Michael Moore
 

On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 16:04:44 -0400, Poquito Loco
wrote:

The food's not 'free', but is
included in the tab, which surely isn't cheap

Sorry I have been listening to Harry and BAO too long ;-)

Michael Moore
 

Poquito Loco
- show quoted text -
"What's with the 'Justine' instead of justan? Is feminizing a name supposed to be a form of ridicule? If so, I'm wondering what you have against females that makes the use of that gender a form of ridicule?

You seem to have gotten away, finally, from using homosexual terminology as a form of ridicule, but now you're using gender.

Why?"



Well well, Johnny. Y'all never pass up an opportunity to instigate, agitate or irritate.
Y'all are quite the control freak. Don't trouble your addled noggin, when Justine acts like one of you turds, I'll refer to him as such but when he's just being a drama queen.....I'll call him Justine. He deserves to be rewarded for acting slightly more sociable.

Michael Moore
 

On 9/26/16 6:31 PM, True North wrote:
Poquito Loco
- show quoted text -
"What's with the 'Justine' instead of justan? Is feminizing a name supposed to be a form of ridicule? If so, I'm wondering what you have against females that makes the use of that gender a form of ridicule?

You seem to have gotten away, finally, from using homosexual terminology as a form of ridicule, but now you're using gender.

Why?"



Well well, Johnny. Y'all never pass up an opportunity to instigate, agitate or irritate.
Y'all are quite the control freak. Don't trouble your addled noggin, when Justine acts like one of you turds, I'll refer to him as such but when he's just being a drama queen.....I'll call him Justine. He deserves to be rewarded for acting slightly more sociable.



I put Johnny the Racist in the TDC category, and simply skip over and
don't read his posts. They are Totally Devoid of Content. I do see an
occasional post of his when he is (rarely) requoted, but thankfully, not
many. You've certainly got his number, in that he *never* passes an
opportunity to "instigate, agitate, or irritate."

Michael Moore
 

On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 15:31:42 -0700 (PDT), True North wrote:

Poquito Loco
- show quoted text -
"What's with the 'Justine' instead of justan? Is feminizing a name supposed to be a form of ridicule? If so, I'm wondering what you have against females that makes the use of that gender a form of ridicule?

You seem to have gotten away, finally, from using homosexual terminology as a form of ridicule, but now you're using gender.

Why?"



Well well, Johnny. Y'all never pass up an opportunity to instigate, agitate or irritate.
Y'all are quite the control freak. Don't trouble your addled noggin, when Justine acts like one of you turds, I'll refer to him as such but when he's just being a drama queen.....I'll call him Justine. He deserves to be rewarded for acting slightly more sociable.

So why do you consider feminizing a name to be a put down? Little gender bias there, Don?

Michael Moore
 

On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 18:36:36 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 9/26/16 6:31 PM, True North wrote:
Poquito Loco
- show quoted text -
"What's with the 'Justine' instead of justan? Is feminizing a name supposed to be a form of ridicule? If so, I'm wondering what you have against females that makes the use of that gender a form of ridicule?

You seem to have gotten away, finally, from using homosexual terminology as a form of ridicule, but now you're using gender.

Why?"



Well well, Johnny. Y'all never pass up an opportunity to instigate, agitate or irritate.
Y'all are quite the control freak. Don't trouble your addled noggin, when Justine acts like one of you turds, I'll refer to him as such but when he's just being a drama queen.....I'll call him Justine. He deserves to be rewarded for acting slightly more sociable.



I put Johnny the Racist in the TDC category, and simply skip over and
don't read his posts. They are Totally Devoid of Content. I do see an
occasional post of his when he is (rarely) requoted, but thankfully, not
many. You've certainly got his number, in that he *never* passes an
opportunity to "instigate, agitate, or irritate."

...and besides, he asks some really hard questions which tend to catch me in a bunch of lies.

Eh, Krause?

Michael Moore
 

Keyser Soze wrote:
On 9/24/16 9:02 PM, justan wrote:
Poquito Loco Wrote in message:
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 11:08:59 -0400 (EDT), justan wrote:

Poquito Loco Wrote in message:
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 09:05:04 -0400 (EDT), justan wrote:

Poquito Loco Wrote in message:
On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 21:35:18 -0400, Alex wrote:

What a douche...

http://www.wideopenspaces.com/green-...rm=Upland/Bird


Great!

Great line - "...nothing more than a mouth breathing, Crisco
sweating waste of space", reminded me
of Krause.

The old Krause or the new Krause?

There's a difference?


Sure. Here's just one example. The old Harry was a
"sportfisherman", meaning he too great pleasure in winching up
fish and turning them loose after darn near killing them. He
didn't even know what sustinence fishing is. The new Harry finds
the concept of sportfishinh deplorable. Here's another example.
The old Harry would burn away boat fuel like it was water and his
justification was he needed to get to the fishing grounds as fast
as possible so he could rip the faces off as many fish as
possible. The new Harry has a twin screw boat in order to burn as
much fuel as possible driving around in circles for no apparent
reason. I wonder if he still keeps the head locked up to keep the
little lady from using it?

You forgot a key word.

'The new Harry *says* he has a twin screw boat...'


I almost wish we hadn't caused Harry to be scared to post about
his boats. Some of his posts were hilarious.


Scared? Of what? The rancorous bozos in rec.bloats? This group is not
the place for boating discussions.

It's certainly not the place for boating lies. You can take that to
another group if there are any left that will have you.

Michael Moore
 

Keyser Soze wrote:
On 9/25/16 4:37 PM, justan wrote:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 9/25/16 11:39 AM, justan wrote:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 9/25/16 4:28 AM, justan wrote:
Poquito Loco Wrote in message:
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 08:33:52 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 9/23/16 9:58 PM, Tim wrote:
On Friday, September 23, 2016 at 8:35:30 PM UTC-5, Alex wrote:
What a douche...

http://www.wideopenspaces.com/green-...rm=Upland/Bird

I

IMO, Mike Moore needs some flea powder...



