|
#48
Tim wrote:
10:39 AMKeyser Söze - show quoted text - The NRA makes all sorts of threats all the time. --- Really? I typed into google "NRA makes legal threats". And went through three pages of articles and didn't find anything. Harry, maybe you're better at looking up stuff than I am He's better at _making_ stuff up than you are, Tim. |
#48
Justan Olphart wrote:
On 6/9/2016 12:14 PM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 06:07:56 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: 7:58 AMPoquito Loco - show quoted text - What terrorist acts has the NRA performed, Harry? But then, you call me racist, so I suppose calling the NRA 'terrorists' is appropriate, for one of your thinking. ...... John, I really believe that Harry and Michael Moore are about the only ones that think the NRA is a terrorist group. And Mike isn't here, so... Harry won't provide any 'justification' for his doing so, so I suppose it's just more Krausescheiße. So what's new? Harry can't justify the foreclosure on his Jacksonville bungalow, his two bankruptcies, his local and Federal tax delinquencies, the abandoning of his wife and children, His association with mobsters, and many other instances of lying, cheating and stealing. In fact,Harry can't justify his miserable existence. You can expect crickets for that post! |
#48
On 6/9/16 7:09 PM, Alex wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 8:52 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 07:47:17 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 7:39 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 19:38:06 -0400, Alex wrote: Poquito Loco wrote: On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:45:39 -0400, Alex wrote: I picked up #48 today. The NRA edition Ruger 22/45. This has the threaded barrel which will, someday, carry a suppressor. My NFA Trust is done so now the ATF waiting game begins. I shot one of these at the Ruger factory - actually their outdoor range down the street - and all you can hear is the action, the hit on the steel target and the shell casing hitting the concrete floor. It wasn't my first color of choice but the NRA edition only comes in red and it looks better in person than the photo on ruger.com. When I picked it up today, a older guy at the store was buying five guns. When he left they told me he owns over 2,000 guns! I can't think of 2,000 that I would like to own if I had that kind of scratch but he evidently has an impressive collection. His last name was 'Smithsonian'? It could be. They think he said 2700 at last count. Well, congrats on #48. Did I tell you I wore my NRA cap to Golden Corrall last time we took the kids for breakfast. Three people came up and told me what a great hat I had. Got a few dirty looks from liberals too, but that just increased the satisfaction. Guns I use #5 is supposed to land at the dealer's today, where it will be jailed for about a week because of Maryland laws. No biggie. It's still #5 because I sold the former #5. Gun #6 is on allocation...no arrival date yet. Are you still using a seeing eye gun dog? Why the 'I use' distinction. Are you too embarrassed to be up front amongst your liberal, gun-hating buddies here? Because I have five guns I use, and two new "collector" hand-engraved revolvers I bought on a whim some years ago that I don't use and, in fact, have never been used. The Ruger Vaquero set that you said you bought AND sold? Keep up with your lies, deadbeat. Uh, no, **** for brains. |
#48
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 7:09 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 8:52 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 07:47:17 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 7:39 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 19:38:06 -0400, Alex wrote: Poquito Loco wrote: On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:45:39 -0400, Alex wrote: I picked up #48 today. The NRA edition Ruger 22/45. This has the threaded barrel which will, someday, carry a suppressor. My NFA Trust is done so now the ATF waiting game begins. I shot one of these at the Ruger factory - actually their outdoor range down the street - and all you can hear is the action, the hit on the steel target and the shell casing hitting the concrete floor. It wasn't my first color of choice but the NRA edition only comes in red and it looks better in person than the photo on ruger.com. When I picked it up today, a older guy at the store was buying five guns. When he left they told me he owns over 2,000 guns! I can't think of 2,000 that I would like to own if I had that kind of scratch but he evidently has an impressive collection. His last name was 'Smithsonian'? It could be. They think he said 2700 at last count. Well, congrats on #48. Did I tell you I wore my NRA cap to Golden Corrall last time we took the kids for breakfast. Three people came up and told me what a great hat I had. Got a few dirty looks from liberals too, but that just increased the satisfaction. Guns I use #5 is supposed to land at the dealer's today, where it will be jailed for about a week because of Maryland laws. No biggie. It's still #5 because I sold the former #5. Gun #6 is on allocation...no arrival date yet. Are you still using a seeing eye gun dog? Why the 'I use' distinction. Are you too embarrassed to be up front amongst your liberal, gun-hating buddies here? Because I have five guns I use, and two new "collector" hand-engraved revolvers I bought on a whim some years ago that I don't use and, in fact, have never been used. The Ruger Vaquero set that you said you bought AND sold? Keep up with your lies, deadbeat. Uh, no, **** for brains. My mistake. It's hard for me to keep track of your lies. Evidently it's equally hard for you: On December 7, 2014 you did say they were unfired, right? "The SA Rugers are very nice, especially if you are a fan of single action revolvers. I have a pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros in ..45 Colt that were nicely engraved and only fired at the factory and not fired since. They're safe queens." Yet that was a lie, 'eh? 1/7/2008 "The Vaquero, ah, I love it and so did everyone else. I only had a couple of boxes of ammo for it (I only brought one revolver with me), and as soon as I shot off the first few rounds, everyone else wanted to shoot it, too. It has a bit less barrel flip than, say, a semi-auto that shoots .40 S&W. These were a real steal. I got them at a gun shop where they were on consignment sale, and I paid less than half the typical retail. One of the pair had less than 100 rounds fired through it, the shop owner said, and the other had never been fired. Consecutive serial numbers, nice presentation box." |
#48
On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 20:22:04 -0400, Alex wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 7:09 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 8:52 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 07:47:17 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 7:39 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 19:38:06 -0400, Alex wrote: Poquito Loco wrote: On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:45:39 -0400, Alex wrote: I picked up #48 today. The NRA edition Ruger 22/45. This has the threaded barrel which will, someday, carry a suppressor. My NFA Trust is done so now the ATF waiting game begins. I shot one of these at the Ruger factory - actually their outdoor range down the street - and all you can hear is the action, the hit on the steel target and the shell casing hitting the concrete floor. It wasn't my first color of choice but the NRA edition only comes in red and it looks better in person than the photo on ruger.com. When I picked it up today, a older guy at the store was buying five guns. When he left they told me he owns over 2,000 guns! I can't think of 2,000 that I would like to own if I had that kind of scratch but he evidently has an impressive collection. His last name was 'Smithsonian'? It could be. They think he said 2700 at last count. Well, congrats on #48. Did I tell you I wore my NRA cap to Golden Corrall last time we took the kids for breakfast. Three people came up and told me what a great hat I had. Got a few dirty looks from liberals too, but that just increased the satisfaction. Guns I use #5 is supposed to land at the dealer's today, where it will be jailed for about a week because of Maryland laws. No biggie. It's still #5 because I sold the former #5. Gun #6 is on allocation...no arrival date yet. Are you still using a seeing eye gun dog? Why the 'I use' distinction. Are you too embarrassed to be up front amongst your liberal, gun-hating buddies here? Because I have five guns I use, and two new "collector" hand-engraved revolvers I bought on a whim some years ago that I don't use and, in fact, have never been used. The Ruger Vaquero set that you said you bought AND sold? Keep up with your lies, deadbeat. Uh, no, **** for brains. My mistake. It's hard for me to keep track of your lies. Evidently it's equally hard for you: On December 7, 2014 you did say they were unfired, right? "The SA Rugers are very nice, especially if you are a fan of single action revolvers. I have a pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros in .45 Colt that were nicely engraved and only fired at the factory and not fired since. They're safe queens." Yet that was a lie, 'eh? 1/7/2008 "The Vaquero, ah, I love it and so did everyone else. I only had a couple of boxes of ammo for it (I only brought one revolver with me), and as soon as I shot off the first few rounds, everyone else wanted to shoot it, too. It has a bit less barrel flip than, say, a semi-auto that shoots .40 S&W. These were a real steal. I got them at a gun shop where they were on consignment sale, and I paid less than half the typical retail. One of the pair had less than 100 rounds fired through it, the shop owner said, and the other had never been fired. Consecutive serial numbers, nice presentation box." Uh, uh, uh....uh, those were two *different* consecutively numbered pair that I managed to get at a steal. See...easily explainable. Now we'll have to add Vaqueros to the owls, barn, etc., list. |
