Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The NRA is full of ****.
The Dallas shooter was a good guy with a gun until he wasn’t. The guns and ammo were legally purchased. There were at least 20 “open carry” guys present when the shooting started, and they all ran from the scene. The victims were heavily armed and highly trained. So much for the concept that there’s a benefit to “carrying” in an open venue. Oh, and did I miss the NRA’s comment on the death of the guy in Minnesota who apparently was legally carrying and shot to death by the cops? Or does the NRA only care about white folks who carry? |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Keyser Söze wrote:
The NRA is full of ****. The Dallas shooter was a good guy with a gun until he wasn’t. The guns and ammo were legally purchased. There were at least 20 “open carry” guys present when the shooting started, and they all ran from the scene. The victims were heavily armed and highly trained. So much for the concept that there’s a benefit to “carrying” in an open venue. Oh, and did I miss the NRA’s comment on the death of the guy in Minnesota who apparently was legally carrying and shot to death by the cops? Or does the NRA only care about white folks who carry? Another dumb post by a racist and loser. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/10/16 11:32 AM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote: The NRA is full of ****. The Dallas shooter was a good guy with a gun until he wasn’t. The guns and ammo were legally purchased. There were at least 20 “open carry” guys present when the shooting started, and they all ran from the scene. The victims were heavily armed and highly trained. So much for the concept that there’s a benefit to “carrying” in an open venue. Oh, and did I miss the NRA’s comment on the death of the guy in Minnesota who apparently was legally carrying and shot to death by the cops? Or does the NRA only care about white folks who carry? Another dumb post by a racist and loser. Bilious, it is fashionable these days for white guys to accuse others of "racism" when the latter point out the racism or possible racism of whites or white-dominated groups. But that doesn't make the charge true. It is simply a way for white guys to try to "transfer" their racism onto those who accuse them of it. The NRA and other nutcase groups frequently state that "if only more people carried firearms...blah blah blah." Well, in Dallas there were plenty of "civilians" open carrying firearms, and they all ran when the shooting started. And where is the comment from the NRA on the guy who apparently was legally carrying and was shot by a cop? If the 2nd Amendment is suppose to allow you to arm yourself so you can protect yourself from an "overreaching" government, well, it doesn't seem to work, does it? |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Keyser Sze Wrote in message:
On 7/10/16 11:32 AM, Califbill wrote: Keyser Sze wrote: The NRA is full of ****. The Dallas shooter was a good guy with a gun until he wasn?t. The guns and ammo were legally purchased. There were at least 20 ?open carry? guys present when the shooting started, and they all ran from the scene. The victims were heavily armed and highly trained. So much for the concept that there?s a benefit to ?carrying? in an open venue. Oh, and did I miss the NRA?s comment on the death of the guy in Minnesota who apparently was legally carrying and shot to death by the cops? Or does the NRA only care about white folks who carry? Another dumb post by a racist and loser. Bilious, it is fashionable these days for white guys to accuse others of "racism" when the latter point out the racism or possible racism of whites or white-dominated groups. But that doesn't make the charge true. It is simply a way for white guys to try to "transfer" their racism onto those who accuse them of it. That's an excellent description of one of your afflictions. You're not bright enough to come up with it on your own. Did Dr Dr feed it to you during a therapy session? -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/10/2016 12:39 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/10/16 11:32 AM, Califbill wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: The NRA is full of ****. The Dallas shooter was a good guy with a gun until he wasn’t. The guns and ammo were legally purchased. There were at least 20 “open carry” guys present when the shooting started, and they all ran from the scene. The victims were heavily armed and highly trained. So much for the concept that there’s a benefit to “carrying” in an open venue. Oh, and did I miss the NRA’s comment on the death of the guy in Minnesota who apparently was legally carrying and shot to death by the cops? Or does the NRA only care about white folks who carry? Another dumb post by a racist and loser. Bilious, it is fashionable these days for white guys to accuse others of "racism" when the latter point out the racism or possible racism of whites or white-dominated groups. But that doesn't make the charge true. It is simply a way for white guys to try to "transfer" their racism onto those who accuse them of it. The NRA and other nutcase groups frequently state that "if only more people carried firearms...blah blah blah." Well, in Dallas there were plenty of "civilians" open carrying firearms, and they all ran when the shooting started. And where is the comment from the NRA on the guy who apparently was legally carrying and was shot by a cop? If the 2nd Amendment is suppose to allow you to arm yourself so you can protect yourself from an "overreaching" government, well, it doesn't seem to work, does it? I wouldn't attempt a shootout with a guy with a high velocity, military type rifle using my carry pistol. Would you? |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/10/16 6:23 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/10/2016 12:39 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/10/16 11:32 AM, Califbill wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: The NRA is full of ****. The Dallas shooter was a good guy with a gun until he wasn’t. The guns and ammo were legally purchased. There were at least 20 “open carry” guys present when the shooting started, and they all ran from the scene. The victims were heavily armed and highly trained. So much for the concept that there’s a benefit to “carrying” in an open venue. Oh, and did I miss the NRA’s comment on the death of the guy in Minnesota who apparently was legally carrying and shot to death by the cops? Or does the NRA only care about white folks who carry? Another dumb post by a racist and loser. Bilious, it is fashionable these days for white guys to accuse others of "racism" when the latter point out the racism or possible racism of whites or white-dominated groups. But that