| Page 2 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Russian hacking?
Poco Loco Wrote in message:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 08:04:05 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 12/14/16 7:27 AM, Its Me wrote: On Tuesday, December 13, 2016 at 7:02:03 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 12/13/2016 6:27 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On 12/13/2016 7:54 AM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On 12/12/2016 8:51 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... Can someone explain how the alleged Russian hacking of DNC and Hillary's campaign email communications resulted in her losing the election, the latest claim by the liberal left? Nobody is suggesting that the ballot box counts were electronically hacked into and manipulated by anyone, even if that was possible. The only affect of the hacking (to my knowledge) was the release of certain emails via Wikileaks. Nobody knows with 100 percent certainty who was responsible for providing these hacked emails to Wikileaks. Regardless of the source, nobody, including the Hillary campaign, are claiming that the content of the leaked emails are'nt authentic either. It's sorta like robbing a bank, being recorded on a video camera and caught, then claiming that you were improperly arrested, blaming it on the security surveillance system. Why are you concerned about this bull****? You got the result you wanted didn't you? Just be satisfied with your lying pussy grabber. You wanted a different kind of candidate. You got it. Donald J. Trump was elected POTUS. Get over it. My, my. How to send a snowflake into a hissy fit. Just ask a legitimate question. It looks like "snowflake" is the latest right-wing term of derision. That's real impressive Trumpster. Carry on with your derisive gloating. It suits you well. I hope Trump does well for you. Sorta like the basket of deplorables, huh? I can only hope Trump does well for everybody ... including you. He'll be the POTUS on Jan 20. I think you'll be sorely disappointed. I won't be. Well, as much as I am pleased that Hillary won't be running the US government for the next four years, I think the Donald has some very serious legal problems ahead. The Constitution specifically forbids him from personally benefiting in any way through payments or dealings with any foreign country. Trump has real estate holdings throughout the world. Unless he sells them all off before Jan 20, it means that if anybody from another country stays at one of his hotels or even buys a drink at the hotel bar, Trump is technically in violation of the Constitution. He's talking about transferring the management to his sons but that's apparently not enough legally. He postponed a news conference at which he was going to explain what he was going to do. I have a hunch that the postponement is because his legal beagles have advised him that his "solution" isn't going to cut it. Going to be interesting. Since when was breaking the law and serving as potus mutually exclusive? I am so looking forward to watching Trump and his family members get themselves into one serious ethical and legal problem after another while they destroy the country and his sleazy cabinet officers and other high officials destroy the agencies they are supposed to run and defend for the commonweal. Wow...an oil baron and buddy buddy of Russia for secretary of state...what could go wrong?The moronic ex governor of Texas as energy czar. What's next, Godzilla as ambassador to Japan? Will those coal miners who voted for Trump get ****ed out of their pensions and health benefits by the Republicans and Trump? We're happy to see you're looking forward to Trump destroying the country in which you live. Isn't America great. Even Krause's jaundiced view is allowed to be expressed. In some countries his head would have be on a pike long ago. -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
Russian hacking?
On 12/14/16 9:09 AM, justan wrote:
Poco Loco Wrote in message: On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 08:04:05 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 12/14/16 7:27 AM, Its Me wrote: On Tuesday, December 13, 2016 at 7:02:03 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 12/13/2016 6:27 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On 12/13/2016 7:54 AM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On 12/12/2016 8:51 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... Can someone explain how the alleged Russian hacking of DNC and Hillary's campaign email communications resulted in her losing the election, the latest claim by the liberal left? Nobody is suggesting that the ballot box counts were electronically hacked into and manipulated by anyone, even if that was possible. The only affect of the hacking (to my knowledge) was the release of certain emails via Wikileaks. Nobody knows with 100 percent certainty who was responsible for providing these hacked emails to Wikileaks. Regardless of the source, nobody, including the Hillary campaign, are claiming that the content of the leaked emails are'nt authentic either. It's sorta like robbing a bank, being recorded on a video camera and caught, then claiming that you were improperly arrested, blaming it on the security surveillance system. Why are you concerned about this bull****? You got the result you wanted didn't you? Just be satisfied with your lying pussy grabber. You wanted a different kind of candidate. You got it. Donald J. Trump was elected POTUS. Get over it. My, my. How to send a snowflake into a hissy fit. Just ask a legitimate question. It looks like "snowflake" is the latest right-wing term of derision. That's real impressive Trumpster. Carry on with your derisive gloating. It suits you well. I hope Trump does well for you. Sorta like the basket of deplorables, huh? I can only hope Trump does well for everybody ... including you. He'll be the POTUS on Jan 20. I think you'll be sorely disappointed. I won't be. Well, as much as I am pleased that Hillary won't be running the US government for the next four years, I think the Donald has some very serious legal problems ahead. The Constitution specifically forbids him from personally benefiting in any way through payments or dealings with any foreign country. Trump has real estate holdings throughout the world. Unless he sells them all off before Jan 20, it means that if anybody from another country stays at one of his hotels or even buys a drink at the hotel bar, Trump is technically in violation of the Constitution. He's talking about transferring the management to his sons but that's apparently not enough legally. He postponed a news conference at which he was going to explain what he was going to do. I have a hunch that the postponement is because his legal beagles have advised him that his "solution" isn't going to cut it. Going to be interesting. Since when was breaking the law and serving as potus mutually exclusive? I am so looking forward to watching Trump and his family members get themselves into one serious ethical and legal problem after another while they destroy the country and his sleazy cabinet officers and other high officials destroy the agencies they are supposed to run and defend for the commonweal. Wow...an oil baron and buddy buddy of Russia for secretary of state...what could go wrong?The moronic ex governor of Texas as energy czar. What's next, Godzilla as ambassador to Japan? Will those coal miners who voted for Trump get ****ed out of their pensions and health benefits by the Republicans and Trump? We're happy to see you're looking forward to Trump destroying the country in which you live. Isn't America great. Even Krause's jaundiced view is allowed to be expressed. In some countries his head would have be on a pike long ago. You peeps voted for the incompetent, ignorant, and crooked Trump and you got him. You think he's going to be other than incompetent, ignorant, and crooked? |
Russian hacking?