This is an age-old and interesting philosophical argument.
Moore is not
the first guy to voice such an opinion. To many, the personnel
who fly
the drones from the safety of the United States while shooting
missiles
at targets far away overseas are considered cowards, too,
because they
don't face the dangers of close-in combat. There's a movie out
called
"Good Kill" that raises some of these issues.

Not everything in life is as simple as the simple-minded would
like, eh?

I suppose artillerymen are cowards too, or fighter pilots using
air to air missiles? Were all the
bomber pilots and crewmen in WWII cowards in your little mind?

'...nothing more than a mouth breathing, Crisco sweating waste
of space", sure fits you, doesn't it?


Nothing more cowardly than
pressure cooker or ied or suicide
bombers or shooters or draft dodgers with college deferrments.




Now here are two responders who are clueless. I bring up a point
about
an interesting philosopher argument, and the two morons go into
snarky
attack mode.
I didn't say *I* thought snipers or drone pilots were cowardly...

Once again, the rec.boats righties demonstrate that this is no
place for
intelligent discussion.


Is that why you dominate with almost half the postings here.



If I do "dominate," it is because you jackals don't have much of
interest to post, or, when you do post, there aren't many folks willing
to expose themselves to your juvenile comebacks. Good point, though,
eh?


So what are you doing trying to foster non intellectual , non
interesting, non intelligent discussion? Are you retalliating
because we won't tolerate your lies and boasts about what you
think would impress us. You can't seem to tear yourself away from
this place even though we've taken your football
away.


Please. You actually think I give a **** about what the right-wing
crap in here thinks, or thinks passes for thinking? Really? I don't.
There's maybe two or three guys I'd call an ambulance for if I saw you
hit by a car.


That says a lot about you.

Michael Moore
 

Keyser Soze wrote:
On 9/25/16 5:32 PM, justan wrote:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 9/25/16 5:20 PM, justan wrote:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 9/25/16 4:55 PM, justan wrote:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 9/24/16 9:02 PM, justan wrote:
Poquito Loco Wrote in message:
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 11:08:59 -0400 (EDT), justan
wrote:

Poquito Loco Wrote in message:
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 09:05:04 -0400 (EDT), justan
wrote:

Poquito Loco Wrote in message:
On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 21:35:18 -0400, Alex
wrote:

What a douche...

http://www.wideopenspaces.com/green-...rm=Upland/Bird


Great!

Great line - "...nothing more than a mouth breathing,
Crisco sweating waste of space", reminded me
of Krause.

The old Krause or the new Krause?

There's a difference?


Sure. Here's just one example. The old Harry was a
"sportfisherman", meaning he too great pleasure in winching up
fish and turning them loose after darn near killing them. He
didn't even know what sustinence fishing is. The new Harry finds
the concept of sportfishinh deplorable. Here's another example.
The old Harry would burn away boat fuel like it was water and
his
justification was he needed to get to the fishing grounds as
fast
as possible so he could rip the faces off as many fish as
possible. The new Harry has a twin screw boat in order to
burn as
much fuel as possible driving around in circles for no apparent
reason. I wonder if he still keeps the head locked up to keep
the
little lady from using it?

You forgot a key word.

'The new Harry *says* he has a twin screw boat...'


I almost wish we hadn't caused Harry to be scared to post about
his boats. Some of his posts were hilarious.


Scared? Of what? The rancorous bozos in rec.bloats? This group
is not
the place for boating discussions.


You misunderstand. You are scared because
YOU have demonstrated
your lack of knowlege and common sense over and over again and
are embarrassed enough that you are afraid to comment further. We
merely pointed out the flaws in your commentary. We are only
the messenger. No need to fear us.
Hope this helps.:-)



Ha ha ha. This from a guy whose posts about his personal boating
experiences add up to nothing. At best, you are an ignorant asshole.


Don't shoot the messenger. I'm just tellin it like it is.



"Like it is...?" You mean, your almost total lack of posts about your
personal boating experiences?



"Almost total lack". What did I let slip by?


Certainly not intelligence, since I doubt you had any to lose.

That's just dumb and childish.

Michael Moore
 

True North wrote:
Keyser Soze
- hide quoted text -
On 9/25/16 5:32 PM, justan wrote:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 9/25/16 5:20 PM, justan wrote:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 9/25/16 4:55 PM, justan wrote:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 9/24/16 9:02 PM, justan wrote:
Poquito Loco Wrote in message:
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 11:08:59 -0400 (EDT), justan wrote:

Poquito Loco Wrote in message:
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 09:05:04 -0400 (EDT), justan wrote:

Poquito Loco Wrote in message:
On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 21:35:18 -0400, Alex wrote:

What a douche...

http://www.wideopenspaces.com/green-...rm=Upland/Bird
Great!

Great line - "...nothing more than a mouth breathing, Crisco sweating waste of space", reminded me
of Krause.

The old Krause or the new Krause?
There's a difference?

Sure. Here's just one example. The old Harry was a
"sportfisherman", meaning he too great pleasure in winching up
fish and turning them loose after darn near killing them. He
didn't even know what sustinence fishing is. The new Harry finds
the concept of sportfishinh deplorable. Here's another example.
The old Harry would burn away boat fuel like it was water and his
justification was he needed to get to the fishing grounds as fast
as possible so he could rip the faces off as many fish as
possible. The new Harry has a twin screw boat in order to burn as
much fuel as possible driving around in circles for no apparent
reason. I wonder if he still keeps the head locked up to keep the
little lady from using it?
You forgot a key word.

'The new Harry *says* he has a twin screw boat...'

I almost wish we hadn't caused Harry to be scared to post about
his boats. Some of his posts were hilarious.

Scared? Of what? The rancorous bozos in rec.bloats? This group is not
the place for boating discussions.

You misunderstand. You are scared because
YOU have demonstrated
your lack of knowlege and common sense over and over again and
are embarrassed enough that you are afraid to comment further. We
merely pointed out the flaws in your commentary. We are only
the messenger. No need to fear us.
Hope this helps.:-)


Ha ha ha. This from a guy whose posts about his personal boating
experiences add up to nothing. At best, you are an ignorant asshole.

Don't shoot the messenger. I'm just tellin it like it is.


"Like it is...?" You mean, your almost total lack of posts about your
personal boating experiences?


"Almost total lack". What did I let slip by?

"Certainly not intelligence, since I doubt you had any to lose."



SNERK!
That Justine never changes.

And here's the boat salesman's dream to provide what little support he
can muster.

Michael Moore
 

Keyser Soze wrote:
On 9/26/16 1:49 PM, justan wrote:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 9/26/16 8:31 AM, justan wrote:
True North Wrote in message:
Keyser Soze
- hide quoted text -
On 9/25/16 5:32 PM, justan wrote:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 9/25/16 5:20 PM, justan wrote:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 9/25/16 4:55 PM, justan wrote:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 9/24/16 9:02 PM, justan wrote:
Poquito Loco Wrote in message:
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 11:08:59 -0400 (EDT), justan
wrote:

Poquito Loco Wrote in message:
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 09:05:04 -0400 (EDT), justan
wrote:

Poquito Loco Wrote in message:
On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 21:35:18 -0400, Alex
wrote:

What a douche...

http://www.wideopenspaces.com/green-...rm=Upland/Bird


Great!

Great line - "...nothing more than a mouth breathing,
Crisco sweating waste of space", reminded me
of Krause.

The old Krause or the new Krause?

There's a difference?


Sure. Here's just one example. The old Harry was a
"sportfisherman", meaning he too great pleasure in
winching up
fish and turning them loose after darn near killing them. He
didn't even know what sustinence fishing is. The new
Harry finds
the concept of sportfishinh deplorable. Here's another
example.
The old Harry would burn away boat fuel like it was water
and his
justification was he needed to get to the fishing grounds
as fast
as possible so he could rip the faces off as many fish as
possible. The new Harry has a twin screw boat in order to
burn as
much fuel as possible driving around in circles for no
apparent
reason. I wonder if he still keeps the head locked up to
keep the
little lady from using it?

You forgot a key word.

'The new Harry *says* he has a twin screw boat...'


I almost wish we hadn't caused Harry to be scared to post
about
his boats. Some of his posts were hilarious.


Scared? Of what? The rancorous bozos in rec.bloats? This
group is not
the place for boating discussions.


You misunderstand. You are scared because
YOU have demonstrated
your lack of knowlege and common sense over and over again and
are embarrassed enough that you are afraid to comment
further. We
merely pointed out the flaws in your commentary. We are only
the messenger. No need to fear us.
Hope this helps.:-)



Ha ha ha. This from a guy whose posts about his personal boating
experiences add up to nothing. At best, you are an ignorant
asshole.


Don't shoot the messenger. I'm just tellin it like it is.



"Like it is...?" You mean, your almost total lack of posts about
your
personal boating experiences?



"Almost total lack". What did I let slip by?


"Certainly not intelligence, since I doubt you had any to lose."



SNERK!
That Justine never changes.


Why thank you Donnine, but I do get handsomer and wiser as I age.
Harry is just bitter because he's getting his clock
cleaned.


You couldn't clean your feet without help.


After surgery, yes. But I'm almost as good as new now.
Thanks for
asking.
Going to the food and wine festival xmorrow. What's your favorite
Disney cullinary delight. Gonna get a Cuban at Emilio's place
this afternoon. What are you up to?


Getting everything set for the "Debate Party" tonight...food, drink,
extra chairs, et cetera.
My favorite Disney culinary delight...probably the chocolate covered
vanilla ice cream pops in the shape of Mickey's head and ears.
Disney's food is decent, but I wouldn't describe it as "culinary
delight."

Chairs plural? How many owls are attending?

Michael Moore
 

True North wrote:
Poquito Loco
- show quoted text -
"What's with the 'Justine' instead of justan? Is feminizing a name supposed to be a form of ridicule? If so, I'm wondering what you have against females that makes the use of that gender a form of ridicule?

You seem to have gotten away, finally, from using homosexual terminology as a form of ridicule, but now you're using gender.

Why?"



Well well, Johnny. Y'all never pass up an opportunity to instigate, agitate or irritate.
Y'all are quite the control freak. Don't trouble your addled noggin, when Justine acts like one of you turds, I'll refer to him as such but when he's just being a drama queen.....I'll call him Justine. He deserves to be rewarded for acting slightly more sociable.

Y'all never pass up an opportunity to instigate, agitate or irritate, eh?

Michael Moore
 

Poquito Loco Wrote in message:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 18:36:36 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 9/26/16 6:31 PM, True North wrote:
Poquito Loco
- show quoted text -
"What's with the 'Justine' instead of justan? Is feminizing a name supposed to be a form of ridicule? If so, I'm wondering what you have against females that makes the use of that gender a form of ridicule?

You seem to have gotten away, finally, from using homosexual terminology as a form of ridicule, but now you're using gender.

Why?"



Well well, Johnny. Y'all never pass up an opportunity to instigate, agitate or irritate.
Y'all are quite the control freak. Don't trouble your addled noggin, when Justine acts like one of you turds, I'll refer to him as such but when he's just being a drama queen.....I'll call him Justine. He deserves to be rewarded for acting slightly more sociable.



I put Johnny the Racist in the TDC category, and simply skip over and
don't read his posts. They are Totally Devoid of Content. I do see an
occasional post of his when he is (rarely) requoted, but thankfully, not
many. You've certainly got his number, in that he *never* passes an
opportunity to "instigate, agitate, or irritate."

...and besides, he asks some really hard questions which tend to catch me in a bunch of lies.

Eh, Krause?


