![]() |
There goes Donald's only hope...
A U.S. official familiar with the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s
email server stated that the FBI has found no evidence Clinton intentionally violated the law, according to CNN. The investigation is ongoing, however, and remains focused on the security of the server and the handling of classified information. The FBI has already interviewed several of Clinton’s aides, some more than once, officials say. Clinton’s longtime adviser Huma Abedin cooperated with the investigation, but her lawyers declined to comment further on it. FBI investigators also interviewed former Clinton employee Bryan Pagliano, who helped set up the server and provided documents and other materials under an immunity agreement. A review of this material has similarly turned up no smoking gun thus far. Investigators expect to complete their work within the next few weeks, after which they will turn their findings over to the Justice Department. The Justice Department will then make a determination on whether to prosecute, but that likelihood has diminished significantly as a result of these revelations. |
There goes Donald's only hope...
|
There goes Donald's only hope...
On Fri, 6 May 2016 09:39:12 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
A U.S. official familiar with the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s email server stated that the FBI has found no evidence Clinton intentionally violated the law, according to CNN. The investigation is ongoing, however, and remains focused on the security of the server and the handling of classified information. The FBI has already interviewed several of Clinton’s aides, some more than once, officials say. Clinton’s longtime adviser Huma Abedin cooperated with the investigation, but her lawyers declined to comment further on it. FBI investigators also interviewed former Clinton employee Bryan Pagliano, who helped set up the server and provided documents and other materials under an immunity agreement. A review of this material has similarly turned up no smoking gun thus far. Investigators expect to complete their work within the next few weeks, after which they will turn their findings over to the Justice Department. The Justice Department will then make a determination on whether to prosecute, but that likelihood has diminished significantly as a result of these revelations. I think the real issue may end up being whether State was doing things that benefitted the CGI and any evidence of that will be long gone. That was the reason why they wanted their own server. Then they knew there would never be any evidence of anything. The other people with "private" email accounts, had them with 3d parties who will archive everything. The Clinton server was like a bookie's flash paper notes. Nothing they wanted to hide, was saved and I would not be surprised if they crushed the disk drives. |
There goes Donald's only hope...
|
There goes Donald's only hope...
In article , says...
On 5/6/2016 9:19 AM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... A U.S. official familiar with the investigation of Hillary Clinton?s email server stated that the FBI has found no evidence Clinton intentionally violated the law, according to CNN. The investigation is ongoing, however, and remains focused on the security of the server and the handling of classified information. The FBI has already interviewed several of Clinton?s aides, some more than once, officials say. Clinton?s longtime adviser Huma Abedin cooperated with the investigation, but her lawyers declined to comment further on it. FBI investigators also interviewed former Clinton employee Bryan Pagliano, who helped set up the server and provided documents and other materials under an immunity agreement. A review of this material has similarly turned up no smoking gun thus far. Investigators expect to complete their work within the next few weeks, after which they will turn their findings over to the Justice Department. The Justice Department will then make a determination on whether to prosecute, but that likelihood has diminished significantly as a result of these revelations. Doesn't matter anyway. Backup Bernie would beat Trump like a drum. With the way he's already moving (even farther) to the left since his clinch, I'm reviving my thoughts that his goal is to actually GET Hillary elected. The guy is a life-long New York Liberal. Vote for the liberal or the liberal. But Trump is a bull**** artist. He has no core values, maybe excepting women, money and ego gratification. Anybody who thinks otherwise is a rube. |
There goes Donald's only hope...
On Fri, 6 May 2016 10:00:12 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote: In article , says... On 5/6/2016 9:19 AM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... A U.S. official familiar with the investigation of Hillary Clinton?s email server stated that the FBI has found no evidence Clinton intentionally violated the law, according to CNN. The investigation is ongoing, however, and remains focused on the security of the server and the handling of classified information. The FBI has already interviewed several of Clinton?s aides, some more than once, officials say. Clinton?s longtime adviser Huma Abedin cooperated with the investigation, but her lawyers declined to comment further on it. FBI investigators also interviewed former Clinton employee Bryan Pagliano, who helped set up the server and provided documents and other materials under an immunity agreement. A review of this material has similarly turned up no smoking gun thus far. Investigators expect to complete their work within the next few weeks, after which they will turn their findings over to the Justice Department. The Justice Department will then make a determination on whether to prosecute, but that likelihood has diminished significantly as a result of these revelations. Doesn't matter anyway. Backup Bernie would beat Trump like a drum. With the way he's already moving (even farther) to the left since his clinch, I'm reviving my thoughts that his goal is to actually GET Hillary elected. The guy is a life-long New York Liberal. Vote for the liberal or the liberal. But Trump is a bull**** artist. He has no core values, maybe excepting women, money and ego gratification. Anybody who thinks otherwise is a rube. I think Trump is shocked that he got this far. I am sure he thought this was going to be a money maker and now he is stuck running for a lousy $400k job. |
There goes Donald's only hope...
|
There goes Donald's only hope...