8:23 AMKeyser Soze
- show quoted text - You peeps voted for the incompetent, ignorant, and crooked Trump and you got him. You think he's going to be other than incompetent, ignorant, and crooked? ..... You mean he's your average politician? |
Russian hacking?
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 08:04:05 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote: Will those coal miners who voted for Trump get ****ed out of their pensions and health benefits by the Republicans and Trump? They will get to keep their jobs and without workers, paying dues, those union promises are just love letters in the sand. |
Russian hacking?
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 08:12:10 -0500, Poco Loco
wrote: I am so looking forward to watching Trump and his family members get themselves into one serious ethical and legal problem after another while they destroy the country and his sleazy cabinet officers and other high officials destroy the agencies they are supposed to run and defend for the commonweal. Wow...an oil baron and buddy buddy of Russia for secretary of state...what could go wrong?The moronic ex governor of Texas as energy czar. What's next, Godzilla as ambassador to Japan? Will those coal miners who voted for Trump get ****ed out of their pensions and health benefits by the Republicans and Trump? We're happy to see you're looking forward to Trump destroying the country in which you live. Haven't you heard. Harry is moving to the communist counties of California people when they secede. (the new CCCP) |
Russian hacking?
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 09:23:56 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote: You peeps voted for the incompetent, ignorant, and crooked Trump and you got him. You think he's going to be other than incompetent, ignorant, and crooked? You can't blame me, I voted for Gary. Egotistical Trump and crooked Hillary were still worse choices |
Russian hacking?
|
Russian hacking?
On 12/14/16 8:57 AM, Its Me wrote:
On Wednesday, December 14, 2016 at 8:12:10 AM UTC-5, Poco Loco wrote: On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 08:04:05 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 12/14/16 7:27 AM, Its Me wrote: On Tuesday, December 13, 2016 at 7:02:03 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 12/13/2016 6:27 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On 12/13/2016 7:54 AM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On 12/12/2016 8:51 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... Can someone explain how the alleged Russian hacking of DNC and Hillary's campaign email communications resulted in her losing the election, the latest claim by the liberal left? Nobody is suggesting that the ballot box counts were electronically hacked into and manipulated by anyone, even if that was possible. The only affect of the hacking (to my knowledge) was the release of certain emails via Wikileaks. Nobody knows with 100 percent certainty who was responsible for providing these hacked emails to Wikileaks. Regardless of the source, nobody, including the Hillary campaign, are claiming that the content of the leaked emails are'nt authentic either. It's sorta like robbing a bank, being recorded on a video camera and caught, then claiming that you were improperly arrested, blaming it on the security surveillance system. Why are you concerned about this bull****? You got the result you wanted didn't you? Just be satisfied with your lying pussy grabber. You wanted a different kind of candidate. You got it. Donald J. Trump was elected POTUS. Get over it. My, my. How to send a snowflake into a hissy fit. Just ask a legitimate question. It looks like "snowflake" is the latest right-wing term of derision. That's real impressive Trumpster. Carry on with your derisive gloating. It suits you well. I hope Trump does well for you. Sorta like the basket of deplorables, huh? I can only hope Trump does well for everybody ... including you. He'll be the POTUS on Jan 20. I think you'll be sorely disappointed. I won't be. Well, as much as I am pleased that Hillary won't be running the US government for the next four years, I think the Donald has some very serious legal problems ahead. The Constitution specifically forbids him from personally benefiting in any way through payments or dealings with any foreign country. Trump has real estate holdings throughout the world. Unless he sells them all off before Jan 20, it means that if anybody from another country stays at one of his hotels or even buys a drink at the hotel bar, Trump is technically in violation of the Constitution. He's talking about transferring the management to his sons but that's apparently not enough legally. He postponed a news conference at which he was going to explain what he was going to do. I have a hunch that the postponement is because his legal beagles have advised him that his "solution" isn't going to cut it. Going to be interesting. Since when was breaking the law and serving as potus mutually exclusive? I am so looking forward to watching Trump and his family members get themselves into one serious ethical and legal problem after another while they destroy the country and his sleazy cabinet officers and other high officials destroy the agencies they are supposed to run and defend for the commonweal. Wow...an oil baron and buddy buddy of Russia for secretary of state...what could go wrong?The moronic ex governor of Texas as energy czar. What's next, Godzilla as ambassador to Japan? Will those coal miners who voted for Trump get ****ed out of their pensions and health benefits by the Republicans and Trump? We're happy to see you're looking forward to Trump destroying the country in which you live. Yeah, that's so weird. Why would you want your own country "destroyed"? I haven't been happy with some of the choices for potus in the past, but I never looked forward to them doing harm to my country. In fact, I I hoped they would do well and cause the least harm possible. It's just another sign that the old boy has lost it. *My* country wouldn't elect a racist, xeonophobic, woman-hating, asshole like Trump who makes fun of the handicapped. But *your* country did. We're on the eve of national destruction. It'll be fun to watch Trump the Destroyer. |
Russian hacking?