Krause has an arsenal of juvenile insults that he uses when he's
intellectually over powered. That's the debate strategy taught by
the klown college he attended in Kansas.
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

Michael Moore
 

On 9/26/16 7:41 PM, Alex wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 9/26/16 1:49 PM, justan wrote:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 9/26/16 8:31 AM, justan wrote:
True North Wrote in message:
Keyser Soze
- hide quoted text -
On 9/25/16 5:32 PM, justan wrote:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 9/25/16 5:20 PM, justan wrote:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 9/25/16 4:55 PM, justan wrote:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 9/24/16 9:02 PM, justan wrote:
Poquito Loco Wrote in message:
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 11:08:59 -0400 (EDT), justan
wrote:

Poquito Loco Wrote in message:
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 09:05:04 -0400 (EDT), justan
wrote:

Poquito Loco Wrote in message:
On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 21:35:18 -0400, Alex
wrote:

What a douche...

http://www.wideopenspaces.com/green-...rm=Upland/Bird


Great!

Great line - "...nothing more than a mouth breathing,
Crisco sweating waste of space", reminded me
of Krause.

The old Krause or the new Krause?

There's a difference?


Sure. Here's just one example. The old Harry was a
"sportfisherman", meaning he too great pleasure in
winching up
fish and turning them loose after darn near killing them. He
didn't even know what sustinence fishing is. The new
Harry finds
the concept of sportfishinh deplorable. Here's another
example.
The old Harry would burn away boat fuel like it was water
and his
justification was he needed to get to the fishing grounds
as fast
as possible so he could rip the faces off as many fish as
possible. The new Harry has a twin screw boat in order to
burn as
much fuel as possible driving around in circles for no
apparent
reason. I wonder if he still keeps the head locked up to
keep the
little lady from using it?

You forgot a key word.

'The new Harry *says* he has a twin screw boat...'


I almost wish we hadn't caused Harry to be scared to post
about
his boats. Some of his posts were hilarious.


Scared? Of what? The rancorous bozos in rec.bloats? This
group is not
the place for boating discussions.


You misunderstand. You are scared because
YOU have demonstrated
your lack of knowlege and common sense over and over again and
are embarrassed enough that you are afraid to comment
further. We
merely pointed out the flaws in your commentary. We are only
the messenger. No need to fear us.
Hope this helps.:-)



Ha ha ha. This from a guy whose posts about his personal boating
experiences add up to nothing. At best, you are an ignorant
asshole.


Don't shoot the messenger. I'm just tellin it like it is.



"Like it is...?" You mean, your almost total lack of posts about
your
personal boating experiences?



"Almost total lack". What did I let slip by?


"Certainly not intelligence, since I doubt you had any to lose."



SNERK!
That Justine never changes.


Why thank you Donnine, but I do get handsomer and wiser as I age.
Harry is just bitter because he's getting his clock
cleaned.


You couldn't clean your feet without help.


After surgery, yes. But I'm almost as good as new now.
Thanks for
asking.
Going to the food and wine festival xmorrow. What's your favorite
Disney cullinary delight. Gonna get a Cuban at Emilio's place
this afternoon. What are you up to?


Getting everything set for the "Debate Party" tonight...food, drink,
extra chairs, et cetera.
My favorite Disney culinary delight...probably the chocolate covered
vanilla ice cream pops in the shape of Mickey's head and ears.
Disney's food is decent, but I wouldn't describe it as "culinary
delight."

Chairs plural? How many owls are attending?


We "signed on" for 25, but I'm guessing about 15, starting to arrive any
minute now.

Michael Moore
 

On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 19:59:57 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

Getting everything set for the "Debate Party" tonight...food, drink,
extra chairs, et cetera.

We "signed on" for 25, but I'm guessing about 15, starting to arrive any
minute now.

Arranged in a circle? insert joke here

Michael Moore
 

On 9/26/16 8:58 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 19:59:57 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

Getting everything set for the "Debate Party" tonight...food, drink,
extra chairs, et cetera.

We "signed on" for 25, but I'm guessing about 15, starting to arrive any
minute now.

Arranged in a circle? insert joke here



We ended up with 23 peeps, and the last couple just left. The secret is
to NOT serve booze at these gatherings.
One of our guests suggested that Trump was on cocaine. We had seven
Republicans here, and five of them said they were
"very disappointed" with Trump's performance. I'm wondering if Trump
will show up for the next two debates.

Michael Moore
 

On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 23:05:58 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 9/26/16 8:58 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 19:59:57 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

Getting everything set for the "Debate Party" tonight...food, drink,
extra chairs, et cetera.

We "signed on" for 25, but I'm guessing about 15, starting to arrive any
minute now.

Arranged in a circle? insert joke here



We ended up with 23 peeps, and the last couple just left. The secret is
to NOT serve booze at these gatherings.
One of our guests suggested that Trump was on cocaine. We had seven
Republicans here, and five of them said they were
"very disappointed" with Trump's performance. I'm wondering if Trump
will show up for the next two debates.

We turned it off after about 15 minutes. I don't believe anything
either of them were saying. I agree Hillary is slicker than Trump but
she has been at it for 30 years. Trump was not prepared to ask any of
the right questions or to actually challenge the BS she was throwing
out there. Blaming the 2009 crash on trickle down economics and the
tax cuts was just stupid, for starters. Trump should have pointed out
the crash could not have happened without CFMA and the repeal of Glass
Steagal (Bill's watch). It is also easy to point out, Fannie and
Freddie made the NINJA loans not only possible but encouraged. After
that exchange I knew Hillary was going to lie and trump was incapable
of calling her on it so we switched over to James Garner and Jack
Lemmon.

Michael Moore
 

On 9/27/16 12:56 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 23:05:58 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 9/26/16 8:58 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 19:59:57 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

Getting everything set for the "Debate Party" tonight...food, drink,
extra chairs, et cetera.

