![]() |
Perspective?
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/7/16 3:12 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 7/7/2016 1:09 PM, wrote: On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 11:42:32 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: But Hillary is being pilloried by the GOP for using a private server? No Hillary's qualifications are being questioned because she was "sloppy", "negligent" and "Very careless" with top secret materials that "any reasonable person would know were secret at the time". Some were even marked that way according to Comey. There is also the question about her lying under oath about it. It is also interesting that Comey said he will not release the details of these recovered E-mails until after the election so we do not know what else may have been discussed. Bear in mind, the details of Watergate were not released until after the election too. I remember how that worked out. I think she is the most likely president to be impeached since her husband. It also appears that she has lied (again) to the public and in congressional hearings while under oath. I feel for Harry. It must be tough to mindlessly support his party's choice in their candidate when it is obvious to the most oblivious observer that her reputation for lying and deceitfulness is so well deserved (and confirmed). This isn't about Trump. It's about Hillary. I don't have any problems voting for Hillary. There isn't a Republican on that list of 17 I would have voted for, under any circumstances, for many reasons. One reason, right? The (R). |
Perspective?
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/7/16 6:45 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 7/7/2016 6:15 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/7/16 5:28 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 7/7/2016 3:45 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/7/16 3:12 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 7/7/2016 1:09 PM, wrote: On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 11:42:32 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: But Hillary is being pilloried by the GOP for using a private server? No Hillary's qualifications are being questioned because she was "sloppy", "negligent" and "Very careless" with top secret materials that "any reasonable person would know were secret at the time". Some were even marked that way according to Comey. There is also the question about her lying under oath about it. It is also interesting that Comey said he will not release the details of these recovered E-mails until after the election so we do not know what else may have been discussed. Bear in mind, the details of Watergate were not released until after the election too. I remember how that worked out. I think she is the most likely president to be impeached since her husband. It also appears that she has lied (again) to the public and in congressional hearings while under oath. I feel for Harry. It must be tough to mindlessly support his party's choice in their candidate when it is obvious to the most oblivious observer that her reputation for lying and deceitfulness is so well deserved (and confirmed). This isn't about Trump. It's about Hillary. I don't have any problems voting for Hillary. There isn't a Republican on that list of 17 I would have voted for, under any circumstances, for many reasons. I'd respect your position more if you *had* some problems regarding Hillary but chalked it off to the lesser of two evils. I could never, ever say I had "no problem" voting for a proven liar with the history of deceitfulness represented in Hillary Clinton. I've had "problems" with every presidential candidate I've ever voted for, but, as I said, I don't have any problems *voting* for Hillary. As for lying, the fact checkers state that Trump has let loose more colossal lies than any other candidate, and by a long shot. Every time a comment is made questioning Hillary's integrity, the Hillary lovers bring up Trump. We aren't talking about Trump. You should be: he's deranged. I would like to see the RNC broker the convention, and put up Gov. Nikki Haley. 2 nd term governor, erudite, younger and better looking female than Hillary, and not known for mainly lies. |
Perspective?
On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 18:45:40 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: Hubby Bill has helped of course ... even telling her early on that "you'll go down in history". The only 2 presidents to be impeached for moral turpitude. |
Perspective?
On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 19:51:25 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/7/16 6:45 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 7/7/2016 6:15 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: I've had "problems" with every presidential candidate I've ever voted for, but, as I said, I don't have any problems *voting* for Hillary. As for lying, the fact checkers state that Trump has let loose more colossal lies than any other candidate, and by a long shot. Every time a comment is made questioning Hillary's integrity, the Hillary lovers bring up Trump. We aren't talking about Trump. You should be: he's deranged. Why can't we just agree with the other 2/3ds of the country and accept that they are both hideous. |
Perspective?