10:51 AMKeyser Soze
- show quoted text - *My* country wouldn't elect a racist, xeonophobic, woman-hating, asshole like Trump who makes fun of the handicapped. But *your* country did. We're on the eve of national destruction. It'll be fun to watch Trump the Destroyer. ..... Harry, if that really were to happen then you'd probably be the first to head to the gulags Quit being an idiot. You know and can do better than that... |
Russian hacking?
On 12/14/16 11:54 AM, Tim wrote:
10:51 AMKeyser Soze - show quoted text - *My* country wouldn't elect a racist, xeonophobic, woman-hating, asshole like Trump who makes fun of the handicapped. But *your* country did. We're on the eve of national destruction. It'll be fun to watch Trump the Destroyer. .... Harry, if that really were to happen then you'd probably be the first to head to the gulags Quit being an idiot. You know and can do better than that... Not me. We've got a ticket to ride. |
Russian hacking?
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 11:56:34 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/14/16 11:54 AM, Tim wrote: 10:51 AMKeyser Soze - show quoted text - *My* country wouldn't elect a racist, xeonophobic, woman-hating, asshole like Trump who makes fun of the handicapped. But *your* country did. We're on the eve of national destruction. It'll be fun to watch Trump the Destroyer. .... Harry, if that really were to happen then you'd probably be the first to head to the gulags Quit being an idiot. You know and can do better than that... Not me. We've got a ticket to ride. Can I say 'adios' now? |
Russian hacking?
On Wednesday, December 14, 2016 at 11:51:17 AM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote:
*My* country wouldn't elect a racist, xeonophobic, woman-hating, asshole like Trump who makes fun of the handicapped. But *your* country did. We're on the eve of national destruction. It'll be fun to watch Trump the Destroyer. Yet *your* country did elect Trump. You've become quite the repetitive, silly old ****. |
Russian hacking?
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/14/16 9:09 AM, justan wrote: Poco Loco Wrote in message: On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 08:04:05 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 12/14/16 7:27 AM, Its Me wrote: On Tuesday, December 13, 2016 at 7:02:03 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 12/13/2016 6:27 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On 12/13/2016 7:54 AM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On 12/12/2016 8:51 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... Can someone explain how the alleged Russian hacking of DNC and Hillary's campaign email communications resulted in her losing the election, the latest claim by the liberal left? Nobody is suggesting that the ballot box counts were electronically hacked into and manipulated by anyone, even if that was possible. The only affect of the hacking (to my knowledge) was the release of certain emails via Wikileaks. Nobody knows with 100 percent certainty who was responsible for providing these hacked emails to Wikileaks. Regardless of the source, nobody, including the Hillary campaign, are claiming that the content of the leaked emails are'nt authentic either. It's sorta like robbing a bank, being recorded on a video camera and caught, then claiming that you were improperly arrested, blaming it on the security surveillance system. Why are you concerned about this bull****? You got the result you wanted didn't you? Just be satisfied with your lying pussy grabber. You wanted a different kind of candidate. You got it. Donald J. Trump was elected POTUS. Get over it. My, my. How to send a snowflake into a hissy fit. Just ask a legitimate question. It looks like "snowflake" is the latest right-wing term of derision. That's real impressive Trumpster. Carry on with your derisive gloating. It suits you well. I hope Trump does well for you. Sorta like the basket of deplorables, huh? I can only hope Trump does well for everybody ... including you. He'll be the POTUS on Jan 20. I think you'll be sorely disappointed. I won't be. Well, as much as I am pleased that Hillary won't be running the US government for the next four years, I think the Donald has some very serious legal problems ahead. The Constitution specifically forbids him from personally benefiting in any way through payments or dealings with any foreign country. Trump has real estate holdings throughout the world. Unless he sells them all off before Jan 20, it means that if anybody from another country stays at one of his hotels or even buys a drink at the hotel bar, Trump is technically in violation of the Constitution. He's talking about transferring the management to his sons but that's apparently not enough legally. He postponed a news conference at which he was going to explain what he was going to do. I have a hunch that the postponement is because his legal beagles have advised him that his "solution" isn't going to cut it. Going to be interesting. Since when was breaking the law and serving as potus mutually exclusive? I am so looking forward to watching Trump and his family members get themselves into one serious ethical and legal problem after another while they destroy the country and his sleazy cabinet officers and other high officials destroy the agencies they are supposed to run and defend for the commonweal. Wow...an oil baron and buddy buddy of Russia for secretary of state...what could go wrong?The moronic ex governor of Texas as energy czar. What's next, Godzilla as ambassador to Japan? Will those coal miners who voted for Trump get ****ed out of their pensions and health benefits by the Republicans and Trump? We're happy to see you're looking forward to Trump destroying the country in which you live. Isn't America great. Even Krause's jaundiced view is allowed to be expressed. In some countries his head would have be on a pike long ago. You peeps voted for the incompetent, ignorant, and crooked Trump and you got him. You think he's going to be other than incompetent, ignorant, and crooked? Actually most of the country voted against Hillary. They have not had improvement in their lives for at least 16 years. |
Russian hacking?
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/14/16 8:57 AM, Its Me wrote: On Wednesday, December 14, 2016 at 8:12:10 AM UTC-5, Poco Loco wrote: On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 08:04:05 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 12/14/16 7:27 AM, Its Me wrote: On Tuesday, December 13, 2016 at 7:02:03 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 12/13/2016 6:27 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On 12/13/2016 7:54 AM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On 12/12/2016 8:51 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... Can someone explain how the alleged Russian hacking of DNC and Hillary's campaign email communications resulted in her losing the election, the latest claim by the liberal left? Nobody is suggesting that the ballot box counts were electronically hacked into and manipulated by anyone, even if that was possible. The only affect of the hacking (to my knowledge) was the release of certain emails via Wikileaks. Nobody knows with 100 percent certainty who was responsible for providing these hacked emails to Wikileaks. Regardless of the source, nobody, including the Hillary campaign, are claiming that the content of the leaked emails are'nt authentic either. It's sorta like robbing a bank, being recorded on a video camera and caught, then claiming that you were improperly arrested, blaming it on the security surveillance system. Why are you concerned about this bull****? You got the result you wanted didn't you? Just be satisfied with your lying pussy grabber. You wanted a different kind of candidate. You got it. Donald J. Trump was elected POTUS. Get over it. My, my. How to send a snowflake into a hissy fit. Just ask a legitimate question. It looks like "snowflake" is the latest right-wing term of derision. That's real impressive Trumpster. Carry on with your derisive gloating. It suits you well. I hope Trump does well for you. Sorta like the basket of deplorables, huh? I can only hope Trump does well for everybody ... including you. He'll be the POTUS on Jan 20. I think you'll be sorely disappointed. I won't be. Well, as much as I am pleased that Hillary won't be running the US government for the next four years, I think the Donald has some very serious legal problems ahead. The Constitution specifically forbids him from personally benefiting in any way through payments or dealings with any foreign country. Trump has real estate holdings throughout the world. Unless he sells them all off before Jan 20, it means that if anybody from another country stays at one of his hotels or even buys a drink at the hotel bar, Trump is technically in violation of the Constitution. He's talking about transferring the management to his sons but that's apparently not enough legally. He postponed a news conference at which he was going to explain what he was going to do. I have a hunch that the postponement is because his legal beagles have advised him that his "solution" isn't going to cut it. Going to be interesting. Since when was breaking the law and serving as potus mutually exclusive? I am so looking forward to watching Trump and his family members get themselves into one serious ethical and legal problem after another while they destroy the country and his sleazy cabinet officers and other high officials destroy the agencies they are supposed to run and defend for the commonweal. Wow...an oil baron and buddy buddy of Russia for secretary of state...what could go wrong?The moronic ex governor of Texas as energy czar. What's next, Godzilla as ambassador to Japan? Will those coal miners who voted for Trump get ****ed out of their pensions and health benefits by the Republicans and Trump? We're happy to see you're looking forward to Trump destroying the country in which you live. Yeah, that's so weird. Why would you want your own country "destroyed"? I haven't been happy with some of the choices for potus in the past, but I never looked forward to them doing harm to my country. In fact, I I hoped they would do well and cause the least harm possible. It's just another sign that the old boy has lost it. *My* country wouldn't elect a racist, xeonophobic, woman-hating, asshole like Trump who makes fun of the handicapped. But *your* country did. We're on the eve of national destruction. It'll be fun to watch Trump the Destroyer. He was a good democrat an election cycle or so ago. If he had run as a Dem, you would be singing his praises. |
Russian hacking?
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 11:51:14 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/14/16 8:57 AM, Its Me wrote: On Wednesday, December 14, 2016 at 8:12:10 AM UTC-5, Poco Loco wrote: On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 08:04:05 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 12/14/16 7:27 AM, Its Me wrote: On Tuesday, December 13, 2016 at 7:02:03 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 12/13/2016 6:27 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On 12/13/2016 7:54 AM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On 12/12/2016 8:51 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... Can someone explain how the alleged Russian hacking of DNC and Hillary's campaign email communications resulted in her losing the election, the latest claim by the liberal left? Nobody is suggesting that the ballot box counts were electronically hacked into and manipulated by anyone, even if that was possible. The only affect of the hacking (to my knowledge) was the release of certain emails via Wikileaks. Nobody knows with 100 percent certainty who was responsible for providing these hacked emails to Wikileaks. Regardless of the source, nobody, including the Hillary campaign, are claiming that the content of the leaked emails are'nt authentic either. It's sorta like robbing a bank, being recorded on a video camera and caught, then claiming that you were improperly arrested, blaming it on the security surveillance system. Why are you concerned about this bull****? You got the result you wanted didn't you? Just be satisfied with your lying pussy grabber. You wanted a different kind of candidate. You got it. Donald J. Trump was elected POTUS. Get over it. My, my. How to send a snowflake into a hissy fit. Just ask a legitimate question. It looks like "snowflake" is the latest right-wing term of derision. That's real impressive Trumpster. Carry on with your derisive gloating. It suits you well. I hope Trump does well for you. Sorta like the basket of deplorables, huh? I can only hope Trump does well for everybody ... including you. He'll be the POTUS on Jan 20. I think you'll be sorely disappointed. I won't be. Well, as much as I am pleased that Hillary won't be running the US government for the next four years, I think the Donald has some very serious legal problems ahead. The Constitution specifically forbids him from personally benefiting in any way through payments or dealings with any foreign country. Trump has real estate holdings throughout the world. Unless he sells them all off before Jan 20, it means that if anybody from another country stays at one of his hotels or even buys a drink at the hotel bar, Trump is technically in violation of the Constitution. He's talking about transferring the management to his sons but that's apparently not enough legally. He postponed a news conference at which he was going to explain what he was going to do. I have a hunch that the postponement is because his legal beagles have advised him that his "solution" isn't going to cut it. Going to be interesting. Since when was breaking the law and serving as potus mutually exclusive? I am so looking forward to watching Trump and his family members get themselves into one serious ethical and legal problem after another while they destroy the country and his sleazy cabinet officers and other high officials destroy the agencies they are supposed to run and defend for the commonweal. Wow...an oil baron and buddy buddy of Russia for secretary of state...what could go wrong?The moronic ex governor of Texas as energy czar. What's next, Godzilla as ambassador to Japan? Will those coal miners who voted for Trump get ****ed out of their pensions and health benefits by the Republicans and Trump? We're happy to see you're looking forward to Trump destroying the country in which you live. Yeah, that's so weird. Why would you want your own country "destroyed"? I haven't been happy with some of the choices for potus in the past, but I never looked forward to them doing harm to my country. In fact, I I hoped they would do well and cause the least harm possible. It's just another sign that the old boy has lost it. *My* country wouldn't elect a racist, xeonophobic, woman-hating, asshole like Trump who makes fun of the handicapped. But *your* country did. We're on the eve of national destruction. It'll be fun to watch Trump the Destroyer. Actually, Krause, it's 'our' country. |
Russian hacking?