On Fri, 6 May 2016 11:16:59 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote: In article , says... I think Trump is shocked that he got this far. I am sure he thought this was going to be a money maker and now he is stuck running for a lousy $400k job. hehehe. Maybe. But Trump's ego has no limits. Ego seems to be the principal criteria when running for president so I suppose he was a natural. It is actually a pretty lousy job and the trappings of power seem to be the only real benefit, even if you don't really have that much power. You certainly give up any inkling of personal privacy and any small mistake you make is amplified by the media. I bet Trump wants to be "Trump" more than he wants to be president. I doubt he will be able to "brand" the white house and AF1 ... but who knows. http://gfretwell.com/ftp/Air_Force_One_Trump.jpg |
There goes Donald's only hope...
10:45
- show quoted text - I think Trump is shocked that he got this far. I am sure he thought this was going to be a money maker and now he is stuck running for a lousy $400k job. .... Oh if by chance he's elected there'll be plenty of business contacts for him down the road.., |
There goes Donald's only hope...
On Fri, 6 May 2016 16:46:44 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote: 10:45 - show quoted text - I think Trump is shocked that he got this far. I am sure he thought this was going to be a money maker and now he is stuck running for a lousy $400k job. ... Oh if by chance he's elected there'll be plenty of business contacts for him down the road.., I understand the days of the destitute former president are long gone but he has to wait at least 4 years to cash them in. I know he says his daughter will run Trump Inc but he would be impeached if he was caught being involved and I am not sure he could stand not being there. All it takes is the hint that he arranged a small deviation in US policy to benefit Trump Inc and out he goes. It could be something so insignificant that it gets lost down in the noise of the day to day but it still might mean millions or even billions on the other end. In the end, that may be what they hang on Hillary and the CGI. I do believe that is why she needed the private Email server, just to be sure that evidence "did not exist". |
There goes Donald's only hope...
|
There goes Donald's only hope...
On Sat, 7 May 2016 08:44:10 -0400, Justan Olphart
wrote: On 5/7/2016 12:53 AM, wrote: On Fri, 6 May 2016 16:46:44 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: 10:45 - show quoted text - I think Trump is shocked that he got this far. I am sure he thought this was going to be a money maker and now he is stuck running for a lousy $400k job. ... Oh if by chance he's elected there'll be plenty of business contacts for him down the road.., I understand the days of the destitute former president are long gone but he has to wait at least 4 years to cash them in. I know he says his daughter will run Trump Inc but he would be impeached if he was caught being involved and I am not sure he could stand not being there. All it takes is the hint that he arranged a small deviation in US policy to benefit Trump Inc and out he goes. It could be something so insignificant that it gets lost down in the noise of the day to day but it still might mean millions or even billions on the other end. In the end, that may be what they hang on Hillary and the CGI. I do believe that is why she needed the private Email server, just to be sure that evidence "did not exist". When's the last time a president was impeached for a civil crime? It would not be a civil crime, it would be influence peddling unless he was caught trying to cover it up. |
There goes Donald's only hope...
On 5/7/16 9:11 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 7 May 2016 08:44:10 -0400, Justan Olphart wrote: On 5/7/2016 12:53 AM, wrote: On Fri, 6 May 2016 16:46:44 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: 10:45 - show quoted text - I think Trump is shocked that he got this far. I am sure he thought this was going to be a money maker and now he is stuck running for a lousy $400k job. ... Oh if by chance he's elected there'll be plenty of business contacts for him down the road.., I understand the days of the destitute former president are long gone but he has to wait at least 4 years to cash them in. I know he says his daughter will run Trump Inc but he would be impeached if he was caught being involved and I am not sure he could stand not being there. All it takes is the hint that he arranged a small deviation in US policy to benefit Trump Inc and out he goes. It could be something so insignificant that it gets lost down in the noise of the day to day but it still might mean millions or even billions on the other end. In the end, that may be what they hang on Hillary and the CGI. I do believe that is why she needed the private Email server, just to be sure that evidence "did not exist". When's the last time a president was impeached for a civil crime? It would not be a civil crime, it would be influence peddling unless he was caught trying to cover it up. Not to worry...while not all Trump supporters are racists, all the racists will be voting for Trump. He has a lot of "influence" with racists. |
There goes Donald's only hope...