#48
On 6/9/16 8:22 PM, Alex wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 7:09 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 8:52 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 07:47:17 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 7:39 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 19:38:06 -0400, Alex wrote: Poquito Loco wrote: On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:45:39 -0400, Alex wrote: I picked up #48 today. The NRA edition Ruger 22/45. This has the threaded barrel which will, someday, carry a suppressor. My NFA Trust is done so now the ATF waiting game begins. I shot one of these at the Ruger factory - actually their outdoor range down the street - and all you can hear is the action, the hit on the steel target and the shell casing hitting the concrete floor. It wasn't my first color of choice but the NRA edition only comes in red and it looks better in person than the photo on ruger.com. When I picked it up today, a older guy at the store was buying five guns. When he left they told me he owns over 2,000 guns! I can't think of 2,000 that I would like to own if I had that kind of scratch but he evidently has an impressive collection. His last name was 'Smithsonian'? It could be. They think he said 2700 at last count. Well, congrats on #48. Did I tell you I wore my NRA cap to Golden Corrall last time we took the kids for breakfast. Three people came up and told me what a great hat I had. Got a few dirty looks from liberals too, but that just increased the satisfaction. Guns I use #5 is supposed to land at the dealer's today, where it will be jailed for about a week because of Maryland laws. No biggie. It's still #5 because I sold the former #5. Gun #6 is on allocation...no arrival date yet. Are you still using a seeing eye gun dog? Why the 'I use' distinction. Are you too embarrassed to be up front amongst your liberal, gun-hating buddies here? Because I have five guns I use, and two new "collector" hand-engraved revolvers I bought on a whim some years ago that I don't use and, in fact, have never been used. The Ruger Vaquero set that you said you bought AND sold? Keep up with your lies, deadbeat. Uh, no, **** for brains. My mistake. It's hard for me to keep track of your lies. Evidently it's equally hard for you: On December 7, 2014 you did say they were unfired, right? "The SA Rugers are very nice, especially if you are a fan of single action revolvers. I have a pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros in .45 Colt that were nicely engraved and only fired at the factory and not fired since. They're safe queens." Yet that was a lie, 'eh? 1/7/2008 "The Vaquero, ah, I love it and so did everyone else. I only had a couple of boxes of ammo for it (I only brought one revolver with me), and as soon as I shot off the first few rounds, everyone else wanted to shoot it, too. It has a bit less barrel flip than, say, a semi-auto that shoots .40 S&W. These were a real steal. I got them at a gun shop where they were on consignment sale, and I paid less than half the typical retail. One of the pair had less than 100 rounds fired through it, the shop owner said, and the other had never been fired. Consecutive serial numbers, nice presentation box." Different sets of revolvers, **** for brains. I've also bought and sold three or four different Ruger Mark III's, including the one I sold this week. |
#48
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 8:22 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 7:09 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 8:52 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 07:47:17 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 7:39 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 19:38:06 -0400, Alex wrote: Poquito Loco wrote: On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:45:39 -0400, Alex wrote: I picked up #48 today. The NRA edition Ruger 22/45. This has the threaded barrel which will, someday, carry a suppressor. My NFA Trust is done so now the ATF waiting game begins. I shot one of these at the Ruger factory - actually their outdoor range down the street - and all you can hear is the action, the hit on the steel target and the shell casing hitting the concrete floor. It wasn't my first color of choice but the NRA edition only comes in red and it looks better in person than the photo on ruger.com. When I picked it up today, a older guy at the store was buying five guns. When he left they told me he owns over 2,000 guns! I can't think of 2,000 that I would like to own if I had that kind of scratch but he evidently has an impressive collection. His last name was 'Smithsonian'? It could be. They think he said 2700 at last count. Well, congrats on #48. Did I tell you I wore my NRA cap to Golden Corrall last time we took the kids for breakfast. Three people came up and told me what a great hat I had. Got a few dirty looks from liberals too, but that just increased the satisfaction. Guns I use #5 is supposed to land at the dealer's today, where it will be jailed for about a week because of Maryland laws. No biggie. It's still #5 because I sold the former #5. Gun #6 is on allocation...no arrival date yet. Are you still using a seeing eye gun dog? Why the 'I use' distinction. Are you too embarrassed to be up front amongst your liberal, gun-hating buddies here? Because I have five guns I use, and two new "collector" hand-engraved revolvers I bought on a whim some years ago that I don't use and, in fact, have never been used. The Ruger Vaquero set that you said you bought AND sold? Keep up with your lies, deadbeat. Uh, no, **** for brains. My mistake. It's hard for me to keep track of your lies. Evidently it's equally hard for you: On December 7, 2014 you did say they were unfired, right? "The SA Rugers are very nice, especially if you are a fan of single action revolvers. I have a pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros in .45 Colt that were nicely engraved and only fired at the factory and not fired since. They're safe queens." Yet that was a lie, 'eh? 1/7/2008 "The Vaquero, ah, I love it and so did everyone else. I only had a couple of boxes of ammo for it (I only brought one revolver with me), and as soon as I shot off the first few rounds, everyone else wanted to shoot it, too. It has a bit less barrel flip than, say, a semi-auto that shoots .40 S&W. These were a real steal. I got them at a gun shop where they were on consignment sale, and I paid less than half the typical retail. One of the pair had less than 100 rounds fired through it, the shop owner said, and the other had never been fired. Consecutive serial numbers, nice presentation box." Different sets of revolvers, **** for brains. I've also bought and sold three or four different Ruger Mark III's, including the one I sold this week. Buy high, sell low. Declare bankruptcy. |
#48
On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 21:04:02 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 8:22 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 7:09 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 8:52 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 07:47:17 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 7:39 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 19:38:06 -0400, Alex wrote: Poquito Loco wrote: On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:45:39 -0400, Alex wrote: I picked up #48 today. The NRA edition Ruger 22/45. This has the threaded barrel which will, someday, carry a suppressor. My NFA Trust is done so now the ATF waiting game begins. I shot one of these at the Ruger factory - actually their outdoor range down the street - and all you can hear is the action, the hit on the steel target and the shell casing hitting the concrete floor. It wasn't my first color of choice but the NRA edition only comes in red and it looks better in person than the photo on ruger.com. When I picked it up today, a older guy at the store was buying five guns. When he left they told me he owns over 2,000 guns! I can't think of 2,000 that I would like to own if I had that kind of scratch but he evidently has an impressive collection. His last name was 'Smithsonian'? It could be. They think he said 2700 at last count. Well, congrats on #48. Did I tell you I wore my NRA cap to Golden Corrall last time we took the kids for breakfast. Three people came up and told me what a great hat I had. Got a few dirty looks from liberals too, but that just increased the satisfaction. Guns I use #5 is supposed to land at the dealer's today, where it will be jailed for about a week because of Maryland laws. No biggie. It's still #5 because I sold the former #5. Gun #6 is on allocation...no arrival date yet. Are you still using a seeing eye gun dog? Why the 'I use' distinction. Are you too embarrassed to be up front amongst your liberal, gun-hating buddies here? Because I have five guns I use, and two new "collector" hand-engraved revolvers I bought on a whim some years ago that I don't use and, in fact, have never been used. The Ruger Vaquero set that you said you bought AND sold? Keep up with your lies, deadbeat. Uh, no, **** for brains. My mistake. It's hard for me to keep track of your lies. Evidently it's equally hard for you: On December 7, 2014 you did say they were unfired, right? "The SA Rugers are very nice, especially if you are a fan of single action revolvers. I have a pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros in .45 Colt that were nicely engraved and only fired at the factory and not fired since. They're safe queens." Yet that was a lie, 'eh? 1/7/2008 "The Vaquero, ah, I love it and so did everyone else. I only had a couple of boxes of ammo for it (I only brought one revolver with me), and as soon as I shot off the first few rounds, everyone else wanted to shoot it, too. It has a bit less barrel flip than, say, a semi-auto that shoots .40 S&W. These were a real steal. I got them at a gun shop where they were on consignment sale, and I paid less than half the typical retail. One of the pair had less than 100 rounds fired through it, the shop owner said, and the other had never been fired. Consecutive serial numbers, nice presentation box." Different sets of revolvers, **** for brains. I've also bought and sold three or four different Ruger Mark III's, including the one I sold this week. I *knew* I was right on the money! |