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 11:56:34 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/14/16 11:54 AM, Tim wrote: 10:51 AMKeyser Soze - show quoted text - *My* country wouldn't elect a racist, xeonophobic, woman-hating, asshole like Trump who makes fun of the handicapped. But *your* country did. We're on the eve of national destruction. It'll be fun to watch Trump the Destroyer. .... Harry, if that really were to happen then you'd probably be the first to head to the gulags Quit being an idiot. You know and can do better than that... Not me. We've got a ticket to ride. |
Russian hacking?
On 12/14/2016 10:45 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/14/16 11:12 AM, wrote: On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 09:23:56 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: You peeps voted for the incompetent, ignorant, and crooked Trump and you got him. You think he's going to be other than incompetent, ignorant, and crooked? You can't blame me, I voted for Gary. Egotistical Trump and crooked Hillary were still worse choices It seems appropriate you voted for the ignorant, simple-minded, dope-smoking fool. At least Trump's policies are his own, for better or for worse. Your candidate was available to serve the highest bidder. Or did you not notice that all those oppressive world leaders and shady business owners stopped making large "charitable contributions" to the Clinton Foundation? |
Russian hacking?
|
Russian hacking?
Its Me Wrote in message:
On Wednesday, December 14, 2016 at 11:51:17 AM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote: *My* country wouldn't elect a racist, xeonophobic, woman-hating, asshole like Trump who makes fun of the handicapped. But *your* country did. We're on the eve of national destruction. It'll be fun to watch Trump the Destroyer. Yet *your* country did elect Trump. You've become quite the repetitive, silly old ****. **** is not a bad descriptor for Krause. -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
Russian hacking?
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/14/16 7:27 AM, Its Me wrote: On Tuesday, December 13, 2016 at 7:02:03 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 12/13/2016 6:27 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On 12/13/2016 7:54 AM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On 12/12/2016 8:51 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... Can someone explain how the alleged Russian hacking of DNC and Hillary's campaign email communications resulted in her losing the election, the latest claim by the liberal left? Nobody is suggesting that the ballot box counts were electronically hacked into and manipulated by anyone, even if that was possible. The only affect of the hacking (to my knowledge) was the release of certain emails via Wikileaks. Nobody knows with 100 percent certainty who was responsible for providing these hacked emails to Wikileaks. Regardless of the source, nobody, including the Hillary campaign, are claiming that the content of the leaked emails are'nt authentic either. It's sorta like robbing a bank, being recorded on a video camera and caught, then claiming that you were improperly arrested, blaming it on the security surveillance system. Why are you concerned about this bull****? You got the result you wanted didn't you? Just be satisfied with your lying pussy grabber. You wanted a different kind of candidate. You got it. Donald J. Trump was elected POTUS. Get over it. My, my. How to send a snowflake into a hissy fit. Just ask a legitimate question. It looks like "snowflake" is the latest right-wing term of derision. That's real impressive Trumpster. Carry on with your derisive gloating. It suits you well. I hope Trump does well for you. Sorta like the basket of deplorables, huh? I can only hope Trump does well for everybody ... including you. He'll be the POTUS on Jan 20. I think you'll be sorely disappointed. I won't be. Well, as much as I am pleased that Hillary won't be running the US government for the next four years, I think the Donald has some very serious legal problems ahead. The Constitution specifically forbids him from personally benefiting in any way through payments or dealings with any foreign country. Trump has real estate holdings throughout the world. Unless he sells them all off before Jan 20, it means that if anybody from another country stays at one of his hotels or even buys a drink at the hotel bar, Trump is technically in violation of the Constitution. He's talking about transferring the management to his sons but that's apparently not enough legally. He postponed a news conference at which he was going to explain what he was going to do. I have a hunch that the postponement is because his legal beagles have advised him that his "solution" isn't going to cut it. Going to be interesting. Since when was breaking the law and serving as potus mutually exclusive? I am so looking forward to watching Trump and his family members get themselves into one serious ethical and legal problem after another while they destroy the country and his sleazy cabinet officers and other high officials destroy the agencies they are supposed to run and defend for the commonweal. Wow...an oil baron and buddy buddy of Russia for secretary of state...what could go wrong?The moronic ex governor of Texas as energy czar. What's next, Godzilla as ambassador to Japan? Will those coal miners who voted for Trump get ****ed out of their pensions and health benefits by the Republicans and Trump? Coal miners are not government workers. |
Russian hacking?