Keyser Söze Wrote in message:
Let me see if I can recall a bit of presidential history. Ford pardoned Nixon. Reagan sold arms to Iran and funded a secret war in Central America without the knowledge of Congress, and then lied to the American people about it. George Herbert Walker Bush participated in Reagan?s secret arms deals and then told us, ?No new taxes,? and, of course, there were new taxes. George W. Bush lied about Iraq?s role in 9/11 and then lied us into the costliest war in U.S. history. His veep, Dick Cheney, outed a covert CIA agent as political payback. But Hillary is being pilloried by the GOP for using a private server? It's not the doing that will be her downfall. It's the lying that will do her in. Same thing as slick willy. Member he swore under oath "I did not have set with that woman". Hilly might be an even bigger dirtbag. -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
Perspective?
Keyser Söze Wrote in message:
On 7/7/16 2:42 PM, wrote: On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 10:44:20 -0700 (PDT), Its Me wrote: "The Justice Department and FBI have formally acknowledged that nearly every examiner in an elite FBI forensic unit gave flawed testimony in almost all trials in which they offered evidence against criminal defendants over more than a two-decade period before 2000.? You forgot this part: "Warnings about the problem have been mounting. In 2002, the FBI reported that its own DNA testing found that examiners reported false hair matches more than 11 percent of the time. In the District, the only jurisdiction where defenders and prosecutors have re-investigated all FBI hair convictions, three of seven defendants whose trials included flawed FBI testimony have been exonerated through DNA testing since 2009, and courts have exonerated two more men. All five served 20 to 30 years in prison for rape or murder. I find it amusing that this is the same government that Harry wants to have total control over every aspect of our lives. You are projecting again. I've never said or intimated that I wanted "government...to have total control over every aspect of our lives." Name 5 things that you feel most strongly, shouldn't be controlled by your government. -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
Perspective?
"Mr. Luddite" Wrote in message:
On 7/7/2016 1:09 PM, wrote: On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 11:42:32 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: But Hillary is being pilloried by the GOP for using a private server? No Hillary's qualifications are being questioned because she was "sloppy", "negligent" and "Very careless" with top secret materials that "any reasonable person would know were secret at the time". Some were even marked that way according to Comey. There is also the question about her lying under oath about it. It is also interesting that Comey said he will not release the details of these recovered E-mails until after the election so we do not know what else may have been discussed. Bear in mind, the details of Watergate were not released until after the election too. I remember how that worked out. I think she is the most likely president to be impeached since her husband. It also appears that she has lied (again) to the public and in congressional hearings while under oath. I feel for Harry. It must be tough to mindlessly support his party's choice in their candidate when it is obvious to the most oblivious observer that her reputation for lying and deceitfulness is so well deserved (and confirmed). This isn't about Trump. It's about Hillary. Harry and Hilly and Billie share the same moral compass. Lying is a way of life to them. -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
Perspective?
|
Perspective?
On 7/7/2016 9:00 PM, justan wrote:
Keyser Söze Wrote in message: Let me see if I can recall a bit of presidential history. Ford pardoned Nixon. Reagan sold arms to Iran and funded a secret war in Central America without the knowledge of Congress, and then lied to the American people about it. George Herbert Walker Bush participated in Reagan?s secret arms deals and then told us, ?No new taxes,? and, of course, there were new taxes. George W. Bush lied about Iraq?s role in 9/11 and then lied us into the costliest war in U.S. history. His veep, Dick Cheney, outed a covert CIA agent as political payback. But Hillary is being pilloried by the GOP for using a private server? It's not the doing that will be her downfall. It's the lying that will do her in. Same thing as slick willy. Member he swore under oath "I did not have set with that woman". Hilly might be an even bigger dirtbag. Maybe, but Bill was (is) slicker than Hillary. He knows how to lie and for the most part, get away with them. Hillary just blurts the lies out without thinking of their ramifications. When caught ... like her famous account of her trip to Bosnia under heavy sniper fire ... she clings to the lie for a while and then finally gives up, figuratively gives everyone the finger and says "so what?" |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:43 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com