#48
On 6/9/2016 7:17 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 8:14 AM, Tim wrote: On Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 6:42:25 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote: Might not have been "liberals." Might have been non-aligned citizens who are horrified by your pimping for a terrorist organization. I still get mailings from the NRA, which I usually return in an unstamped envelope with the hope the terrorists have to pay postage due. LOL If they are "horrified, non-aligned citizens" all because of some hat then they have some very serious problems. Probably can't go to the bathroom by themselves either. D'oh. It's not the hat, it's the symbolism. The NRA is a terrorist organization. What do you define at "terrorism?" |
#48
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 12:02:24 -0500, "Ryan P." wrote:
On 6/9/2016 7:17 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 8:14 AM, Tim wrote: On Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 6:42:25 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote: Might not have been "liberals." Might have been non-aligned citizens who are horrified by your pimping for a terrorist organization. I still get mailings from the NRA, which I usually return in an unstamped envelope with the hope the terrorists have to pay postage due. LOL If they are "horrified, non-aligned citizens" all because of some hat then they have some very serious problems. Probably can't go to the bathroom by themselves either. D'oh. It's not the hat, it's the symbolism. The NRA is a terrorist organization. What do you define at "terrorism?" Asked and unanswered. Questions about Harry's moronic statements are, in his terms, moronic questions. I suppose that makes some kind of sense. |
#48
On 6/10/16 2:06 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 12:02:24 -0500, "Ryan P." wrote: On 6/9/2016 7:17 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 8:14 AM, Tim wrote: On Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 6:42:25 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote: Might not have been "liberals." Might have been non-aligned citizens who are horrified by your pimping for a terrorist organization. I still get mailings from the NRA, which I usually return in an unstamped envelope with the hope the terrorists have to pay postage due. LOL If they are "horrified, non-aligned citizens" all because of some hat then they have some very serious problems. Probably can't go to the bathroom by themselves either. D'oh. It's not the hat, it's the symbolism. The NRA is a terrorist organization. What do you define at "terrorism?" Asked and unanswered. Questions about Harry's moronic statements are, in his terms, moronic questions. I suppose that makes some kind of sense. No need for me to respond. Just google "NRA is a terrorist organization." |
#48
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 14:16:12 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: No need for me to respond. Just google "NRA is a terrorist organization." You will get a bunch of hits from partisan organizations. So what? Google just about anything negative along with "Clinton" and see what you get. |
#48
|
#48
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/9/16 8:22 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 7:09 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 8:52 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 07:47:17 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 7:39 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 19:38:06 -0400, Alex wrote: Poquito Loco wrote: On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:45:39 -0400, Alex wrote: I picked up #48 today. The NRA edition Ruger 22/45. This has the threaded barrel which will, someday, carry a suppressor. My NFA Trust is done so now the ATF waiting game begins. I shot one of these at the Ruger factory - actually their outdoor range down the street - and all you can hear is the action, the hit on the steel target and the shell casing hitting the concrete floor. It wasn't my first color of choice but the NRA edition only comes in red and it looks better in person than the photo on ruger.com. When I picked it up today, a older guy at the store was buying five guns. When he left they told me he owns over 2,000 guns! I can't think of 2,000 that I would like to own if I had that kind of scratch but he evidently has an impressive collection. His last name was 'Smithsonian'? It could be. They think he said 2700 at last count. Well, congrats on #48. Did I tell you I wore my NRA cap to Golden Corrall last time we took the kids for breakfast. Three people came up and told me what a great hat I had. Got a few dirty looks from liberals too, but that just increased the satisfaction. Guns I use #5 is supposed to land at the dealer's today, where it will be jailed for about a week because of Maryland laws. No biggie. It's still #5 because I sold the former #5. Gun #6 is on allocation...no arrival date yet. Are you still using a seeing eye gun dog? Why the 'I use' distinction. Are you too embarrassed to be up front amongst your liberal, gun-hating buddies here? Because I have five guns I use, and two new "collector" hand-engraved revolvers I bought on a whim some years ago that I don't use and, in fact, have never been used. The Ruger Vaquero set that you said you bought AND sold? Keep up with your lies, deadbeat. Uh, no, **** for brains. My mistake. It's hard for me to keep track of your lies. Evidently it's equally hard for you: On December 7, 2014 you did say they were unfired, right? "The SA Rugers are very nice, especially if you are a fan of single action revolvers. I have a pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros in .45 Colt that were nicely engraved and only fired at the factory and not fired since. They're safe queens." Yet that was a lie, 'eh? 1/7/2008 "The Vaquero, ah, I love it and so did everyone else. I only had a couple of boxes of ammo for it (I only brought one revolver with me), and as soon as I shot off the first few rounds, everyone else wanted to shoot it, too. It has a bit less barrel flip than, say, a semi-auto that shoots .40 S&W. These were a real steal. I got them at a gun shop where they were on consignment sale, and I paid less than half the typical retail. One of the pair had less than 100 rounds fired through it, the shop owner said, and the other had never been fired. Consecutive serial numbers, nice presentation box." Different sets of revolvers, **** for brains. I've also bought and sold three or four different Ruger Mark III's, including the one I sold this week. Bull****, liar. |
#48
Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 21:04:02 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 8:22 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 7:09 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 8:52 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 07:47:17 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 7:39 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 19:38:06 -0400, Alex wrote: Poquito Loco wrote: On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:45:39 -0400, Alex wrote: I picked up #48 today. The NRA edition Ruger 22/45. This has the threaded barrel which will, someday, carry a suppressor. My NFA Trust is done so now the ATF waiting game begins. I shot one of these at the Ruger factory - actually their outdoor range down the street - and all you can hear is the action, the hit on the steel target and the shell casing hitting the concrete floor. It wasn't my first color of choice but the NRA edition only comes in red and it looks better in person than the photo on ruger.com. When I picked it up today, a older guy at the store was buying five guns. When he left they told me he owns over 2,000 guns! I can't think of 2,000 that I would like to own if I had that kind of scratch but he evidently has an impressive collection. His last name was 'Smithsonian'? It could be. They think he said 2700 at last count. Well, congrats on #48. Did I tell you I wore my NRA cap to Golden Corrall last time we took the kids for breakfast. Three people came up and told me what a great hat I had. Got a few dirty looks from liberals too, but that just increased the satisfaction. Guns I use #5 is supposed to land at the dealer's today, where it will be jailed for about a week because of Maryland laws. No biggie. It's still #5 because I sold the former #5. Gun #6 is on allocation...no arrival date yet. Are you still using a seeing eye gun dog? Why the 'I use' distinction. Are you too embarrassed to be up front amongst your liberal, gun-hating buddies here? Because I have five guns I use, and two new "collector" hand-engraved revolvers I bought on a whim some years ago that I don't use and, in fact, have never been used. The Ruger Vaquero set that you said you bought AND sold? Keep up with your lies, deadbeat. Uh, no, **** for brains. My mistake. It's hard for me to keep track of your lies. Evidently it's equally hard for you: On December 7, 2014 you did say they were unfired, right? "The SA Rugers are very nice, especially if you are a fan of single action revolvers. I have a pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros in .45 Colt that were nicely engraved and only fired at the factory and not fired since. They're safe queens." Yet that was a lie, 'eh? 1/7/2008 "The Vaquero, ah, I love it and so did everyone else. I only had a couple of boxes of ammo for it (I only brought one revolver with me), and as soon as I shot off the first few rounds, everyone else wanted to shoot it, too. It has a bit less barrel flip than, say, a semi-auto that shoots .40 S&W. These were a real steal. I got them at a gun shop where they were on consignment sale, and I paid less than half the typical retail. One of the pair had less than 100 rounds fired through it, the shop owner said, and the other had never been fired. Consecutive serial numbers, nice presentation box." Different sets of revolvers, **** for brains. I've also bought and sold three or four different Ruger Mark III's, including the one I sold this week. I *knew* I was right on the money! Next time, STFU and let him make up his own lies! |
#48
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 16:07:07 -0400, Poquito Loco
wrote: On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:37:01 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 14:16:12 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: No need for me to respond. Just google "NRA is a terrorist organization." You will get a bunch of hits from partisan organizations. So what? Google just about anything negative along with "Clinton" and see what you get. "Clinton is a terrorist" gets about 591,000 results (0.48 seconds). She must be a terrorist. === Googled "Harry Krause is an ass wipe" and got 246,000 results, some of which very definitely refer to our hero. |
#48
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 20:13:14 -0400, Alex wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 8:22 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 7:09 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 8:52 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 07:47:17 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 7:39 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 19:38:06 -0400, Alex wrote: Poquito Loco wrote: On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:45:39 -0400, Alex wrote: I picked up #48 today. The NRA edition Ruger 22/45. This has the threaded barrel which will, someday, carry a suppressor. My NFA Trust is done so now the ATF waiting game begins. I shot one of these at the Ruger factory - actually their outdoor range down the street - and all you can hear is the action, the hit on the steel target and the shell casing hitting the concrete floor. It wasn't my first color of choice but the NRA edition only comes in red and it looks better in person than the photo on ruger.com. When I picked it up today, a older guy at the store was buying five guns. When he left they told me he owns over 2,000 guns! I can't think of 2,000 that I would like to own if I had that kind of scratch but he evidently has an impressive collection. His last name was 'Smithsonian'? It could be. They think he said 2700 at last count. Well, congrats on #48. Did I tell you I wore my NRA cap to Golden Corrall last time we took the kids for breakfast. Three people came up and told me what a great hat I had. Got a few dirty looks from liberals too, but that just increased the satisfaction. Guns I use #5 is supposed to land at the dealer's today, where it will be jailed for about a week because of Maryland laws. No biggie. It's still #5 because I sold the former #5. Gun #6 is on allocation...no arrival date yet. Are you still using a seeing eye gun dog? Why the 'I use' distinction. Are you too embarrassed to be up front amongst your liberal, gun-hating buddies here? Because I have five guns I use, and two new "collector" hand-engraved revolvers I bought on a whim some years ago that I don't use and, in fact, have never been used. The Ruger Vaquero set that you said you bought AND sold? Keep up with your lies, deadbeat. Uh, no, **** for brains. My mistake. It's hard for me to keep track of your lies. Evidently it's equally hard for you: On December 7, 2014 you did say they were unfired, right? "The SA Rugers are very nice, especially if you are a fan of single action revolvers. I have a pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros in .45 Colt that were nicely engraved and only fired at the factory and not fired since. They're safe queens." Yet that was a lie, 'eh? 1/7/2008 "The Vaquero, ah, I love it and so did everyone else. I only had a couple of boxes of ammo for it (I only brought one revolver with me), and as soon as I shot off the first few rounds, everyone else wanted to shoot it, too. It has a bit less barrel flip than, say, a semi-auto that shoots .40 S&W. These were a real steal. I got them at a gun shop where they were on consignment sale, and I paid less than half the typical retail. One of the pair had less than 100 rounds fired through it, the shop owner said, and the other had never been fired. Consecutive serial numbers, nice presentation box." Different sets of revolvers, **** for brains. I've also bought and sold three or four different Ruger Mark III's, including the one I sold this week. Bull****, liar. Gosh, it makes perfect sense that he'd buy a pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros in '08, shoot them a bit, and then get bored with them and sell them. Then, few years later, he'd forget that he'd owned a pair, buy *another* pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros, this time only fired at the factory, and store them in his safe. Nothing unbelievable there, is there? ;) Imagine having to see this each time he looks in a mirror: https://media.licdn.com/mpr/mpr/p/1/...a2/1c3668d.jpg |
#48
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 20:38:25 -0400, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 16:07:07 -0400, Poquito Loco wrote: On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:37:01 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 14:16:12 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: No need for me to respond. Just google "NRA is a terrorist organization." You will get a bunch of hits from partisan organizations. So what? Google just about anything negative along with "Clinton" and see what you get. "Clinton is a terrorist" gets about 591,000 results (0.48 seconds). She must be a terrorist. === Googled "Harry Krause is an ass wipe" and got 246,000 results, some of which very definitely refer to our hero. Proof positive, using Krauselogic. |
#48
On 6/11/16 6:45 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 20:13:14 -0400, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 8:22 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 7:09 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 8:52 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 07:47:17 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 7:39 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 19:38:06 -0400, Alex wrote: Poquito Loco wrote: On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:45:39 -0400, Alex wrote: I picked up #48 today. The NRA edition Ruger 22/45. This has the threaded barrel which will, someday, carry a suppressor. My NFA Trust is done so now the ATF waiting game begins. I shot one of these at the Ruger factory - actually their outdoor range down the street - and all you can hear is the action, the hit on the steel target and the shell casing hitting the concrete floor. It wasn't my first color of choice but the NRA edition only comes in red and it looks better in person than the photo on ruger.com. When I picked it up today, a older guy at the store was buying five guns. When he left they told me he owns over 2,000 guns! I can't think of 2,000 that I would like to own if I had that kind of scratch but he evidently has an impressive collection. His last name was 'Smithsonian'? It could be. They think he said 2700 at last count. Well, congrats on #48. Did I tell you I wore my NRA cap to Golden Corrall last time we took the kids for breakfast. Three people came up and told me what a great hat I had. Got a few dirty looks from liberals too, but that just increased the satisfaction. Guns I use #5 is supposed to land at the dealer's today, where it will be jailed for about a week because of Maryland laws. No biggie. It's still #5 because I sold the former #5. Gun #6 is on allocation...no arrival date yet. Are you still using a seeing eye gun dog? Why the 'I use' distinction. Are you too embarrassed to be up front amongst your liberal, gun-hating buddies here? Because I have five guns I use, and two new "collector" hand-engraved revolvers I bought on a whim some years ago that I don't use and, in fact, have never been used. The Ruger Vaquero set that you said you bought AND sold? Keep up with your lies, deadbeat. Uh, no, **** for brains. My mistake. It's hard for me to keep track of your lies. Evidently it's equally hard for you: On December 7, 2014 you did say they were unfired, right? "The SA Rugers are very nice, especially if you are a fan of single action revolvers. I have a pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros in .45 Colt that were nicely engraved and only fired at the factory and not fired since. They're safe queens." Yet that was a lie, 'eh? 1/7/2008 "The Vaquero, ah, I love it and so did everyone else. I only had a couple of boxes of ammo for it (I only brought one revolver with me), and as soon as I shot off the first few rounds, everyone else wanted to shoot it, too. It has a bit less barrel flip than, say, a semi-auto that shoots .40 S&W. These were a real steal. I got them at a gun shop where they were on consignment sale, and I paid less than half the typical retail. One of the pair had less than 100 rounds fired through it, the shop owner said, and the other had never been fired. Consecutive serial numbers, nice presentation box." Different sets of revolvers, **** for brains. I've also bought and sold three or four different Ruger Mark III's, including the one I sold this week. Bull****, liar. Gosh, it makes perfect sense that he'd buy a pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros in '08, shoot them a bit, and then get bored with them and sell them. Then, few years later, he'd forget that he'd owned a pair, buy *another* pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros, this time only fired at the factory, and store them in his safe. Nothing unbelievable there, is there? ;) The second set were engraved, unfired, and in a fancy presentation box, probably fancier than the pine box in which you'll be taking your final dirt nap. Don't you have upcoming surgery, or are you all finished until something else in your crumbling body fails? |
#48