We "signed on" for 25, but I'm guessing about 15, starting to arrive any
minute now.

Arranged in a circle? insert joke here



We ended up with 23 peeps, and the last couple just left. The secret is
to NOT serve booze at these gatherings.
One of our guests suggested that Trump was on cocaine. We had seven
Republicans here, and five of them said they were
"very disappointed" with Trump's performance. I'm wondering if Trump
will show up for the next two debates.

We turned it off after about 15 minutes.


Too bad you were not interested enough in the future of this country to
watch the next POTUS. You would have seen Trump interrupt Clinton about
50 times, sniff as if he were on cocaine, exhibit his almost total
ignorance about our laws or international, act like a spoiled child, and
avoid responding to direct, simple questions. In comparison, Hillary did
better than ok.

Trump has hinted that in the next debate, he will bring up Bill
Clinton's sexual indiscretions. That should be funny, coming from a man
who has admitted a long history of cheating on wives and who has been
accused of raping a 13 year old girl when he was an adult.

Michael Moore
 

Keyser Soze wrote:
On 9/27/16 12:56 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 23:05:58 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 9/26/16 8:58 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 19:59:57 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

Getting everything set for the "Debate Party" tonight...food, drink,
extra chairs, et cetera.

We "signed on" for 25, but I'm guessing about 15, starting to arrive any
minute now.

Arranged in a circle? insert joke here



We ended up with 23 peeps, and the last couple just left. The secret is
to NOT serve booze at these gatherings.
One of our guests suggested that Trump was on cocaine. We had seven
Republicans here, and five of them said they were
"very disappointed" with Trump's performance. I'm wondering if Trump
will show up for the next two debates.

We turned it off after about 15 minutes.


Too bad you were not interested enough in the future of this country to
watch the next POTUS. You would have seen Trump interrupt Clinton about
50 times, sniff as if he were on cocaine, exhibit his almost total
ignorance about our laws or international, act like a spoiled child, and
avoid responding to direct, simple questions. In comparison, Hillary did
better than ok.

Trump has hinted that in the next debate, he will bring up Bill
Clinton's sexual indiscretions. That should be funny, coming from a man
who has admitted a long history of cheating on wives and who has been
accused of raping a 13 year old girl when he was an adult.


He was accused. So, people accuse Hillary of having Vince Foster and
others offed. Accusations are easy. You know that. You accuse anybody
not in lockstep with you of being a racist, or dumb. As I state,
accusations are cheap.

Michael Moore
 

On 9/27/16 1:59 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 9/27/16 12:56 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 23:05:58 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 9/26/16 8:58 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 19:59:57 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

Getting everything set for the "Debate Party" tonight...food, drink,
extra chairs, et cetera.

We "signed on" for 25, but I'm guessing about 15, starting to arrive any
minute now.

Arranged in a circle? insert joke here



We ended up with 23 peeps, and the last couple just left. The secret is
to NOT serve booze at these gatherings.
One of our guests suggested that Trump was on cocaine. We had seven
Republicans here, and five of them said they were
"very disappointed" with Trump's performance. I'm wondering if Trump
will show up for the next two debates.

We turned it off after about 15 minutes.


Too bad you were not interested enough in the future of this country to
watch the next POTUS. You would have seen Trump interrupt Clinton about
50 times, sniff as if he were on cocaine, exhibit his almost total
ignorance about our laws or international, act like a spoiled child, and
avoid responding to direct, simple questions. In comparison, Hillary did
better than ok.

Trump has hinted that in the next debate, he will bring up Bill
Clinton's sexual indiscretions. That should be funny, coming from a man
who has admitted a long history of cheating on wives and who has been
accused of raping a 13 year old girl when he was an adult.


He was accused. So, people accuse Hillary of having Vince Foster and
others offed. Accusations are easy. You know that. You accuse anybody
not in lockstep with you of being a racist, or dumb. As I state,
accusations are cheap.



It's great that Trump has such stalwart defenders as...you.

Michael Moore
 

On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:51:50 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 9/27/16 12:56 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 23:05:58 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 9/26/16 8:58 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 19:59:57 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

Getting everything set for the "Debate Party" tonight...food, drink,
extra chairs, et cetera.

We "signed on" for 25, but I'm guessing about 15, starting to arrive any
minute now.

Arranged in a circle? insert joke here



We ended up with 23 peeps, and the last couple just left. The secret is
to NOT serve booze at these gatherings.
One of our guests suggested that Trump was on cocaine. We had seven
Republicans here, and five of them said they were
"very disappointed" with Trump's performance. I'm wondering if Trump
will show up for the next two debates.

We turned it off after about 15 minutes.


Too bad you were not interested enough in the future of this country to
watch the next POTUS. You would have seen Trump interrupt Clinton about
50 times, sniff as if he were on cocaine, exhibit his almost total
ignorance about our laws or international, act like a spoiled child, and
avoid responding to direct, simple questions. In comparison, Hillary did
better than ok.

Trump has hinted that in the next debate, he will bring up Bill
Clinton's sexual indiscretions. That should be funny, coming from a man
who has admitted a long history of cheating on wives and who has been
accused of raping a 13 year old girl when he was an adult.

I knew it would be repeated on TV ad nauseum. I still wonder, after
watching this dumpster fire, why Johnson and Stein were excluded?

Did anyone actually hear anything new from either of them? Was there
anything informative said? The people who like Trump, still like Trump
and the people who like Clinton, still like Clinton. If anything the
undecided/neither number actually increased. Our local NBC station
poll had 33% saying Clinton won, 33% saying Trump won, 3% saying it
was a tie and 31% saying both lost.
I am in the "both lost" camp. Clinton looked over prepared, coming in
with a several dozen rehearsed lines and you could tell she was happy
each time Trump teed himself up for one.
Trump was totally unprepared and tried to get by just being Trump.
Neither looked particularly like a leader or even particularly smart.
Clinton was the better actor tho.

