Talking about unemployment numbers
 

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-1...me-jobs-tumble

It turns out a lot of those "new jobs created" are just part time gigs
that people need to supplement the part time job they have.
Basically they get 2 or 3 jobs for the price of one. (and no benefits)

Anyone who thinks the government is not cooking the books on
unemployment is simply not looking.

Talking about unemployment numbers
 

On 11/4/16 11:56 AM, wrote:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-1...me-jobs-tumble

It turns out a lot of those "new jobs created" are just part time gigs
that people need to supplement the part time job they have.
Basically they get 2 or 3 jobs for the price of one. (and no benefits)

Anyone who thinks the government is not cooking the books on
unemployment is simply not looking.



The "comments" section on your cited page URL say more about you and
your sources of info than the info says. :)

Talking about unemployment numbers
 

On Friday, November 4, 2016 at 12:18:37 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 11/4/16 11:56 AM, wrote:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-1...me-jobs-tumble

It turns out a lot of those "new jobs created" are just part time gigs
that people need to supplement the part time job they have.
Basically they get 2 or 3 jobs for the price of one. (and no benefits)

Anyone who thinks the government is not cooking the books on
unemployment is simply not looking.



The "comments" section on your cited page URL say more about you and
your sources of info than the info says. :)

You've obviously never read the comments section of The Slate. :)

Talking about unemployment numbers
 

On Fri, 4 Nov 2016 12:18:34 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 11/4/16 11:56 AM, wrote:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-1...me-jobs-tumble

It turns out a lot of those "new jobs created" are just part time gigs
that people need to supplement the part time job they have.
Basically they get 2 or 3 jobs for the price of one. (and no benefits)

Anyone who thinks the government is not cooking the books on
unemployment is simply not looking.



The "comments" section on your cited page URL say more about you and
your sources of info than the info says. :)

Attack the messenger. Typical of people who deny the numbers.
Bernie said the same sort of thing last spring and Hillary attacked
him too.
Do I need to go get them from the BLM?