On Mon, 31 Oct 2016 20:14:26 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 10/31/16 5:15 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2016 14:27:47 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 14:25:08 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 10/30/16 12:55 PM, wrote:
A lot is being made of the Comey announcement and the left says it is
unprecedented but that is just not true. In 1992, when Bill was
running against HW, they dropped a bomb about Iran Contra (an
additional indictment on Weinberger) right before the election and
Bill pounced on it.
The ironic thing is shortly after the election, the indictment was
tossed because the statute of limitations had run out.
This may have just been a democrat 102d congress (both houses) running
amok.



An indictment is a bit more than announcing you might have some emails
you might not have seen before, and you don't know who sent them and who
got them.


Still can't excuse receiving a congressional summons to surrender *all*
emails and destroying them instead. Obstruction of justice is a crime.

Still can't excuse giving false testimony to congress. Perjury is a crime.

Still can't believe the number of people willing to give her a pass.


There will be a perjury trap like the one the congress set for her
husband and she will be faced with the option of admitting she lied
before or that she is lying now.
Once the media smells blood in the water they will be scrambling to
get a presidential scalp on their belt. It is not because they are not
democrats, they will just want to be Wood/Stein. It is what they do.


Speculating again, eh?

It is based on past performance and these guys have not had an
original idea for 25 years.
The media scalp hunting has been going on for more like 45 years.
As much as CNN likes Hillary and hates Trump, they are all over this
story. I am not really watching but it was all mailgate all the time
the few minutes I saw today. I was outside most of the day tho. I
mowed, did a router trick for my neighbor and visited with Henk from
the Netherlands.
They think we are nuts over there. They don't think much of Hillary
and they hate Trump. The attitude seems to be "350 million people and
this is the best you can do"?
I brought up Brexit and Henk said the world is going mad ... although
there is a pretty strong "leave" sentiment in the Netherlands too.

In article ,
says...

On 10/31/2016 6:01 PM, wrote:


I understand the Senate is a high hurdle to clear but if there is a
real smoking gun. they will have to do it. The reality is Hillary will
just be wounded and end up being more of a republican than she is now
... just like her hubby was.
If there is enough coming out the senate could really go south on them
and she might actually be in trouble tho.



I think Hillary will be elected but within 2 years will be impeached and
will probably resign. Charges will be obstruction of justice, perjury
and improper handling of classified documents. Bill may join her in an
adjoining cell in Levenworth.

What a couple of GOP cheerleaders you two are. HRC won't be impeached or
charged with anything. Why? She has done nothing illegal.
After 25 of going after her, you GOP muckrakers haven't learned anything.
OTOH, she's got your number.
Bet you watch that "Finding Bigfoot" stuff on the Discovery Channel.
Or is it "Ancient Aliens?"

On Tue, 1 Nov 2016 09:39:52 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

Oh, I don't give a **** about the emails or the server. Never did. Big
yawn.

I know you don't. You think a fine upstanding democrat should be able
to leverage her position as SoS into a few hundred million bucks in
bribes.
That is the shoe that hasn't dropped. Are there Emails implicating her
and Bill in pay to play? Comey has been silent on that because nobody
has asked him to look.
If Comey finds out she was sending classified info to Abedin (and
Wiener) through Yahoo, simply because she was to stupid to be able to
print from a blackberry, this may get interesting sooner.

On Tue, 1 Nov 2016 09:25:23 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

HRC won't be impeached

I bet she will be. Whether it sticks in the senate will be the only
open question.

On 11/1/2016 10:25 AM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 10/31/2016 6:01 PM, wrote:


I understand the Senate is a high hurdle to clear but if there is a
real smoking gun. they will have to do it. The reality is Hillary will
just be wounded and end up being more of a republican than she is now
... just like her hubby was.
If there is enough coming out the senate could really go south on them
and she might actually be in trouble tho.



I think Hillary will be elected but within 2 years will be impeached and
will probably resign. Charges will be obstruction of justice, perjury
and improper handling of classified documents. Bill may join her in an
adjoining cell in Levenworth.

What a couple of GOP cheerleaders you two are. HRC won't be impeached or
charged with anything. Why? She has done nothing illegal.
After 25 of going after her, you GOP muckrakers haven't learned anything.
OTOH, she's got your number.
Bet you watch that "Finding Bigfoot" stuff on the Discovery Channel.
Or is it "Ancient Aliens?"



We shall see what the future holds. Many are too blind to see.

On Tue, 1 Nov 2016 13:05:45 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 11/1/2016 10:25 AM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 10/31/2016 6:01 PM, wrote:


I understand the Senate is a high hurdle to clear but if there is a
real smoking gun. they will have to do it. The reality is Hillary will
just be wounded and end up being more of a republican than she is now
... just like her hubby was.
If there is enough coming out the senate could really go south on them
and she might actually be in trouble tho.



I think Hillary will be elected but within 2 years will be impeached and
will probably resign. Charges will be obstruction of justice, perjury
and improper handling of classified documents. Bill may join her in an
adjoining cell in Levenworth.

What a couple of GOP cheerleaders you two are. HRC won't be impeached or
charged with anything. Why? She has done nothing illegal.
After 25 of going after her, you GOP muckrakers haven't learned anything.
OTOH, she's got your number.
Bet you watch that "Finding Bigfoot" stuff on the Discovery Channel.
Or is it "Ancient Aliens?"



We shall see what the future holds. Many are too blind to see.

Four years of investigations and gridlock are certain, no matter which
of them wins. When you have the two most unpopular candidates in the
history of the republic running (combined 81% unfavorable rating),
even most of the people who voted for the winner will not be a raving
fan.
That spells volatility and that is not good for the economy
There may some lucrative trades out there to be had but the market as
a whole is going to go down is my guess. That is going to be tough on
401ks.

On 11/1/16 10:27 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 1 Nov 2016 09:39:52 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

Oh, I don't give a **** about the emails or the server. Never did. Big
yawn.

I know you don't. You think a fine upstanding democrat should be able
to leverage her position as SoS into a few hundred million bucks in
bribes.


You're doing it again.

On Tue, 1 Nov 2016 15:21:03 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

I know you don't. You think a fine upstanding democrat should be able
to leverage her position as SoS into a few hundred million bucks in
bribes.


You're doing it again.

I absolutely have questions and until I hear a better answers I will
continue to connect 6 figure payments to the Clintons to subsequent
favors from Stat. I will continue to ask "why isn't this "pay to
play"?
The classified info thing is still an issue but in a government as
leaky as ours, it is not a big thing beyond demonstrating how
"sloppy", "extremely careless" and "negligent" Hillary is with that
information.

On 11/1/16 3:53 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 1 Nov 2016 15:21:03 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

I know you don't. You think a fine upstanding democrat should be able
to leverage her position as SoS into a few hundred million bucks in
bribes.


You're doing it again.

I absolutely have questions and until I hear a better answers I will
continue to connect 6 figure payments to the Clintons to subsequent
favors from Stat. I will continue to ask "why isn't this "pay to
play"?
The classified info thing is still an issue but in a government as
leaky as ours, it is not a big thing beyond demonstrating how
"sloppy", "extremely careless" and "negligent" Hillary is with that
information.



My comment was about the "You think...." comment of yours. You don't
know what I think.

9:59 AMKeyser Soze
- show quoted text -
I haven't "believed" the FBI since the 1960s, and I wouldn't have
believed it before then if I had been aware of how corrupt Hoover was.
.....

Hoover was corrupt and gave the FBI a proverbial black eye.

But though Hillary is corrupt you give her a pass?