Michael Moore
 

On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 14:01:58 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 9/27/16 1:59 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 9/27/16 12:56 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 23:05:58 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 9/26/16 8:58 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 19:59:57 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

Getting everything set for the "Debate Party" tonight...food, drink,
extra chairs, et cetera.

We "signed on" for 25, but I'm guessing about 15, starting to arrive any
minute now.

Arranged in a circle? insert joke here



We ended up with 23 peeps, and the last couple just left. The secret is
to NOT serve booze at these gatherings.
One of our guests suggested that Trump was on cocaine. We had seven
Republicans here, and five of them said they were
"very disappointed" with Trump's performance. I'm wondering if Trump
will show up for the next two debates.

We turned it off after about 15 minutes.


Too bad you were not interested enough in the future of this country to
watch the next POTUS. You would have seen Trump interrupt Clinton about
50 times, sniff as if he were on cocaine, exhibit his almost total
ignorance about our laws or international, act like a spoiled child, and
avoid responding to direct, simple questions. In comparison, Hillary did
better than ok.

Trump has hinted that in the next debate, he will bring up Bill
Clinton's sexual indiscretions. That should be funny, coming from a man
who has admitted a long history of cheating on wives and who has been
accused of raping a 13 year old girl when he was an adult.


He was accused. So, people accuse Hillary of having Vince Foster and
others offed. Accusations are easy. You know that. You accuse anybody
not in lockstep with you of being a racist, or dumb. As I state,
accusations are cheap.



It's great that Trump has such stalwart defenders as...you.

I would think if the rape was true, the democrats would be all over it
and Hillary would have the victim sitting next to Mark Cuban.

Michael Moore
 

On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 at 3:06:22 PM UTC-4, wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:51:50 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 9/27/16 12:56 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 23:05:58 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 9/26/16 8:58 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 19:59:57 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

Getting everything set for the "Debate Party" tonight...food, drink,
extra chairs, et cetera.

We "signed on" for 25, but I'm guessing about 15, starting to arrive any
minute now.

Arranged in a circle? insert joke here



We ended up with 23 peeps, and the last couple just left. The secret is
to NOT serve booze at these gatherings.
One of our guests suggested that Trump was on cocaine. We had seven
Republicans here, and five of them said they were
"very disappointed" with Trump's performance. I'm wondering if Trump
will show up for the next two debates.

We turned it off after about 15 minutes.


Too bad you were not interested enough in the future of this country to
watch the next POTUS. You would have seen Trump interrupt Clinton about
50 times, sniff as if he were on cocaine, exhibit his almost total
ignorance about our laws or international, act like a spoiled child, and
avoid responding to direct, simple questions. In comparison, Hillary did
better than ok.

Trump has hinted that in the next debate, he will bring up Bill
Clinton's sexual indiscretions. That should be funny, coming from a man
who has admitted a long history of cheating on wives and who has been
accused of raping a 13 year old girl when he was an adult.

I knew it would be repeated on TV ad nauseum. I still wonder, after
watching this dumpster fire, why Johnson and Stein were excluded?

Did anyone actually hear anything new from either of them? Was there
anything informative said? The people who like Trump, still like Trump
and the people who like Clinton, still like Clinton. If anything the
undecided/neither number actually increased. Our local NBC station
poll had 33% saying Clinton won, 33% saying Trump won, 3% saying it
was a tie and 31% saying both lost.
I am in the "both lost" camp. Clinton looked over prepared, coming in
with a several dozen rehearsed lines and you could tell she was happy
each time Trump teed himself up for one.
Trump was totally unprepared and tried to get by just being Trump.
Neither looked particularly like a leader or even particularly smart.
Clinton was the better actor tho.

Agreed. They both started looking tired before the end. First Trump, then Clinton. 90 minutes is a long time to stand up there and do that. Hilly has far more practice at it.

Michael Moore
 

On 9/27/16 3:05 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:51:50 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 9/27/16 12:56 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 23:05:58 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 9/26/16 8:58 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 19:59:57 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

Getting everything set for the "Debate Party" tonight...food, drink,
extra chairs, et cetera.

We "signed on" for 25, but I'm guessing about 15, starting to arrive any
minute now.

Arranged in a circle? insert joke here



We ended up with 23 peeps, and the last couple just left. The secret is
to NOT serve booze at these gatherings.
One of our guests suggested that Trump was on cocaine. We had seven
Republicans here, and five of them said they were
"very disappointed" with Trump's performance. I'm wondering if Trump
will show up for the next two debates.

We turned it off after about 15 minutes.


Too bad you were not interested enough in the future of this country to
watch the next POTUS. You would have seen Trump interrupt Clinton about
50 times, sniff as if he were on cocaine, exhibit his almost total
ignorance about our laws or international, act like a spoiled child, and
avoid responding to direct, simple questions. In comparison, Hillary did
better than ok.

Trump has hinted that in the next debate, he will bring up Bill
Clinton's sexual indiscretions. That should be funny, coming from a man
who has admitted a long history of cheating on wives and who has been
accused of raping a 13 year old girl when he was an adult.

I knew it would be repeated on TV ad nauseum. I still wonder, after
watching this dumpster fire, why Johnson and Stein were excluded?

Did anyone actually hear anything new from either of them? Was there
anything informative said? The people who like Trump, still like Trump
and the people who like Clinton, still like Clinton. If anything the
undecided/neither number actually increased. Our local NBC station
poll had 33% saying Clinton won, 33% saying Trump won, 3% saying it
was a tie and 31% saying both lost.
I am in the "both lost" camp. Clinton looked over prepared, coming in
with a several dozen rehearsed lines and you could tell she was happy
each time Trump teed himself up for one.
Trump was totally unprepared and tried to get by just being Trump.
Neither looked particularly like a leader or even particularly smart.
Clinton was the better actor tho.



There already was one guy - Trump - up on the stage who demonstrated he
knew nothing. Putting Johnson up there would have only doubled the
number of men on the stage who knew nothing.