On 6/11/16 6:45 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 20:38:25 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 16:07:07 -0400, Poquito Loco wrote: On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:37:01 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 14:16:12 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: No need for me to respond. Just google "NRA is a terrorist organization." You will get a bunch of hits from partisan organizations. So what? Google just about anything negative along with "Clinton" and see what you get. "Clinton is a terrorist" gets about 591,000 results (0.48 seconds). She must be a terrorist. === Googled "Harry Krause is an ass wipe" and got 246,000 results, some of which very definitely refer to our hero. Proof positive, using Krauselogic. Even funnier, when I google "Trump voters," the names of all the right-wing trash in rec.bloats pops up. |
#48
On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 06:56:58 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/11/16 6:45 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 20:38:25 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 16:07:07 -0400, Poquito Loco wrote: On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:37:01 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 14:16:12 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: No need for me to respond. Just google "NRA is a terrorist organization." You will get a bunch of hits from partisan organizations. So what? Google just about anything negative along with "Clinton" and see what you get. "Clinton is a terrorist" gets about 591,000 results (0.48 seconds). She must be a terrorist. === Googled "Harry Krause is an ass wipe" and got 246,000 results, some of which very definitely refer to our hero. Proof positive, using Krauselogic. Even funnier, when I google "Trump voters," the names of all the right-wing trash in rec.bloats pops up. ....and most likely your name is in there several hundred times! Go check out the 'A Virtual Classic' thread. |
#48
On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 06:56:13 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/11/16 6:45 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 20:13:14 -0400, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 8:22 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 7:09 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 8:52 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 07:47:17 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 7:39 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 19:38:06 -0400, Alex wrote: Poquito Loco wrote: On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:45:39 -0400, Alex wrote: I picked up #48 today. The NRA edition Ruger 22/45. This has the threaded barrel which will, someday, carry a suppressor. My NFA Trust is done so now the ATF waiting game begins. I shot one of these at the Ruger factory - actually their outdoor range down the street - and all you can hear is the action, the hit on the steel target and the shell casing hitting the concrete floor. It wasn't my first color of choice but the NRA edition only comes in red and it looks better in person than the photo on ruger.com. When I picked it up today, a older guy at the store was buying five guns. When he left they told me he owns over 2,000 guns! I can't think of 2,000 that I would like to own if I had that kind of scratch but he evidently has an impressive collection. His last name was 'Smithsonian'? It could be. They think he said 2700 at last count. Well, congrats on #48. Did I tell you I wore my NRA cap to Golden Corrall last time we took the kids for breakfast. Three people came up and told me what a great hat I had. Got a few dirty looks from liberals too, but that just increased the satisfaction. Guns I use #5 is supposed to land at the dealer's today, where it will be jailed for about a week because of Maryland laws. No biggie. It's still #5 because I sold the former #5. Gun #6 is on allocation...no arrival date yet. Are you still using a seeing eye gun dog? Why the 'I use' distinction. Are you too embarrassed to be up front amongst your liberal, gun-hating buddies here? Because I have five guns I use, and two new "collector" hand-engraved revolvers I bought on a whim some years ago that I don't use and, in fact, have never been used. The Ruger Vaquero set that you said you bought AND sold? Keep up with your lies, deadbeat. Uh, no, **** for brains. My mistake. It's hard for me to keep track of your lies. Evidently it's equally hard for you: On December 7, 2014 you did say they were unfired, right? "The SA Rugers are very nice, especially if you are a fan of single action revolvers. I have a pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros in .45 Colt that were nicely engraved and only fired at the factory and not fired since. They're safe queens." Yet that was a lie, 'eh? 1/7/2008 "The Vaquero, ah, I love it and so did everyone else. I only had a couple of boxes of ammo for it (I only brought one revolver with me), and as soon as I shot off the first few rounds, everyone else wanted to shoot it, too. It has a bit less barrel flip than, say, a semi-auto that shoots .40 S&W. These were a real steal. I got them at a gun shop where they were on consignment sale, and I paid less than half the typical retail. One of the pair had less than 100 rounds fired through it, the shop owner said, and the other had never been fired. Consecutive serial numbers, nice presentation box." Different sets of revolvers, **** for brains. I've also bought and sold three or four different Ruger Mark III's, including the one I sold this week. Bull****, liar. Gosh, it makes perfect sense that he'd buy a pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros in '08, shoot them a bit, and then get bored with them and sell them. Then, few years later, he'd forget that he'd owned a pair, buy *another* pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros, this time only fired at the factory, and store them in his safe. Nothing unbelievable there, is there? ;) The second set were engraved, unfired, and in a fancy presentation box, probably fancier than the pine box in which you'll be taking your final dirt nap. Don't you have upcoming surgery, or are you all finished until something else in your crumbling body fails? Wait, the first set was in a "nice presentation box." Did Ruger actually sell a matched pair, with consecutive serial numbers, in a presentation box *without* engraving? (How much deeper are you going to keep digging this hole?) |
#48
On 6/11/16 8:56 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 06:56:13 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/11/16 6:45 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 20:13:14 -0400, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 8:22 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 7:09 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 8:52 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 07:47:17 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 7:39 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 19:38:06 -0400, Alex wrote: Poquito Loco wrote: On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:45:39 -0400, Alex wrote: I picked up #48 today. The NRA edition Ruger 22/45. This has the threaded barrel which will, someday, carry a suppressor. My NFA Trust is done so now the ATF waiting game begins. I shot one of these at the Ruger factory - actually their outdoor range down the street - and all you can hear is the action, the hit on the steel target and the shell casing hitting the concrete floor. It wasn't my first color of choice but the NRA edition only comes in red and it looks better in person than the photo on ruger.com. When I picked it up today, a older guy at the store was buying five guns. When he left they told me he owns over 2,000 guns! I can't think of 2,000 that I would like to own if I had that kind of scratch but he evidently has an impressive collection. His last name was 'Smithsonian'? It could be. They think he said 2700 at last count. Well, congrats on #48. Did I tell you I wore my NRA cap to Golden Corrall last time we took the kids for breakfast. Three people came up and told me what a great hat I had. Got a few dirty looks from liberals too, but that just increased the satisfaction. Guns I use #5 is supposed to land at the dealer's today, where it will be jailed for about a week because of Maryland laws. No biggie. It's still #5 because I sold the former #5. Gun #6 is on allocation...no arrival date yet. Are you still using a seeing eye gun dog? Why the 'I use' distinction. Are you too embarrassed to be up front amongst your liberal, gun-hating buddies here? Because I have five guns I use, and two new "collector" hand-engraved revolvers I bought on a whim some years ago that I don't use and, in fact, have never been used. The Ruger Vaquero set that you said you bought AND sold? Keep up with your lies, deadbeat. Uh, no, **** for brains. My mistake. It's hard for me to keep track of your lies. Evidently it's equally hard for you: On December 7, 2014 you did say they were unfired, right? "The SA Rugers are very nice, especially if you are a fan of single action revolvers. I have a pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros in .45 Colt that were nicely engraved and only fired at the factory and not fired since. They're safe queens." Yet that was a lie, 'eh? 1/7/2008 "The Vaquero, ah, I love it and so did everyone else. I only had a couple of boxes of ammo for it (I only brought one revolver with me), and as soon as I shot off the first few rounds, everyone else wanted to shoot it, too. It has a bit less barrel flip than, say, a semi-auto that shoots .40 S&W. These were a real steal. I got them at a gun shop where they were on consignment sale, and I paid less than half the typical retail. One of the pair had less than 100 rounds fired through it, the shop owner said, and the other had never been fired. Consecutive serial numbers, nice presentation box." Different sets of revolvers, **** for brains. I've also bought and sold three or four different Ruger Mark III's, including the one I sold this week. Bull****, liar. Gosh, it makes perfect sense that he'd buy a pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros in '08, shoot them a bit, and then get bored with them and sell them. Then, few years later, he'd forget that he'd owned a pair, buy *another* pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros, this time only fired at the factory, and store them in his safe. Nothing unbelievable there, is there? ;) The second set were engraved, unfired, and in a fancy presentation box, probably fancier than the pine box in which you'll be taking your final dirt nap. Don't you have upcoming surgery, or are you all finished until something else in your crumbling body fails? Wait, the first set was in a "nice presentation box." Did Ruger actually sell a matched pair, with consecutive serial numbers, in a presentation box *without* engraving? (How much deeper are you going to keep digging this hole?) 1. I don't know. 2. Go vote for Trump. |
