Great Show
 

On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 12:34:04 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 6/11/16 12:03 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 06:50:11 -0400, Poquito Loco
wrote:

Too bad the founders were interested in the rights of the states.
This is where the democrats start not giving a **** about the minority
I guess.
I suppose it is because their mass resides in a dozen big cities and
they like the feudal system.

And they don't mind that those same cities keep us so low in the 'peaceful country' and 'best
educated' lists.

It is ironic that the big cities, that rank so badly in every measure
of the human endeavor, want to drag the rest of the country down to
their level and call it "progressive".



Right, because everyone should live in backwater Florida.

I wish fewer north easters did. They come down here saying they want
to get away from it all, them bring it all with them.
I don't want you here and I don't want you to try to impose your urban
ideas on me.

Great Show
 

wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 12:32:55 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Read the 12th amendment and get back to us. The duties and procedures of
the EC were changed.

How electors are selected did not change and there is still nothing
that forces the electors to vote for the person they were supposed to.
Plenty of elections have at least one rogue elector. Most recently was
2004 where one idiot from Minnesota voted for Edwards as president and
vice president. In 1988 a West Virginia democrat voted for Bentsen for
president and Dukakis for VP. In 76 Reagan got a vote and he wasn't
even running.


California only requires the electors to vote for their pledge delegate on
the first two votes. After that they can vote for whomever.

Great Show
 

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/11/16 12:40 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 12:34:04 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 6/11/16 12:03 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 06:50:11 -0400, Poquito Loco
wrote:

Too bad the founders were interested in the rights of the states.
This is where the democrats start not giving a **** about the minority
I guess.
I suppose it is because their mass resides in a dozen big cities and
they like the feudal system.

And they don't mind that those same cities keep us so low in the
'peaceful country' and 'best
educated' lists.

It is ironic that the big cities, that rank so badly in every measure
of the human endeavor, want to drag the rest of the country down to
their level and call it "progressive".



Right, because everyone should live in backwater Florida.

So you consider the increase in Chicago's murder rate 'progression'?

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2...2016/82507210/

They're apparently progressing fairly rapidly.


Still obsessed with Chicago, eh? It's still one of my favorite cities,
along with New York, Boston, Miami, and San Francisco. You're such a
pussy, I'm sure I'll never encounter you there...you're more comfy with
your redneck buds at the blown-out grass "festivals."


I like San Francisco, but the "progressive" politics has not improved the
city over the last 60 years. I worked their for 10 years, and graduated
university there so I have an idea of the changes. I also grew up across
the bay from SF, and own property there. So I look at the waste of tax
money.

Great Show
 

On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 12:49:06 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 6/11/16 12:40 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 12:34:04 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 6/11/16 12:03 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 06:50:11 -0400, Poquito Loco
wrote:

Too bad the founders were interested in the rights of the states.
This is where the democrats start not giving a **** about the minority
I guess.
I suppose it is because their mass resides in a dozen big cities and
they like the feudal system.

And they don't mind that those same cities keep us so low in the 'peaceful country' and 'best
educated' lists.

It is ironic that the big cities, that rank so badly in every measure
of the human endeavor, want to drag the rest of the country down to
their level and call it "progressive".



Right, because everyone should live in backwater Florida.

So you consider the increase in Chicago's murder rate 'progression'?

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2...2016/82507210/

They're apparently progressing fairly rapidly.


Still obsessed with Chicago, eh? It's still one of my favorite cities,
along with New York, Boston, Miami, and San Francisco. You're such a
pussy, I'm sure I'll never encounter you there...you're more comfy with
your redneck buds at the blown-out grass "festivals."

Changed that subject quickly, dincha?

Great Show
 

On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 12:01:03 -0500, Califbill
wrote:

wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 12:32:55 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Read the 12th amendment and get back to us. The duties and procedures of
the EC were changed.