Michael Moore
 

Keyser Soze wrote:
On 9/27/16 1:59 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 9/27/16 12:56 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 23:05:58 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 9/26/16 8:58 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 19:59:57 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

Getting everything set for the "Debate Party" tonight...food, drink,
extra chairs, et cetera.

We "signed on" for 25, but I'm guessing about 15, starting to arrive any
minute now.

Arranged in a circle? insert joke here



We ended up with 23 peeps, and the last couple just left. The secret is
to NOT serve booze at these gatherings.
One of our guests suggested that Trump was on cocaine. We had seven
Republicans here, and five of them said they were
"very disappointed" with Trump's performance. I'm wondering if Trump
will show up for the next two debates.

We turned it off after about 15 minutes.


Too bad you were not interested enough in the future of this country to
watch the next POTUS. You would have seen Trump interrupt Clinton about
50 times, sniff as if he were on cocaine, exhibit his almost total
ignorance about our laws or international, act like a spoiled child, and
avoid responding to direct, simple questions. In comparison, Hillary did
better than ok.

Trump has hinted that in the next debate, he will bring up Bill
Clinton's sexual indiscretions. That should be funny, coming from a man
who has admitted a long history of cheating on wives and who has been
accused of raping a 13 year old girl when he was an adult.


He was accused. So, people accuse Hillary of having Vince Foster and
others offed. Accusations are easy. You know that. You accuse anybody
not in lockstep with you of being a racist, or dumb. As I state,
accusations are cheap.



It's great that Trump has such stalwart defenders as...you.


I dislike both Trump and Hillary. But a screwed up "debate". I turned it
off, listened on the radio while returning from a funeral in Carmel, when
they brought up the birther question! What did that have the do with
policy or running the country? Only to slant the gathering.

Michael Moore
 

Keyser Soze wrote:
On 9/27/16 3:05 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:51:50 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 9/27/16 12:56 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 23:05:58 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 9/26/16 8:58 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 19:59:57 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

Getting everything set for the "Debate Party" tonight...food, drink,
extra chairs, et cetera.

We "signed on" for 25, but I'm guessing about 15, starting to arrive any
minute now.

Arranged in a circle? insert joke here



We ended up with 23 peeps, and the last couple just left. The secret is
to NOT serve booze at these gatherings.
One of our guests suggested that Trump was on cocaine. We had seven
Republicans here, and five of them said they were
"very disappointed" with Trump's performance. I'm wondering if Trump
will show up for the next two debates.

We turned it off after about 15 minutes.


Too bad you were not interested enough in the future of this country to
watch the next POTUS. You would have seen Trump interrupt Clinton about
50 times, sniff as if he were on cocaine, exhibit his almost total
ignorance about our laws or international, act like a spoiled child, and
avoid responding to direct, simple questions. In comparison, Hillary did
better than ok.

Trump has hinted that in the next debate, he will bring up Bill
Clinton's sexual indiscretions. That should be funny, coming from a man
who has admitted a long history of cheating on wives and who has been
accused of raping a 13 year old girl when he was an adult.

I knew it would be repeated on TV ad nauseum. I still wonder, after
watching this dumpster fire, why Johnson and Stein were excluded?

Did anyone actually hear anything new from either of them? Was there
anything informative said? The people who like Trump, still like Trump
and the people who like Clinton, still like Clinton. If anything the
undecided/neither number actually increased. Our local NBC station
poll had 33% saying Clinton won, 33% saying Trump won, 3% saying it
was a tie and 31% saying both lost.
I am in the "both lost" camp. Clinton looked over prepared, coming in
with a several dozen rehearsed lines and you could tell she was happy
each time Trump teed himself up for one.
Trump was totally unprepared and tried to get by just being Trump.
Neither looked particularly like a leader or even particularly smart.
Clinton was the better actor tho.



There already was one guy - Trump - up on the stage who demonstrated he
knew nothing. Putting Johnson up there would have only doubled the
number of men on the stage who knew nothing.


Then why are the DNC and RNC worried?

Michael Moore
 

On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 15:34:24 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 9/27/16 3:05 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:51:50 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 9/27/16 12:56 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 23:05:58 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 9/26/16 8:58 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 19:59:57 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

Getting everything set for the "Debate Party" tonight...food, drink,
extra chairs, et cetera.

We "signed on" for 25, but I'm guessing about 15, starting to arrive any
minute now.

Arranged in a circle? insert joke here



We ended up with 23 peeps, and the last couple just left. The secret is
to NOT serve booze at these gatherings.
One of our guests suggested that Trump was on cocaine. We had seven
Republicans here, and five of them said they were
"very disappointed" with Trump's performance. I'm wondering if Trump
will show up for the next two debates.

We turned it off after about 15 minutes.


Too bad you were not interested enough in the future of this country to
watch the next POTUS. You would have seen Trump interrupt Clinton about
50 times, sniff as if he were on cocaine, exhibit his almost total
ignorance about our laws or international, act like a spoiled child, and
avoid responding to direct, simple questions. In comparison, Hillary did
better than ok.

Trump has hinted that in the next debate, he will bring up Bill
Clinton's sexual indiscretions. That should be funny, coming from a man
who has admitted a long history of cheating on wives and who has been
accused of raping a 13 year old girl when he was an adult.

I knew it would be repeated on TV ad nauseum. I still wonder, after
watching this dumpster fire, why Johnson and Stein were excluded?

Did anyone actually hear anything new from either of them? Was there
anything informative said? The people who like Trump, still like Trump
and the people who like Clinton, still like Clinton. If anything the
undecided/neither number actually increased. Our local NBC station
poll had 33% saying Clinton won, 33% saying Trump won, 3% saying it
was a tie and 31% saying both lost.
I am in the "both lost" camp. Clinton looked over prepared, coming in
with a several dozen rehearsed lines and you could tell she was happy
each time Trump teed himself up for one.
Trump was totally unprepared and tried to get by just being Trump.
Neither looked particularly like a leader or even particularly smart.
Clinton was the better actor tho.