doesn't make the charge true. It is simply a way for white guys to try to "transfer" their racism onto those who accuse them of it. The NRA and other nutcase groups frequently state that "if only more people carried firearms...blah blah blah." Well, in Dallas there were plenty of "civilians" open carrying firearms, and they all ran when the shooting started. And where is the comment from the NRA on the guy who apparently was legally carrying and was shot by a cop? If the 2nd Amendment is suppose to allow you to arm yourself so you can protect yourself from an "overreaching" government, well, it doesn't seem to work, does it? I wouldn't attempt a shootout with a guy with a high velocity, military type rifle using my carry pistol. Would you? News photos and reports showed some of the open carry morons carrying semi-auto rifles. But that's not the point. The point is that the NRA and other gun nutzies claim a "good citizen" carrying would stop a bad guy shooting. That didn't happen in Dallas, and it typically doesn't happen. A carry firearm might help you defend yourself, if you can get to it in time and if you can shoot and if you get a shot. It's hardly a weapon to shut down a crazy dude or a terrorist or terrorists who have you outgunned and who don't care about their personal safety. What the NRA promotes in carry to protect others is mostly a canard. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 18:32:20 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: News photos and reports showed some of the open carry morons carrying semi-auto rifles. But that's not the point. The point is that the NRA and other gun nutzies claim a "good citizen" carrying would stop a bad guy shooting. That didn't happen in Dallas, and it typically doesn't happen. A carry firearm might help you defend yourself, if you can get to it in time and if you can shoot and if you get a shot. It's hardly a weapon to shut down a crazy dude or a terrorist or terrorists who have you outgunned and who don't care about their personal safety. What the NRA promotes in carry to protect others is mostly a canard. I agree with you to a certain point but the reality is, if a civilian had fired a shot, 20 cops would have returned fire, even if he hit the bad guy in the eye. Walking around downtown with a long gun is stupid and the only way a handgun would be useful is if you were close to the shooter. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/10/16 11:32 AM, Califbill wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: The NRA is full of ****. The Dallas shooter was a good guy with a gun until he wasn’t. The guns and ammo were legally purchased. There were at least 20 “open carry” guys present when the shooting started, and they all ran from the scene. The victims were heavily armed and highly trained. So much for the concept that there’s a benefit to “carrying” in an open venue. Oh, and did I miss the NRA’s comment on the death of the guy in Minnesota who apparently was legally carrying and shot to death by the cops? Or does the NRA only care about white folks who carry? Another dumb post by a racist and loser. Bilious, it is fashionable these days for white guys to accuse others of "racism" when the latter point out the racism or possible racism of whites or white-dominated groups. But that doesn't make the charge true. It is simply a way for white guys to try to "transfer" their racism onto those who accuse them of it. The NRA and other nutcase groups frequently state that "if only more people carried firearms...blah blah blah." Well, in Dallas there were plenty of "civilians" open carrying firearms, and they all ran when the shooting started. And where is the comment from the NRA on the guy who apparently was legally carrying and was shot by a cop? If the 2nd Amendment is suppose to allow you to arm yourself so you can protect yourself from an "overreaching" government, well, it doesn't seem to work, does it? The first paragraph pretty much describes your calling most posters racist. Seeing the amount of asset forfeiture and shootings by police, we seem to have an overreaching government. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/10/16 11:48 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/10/16 11:32 AM, Califbill wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: The NRA is full of ****. The Dallas shooter was a good guy with a gun until he wasn’t. The guns and ammo were legally purchased. There were at least 20 “open carry” guys present when the shooting started, and they all ran from the scene. The victims were heavily armed and highly trained. So much for the concept that there’s a benefit to “carrying” in an open venue. Oh, and did I miss the NRA’s comment on the death of the guy in Minnesota who apparently was legally carrying and shot to death by the cops? Or does the NRA only care about white folks who carry? Another dumb post by a racist and loser. Bilious, it is fashionable these days for white guys to accuse others of "racism" when the latter point out the racism or possible racism of whites or white-dominated groups. But that doesn't make the charge true. It is simply a way for white guys to try to "transfer" their racism onto those who accuse them of it. The NRA and other nutcase groups frequently state that "if only more people carried firearms...blah blah blah." Well, in Dallas there were plenty of "civilians" open carrying firearms, and they all ran when the shooting started. And where is the comment from the NRA on the guy who apparently was legally carrying and was shot by a cop? If the 2nd Amendment is suppose to allow you to arm yourself so you can protect yourself from an "overreaching" government, well, it doesn't seem to work, does it? The first paragraph pretty much describes your calling most posters racist. Seeing the amount of asset forfeiture and shootings by police, we seem to have an overreaching government. Indeed, you and others transfer your racism onto others, as I pointed out. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Califbill Wrote in message:
Keyser Sze wrote: The NRA is full of ****. The Dallas shooter was a good guy with a gun until he wasn?t. The guns and ammo were legally purchased. There were at least 20 ?open carry? guys present when the shooting started, and they all ran from the scene. The victims were heavily armed and highly trained. So much for the concept that there?s a benefit to ?carrying? in an open venue. Oh, and did I miss the NRA?s comment on the death of the guy in Minnesota who apparently was legally carrying and shot to death by the cops? Or does the NRA only care about white folks who carry? Another dumb post by a racist and loser. Harry is kind of a unique racist. He hates his own race. That's assuming he's a purebred. -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |