I was thinking last night ...
 

.... about how much things have changed in the last 50 years and how far
liberal thinking has influenced those changes in the USA. Not saying
all is bad but it certainly is a different world. For example:

When I first entered military service in 1968 being "gay" was cause for
immediate discharge. There were logical reasons for this policy, the
most important being that in those days the stigma associated with being
gay could potentially cause attempts at blackmail orchestrated by our
adversaries, especially to those who held security clearances and had
access to classified or sensitive documents.

Fast forward to today.

Now a guy in the military, confused as to his/her gender identity,
compromises 750,000 documents, many containing classified data that
exposed people to risk and probably death, is found guilty, sentenced to
35 years but has that sentence commuted by a progressive liberal
president in the last days of his term and .. has or is now going to
have a sex change procedure paid for by the Army (the taxpayers).

I wonder how many of the socialist European countries that Harry admires
so much would allow for this on their nickel.

I was thinking last night ...
 

On 1/19/17 7:23 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
... about how much things have changed in the last 50 years and how far
liberal thinking has influenced those changes in the USA. Not saying
all is bad but it certainly is a different world. For example:

When I first entered military service in 1968 being "gay" was cause for
immediate discharge. There were logical reasons for this policy, the
most important being that in those days the stigma associated with being
gay could potentially cause attempts at blackmail orchestrated by our
adversaries, especially to those who held security clearances and had
access to classified or sensitive documents.

Fast forward to today.

Now a guy in the military, confused as to his/her gender identity,
compromises 750,000 documents, many containing classified data that
exposed people to risk and probably death, is found guilty, sentenced to
35 years but has that sentence commuted by a progressive liberal
president in the last days of his term and .. has or is now going to
have a sex change procedure paid for by the Army (the taxpayers).

I wonder how many of the socialist European countries that Harry admires
so much would allow for this on their nickel.


Manning didn't give aid, comfort, and cover to the enemy, as Trump has.

I was thinking last night ...
 

On 1/19/2017 7:29 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 1/19/17 7:23 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
... about how much things have changed in the last 50 years and how far
liberal thinking has influenced those changes in the USA. Not saying
all is bad but it certainly is a different world. For example:

When I first entered military service in 1968 being "gay" was cause for
immediate discharge. There were logical reasons for this policy, the
most important being that in those days the stigma associated with being
gay could potentially cause attempts at blackmail orchestrated by our
adversaries, especially to those who held security clearances and had
access to classified or sensitive documents.

Fast forward to today.

Now a guy in the military, confused as to his/her gender identity,
compromises 750,000 documents, many containing classified data that
exposed people to risk and probably death, is found guilty, sentenced to
35 years but has that sentence commuted by a progressive liberal
president in the last days of his term and .. has or is now going to
have a sex change procedure paid for by the Army (the taxpayers).

I wonder how many of the socialist European countries that Harry admires
so much would allow for this on their nickel.


Manning didn't give aid, comfort, and cover to the enemy, as Trump has.


Like hell he didn't. What planet do you live on?

I was thinking last night ...
 

On 1/19/2017 7:29 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 1/19/17 7:23 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
... about how much things have changed in the last 50 years and how far
liberal thinking has influenced those changes in the USA. Not saying
all is bad but it certainly is a different world. For example:

When I first entered military service in 1968 being "gay" was cause for
immediate discharge. There were logical reasons for this policy, the
most important being that in those days the stigma associated with being
gay could potentially cause attempts at blackmail orchestrated by our
adversaries, especially to those who held security clearances and had
access to classified or sensitive documents.

Fast forward to today.

Now a guy in the military, confused as to his/her gender identity,
compromises 750,000 documents, many containing classified data that
exposed people to risk and probably death, is found guilty, sentenced to
35 years but has that sentence commuted by a progressive liberal
president in the last days of his term and .. has or is now going to
have a sex change procedure paid for by the Army (the taxpayers).

I wonder how many of the socialist European countries that Harry admires
so much would allow for this on their nickel.



Manning didn't give aid, comfort, and cover to the enemy, as Trump has.

I guess I can understand how you might think that given your lack of
understanding of military service and the responsibilities involved.
So, let me give you an example that even *you* might understand:

Before Manning came along and delivered 750,000 classified and sensitive
documents to Julian Assange, "Wikileaks" was a non-event and had little
influence or notoriety. The documents Manning provided put Wikileaks on
the map.

Liberals are crying foul now because Wikileaks made public tens of
thousands of "sensitive" DNC and Clinton campaign emails, causing the
election loss of Hillary in the minds of many of them.

So, you see, Manning's enabling of Wikileaks caused it to become a
prominent influence in the election. Wouldn't you consider that
"aiding" the enemy in your mind?

I was thinking last night ...
 

On Thu, 19 Jan 2017 07:32:58 -0500 (EST), justan wrote:

"Mr. Luddite" Wrote in message:
... about how much things have changed in the last 50 years and how far
liberal thinking has influenced those changes in the USA. Not saying
all is bad but it certainly is a different world. For example:

When I first entered military service in 1968 being "gay" was cause for
immediate discharge. There were logical reasons for this policy, the
most important being that in those days the stigma associated with being
gay could potentially cause attempts at blackmail orchestrated by our
adversaries, especially to those who held security clearances and had
access to classified or sensitive documents.

Fast forward to today.

Now a guy in the military, confused as to his/her gender identity,
compromises 750,000 documents, many containing classified data that
exposed people to risk and probably death, is found guilty, sentenced to
35 years but has that sentence commuted by a progressive liberal
president in the last days of his term and .. has or is now going to
have a sex change procedure paid for by the Army (the taxpayers).

I wonder how many of the socialist European countries that Harry admires
so much would allow for this on their nickel.


Is Europe into gayism as much as factions in the US seem to be?

That's a good question. I'll ask my Dutch friend.

I was thinking last night ...
 

On Thu, 19 Jan 2017 07:55:29 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 1/19/2017 7:29 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 1/19/17 7:23 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
... about how much things have changed in the last 50 years and how far
liberal thinking has influenced those changes in the USA. Not saying
all is bad but it certainly is a different world. For example:

When I first entered military service in 1968 being "gay" was cause for
immediate discharge. There were logical reasons for this policy, the
most important being that in those days the stigma associated with being
gay could potentially cause attempts at blackmail orchestrated by our
adversaries, especially to those who held security clearances and had
access to classified or sensitive documents.

Fast forward to today.

Now a guy in the military, confused as to his/her gender identity,
compromises 750,000 documents, many containing classified data that
exposed people to risk and probably death, is found guilty, sentenced to
35 years but has that sentence commuted by a progressive liberal
president in the last days of his term and .. has or is now going to
have a sex change procedure paid for by the Army (the taxpayers).

I wonder how many of the socialist European countries that Harry admires
so much would allow for this on their nickel.



Manning didn't give aid, comfort, and cover to the enemy, as Trump has.

I guess I can understand how you might think that given your lack of
understanding of military service and the responsibilities involved.
So, let me give you an example that even *you* might understand:

Before Manning came along and delivered 750,000 classified and sensitive
documents to Julian Assange, "Wikileaks" was a non-event and had little
influence or notoriety. The documents Manning provided put Wikileaks on
the map.

Liberals are crying foul now because Wikileaks made public tens of
thousands of "sensitive" DNC and Clinton campaign emails, causing the
election loss of Hillary in the minds of many of them.

So, you see, Manning's enabling of Wikileaks caused it to become a
prominent influence in the election. Wouldn't you consider that
"aiding" the enemy in your mind?

You have to add Snowden to that list.