Is this what they are protecting?
 

On Tuesday, April 12, 2016 at 11:25:34 AM UTC-4, Keine Krausescheiße wrote:
On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 11:00:06 -0400 (EDT), fire man wrote:

Wrote in message:
On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 09:27:13 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

All the recent political and social commotion about transgender people
and bathrooms is even sillier when you look at the numbers. How many
trans people have been arrested for sex acts in bathrooms? As best as we
can tell, zero.

I think they just posted 2 (peepers) but there are plenty of women who
are uncomfortable with men in the ladies bathroom, no matter how they
are dressed. I am married to one and she is as gay friendly as anyone.
The fact remains that the majority of cross dressers are not gay. They
are not really transgender but once you open this can of worms they
will exploit the opportunity, if just for their own gratification.
Maybe your wife can explain it to you.

By law, she has the right to refuse to treat him. In order to
preserve domestic tranquillity, I'm sure she exercises that
right.


Then he'll probably remain being mistreated.
--

Ban liars, tax cheats, juvenile name-callers, and narcissists...not guns!

http://cnsnews.com/commentary/j-matt-barber/american-college-pediatricians-transgender-conditioning-child-abuse

Among other science in the article:
"2. No one is born with a gender. Everyone is born with a biological sex. Gender (an awareness and sense of oneself as male or female) is a sociological and psychological concept; not an objective biological one.

Let's take it a step further. The "gender" phenomenon is, in the larger sense, an artificial and anti-theist-tainted social construct. It's an overt act of fist-shaking rebellion against the laws of nature and nature's God.

And it's dangerous.

Johns Hopkins Hospital was the pioneer in "gender reassignment surgery." It now refuses to perform these discredited cosmetic procedures. Dr. Paul R. McHugh, the hospital's former psychiatrist-in-chief and current distinguished service professor of psychiatry, is among those who participated in the ACPeds report. He has noted in the past that, as even the left-leaning APA reluctantly acknowledges, transgenderism is a "mental disorder" and that the idea of a "sex change" is "biologically impossible." "People who identify as 'feeling like the opposite sex' or 'somewhere in between' do not comprise a third sex. They remain biological men or biological women," determines ACPeds."

Is this what they are protecting?
 

no arrests? Here. I'm sure there's plenty more if you'd look. But I really doubt if you will

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/se...der-to-assault

Is this what they are protecting?
 

Tim wrote:
no arrests? Here. I'm sure there's plenty more if you'd look. But I
really doubt if you will

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/se...der-to-assault


Well you could pray for the guy.

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

Is this what they are protecting?
 

11:49 AMKeyser Söze
- show quoted text -
Well you could pray for the guy.

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+
-----

Ok, on my prayer list do you want his name before, or after yours?

Is this what they are protecting?
 

On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 09:17:13 -0700 (PDT), Its Me
wrote:

On Tuesday, April 12, 2016 at 9:51:26 AM UTC-4, wrote:
On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 09:27:13 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

All the recent political and social commotion about transgender people
and bathrooms is even sillier when you look at the numbers. How many
trans people have been arrested for sex acts in bathrooms? As best as we
can tell, zero.

I think they just posted 2 (peepers) but there are plenty of women who
are uncomfortable with men in the ladies bathroom, no matter how they
are dressed. I am married to one and she is as gay friendly as anyone.
The fact remains that the majority of cross dressers are not gay. They
are not really transgender but once you open this can of worms they
will exploit the opportunity, if just for their own gratification.
Maybe your wife can explain it to you.

It's amazing that these idiots don't think there's going to be a problem when you start allowing the opposite sex in the bathroom.

The rule is simple: You have junk, you go to the men's room. No junk, you go to the ladies room. If that stresses you out, you go see a mental health pro, not a legislator.

I suppose the real answer will be more "family" rest rooms where both
sexes are accepted. They are "one holers".

The reality is, a lot of places have unisex one holers now anyway. It
stops the suits about bathroom inequity where the number of mens vs
womens does not match the perceived need

Is this what they are protecting?
 