#48
On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 09:00:48 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/11/16 8:56 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 06:56:13 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: snippage The Ruger Vaquero set that you said you bought AND sold? Keep up with your lies, deadbeat. Uh, no, **** for brains. My mistake. It's hard for me to keep track of your lies. Evidently it's equally hard for you: On December 7, 2014 you did say they were unfired, right? "The SA Rugers are very nice, especially if you are a fan of single action revolvers. I have a pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros in .45 Colt that were nicely engraved and only fired at the factory and not fired since. They're safe queens." Yet that was a lie, 'eh? 1/7/2008 "The Vaquero, ah, I love it and so did everyone else. I only had a couple of boxes of ammo for it (I only brought one revolver with me), and as soon as I shot off the first few rounds, everyone else wanted to shoot it, too. It has a bit less barrel flip than, say, a semi-auto that shoots .40 S&W. These were a real steal. I got them at a gun shop where they were on consignment sale, and I paid less than half the typical retail. One of the pair had less than 100 rounds fired through it, the shop owner said, and the other had never been fired. Consecutive serial numbers, nice presentation box." Different sets of revolvers, **** for brains. I've also bought and sold three or four different Ruger Mark III's, including the one I sold this week. Bull****, liar. Gosh, it makes perfect sense that he'd buy a pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros in '08, shoot them a bit, and then get bored with them and sell them. Then, few years later, he'd forget that he'd owned a pair, buy *another* pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros, this time only fired at the factory, and store them in his safe. Nothing unbelievable there, is there? ;) The second set were engraved, unfired, and in a fancy presentation box, probably fancier than the pine box in which you'll be taking your final dirt nap. Don't you have upcoming surgery, or are you all finished until something else in your crumbling body fails? Wait, the first set was in a "nice presentation box." Did Ruger actually sell a matched pair, with consecutive serial numbers, in a presentation box *without* engraving? (How much deeper are you going to keep digging this hole?) 1. I don't know. If I were you, I'd try to change the subject. 2. Go vote for Trump. Oh, I see you have. |
#48
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/11/16 8:56 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 06:56:13 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/11/16 6:45 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 20:13:14 -0400, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 8:22 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 7:09 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 8:52 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 07:47:17 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 7:39 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 19:38:06 -0400, Alex wrote: Poquito Loco wrote: On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:45:39 -0400, Alex wrote: I picked up #48 today. The NRA edition Ruger 22/45. This has the threaded barrel which will, someday, carry a suppressor. My NFA Trust is done so now the ATF waiting game begins. I shot one of these at the Ruger factory - actually their outdoor range down the street - and all you can hear is the action, the hit on the steel target and the shell casing hitting the concrete floor. It wasn't my first color of choice but the NRA edition only comes in red and it looks better in person than the photo on ruger.com. When I picked it up today, a older guy at the store was buying five guns. When he left they told me he owns over 2,000 guns! I can't think of 2,000 that I would like to own if I had that kind of scratch but he evidently has an impressive collection. His last name was 'Smithsonian'? It could be. They think he said 2700 at last count. Well, congrats on #48. Did I tell you I wore my NRA cap to Golden Corrall last time we took the kids for breakfast. Three people came up and told me what a great hat I had. Got a few dirty looks from liberals too, but that just increased the satisfaction. Guns I use #5 is supposed to land at the dealer's today, where it will be jailed for about a week because of Maryland laws. No biggie. It's still #5 because I sold the former #5. Gun #6 is on allocation...no arrival date yet. Are you still using a seeing eye gun dog? Why the 'I use' distinction. Are you too embarrassed to be up front amongst your liberal, gun-hating buddies here? Because I have five guns I use, and two new "collector" hand-engraved revolvers I bought on a whim some years ago that I don't use and, in fact, have never been used. The Ruger Vaquero set that you said you bought AND sold? Keep up with your lies, deadbeat. Uh, no, **** for brains. My mistake. It's hard for me to keep track of your lies. Evidently it's equally hard for you: On December 7, 2014 you did say they were unfired, right? "The SA Rugers are very nice, especially if you are a fan of single action revolvers. I have a pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros in .45 Colt that were nicely engraved and only fired at the factory and not fired since. They're safe queens." Yet that was a lie, 'eh? 1/7/2008 "The Vaquero, ah, I love it and so did everyone else. I only had a couple of boxes of ammo for it (I only brought one revolver with me), and as soon as I shot off the first few rounds, everyone else wanted to shoot it, too. It has a bit less barrel flip than, say, a semi-auto that shoots .40 S&W. These were a real steal. I got them at a gun shop where they were on consignment sale, and I paid less than half the typical retail. One of the pair had less than 100 rounds fired through it, the shop owner said, and the other had never been fired. Consecutive serial numbers, nice presentation box." Different sets of revolvers, **** for brains. I've also bought and sold three or four different Ruger Mark III's, including the one I sold this week. Bull****, liar. Gosh, it makes perfect sense that he'd buy a pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros in '08, shoot them a bit, and then get bored with them and sell them. Then, few years later, he'd forget that he'd owned a pair, buy *another* pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros, this time only fired at the factory, and store them in his safe. Nothing unbelievable there, is there? ;) The second set were engraved, unfired, and in a fancy presentation box, probably fancier than the pine box in which you'll be taking your final dirt nap. Don't you have upcoming surgery, or are you all finished until something else in your crumbling body fails? Wait, the first set was in a "nice presentation box." Did Ruger actually sell a matched pair, with consecutive serial numbers, in a presentation box *without* engraving? (How much deeper are you going to keep digging this hole?) 1. I don't know. Wrong answer. You just proved you lied. No surprise. 2. Go vote for Trump. I'm left with no other choice. |
#48
On 6/11/2016 9:45 PM, Alex wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/11/16 8:56 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 06:56:13 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/11/16 6:45 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 20:13:14 -0400, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 8:22 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 7:09 PM, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 8:52 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 07:47:17 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/9/16 7:39 AM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 19:38:06 -0400, Alex wrote: Poquito Loco wrote: On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:45:39 -0400, Alex wrote: I picked up #48 today. The NRA edition Ruger 22/45. This has the threaded barrel which will, someday, carry a suppressor. My NFA Trust is done so now the ATF waiting game begins. I shot one of these at the Ruger factory - actually their outdoor range down the street - and all you can hear is the action, the hit on the steel target and the shell casing hitting the concrete floor. It wasn't my first color of choice but the NRA edition only comes in red and it looks better in person than the photo on ruger.com. When I picked it up today, a older guy at the store was buying five guns. When he left they told me he owns over 2,000 guns! I can't think of 2,000 that I would like to own if I had that kind of scratch but he evidently has an impressive collection. His last name was 'Smithsonian'? It could be. They think he said 2700 at last count. Well, congrats on #48. Did I tell you I wore my NRA cap to Golden Corrall last time we took the kids for breakfast. Three people came up and told me what a great hat I had. Got a