How electors are selected did not change and there is still nothing
that forces the electors to vote for the person they were supposed to.
Plenty of elections have at least one rogue elector. Most recently was
2004 where one idiot from Minnesota voted for Edwards as president and
vice president. In 1988 a West Virginia democrat voted for Bentsen for
president and Dukakis for VP. In 76 Reagan got a vote and he wasn't
even running.


California only requires the electors to vote for their pledge delegate on
the first two votes. After that they can vote for whomever.

Are you talking about convention delegates? EC electors only get one
swing at it, then it goes to the house if nobody has 270.

Great Show
 

On 6/11/2016 12:55 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 12:34:04 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 6/11/16 12:03 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 06:50:11 -0400, Poquito Loco
wrote:

Too bad the founders were interested in the rights of the states.
This is where the democrats start not giving a **** about the minority
I guess.
I suppose it is because their mass resides in a dozen big cities and
they like the feudal system.

And they don't mind that those same cities keep us so low in the 'peaceful country' and 'best
educated' lists.

It is ironic that the big cities, that rank so badly in every measure
of the human endeavor, want to drag the rest of the country down to
their level and call it "progressive".



Right, because everyone should live in backwater Florida.

I wish fewer north easters did. They come down here saying they want
to get away from it all, them bring it all with them.
I don't want you here and I don't want you to try to impose your urban
ideas on me.

Urbania is for rats and other vermin. He can have them.

Great Show
 

wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 12:01:03 -0500, Califbill
wrote:

wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 12:32:55 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Read the 12th amendment and get back to us. The duties and procedures of
the EC were changed.

How electors are selected did not change and there is still nothing
that forces the electors to vote for the person they were supposed to.
Plenty of elections have at least one rogue elector. Most recently was
2004 where one idiot from Minnesota voted for Edwards as president and
vice president. In 1988 a West Virginia democrat voted for Bentsen for
president and Dukakis for VP. In 76 Reagan got a vote and he wasn't
even running.


California only requires the electors to vote for their pledge delegate on
the first two votes. After that they can vote for whomever.

Are you talking about convention delegates? EC electors only get one
swing at it, then it goes to the house if nobody has 270.


I bad. Yes.

Great Show
 

On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 15:32:32 -0500, Califbill
wrote:

wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 12:01:03 -0500, Califbill
wrote:

wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 12:32:55 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Read the 12th amendment and get back to us. The duties and procedures of
the EC were changed.

How electors are selected did not change and there is still nothing
that forces the electors to vote for the person they were supposed to.
Plenty of elections have at least one rogue elector. Most recently was
2004 where one idiot from Minnesota voted for Edwards as president and
vice president. In 1988 a West Virginia democrat voted for Bentsen for
president and Dukakis for VP. In 76 Reagan got a vote and he wasn't
even running.


California only requires the electors to vote for their pledge delegate on
the first two votes. After that they can vote for whomever.

Are you talking about convention delegates? EC electors only get one
swing at it, then it goes to the house if nobody has 270.


I bad. Yes.

All of this arcane stuff does seem to blur together when you actually
look at it too long. The only thing you really come away with is how
little most people's votes actually count. It usually comes down to a
few swing states because the rest of them are so partisan, one way or
the other, that the average guy is lost in the landslide.

Great Show
 

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/11/16 8:11 AM, Tim wrote:
Myth? Lol! I can prove my native ancestry. As far as Jesus goes yeh,
my folks told me about Him. The bible talks about him, then so do era
philosophers and historians like Josephus, Pliney, and Tactius.

You talk about Ducati's, guns, and big boat ownership. But show no
real evidence.
Hmmm myths do die hard, eh



Obviously you missed the point. Warren's parents told her repeatedly
about her native American ancestry. She believed her parents.

You believed your parents about Jesus, and also you believed the new
testament and others. No real evidence, though, eh?

If I were interested in the comments/opinions of the participants
here, I'd post photos. I post those elsewhere.


You always post pictures of your real possessions - even the Walmart
printer in your basement. The imaginary items are all BS.