On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:00:26 -0400 (EDT), fire man wrote:

Its Me Wrote in message:
On Tuesday, April 12, 2016 at 9:51:26 AM UTC-4, wrote:
On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 09:27:13 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

All the recent political and social commotion about transgender people
and bathrooms is even sillier when you look at the numbers. How many
trans people have been arrested for sex acts in bathrooms? As best as we
can tell, zero.

I think they just posted 2 (peepers) but there are plenty of women who
are uncomfortable with men in the ladies bathroom, no matter how they
are dressed. I am married to one and she is as gay friendly as anyone.
The fact remains that the majority of cross dressers are not gay. They
are not really transgender but once you open this can of worms they
will exploit the opportunity, if just for their own gratification.
Maybe your wife can explain it to you.

It's amazing that these idiots don't think there's going to be a problem when you start allowing the opposite sex in the bathroom.

The rule is simple: You have junk, you go to the men's room. No junk, you go to the ladies room. If that stresses you out, you go see a mental health pro, not a legislator.


That's pretty easy to follow. Even Harry SHOULD be able to comply.

All he has to do is walk upstairs and talk to the pro.
--

Ban liars, tax cheats, juvenile name-callers, and narcissists...not guns!

Is this what they are protecting?
 

On Tuesday, April 12, 2016 at 1:13:41 PM UTC-4, Tim wrote:
11:49 AMKeyser Söze
- show quoted text -
Well you could pray for the guy.

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+
-----

Ok, on my prayer list do you want his name before, or after yours?

You owe me a keyboard! :)

Is this what they are protecting?
 

On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 12:57:09 -0400 (EDT), fire man wrote:

Its Me Wrote in message:
On Tuesday, April 12, 2016 at 11:25:34 AM UTC-4, Keine Krausescheiße wrote:
On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 11:00:06 -0400 (EDT), fire man wrote:

Wrote in message:
On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 09:27:13 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

All the recent political and social commotion about transgender people
and bathrooms is even sillier when you look at the numbers. How many
trans people have been arrested for sex acts in bathrooms? As best as we
can tell, zero.

I think they just posted 2 (peepers) but there are plenty of women who
are uncomfortable with men in the ladies bathroom, no matter how they
are dressed. I am married to one and she is as gay friendly as anyone.
The fact remains that the majority of cross dressers are not gay. They
are not really transgender but once you open this can of worms they
will exploit the opportunity, if just for their own gratification.
Maybe your wife can explain it to you.

By law, she has the right to refuse to treat him. In order to
preserve domestic tranquillity, I'm sure she exercises that
right.


Then he'll probably remain being mistreated.
--

Ban liars, tax cheats, juvenile name-callers, and narcissists...not guns!

http://cnsnews.com/commentary/j-matt-barber/american-college-pediatricians-transgender-conditioning-child-abuse

Among other science in the article:
"2. No one is born with a gender. Everyone is born with a biological sex. Gender (an awareness and sense of oneself as male or female) is a sociological and psychological concept; not an objective biological one.

Let's take it a step further. The "gender" phenomenon is, in the larger sense, an artificial and anti-theist-tainted social construct. It's an overt act of fist-shaking rebellion against the laws of nature and nature's God.

And it's dangerous.

Johns Hopkins Hospital was the pioneer in "gender reassignment surgery." It now refuses to perform these discredited cosmetic procedures. Dr. Paul R. McHugh, the hospital's former psychiatrist-in-chief and current distinguished service professor of psychiatry, is among those who participated in the ACPeds report. He has noted in the past that, as even the left-leaning APA reluctantly acknowledges, transgenderism is a "mental disorder" and that the idea of a "sex change" is "biologically impossible." "People who identify as 'feeling like the opposite sex' or 'somewhere in between' do not comprise a third sex. They remain biological men or biological women," determines ACPeds."


Are you saying that Harry might actually be a girl?

LOL! That was shameful!
--

Ban liars, tax cheats, juvenile name-callers, and narcissists...not guns!