few dirty looks from liberals too, but that just increased the satisfaction. Guns I use #5 is supposed to land at the dealer's today, where it will be jailed for about a week because of Maryland laws. No biggie. It's still #5 because I sold the former #5. Gun #6 is on allocation...no arrival date yet. Are you still using a seeing eye gun dog? Why the 'I use' distinction. Are you too embarrassed to be up front amongst your liberal, gun-hating buddies here? Because I have five guns I use, and two new "collector" hand-engraved revolvers I bought on a whim some years ago that I don't use and, in fact, have never been used. The Ruger Vaquero set that you said you bought AND sold? Keep up with your lies, deadbeat. Uh, no, **** for brains. My mistake. It's hard for me to keep track of your lies. Evidently it's equally hard for you: On December 7, 2014 you did say they were unfired, right? "The SA Rugers are very nice, especially if you are a fan of single action revolvers. I have a pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros in .45 Colt that were nicely engraved and only fired at the factory and not fired since. They're safe queens." Yet that was a lie, 'eh? 1/7/2008 "The Vaquero, ah, I love it and so did everyone else. I only had a couple of boxes of ammo for it (I only brought one revolver with me), and as soon as I shot off the first few rounds, everyone else wanted to shoot it, too. It has a bit less barrel flip than, say, a semi-auto that shoots .40 S&W. These were a real steal. I got them at a gun shop where they were on consignment sale, and I paid less than half the typical retail. One of the pair had less than 100 rounds fired through it, the shop owner said, and the other had never been fired. Consecutive serial numbers, nice presentation box." Different sets of revolvers, **** for brains. I've also bought and sold three or four different Ruger Mark III's, including the one I sold this week. Bull****, liar. Gosh, it makes perfect sense that he'd buy a pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros in '08, shoot them a bit, and then get bored with them and sell them. Then, few years later, he'd forget that he'd owned a pair, buy *another* pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros, this time only fired at the factory, and store them in his safe. Nothing unbelievable there, is there? ;) The second set were engraved, unfired, and in a fancy presentation box, probably fancier than the pine box in which you'll be taking your final dirt nap. Don't you have upcoming surgery, or are you all finished until something else in your crumbling body fails? Wait, the first set was in a "nice presentation box." Did Ruger actually sell a matched pair, with consecutive serial numbers, in a presentation box *without* engraving? (How much deeper are you going to keep digging this hole?) 1. I don't know. Wrong answer. You just proved you lied. No surprise. 2. Go vote for Trump. I'm left with no other choice. That's the way I see it. So Solly Hilly. Yur just too old and set in yur liberal progressive ways. Besides you are an obvious manipulator and liar. |
#48
On 6/12/16 7:40 AM, Justan Olphart wrote:
On 6/11/2016 9:45 PM, Alex wrote: 2. Go vote for Trump. I'm left with no other choice. That's the way I see it. So Solly Hilly. Yur just too old and set in yur liberal progressive ways. Besides you are an obvious manipulator and liar. Trump is the perfect candidate for white, racist, anti-ethnic, scared of women piglets like his supporters in rec.boats. I'm glad you aren't disappointing me on this. especially you, FlaJim, who is frightened and jealous of successful women, and I don't mean Sarah Palin. Early polls don't mean a lot, but the very latest Reuters/IPSOS poll shows Mrs. Clinton opening up an 11-point lead over Trumpster the Dumpster. http://polling.reuters.com/#!poll/TM651Y15_13 |
#48
On 6/12/2016 8:31 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
I'm glad you aren't disappointing me on this. especially you, FlaJim, who is frightened and jealous of successful women, and I don't mean Sarah Palin. Who was it who had the opportunity to meet and chat with Peggie Hall and passed because, why. A. You harassed her on rec.boats for no good reason. B. You had nothing in common to talk about. (She's a boater) C. You have no balls. D. You were afraid she'd read you the riot act. E. You aren't bright enough to carry on a conversation with her. You were almost close enough to reach out and touch her and you chickened out. And then there's the stalking issue with Mad Cow that you posted pictures for proof. And how about Karen from OZ. Another female whom you tried to intimidate and just made yourself look foolish. So don't project your shortcomings on me, asshole. Have a spectacular day Harry. |
#48
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 10:33:07 -0400, Justan Olphart wrote:
On 6/12/2016 8:31 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: I'm glad you aren't disappointing me on this. especially you, FlaJim, who is frightened and jealous of successful women, and I don't mean Sarah Palin. Who was it who had the opportunity to meet and chat with Peggie Hall and passed because, why. A. You harassed her on rec.boats for no good reason. B. You had nothing in common to talk about. (She's a boater) C. You have no balls. D. You were afraid she'd read you the riot act. E. You aren't bright enough to carry on a conversation with her. You were almost close enough to reach out and touch her and you chickened out. And then there's the stalking issue with Mad Cow that you posted pictures for proof. And how about Karen from OZ. Another female whom you tried to intimidate and just made yourself look foolish. So don't project your shortcomings on me, asshole. Have a spectacular day Harry. From 13 years ago: " the one who has always attacked any women NG posters in a sad display of sexism from a clearly inadequate person who can't even communicate with the opposite sex, the one who was so seriously ***ly maladjusted you needed to lie about your therapist (probably court ordered) so she became your 15 to 20 yr younger beautiful successful wife, the one who even followed some NG women from NG to NG, then the one who went completely mad & posted specific details of your real life stalking of at least two NG women, " http://sporttoday.org/28_9124673969156982_1.htm He's not changed much. |
#48
On 6/12/16 10:33 AM, Justan Olphart wrote:
On 6/12/2016 8:31 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: I'm glad you aren't disappointing me on this. especially you, FlaJim, who is frightened and jealous of successful women, and I don't mean Sarah Palin. Who was it who had the opportunity to meet and chat with Peggie Hall and passed because, why. A. You harassed her on rec.boats for no good reason. B. You had nothing in common to talk about. (She's a boater) C. You have no balls. D. You were afraid she'd read you the riot act. E. You aren't bright enough to carry on a conversation with her. You were almost close enough to reach out and touch her and you chickened out. And then there's the stalking issue with Mad Cow that you posted pictures for proof. And how about Karen from OZ. Another female whom you tried to intimidate and just made yourself look foolish. So don't project your shortcomings on me, asshole. Have a spectacular day Harry. 1. Ms. Hall was busy when I saw her at the Annapolis boat show, with several others waiting in line to ask her about the products she was demonstrating/speaking about. I didn't feel like waiting. 2. The only argument I had with her was about her right-wing politics. 3. Right, because you're the guy who would stand by and watch someone beat up a woman, and probably cheer on the assailant. 7. Mad Cow was a boating moron, and the photos were photos she took and posted on a boat club site. 8. Karen of Oz...gosh, whatever happened to her. Oh, did you complete the 9th grade before you got in trouble with the law and were ordered into the military or, if not, into jail? You're a cowardly pussy, fella. You hide behind anonymity so you can toss your junior high insults here. You wouldn't be behaving that way if you were posting here with your identity generally known. |
#48
On 6/12/2016 11:21 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/12/16 10:33 AM, Justan Olphart wrote: On 6/12/2016 8:31 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: I'm glad you aren't disappointing me on this. especially you, FlaJim, who is frightened and jealous of successful women, and I don't mean Sarah Palin. Who was it who had the opportunity to meet and chat with Peggie Hall and passed because, why. A. You harassed her on rec.boats for no good reason. B. You had nothing in common to talk about. (She's a boater) C. You have no balls. D. You were afraid she'd read you the riot act. E. You aren't bright enough to carry on a conversation with her. You were almost close enough to reach out and touch her and you chickened out. And then there's the stalking issue with Mad Cow that you posted pictures for proof. And how about Karen from OZ. Another female whom you tried to intimidate and just made yourself look foolish. So don't project your shortcomings on me, asshole. Have a spectacular day Harry. 1. Ms. Hall was busy when I saw her at the Annapolis boat show, with several others waiting in line to ask her about the products she was demonstrating/speaking about. I didn't feel like waiting. 2. The only argument I had with her was about her right-wing politics. 3. Right, because you're the guy who would stand by and watch someone beat up a woman, and probably cheer on the assailant. 7. Mad Cow was a boating moron, and the photos were photos she took and posted on a boat club site. 8. Karen of Oz...gosh, whatever happened to her. Oh, did you complete the 9th grade before you got in trouble with the law and were ordered into the military or, if not, into jail? You're a cowardly pussy, fella. You hide behind anonymity so you can toss your junior high insults here. You wouldn't be behaving that way if you were posting here with your identity generally known. Not my fault that you stupidly provide personal information that should be kept off line. Your statements to and about the women of rec.boats prove that you are jealous of and hateful toward all women who've posted here. Probably because they are more knowledgeable about boats and boating than you. Is that why you are a hater. If you feel insulted by truths about you, that's your problem, not mine. Considering your cowardly draft dodging, tax evasion, foreclosure, twice bankrupt, constant bragging, lying, hating of women and men whose politics don't suit you, associations with low life, demonstrating your hatefulness of southerners, Berating most religious folks, although you seem to lay off Jewish people for some reason. That should be enough reason to disregard any of your assertions as tripe. Apparently you are not having a spectacular day. Again that's not my fault. Carry on asshole. |
