![]() |
Motorcycle headlight
On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 16:10:56 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:
And that electoral college imbalance is a consequence of placating the Southern states when the union was being formed in order to help those states out with their slavery problem. === It wasn't just the southern states that needed placating. It was all states outside of the big city northeast corridor. Like it or not, the electoral college is functioning exactly as it was intended. It's really difficult to dispute the wisdom of the founding fathers. |
Motorcycle headlight
On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 16:10:56 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/7/16 3:59 PM, Tim wrote: 2:48 PMKeyser Soze - show quoted text - You righties are always "so sure" about everything. ... And you "leftists" knew that Hillary was a shoe-in for the whitehouse. Yeah yeah For sure, we underestimated the amount of minority voter suppression Repub governors would be able to inflict in their states. Still at the moment, Hillary leads the popular vote by nearly 2.7 million. Here's an interesting stat: Electoral College Math The population of California is about 38,800,000. The population of Wyoming is about 584,153. California has 55 electoral college votes. Wyoming has 3 electoral college votes. It takes 705,454 Californians to equal 1 electoral college vote. It takes 194,717 Wyomingites to equal 1 electoral college vote. That makes every vote in Wyoming worth 362% what each vote from California is worth in the election for President of the United States. As it should be. |
Motorcycle headlight
On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 4:27:55 PM UTC-6, wrote:
On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 12:59:27 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: 2:48 PMKeyser Soze - show quoted text - You righties are always "so sure" about everything. ... And you "leftists" knew that Hillary was a shoe-in for the whitehouse. Yeah yeah === And they hoped that Trump would get the (R) nomination because they *knew* that he'd be easy to beat. yep https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHG0ezLiVGc |
Motorcycle headlight
On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 3:10:59 PM UTC-6, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/7/16 3:59 PM, Tim wrote: 2:48 PMKeyser Soze - show quoted text - You righties are always "so sure" about everything. ... And you "leftists" knew that Hillary was a shoe-in for the whitehouse. Yeah yeah For sure, we underestimated the amount of minority voter suppression Repub governors would be able to inflict in their states. Still at the moment, Hillary leads the popular vote by nearly 2.7 million. Here's an interesting stat: Electoral College Math The population of California is about 38,800,000. The population of Wyoming is about 584,153. California has 55 electoral college votes. Wyoming has 3 electoral college votes. It takes 705,454 Californians to equal 1 electoral college vote. It takes 194,717 Wyomingites to equal 1 electoral college vote. That makes every vote in Wyoming worth 362% what each vote from California is worth in the election for President of the United States. And that electoral college imbalance is a consequence of placating the Southern states when the union was being formed in order to help those states out with their slavery problem. I doubt Trump will last long in the presidency. Probably a lot longer than you'd like or hope. BTW, here's one of your election math links you didn't feel was worth providing... https://onsizzle.com/i/electoral-col...00-the-4175736 |
Motorcycle headlight
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/7/16 3:59 PM, Tim wrote: 2:48 PMKeyser Soze - show quoted text - You righties are always "so sure" about everything. ... And you "leftists" knew that Hillary was a shoe-in for the whitehouse. Yeah yeah For sure, we underestimated the amount of minority voter suppression Repub governors would be able to inflict in their states. Still at the moment, Hillary leads the popular vote by nearly 2.7 million. Here's an interesting stat: Electoral College Math The population of California is about 38,800,000. The population of Wyoming is about 584,153. California has 55 electoral college votes. Wyoming has 3 electoral college votes. It takes 705,454 Californians to equal 1 electoral college vote. It takes 194,717 Wyomingites to equal 1 electoral college vote. That makes every vote in Wyoming worth 362% what each vote from California is worth in the election for President of the United States. And that electoral college imbalance is a consequence of placating the Southern states when the union was being formed in order to help those states out with their slavery problem. I doubt Trump will last long in the presidency. Yup, is it not great how the founding fathers made even the small states count. The EC did not come from slavery, came from having the states select the POTUS, and the small,states made sure they had a say. The EC had no input from the individual voters for years. Was and is up to the states how they chose their voters. |
Motorcycle headlight
Tim wrote:
On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 3:10:59 PM UTC-6, Keyser Soze wrote: On 12/7/16 3:59 PM, Tim wrote: 2:48 PMKeyser Soze - show quoted text - You righties are always "so sure" about everything. ... And you "leftists" knew that Hillary was a shoe-in for the whitehouse. Yeah yeah For sure, we underestimated the amount of minority voter suppression Repub governors would be able to inflict in their states. Still at the moment, Hillary leads the popular vote by nearly 2.7 million. Here's an interesting stat: Electoral College Math The population of California is about 38,800,000. The population of Wyoming is about 584,153. California has 55 electoral college votes. Wyoming has 3 electoral college votes. It takes 705,454 Californians to equal 1 electoral college vote. It takes 194,717 Wyomingites to equal 1 electoral college vote. That makes every vote in Wyoming worth 362% what each vote from California is worth in the election for President of the United States. And that electoral college imbalance is a consequence of placating the Southern states when the union was being formed in order to help those states out with their slavery problem. I doubt Trump will last long in the presidency. Probably a lot longer than you'd like or hope. BTW, here's one of your election math links you didn't feel was worth providing... https://onsizzle.com/i/electoral-col...00-the-4175736 And over half of California geographically voted for Trump, and have no representation in. Our EC votes. |
Motorcycle headlight
On 12/7/2016 4:10 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/7/16 3:59 PM, Tim wrote: 2:48 PMKeyser Soze - show quoted text - You righties are always "so sure" about everything. ... And you "leftists" knew that Hillary was a shoe-in for the whitehouse. Yeah yeah For sure, we underestimated the amount of minority voter suppression Repub governors would be able to inflict in their states. Still at the moment, Hillary leads the popular vote by nearly 2.7 million. Here's an interesting stat: Electoral College Math The population of California is about 38,800,000. The population of Wyoming is about 584,153. California has 55 electoral college votes. Wyoming has 3 electoral college votes. It takes 705,454 Californians to equal 1 electoral college vote. It takes 194,717 Wyomingites to equal 1 electoral college vote. That makes every vote in Wyoming worth 362% what each vote from California is worth in the election for President of the United States. And that electoral college imbalance is a consequence of placating the Southern states when the union was being formed in order to help those states out with their slavery problem. I doubt Trump will last long in the presidency. Oh, stop your whining Harry. Nancy "No Change" Pelosi has your back. |
Motorcycle headlight
On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 15:48:57 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:
I've done 120 mph on my motorcycle, once, and that was enough for me. It doesn't mean anything unless you were standing on the seat, with one foot sticking out behind you. ;-) |
Motorcycle headlight
|
Motorcycle headlight
On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 4:27:55 PM UTC-6, wrote:
On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 12:59:27 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: 2:48 PMKeyser Soze - show quoted text - You righties are always "so sure" about everything. ... And you "leftists" knew that Hillary was a shoe-in for the whitehouse. Yeah yeah === And they hoped that Trump would get the (R) nomination because they *knew* that he'd be easy to beat. Didn't Krause the Simpleton urge others to vote for Trump thinking that Madame Clinton would win my a sound and sweeping victory? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:02 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com