There already was one guy - Trump - up on the stage who demonstrated he
knew nothing. Putting Johnson up there would have only doubled the
number of men on the stage who knew nothing.

Johnson might have asked more about how they plan to deal with debt,
DoD spending, wars we don't need to be in and why we have more people
in jail than any other country on the planet, either measured by total
population (2.1 million) or percentage (737 per 100,000).
Let the other 2 justify the drug war. That may have more impact on the
futures of black and brown people than any other factor.

Michael Moore
 

On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 14:51:21 -0500, Califbill
wrote:

Keyser Soze wrote:

There already was one guy - Trump - up on the stage who demonstrated he
knew nothing. Putting Johnson up there would have only doubled the
number of men on the stage who knew nothing.


Then why are the DNC and RNC worried?

Answered one note up

Michael Moore
 

On 9/27/16 4:17 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 15:34:24 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 9/27/16 3:05 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:51:50 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 9/27/16 12:56 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 23:05:58 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 9/26/16 8:58 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 19:59:57 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

Getting everything set for the "Debate Party" tonight...food, drink,
extra chairs, et cetera.

We "signed on" for 25, but I'm guessing about 15, starting to arrive any
minute now.

Arranged in a circle? insert joke here



We ended up with 23 peeps, and the last couple just left. The secret is
to NOT serve booze at these gatherings.
One of our guests suggested that Trump was on cocaine. We had seven
Republicans here, and five of them said they were
"very disappointed" with Trump's performance. I'm wondering if Trump
will show up for the next two debates.

We turned it off after about 15 minutes.


Too bad you were not interested enough in the future of this country to
watch the next POTUS. You would have seen Trump interrupt Clinton about
50 times, sniff as if he were on cocaine, exhibit his almost total
ignorance about our laws or international, act like a spoiled child, and
avoid responding to direct, simple questions. In comparison, Hillary did
better than ok.

Trump has hinted that in the next debate, he will bring up Bill
Clinton's sexual indiscretions. That should be funny, coming from a man
who has admitted a long history of cheating on wives and who has been
accused of raping a 13 year old girl when he was an adult.

I knew it would be repeated on TV ad nauseum. I still wonder, after
watching this dumpster fire, why Johnson and Stein were excluded?

Did anyone actually hear anything new from either of them? Was there
anything informative said? The people who like Trump, still like Trump
and the people who like Clinton, still like Clinton. If anything the
undecided/neither number actually increased. Our local NBC station
poll had 33% saying Clinton won, 33% saying Trump won, 3% saying it
was a tie and 31% saying both lost.
I am in the "both lost" camp. Clinton looked over prepared, coming in
with a several dozen rehearsed lines and you could tell she was happy
each time Trump teed himself up for one.
Trump was totally unprepared and tried to get by just being Trump.
Neither looked particularly like a leader or even particularly smart.
Clinton was the better actor tho.



There already was one guy - Trump - up on the stage who demonstrated he
knew nothing. Putting Johnson up there would have only doubled the
number of men on the stage who knew nothing.

Johnson might have asked more about how they plan to deal with debt,
DoD spending, wars we don't need to be in and why we have more people
in jail than any other country on the planet, either measured by total
population (2.1 million) or percentage (737 per 100,000).
Let the other 2 justify the drug war. That may have more impact on the
futures of black and brown people than any other factor.



It's easy to ask questions. It's more difficult to provide answers. I've
checked the Libertarian page a few times, and there is nothing there in
any details, and in the seven times I've now seen him interviewed, he
never offers any details. I've seen Hillary many times explain some of
her proposals in great detail. I think there is a lot less to Johnson
than meets the eye. Nice guy, though, but he should cut back on the
marijuana so that he can keep pace with current events.

Michael Moore
 

On 9/27/16 4:18 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 14:51:21 -0500, Califbill
wrote:

Keyser Soze wrote:

There already was one guy - Trump - up on the stage who demonstrated he
knew nothing. Putting Johnson up there would have only doubled the
number of men on the stage who knew nothing.


Then why are the DNC and RNC worried?

Answered one note up


My only concern is that Johnson might suck down enough votes in a hotly
contested state to toss the election into the U.S. House, where the
Repugnants pick the next POTUS. No thanks.

Michael Moore
 

On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 16:23:04 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 9/27/16 4:18 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 14:51:21 -0500, Califbill
wrote:

Keyser Soze wrote:

There already was one guy - Trump - up on the stage who demonstrated he
knew nothing. Putting Johnson up there would have only doubled the
number of men on the stage who knew nothing.


Then why are the DNC and RNC worried?

Answered one note up


My only concern is that Johnson might suck down enough votes in a hotly
contested state to toss the election into the U.S. House, where the
Repugnants pick the next POTUS. No thanks.

===

In my opinion that's the best possible outcome.

Michael Moore
 

On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 16:23:04 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 9/27/16 4:18 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 14:51:21 -0500, Califbill
wrote:

Keyser Soze wrote:

There already was one guy - Trump - up on the stage who demonstrated he
knew nothing. Putting Johnson up there would have only doubled the
number of men on the stage who knew nothing.


Then why are the DNC and RNC worried?

Answered one note up


My only concern is that Johnson might suck down enough votes in a hotly
contested state to toss the election into the U.S. House, where the
Repugnants pick the next POTUS. No thanks.

If the trend continues, Trump might win outright, in spite of how hard
he is working to throw the race. I think his dream outcome would be to
win the popular vote and lose in the EC. Then he could call himself a
winner, blame it all on a rigged system and go back to running "Trump"
with a lot more status to his brand.
I do not think he really wants to be president.
I do think he would like a TV show about how he ran for president once
and was "cheated out of it".
No matter what, Hillary will owe him plenty if she wins. There are
several republicans who would have given her a far harder time.