On 5/7/2016 9:11 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 7 May 2016 08:44:10 -0400, Justan Olphart wrote: On 5/7/2016 12:53 AM, wrote: On Fri, 6 May 2016 16:46:44 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: 10:45 - show quoted text - I think Trump is shocked that he got this far. I am sure he thought this was going to be a money maker and now he is stuck running for a lousy $400k job. ... Oh if by chance he's elected there'll be plenty of business contacts for him down the road.., I understand the days of the destitute former president are long gone but he has to wait at least 4 years to cash them in. I know he says his daughter will run Trump Inc but he would be impeached if he was caught being involved and I am not sure he could stand not being there. All it takes is the hint that he arranged a small deviation in US policy to benefit Trump Inc and out he goes. It could be something so insignificant that it gets lost down in the noise of the day to day but it still might mean millions or even billions on the other end. In the end, that may be what they hang on Hillary and the CGI. I do believe that is why she needed the private Email server, just to be sure that evidence "did not exist". When's the last time a president was impeached for a civil crime? It would not be a civil crime, it would be influence peddling unless he was caught trying to cover it up. Is influence peddling impeachable? |
There goes Donald's only hope...
On Sat, 7 May 2016 09:41:19 -0400, Justan Olphart
wrote: On 5/7/2016 9:11 AM, wrote: On Sat, 7 May 2016 08:44:10 -0400, Justan Olphart wrote: On 5/7/2016 12:53 AM, wrote: On Fri, 6 May 2016 16:46:44 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: 10:45 - show quoted text - I think Trump is shocked that he got this far. I am sure he thought this was going to be a money maker and now he is stuck running for a lousy $400k job. ... Oh if by chance he's elected there'll be plenty of business contacts for him down the road.., I understand the days of the destitute former president are long gone but he has to wait at least 4 years to cash them in. I know he says his daughter will run Trump Inc but he would be impeached if he was caught being involved and I am not sure he could stand not being there. All it takes is the hint that he arranged a small deviation in US policy to benefit Trump Inc and out he goes. It could be something so insignificant that it gets lost down in the noise of the day to day but it still might mean millions or even billions on the other end. In the end, that may be what they hang on Hillary and the CGI. I do believe that is why she needed the private Email server, just to be sure that evidence "did not exist". When's the last time a president was impeached for a civil crime? It would not be a civil crime, it would be influence peddling unless he was caught trying to cover it up. Is influence peddling impeachable? If you get caught it is. Selling out the American tax payer might be the "highest" crime. |
There goes Donald's only hope...
On Sat, 7 May 2016 09:18:10 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 5/7/16 9:11 AM, wrote: On Sat, 7 May 2016 08:44:10 -0400, Justan Olphart wrote: On 5/7/2016 12:53 AM, wrote: On Fri, 6 May 2016 16:46:44 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: 10:45 - show quoted text - I think Trump is shocked that he got this far. I am sure he thought this was going to be a money maker and now he is stuck running for a lousy $400k job. ... Oh if by chance he's elected there'll be plenty of business contacts for him down the road.., I understand the days of the destitute former president are long gone but he has to wait at least 4 years to cash them in. I know he says his daughter will run Trump Inc but he would be impeached if he was caught being involved and I am not sure he could stand not being there. All it takes is the hint that he arranged a small deviation in US policy to benefit Trump Inc and out he goes. It could be something so insignificant that it gets lost down in the noise of the day to day but it still might mean millions or even billions on the other end. In the end, that may be what they hang on Hillary and the CGI. I do believe that is why she needed the private Email server, just to be sure that evidence "did not exist". When's the last time a president was impeached for a civil crime? It would not be a civil crime, it would be influence peddling unless he was caught trying to cover it up. Not to worry...while not all Trump supporters are racists, all the racists will be voting for Trump. He has a lot of "influence" with racists. Using your definition of racist, you should be very afraid. |
There goes Donald's only hope...
Keyser Söze wrote:
A U.S. official familiar with the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s email server stated that the FBI has found no evidence Clinton intentionally violated the law, according to CNN. The investigation is ongoing, however, and remains focused on the security of the server and the handling of classified information. The FBI has already interviewed several of Clinton’s aides, some more than once, officials say. Clinton’s longtime adviser Huma Abedin cooperated with the investigation, but her lawyers declined to comment further on it. FBI investigators also interviewed former Clinton employee Bryan Pagliano, who helped set up the server and provided documents and other materials under an immunity agreement. A review of this material has similarly turned up no smoking gun thus far. Investigators expect to complete their work within the next few weeks, after which they will turn their findings over to the Justice Department. The Justice Department will then make a determination on whether to prosecute, but that likelihood has diminished significantly as a result of these revelations. Ignorance of the law is no excuse. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:55 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com