, any woman, in the white house. They would have settled for Hilly even with her scandals, lies, and crookedness. Simply because she is a woman. If they had a cogent message it might have been more convincing. As it was, it was simply flailing about, and life will go on. I agree with you. The reason for the high gain reaction is because it was assumed that Hillary had this election in the bag, even up to election night when the returns first started coming in. Harry was predicting a "significant" victory by Hillary and thought the Senate could very well go Democratic as well. A lot of people were fooled, including me. Hillary was not even on the list of Women's March honorees. http://people.com/politics/hillary-c...on-washington/ Apparently she wasn't very well thought of. |
Harry! You were there...is this true?
On Sun, 22 Jan 2017 14:11:52 -0500, Poco Deplorevole
wrote: Hillary was not even on the list of Women's March honorees. http://people.com/politics/hillary-c...on-washington/ Apparently she wasn't very well thought of. "Put that coffee down, Coffee is for closers" Blake- Glengarry Glen Ross. |
Harry! You were there...is this true?
On 1/22/17 1:34 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2017 at 12:27:13 PM UTC-5, Tim wrote: 8:31 AMPoco Deplorevole https://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net...88&oe=59028A1F or: http://tinyurl.com/hyt5zxh Just think, without Facebook we'd never have seen such wisdom. ..... Makes sense to me. I wonder how many of those people actually voted? It's just a bunch of malcontents who wanted a woman, any woman, in the white house. They would have settled for Hilly even with her scandals, lies, and crookedness. Simply because she is a woman. If they had a cogent message it might have been more convincing. As it was, it was simply flailing about, and life will go on. You boys are pathetic and scared. Last Saturday's demonstrations in DC, across the United States and around the world made a strong statement against Trump and the horrors for which he stands. Trying to knock the demonstrations and a few of the demonstrators is I suppose all you really have. Hopefully the demonstrations turn into active civil resistance. |
Harry! You were there...is this true?
On Monday, January 23, 2017 at 5:20:54 AM UTC-6, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 1/22/17 1:34 PM, Its Me wrote: On Sunday, January 22, 2017 at 12:27:13 PM UTC-5, Tim wrote: 8:31 AMPoco Deplorevole https://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net...88&oe=59028A1F or: http://tinyurl.com/hyt5zxh Just think, without Facebook we'd never have seen such wisdom. ..... Makes sense to me. I wonder how many of those people actually voted? It's just a bunch of malcontents who wanted a woman, any woman, in the white house. They would have settled for Hilly even with her scandals, lies, and crookedness. Simply because she is a woman. If they had a cogent message it might have been more convincing. As it was, it was simply flailing about, and life will go on. You boys are pathetic and scared. Last Saturday's demonstrations in DC, across the United States and around the world made a strong statement against Trump and the horrors for which he stands. Thats why all the marching. You're scared |
Harry! You were there...is this true?
On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 06:20:52 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 1/22/17 1:34 PM, Its Me wrote: On Sunday, January 22, 2017 at 12:27:13 PM UTC-5, Tim wrote: 8:31 AMPoco Deplorevole https://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net...88&oe=59028A1F or: http://tinyurl.com/hyt5zxh Just think, without Facebook we'd never have seen such wisdom. ..... Makes sense to me. I wonder how many of those people actually voted? It's just a bunch of malcontents who wanted a woman, any woman, in the white house. They would have settled for Hilly even with her scandals, lies, and crookedness. Simply because she is a woman. If they had a cogent message it might have been more convincing. As it was, it was simply flailing about, and life will go on. You boys are pathetic and scared. Last Saturday's demonstrations in DC, across the United States and around the world made a strong statement against Trump and the horrors for which he stands. Trying to knock the demonstrations and a few of the demonstrators is I suppose all you really have. Hopefully the demonstrations turn into active civil resistance. Scared of what? Resistance to what? And what did the razor have to do with Viagra? And what unit did you serve with while supporting the war in Vietnam? |
Harry! You were there...is this true?
On 1/23/2017 6:20 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 1/22/17 1:34 PM, Its Me wrote: On Sunday, January 22, 2017 at 12:27:13 PM UTC-5, Tim wrote: 8:31 AMPoco Deplorevole https://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net...88&oe=59028A1F or: http://tinyurl.com/hyt5zxh Just think, without Facebook we'd never have seen such wisdom. ..... Makes sense to me. I wonder how many of those people actually voted? It's just a bunch of malcontents who wanted a woman, any woman, in the white house. They would have settled for Hilly even with her scandals, lies, and crookedness. Simply because she is a woman. If they had a cogent message it might have been more convincing. As it was, it was simply flailing about, and life will go on. You boys are pathetic and scared. Last Saturday's demonstrations in DC, across the United States and around the world made a strong statement against Trump and the horrors for which he stands. Trying to knock the demonstrations and a few of the demonstrators is I suppose all you really have. Hopefully the demonstrations turn into active civil resistance. As more honest news releases of the "demonstrations" come out, the more people are realizing that the protesters really didn't have a unified message at all. It was a hodgepodge of different "issues" that were not necessarily inter-related. The event is turning out to be more of an embarrassment than anything else for the anti-Trump, liberal cause. Crap ... I was in the Navy for 9 years but some of the signs and costumes held or worn by female demonstrators made *me* blush. :-) |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:05 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com