Poco Loco wrote:
On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 20:01:49 -0500, Alex wrote: True North wrote: On Tuesday, 13 December 2016 12:36:19 UTC-4, Justine giggles... Keyser Söze Wrote in message: justan wrote: "Mr. Luddite" Wrote in message: On 12/13/2016 7:54 AM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On 12/12/2016 8:51 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... Can someone explain how the alleged Russian hacking of DNC and Hillary's campaign email communications resulted in her losing the election, the latest claim by the liberal left? Nobody is suggesting that the ballot box counts were electronically hacked into and manipulated by anyone, even if that was possible. The only affect of the hacking (to my knowledge) was the release of certain emails via Wikileaks. Nobody knows with 100 percent certainty who was responsible for providing these hacked emails to Wikileaks. Regardless of the source, nobody, including the Hillary campaign, are claiming that the content of the leaked emails are'nt authentic either. It's sorta like robbing a bank, being recorded on a video camera and caught, then claiming that you were improperly arrested, blaming it on the security surveillance system. Why are you concerned about this bull****? You got the result you wanted didn't you? Just be satisfied with your lying pussy grabber. You wanted a different kind of candidate. You got it. Donald J. Trump was elected POTUS. Get over it. My, my. How to send a snowflake into a hissy fit. Just ask a legitimate question. It looks like "snowflake" is the latest right-wing term of derision. That's real impressive Trumpster. Carry on with your derisive gloating. It suits you well. I hope Trump does well for you. Sorta like the basket of deplorables, huh? I can only hope Trump does well for everybody ... including you. He'll be the POTUS on Jan 20. Trump says he wants to act as president for ALL the people. I don't know why BAO doesn't embrace that new concept. Trump says a lot of things...and it is mostly bull****. -- Posted with my iPhone 7+. Your entire act is bull****. I can't remember the last time you told the truth about anything that matters. -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ The truth.... you couldn't handle the truth! Damn, that was lame. Donald's admission that you don't get the truth from Harry is a sign that he's maturing. I'll give him that. Maybe he's getting tired of Krause's bull****, too. |
Russian hacking?
On Wednesday, December 14, 2016 at 10:51:17 AM UTC-6, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/14/16 8:57 AM, Its Me wrote: On Wednesday, December 14, 2016 at 8:12:10 AM UTC-5, Poco Loco wrote: On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 08:04:05 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 12/14/16 7:27 AM, Its Me wrote: On Tuesday, December 13, 2016 at 7:02:03 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 12/13/2016 6:27 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On 12/13/2016 7:54 AM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On 12/12/2016 8:51 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... Can someone explain how the alleged Russian hacking of DNC and Hillary's campaign email communications resulted in her losing the election, the latest claim by the liberal left? Nobody is suggesting that the ballot box counts were electronically hacked into and manipulated by anyone, even if that was possible. The only affect of the hacking (to my knowledge) was the release of certain emails via Wikileaks. Nobody knows with 100 percent certainty who was responsible for providing these hacked emails to Wikileaks. Regardless of the source, nobody, including the Hillary campaign, are claiming that the content of the leaked emails are'nt authentic either. It's sorta like robbing a bank, being recorded on a video camera and caught, then claiming that you were improperly arrested, blaming it on the security surveillance system. Why are you concerned about this bull****? You got the result you wanted didn't you? Just be satisfied with your lying pussy grabber. You wanted a different kind of candidate. You got it. Donald J. Trump was elected POTUS. Get over it. My, my. How to send a snowflake into a hissy fit. Just ask a legitimate question. It looks like "snowflake" is the latest right-wing term of derision. That's real impressive Trumpster. Carry on with your derisive gloating. It suits you well. I hope Trump does well for you. Sorta like the basket of deplorables, huh? I can only hope Trump does well for everybody ... including you. He'll be the POTUS on Jan 20. I think you'll be sorely disappointed. I won't be. Well, as much as I am pleased that Hillary won't be running the US government for the next four years, I think the Donald has some very serious legal problems ahead. The Constitution specifically forbids him from personally benefiting in any way through payments or dealings with any foreign country. Trump has real estate holdings throughout the world. Unless he sells them all off before Jan 20, it means that if anybody from another country stays at one of his hotels or even buys a drink at the hotel bar, Trump is technically in violation of the Constitution. He's talking about transferring the management to his sons but that's apparently not enough legally. He postponed a news conference at which he was going to explain what he was going to do.. I have a hunch that the postponement is because his legal beagles have advised him that his "solution" isn't going to cut it. Going to be interesting. Since when was breaking the law and serving as potus mutually exclusive? I am so looking forward to watching Trump and his family members get themselves into one serious ethical and legal problem after another while they destroy the country and his sleazy cabinet officers and other high officials destroy the agencies they are supposed to run and defend for the commonweal. Wow...an oil baron and buddy buddy of Russia for secretary of state...what could go wrong?The moronic ex governor of Texas as energy czar. What's next, Godzilla as ambassador to Japan? Will those coal miners who voted for Trump get ****ed out of their pensions and health benefits by the Republicans and Trump? We're happy to see you're looking forward to Trump destroying the country in which you live. Yeah, that's so weird. Why would you want your own country "destroyed"? I haven't been happy with some of the choices for potus in the past, but I never looked forward to them doing harm to my country. In fact, I I hoped they would do well and cause the least harm possible. It's just another sign that the old boy has lost it. *My* country wouldn't elect a racist, xeonophobic, woman-hating, asshole like Trump who makes fun of the handicapped. But *your* country did. We're on the eve of national destruction. It'll be fun to watch Trump the Destroyer. So when are you forfeiting your U.S. citizenship for the Antarctic? |
Russian hacking?