#48
On 6/12/2016 10:40 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 10:33:07 -0400, Justan Olphart wrote: On 6/12/2016 8:31 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: I'm glad you aren't disappointing me on this. especially you, FlaJim, who is frightened and jealous of successful women, and I don't mean Sarah Palin. Who was it who had the opportunity to meet and chat with Peggie Hall and passed because, why. A. You harassed her on rec.boats for no good reason. B. You had nothing in common to talk about. (She's a boater) C. You have no balls. D. You were afraid she'd read you the riot act. E. You aren't bright enough to carry on a conversation with her. You were almost close enough to reach out and touch her and you chickened out. And then there's the stalking issue with Mad Cow that you posted pictures for proof. And how about Karen from OZ. Another female whom you tried to intimidate and just made yourself look foolish. So don't project your shortcomings on me, asshole. Have a spectacular day Harry. From 13 years ago: " the one who has always attacked any women NG posters in a sad display of sexism from a clearly inadequate person who can't even communicate with the opposite sex, the one who was so seriously ***ly maladjusted you needed to lie about your therapist (probably court ordered) so she became your 15 to 20 yr younger beautiful successful wife, the one who even followed some NG women from NG to NG, then the one who went completely mad & posted specific details of your real life stalking of at least two NG women, " http://sporttoday.org/28_9124673969156982_1.htm He's not changed much. The sad thing is that Harry doesn't see himself as the dirtbag he is. He seems unphased by the barrage of uncomplimentary comments about him coming from all quarters. How can so many people misjudge him? |
#48
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 12:28:21 -0400, Justan Olphart
wrote: Not my fault that you stupidly provide personal information that should be kept off line. Since most of the stuff in your rant was online from public sources I think the idea of "providing" information is moot. Privacy is an obsolete idea these days when virtually everything important about someone is freely available from government web sites and all it takes is a snippet of information to get started. I know that when I was looking into buying the house next door (tax deed sale and a foreclosure), I ended up knowing a lot more about my neighbor than I needed to know, simply by investigating the title on the house and using the links at the court clerk's site from the strap number. |
#48
|
#48
On 6/12/16 12:28 PM, Justan Olphart wrote:
Apparently you are not having a spectacular day. Again that's not my fault. Carry on asshole. Any day anyone can wake up and not be a right-wing, racist, dirtbag like you is a good day. |
#48
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 11:21:33 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/12/16 10:33 AM, Justan Olphart wrote: On 6/12/2016 8:31 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: I'm glad you aren't disappointing me on this. especially you, FlaJim, who is frightened and jealous of successful women, and I don't mean Sarah Palin. Who was it who had the opportunity to meet and chat with Peggie Hall and passed because, why. A. You harassed her on rec.boats for no good reason. B. You had nothing in common to talk about. (She's a boater) C. You have no balls. D. You were afraid she'd read you the riot act. E. You aren't bright enough to carry on a conversation with her. You were almost close enough to reach out and touch her and you chickened out. And then there's the stalking issue with Mad Cow that you posted pictures for proof. And how about Karen from OZ. Another female whom you tried to intimidate and just made yourself look foolish. So don't project your shortcomings on me, asshole. Have a spectacular day Harry. 1. Ms. Hall was busy when I saw her at the Annapolis boat show, with several others waiting in line to ask her about the products she was demonstrating/speaking about. I didn't feel like waiting. 2. The only argument I had with her was about her right-wing politics. 3. Right, because you're the guy who would stand by and watch someone beat up a woman, and probably cheer on the assailant. 7. Mad Cow was a boating moron, and the photos were photos she took and posted on a boat club site. 8. Karen of Oz...gosh, whatever happened to her. Oh, did you complete the 9th grade before you got in trouble with the law and were ordered into the military or, if not, into jail? You're a cowardly pussy, fella. You hide behind anonymity so you can toss your junior high insults here. You wouldn't be behaving that way if you were posting here with your identity generally known. Does 'cowardly pussy' apply to 'Nomen...' and 'anonymous'? My identity is generally known, and I have no problem showing your lack of veracity. What info do you need to know? Which data cells are empty? |
#48
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 12:56:57 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/12/16 12:28 PM, Justan Olphart wrote: Apparently you are not having a spectacular day. Again that's not my fault. Carry on asshole. Any day anyone can wake up and not be a right-wing, racist, dirtbag like you is a good day. Just wait a f'ing minute! *I'm* the racist here. What did Justan do to deserve being called a racist by you? You are so f'ing fickle, Krause. |
#48
On Sunday, June 12, 2016 at 7:31:12 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/12/16 7:40 AM, Justan Olphart wrote: On 6/11/2016 9:45 PM, Alex wrote: 2. Go vote for Trump. I'm left with no other choice. That's the way I see it. So Solly Hilly. Yur just too old and set in yur liberal progressive ways. Besides you are an obvious manipulator and liar. Trump is the perfect candidate for white, racist, anti-ethnic, scared of women piglets like his supporters in rec.boats. I'm glad you aren't disappointing me on this. especially you, FlaJim, who is frightened and jealous of successful women, and I don't mean Sarah Palin. Early polls don't mean a lot, but the very latest Reuters/IPSOS poll shows Mrs. Clinton opening up an 11-point lead over Trumpster the Dumpster. http://polling.reuters.com/#!poll/TM651Y15_13 I don't know of anyone here who is scared of women piglets. did you mean 'Sows?' hmmm, is that a demeaning to women remark you just made there, Harry? And 11 points isn't much to brag about. Not hardly at all. 30 , now that'd be diffrent... |
#48
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 11:39:27 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:
On Sunday, June 12, 2016 at 7:31:12 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/12/16 7:40 AM, Justan Olphart wrote: On 6/11/2016 9:45 PM, Alex wrote: 2. Go vote for Trump. I'm left with no other choice. That's the way I see it. So Solly Hilly. Yur just too old and set in yur liberal progressive ways. Besides you are an obvious manipulator and liar. Trump is the perfect candidate for white, racist, anti-ethnic, scared of women piglets like his supporters in rec.boats. I'm glad you aren't disappointing me on this. especially you, FlaJim, who is frightened and jealous of successful women, and I don't mean Sarah Palin. Early polls don't mean a lot, but the very latest Reuters/IPSOS poll shows Mrs. Clinton opening up an 11-point lead over Trumpster the Dumpster. http://polling.reuters.com/#!poll/TM651Y15_13 I don't know of anyone here who is scared of women piglets. did you mean 'Sows?' hmmm, is that a demeaning to women remark you just made there, Harry? And 11 points isn't much to brag about. Not hardly at all. 30 , now that'd be diffrent... His anti-female attitude has shown itself over and over. Calling women 'piglets' is another example. |
#48
On 6/12/16 3:06 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 11:39:27 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Sunday, June 12, 2016 at 7:31:12 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote: On 6/12/16 7:40 AM, Justan Olphart wrote: On 6/11/2016 9:45 PM, Alex wrote: 2. Go vote for Trump. I'm left with no other choice. That's the way I see it. So Solly Hilly. Yur just too old and set in yur liberal progressive ways. Besides you are an obvious manipulator and liar. Trump is the perfect candidate for white, racist, anti-ethnic, scared of women piglets like his supporters in rec.boats. I'm glad you aren't disappointing me on this. especially you, FlaJim, who is frightened and jealous of successful women, and I don't mean Sarah Palin. Early polls don't mean a lot, but the very latest Reuters/IPSOS poll shows Mrs. Clinton opening up an 11-point lead over Trumpster the Dumpster. http://polling.reuters.com/#!poll/TM651Y15_13 I don't know of anyone here who is scared of women piglets. did you mean 'Sows?' hmmm, is that a demeaning to women remark you just made there, Harry? And 11 points isn't much to brag about. Not hardly at all. 30 , now that'd be diffrent... His anti-female attitude has shown itself over and over. Calling women 'piglets' is another example. D'oh. Trump used the term piglets to describe women. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:09 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com