On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 22:05:49 -0500 (EST), justan wrote:
When does an assessment become fact? When evidence is presented. |
Russian hacking?
On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 07:09:47 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote: On 12/16/16 11:49 PM, wrote: On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 18:00:07 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: Is this the same corrupt FBI that you were bitching about a month ago? Again, when is reporting the truth disruptive to anyone but the liar? Perhaps the DNC's lies and dirty dealing was disrupted but those dirty tricks were the act that tried to influence the election. I haven't read where everything the FBI, CIA and other intelligence gathering agencies has been revealed. Apparently you have in the double secret stuff Kellyanne Conway must be sending you, eh? WTF are you talking about? We were discussing the allegation that the russians leaked actual emails the DNC was sending back and forth. When is telling the truth about back room dealing a bad thing, no matter who does it? As I have said many times, If the Washington Post was behind this, they would want a Pulitzer. |
Russian hacking?
On 12/17/16 10:58 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 07:09:47 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 12/16/16 11:49 PM, wrote: On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 18:00:07 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: Is this the same corrupt FBI that you were bitching about a month ago? Again, when is reporting the truth disruptive to anyone but the liar? Perhaps the DNC's lies and dirty dealing was disrupted but those dirty tricks were the act that tried to influence the election. I haven't read where everything the FBI, CIA and other intelligence gathering agencies has been revealed. Apparently you have in the double secret stuff Kellyanne Conway must be sending you, eh? WTF are you talking about? We were discussing the allegation that the russians leaked actual emails the DNC was sending back and forth. When is telling the truth about back room dealing a bad thing, no matter who does it? As I have said many times, If the Washington Post was behind this, they would want a Pulitzer. Oh. You think just emails were involved. I get it. |
Russian hacking?
On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 10:58:10 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote: Most of the voters preferred Clinton. About 3,000,000 more. Unfortunately, we are saddled with an Electoral College system that is still a payback for the founders allowing slavery to exist. Even Biden admits, Hillary lost the election because she did not connect with anyone outside of the big cities. The EC exists so those people have a voice. Otherwise we would still be in the olde english feudal system where the people in the castle control all of the serfs outside. It had little to do with slavery. Just like today, the rest of the country did not want to be ruled by New York and Boston. |
Russian hacking?
On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 11:03:38 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote: On 12/17/16 10:58 AM, wrote: On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 07:09:47 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 12/16/16 11:49 PM, wrote: On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 18:00:07 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: Is this the same corrupt FBI that you were bitching about a month ago? Again, when is reporting the truth disruptive to anyone but the liar? Perhaps the DNC's lies and dirty dealing was disrupted but those dirty tricks were the act that tried to influence the election. I haven't read where everything the FBI, CIA and other intelligence gathering agencies has been revealed. Apparently you have in the double secret stuff Kellyanne Conway must be sending you, eh? WTF are you talking about? We were discussing the allegation that the russians leaked actual emails the DNC was sending back and forth. When is telling the truth about back room dealing a bad thing, no matter who does it? As I have said many times, If the Washington Post was behind this, they would want a Pulitzer. Oh. You think just emails were involved. I get it. What do you think was involved? It certainly was not any advanced spycraft or anything. They got into an unprotected server and read some Email. This is not Stuxnet. There are 15 year olds who can do what is alleged here. If it was a state actor, they would be sophisticated enough to leave footprints pointing somewhere else. Your buddy Netanyahu has far more to gain from Trump winning than Putin. |
Russian hacking?
On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 11:26:06 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote: You notice the words "big-time shootin war" and "your...kids...becoming draft-eligible..."? Try again. All kids are "draft eligible" and have been since the founding of the country. It is just a lack of need that prevents them from going. If you don't think Afghanistan and Iraq are shootin wars, I doubt we will ever have one again. Any war with a super power will go nuclear long before any native soil on either side is threatened. That is why that Princeton guy is so worried about us saber rattling the russians, while NATO is putting an unprecedented number of troops on their western border. It isn't really unprecedented. Hitler did it right before Operation Barbarosa. If that blows up, we will all be nuked long before any draftees get to boot camp. |
Russian hacking?
9:58 AMKeyser Soze
- show quoted text - Most of the voters preferred Clinton. About 3,000,000 more. Unfortunately, we are saddled with an Electoral College system that is still a payback for the founders allowing slavery to exist. ...... You wouldn't think so lowly if the EC if if the candidates were reversed, would you Harry? |
Russian hacking?
On 12/17/2016 11:03 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/17/16 10:58 AM, wrote: On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 07:09:47 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 12/16/16 11:49 PM, wrote: On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 18:00:07 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: Is this the same corrupt FBI that you were bitching about a month ago? Again, when is reporting the truth disruptive to anyone but the liar? Perhaps the DNC's lies and dirty dealing was disrupted but those dirty tricks were the act that tried to influence the election. I haven't read where everything the FBI, CIA and other intelligence gathering agencies has been revealed. Apparently you have in the double secret stuff Kellyanne Conway must be sending you, eh? WTF are you talking about? We were discussing the allegation that the russians leaked actual emails the DNC was sending back and forth. When is telling the truth about back room dealing a bad thing, no matter who does it? As I have said many times, If the Washington Post was behind this, they would want a Pulitzer. Oh. You think just emails were involved. I get it. What else was there Harry? Did the Russians hack into the vote counting machines? |
Russian hacking?
On 12/17/16 3:18 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/17/2016 11:03 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 12/17/16 10:58 AM, wrote: On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 07:09:47 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: On 12/16/16 11:49 PM, wrote: On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 18:00:07 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: Is this the same corrupt FBI that you were bitching about a month ago? Again, when is reporting the truth disruptive to anyone but the liar? Perhaps the DNC's lies and dirty dealing was disrupted but those dirty tricks were the act that tried to influence the election. I haven't read where everything the FBI, CIA and other intelligence gathering agencies has been revealed. Apparently you have in the double secret stuff Kellyanne Conway must be sending you, eh? WTF are you talking about? We were discussing the allegation that the russians leaked actual emails the DNC was sending back and forth. When is telling the truth about back room dealing a bad thing, no matter who does it? As I have said many times, If the Washington Post was behind this, they would want a Pulitzer. Oh. You think just emails were involved. I get it. What else was there Harry? Did the Russians hack into the vote counting machines? Gee, I don't know. Do you? |
Russian hacking?
On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 21:21:39 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote: Heheheheh. Naivete at its pinnacle. There are ways to "hack" without an internet connection and there is all kinds of non-voting interference that is possible. How about deleting registrations...oh, wait, your party does that without the help of the Russians. I am still waiting for the example of any if this that was not following the law. If someone registered so they could vote for Carter and never showed up at the polls or re registered since, they should delete the registration. It cuts down on the "dead" vote but I understand that is a major democrat voter base. |
Russian hacking?
|
Russian hacking?
On Sun, 18 Dec 2016 08:32:24 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote: On 12/18/16 1:14 AM, wrote: On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 21:21:39 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: Heheheheh. Naivete at its pinnacle. There are ways to "hack" without an internet connection and there is all kinds of non-voting interference that is possible. How about deleting registrations...oh, wait, your party does that without the help of the Russians. I am still waiting for the example of any if this that was not following the law. If someone registered so they could vote for Carter and never showed up at the polls or re registered since, they should delete the registration. It cuts down on the "dead" vote but I understand that is a major democrat voter base. Following the law...oh, yeah, when the Republicans in the governor's chair and the legislature pass laws to make it harder for legitimate voters to register or vote. Here's another example of Republicans interfering with the will of the voters...the shenanigans the outgoing governor and legislature in North Carolina just went through to negate the impact of the election that turned out the governor, the gay-hating governor who is now going to work for Trumplethinskin. Nice bit of hyperbole but it is certainly not true in my state. |
Russian hacking?
|
Russian hacking?
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/18/16 1:14 AM, wrote: On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 21:21:39 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: Heheheheh. Naivete at its pinnacle. There are ways to "hack" without an internet connection and there is all kinds of non-voting interference that is possible. How about deleting registrations...oh, wait, your party does that without the help of the Russians. I am still waiting for the example of any if this that was not following the law. If someone registered so they could vote for Carter and never showed up at the polls or re registered since, they should delete the registration. It cuts down on the "dead" vote but I understand that is a major democrat voter base. Following the law...oh, yeah, when the Republicans in the governor's chair and the legislature pass laws to make it harder for legitimate voters to register or vote. Here's another example of Republicans interfering with the will of the voters...the shenanigans the outgoing governor and legislature in North Carolina just went through to negate the impact of the election that turned out the governor, the gay-hating governor who is now going to work for Trumplethinskin. What is wrong on deleting a non voter. If you do not vote in the General Election in California you get dropped from the voter registration. |
Russian hacking?
On Sun, 18 Dec 2016 11:04:03 -0600, Califbill
wrote: Keyser Soze wrote: On 12/18/16 1:14 AM, wrote: On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 21:21:39 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: Heheheheh. Naivete at its pinnacle. There are ways to "hack" without an internet connection and there is all kinds of non-voting interference that is possible. How about deleting registrations...oh, wait, your party does that without the help of the Russians. I am still waiting for the example of any if this that was not following the law. If someone registered so they could vote for Carter and never showed up at the polls or re registered since, they should delete the registration. It cuts down on the "dead" vote but I understand that is a major democrat voter base. Following the law...oh, yeah, when the Republicans in the governor's chair and the legislature pass laws to make it harder for legitimate voters to register or vote. Here's another example of Republicans interfering with the will of the voters...the shenanigans the outgoing governor and legislature in North Carolina just went through to negate the impact of the election that turned out the governor, the gay-hating governor who is now going to work for Trumplethinskin. What is wrong on deleting a non voter. If you do not vote in the General Election in California you get dropped from the voter registration. In Florida you have to stay away from the polls for something like 6 years and ignore the mailed warnings. Any response at all will automatically renew you. I could still vote my mother's ballot if I wanted to be a crook but I threw away the renewal warning. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:06 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com