![]() |
LED traffic lights
I noticed something over the weekend that all you "southerners" don't
have to deal with. Pretty much all traffic lights are now high output LEDs. Saves energy and they last a long time, but there's a problem. After a wind swept snow storm with heavy wet snow that then freezes like we had Friday, the lights become completely covered and you can't see which one is on. The LED's aren't hot enough to melt the snow away like the old fashioned incandescent types, so even 24 hours after the snow stopped flying you still can't see which of the lights are lit at many intersections. Causes quite a bit of confusion until people realize what the issue is. |
LED traffic lights
Oh oh! We build them up here in the Amherst area so the push is on for the city and province to convert. They might have to add a heating element controlled automatically or from the ground to use when needed.
|
LED traffic lights
On 2/7/2016 5:23 PM, True North wrote:
Oh oh! We build them up here in the Amherst area so the push is on for the city and province to convert. They might have to add a heating element controlled automatically or from the ground to use when needed. That thought ran through my mind when I realized that several traffic lights were working ... you just couldn't see what was on or off. There was one that I could see red ... but it was very, very faint, showing through the ice and snow. The green was more visible. |
LED traffic lights
Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/7/2016 5:23 PM, True North wrote: Oh oh! We build them up here in the Amherst area so the push is on for the city and province to convert. They might have to add a heating element controlled automatically or from the ground to use when needed. That thought ran through my mind when I realized that several traffic lights were working ... you just couldn't see what was on or off. There was one that I could see red ... but it was very, very faint, showing through the ice and snow. The green was more visible. Leave the bottom of the deflector can open. Snow can not build up then. |
LED traffic lights
On 2/7/2016 5:41 PM, Califbill wrote:
Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/7/2016 5:23 PM, True North wrote: Oh oh! We build them up here in the Amherst area so the push is on for the city and province to convert. They might have to add a heating element controlled automatically or from the ground to use when needed. That thought ran through my mind when I realized that several traffic lights were working ... you just couldn't see what was on or off. There was one that I could see red ... but it was very, very faint, showing through the ice and snow. The green was more visible. Leave the bottom of the deflector can open. Snow can not build up then. Oh, it does. Nothing to do with the design of the can. The wind driven, wet snow just gets pasted on the lenses so thick that no light gets through. The old incandescent bulbs thru enough heat out to melt anything that stuck and kept a buildup from happening. Dry fluffy snow isn't a problem. It's the wet, sticky stuff. |
LED traffic lights
On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 17:12:11 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:
I noticed something over the weekend that all you "southerners" don't have to deal with. Pretty much all traffic lights are now high output LEDs. Saves energy and they last a long time, but there's a problem. After a wind swept snow storm with heavy wet snow that then freezes like we had Friday, the lights become completely covered and you can't see which one is on. The LED's aren't hot enough to melt the snow away like the old fashioned incandescent types, so even 24 hours after the snow stopped flying you still can't see which of the lights are lit at many intersections. Causes quite a bit of confusion until people realize what the issue is. We have some type of heating element in the light to keep it from freezing over. Yay Virginia DOT. -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
LED traffic lights
On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 17:12:11 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: I noticed something over the weekend that all you "southerners" don't have to deal with. Pretty much all traffic lights are now high output LEDs. Saves energy and they last a long time, but there's a problem. After a wind swept snow storm with heavy wet snow that then freezes like we had Friday, the lights become completely covered and you can't see which one is on. The LED's aren't hot enough to melt the snow away like the old fashioned incandescent types, so even 24 hours after the snow stopped flying you still can't see which of the lights are lit at many intersections. Causes quite a bit of confusion until people realize what the issue is. I suppose the trick would be to coat the lenses with something snow won't stick to. If that doesn't work I guess is that thermostatically controlled heater Don mentioned is the next step. This is not the first time I heard this story. I am surprised someone hasn't fixed it. Must be Bush's fault. |
LED traffic lights
On 2/7/2016 6:52 PM, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 17:12:11 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: I noticed something over the weekend that all you "southerners" don't have to deal with. Pretty much all traffic lights are now high output LEDs. Saves energy and they last a long time, but there's a problem. After a wind swept snow storm with heavy wet snow that then freezes like we had Friday, the lights become completely covered and you can't see which one is on. The LED's aren't hot enough to melt the snow away like the old fashioned incandescent types, so even 24 hours after the snow stopped flying you still can't see which of the lights are lit at many intersections. Causes quite a bit of confusion until people realize what the issue is. We have some type of heating element in the light to keep it from freezing over. Yay Virginia DOT. -- Ban idiots, not guns! I guess we are not the only ones with this problem: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/16/led-traffic-lights-that-c_n_393769.html |
LED traffic lights
On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 18:57:19 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: On 2/7/2016 6:52 PM, John H. wrote: On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 17:12:11 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: I noticed something over the weekend that all you "southerners" don't have to deal with. Pretty much all traffic lights are now high output LEDs. Saves energy and they last a long time, but there's a problem. After a wind swept snow storm with heavy wet snow that then freezes like we had Friday, the lights become completely covered and you can't see which one is on. The LED's aren't hot enough to melt the snow away like the old fashioned incandescent types, so even 24 hours after the snow stopped flying you still can't see which of the lights are lit at many intersections. Causes quite a bit of confusion until people realize what the issue is. We have some type of heating element in the light to keep it from freezing over. Yay Virginia DOT. -- Ban idiots, not guns! I guess we are not the only ones with this problem: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/16/led-traffic-lights-that-c_n_393769.html I said I have heard about this before. That is a 6 year old story ... and nobody has fixed it? "We are from the government and we are here to help." I can't believe this was not in the first conversations about LED lights. |
LED traffic lights
On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 19:08:27 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: On 2/7/2016 6:56 PM, wrote: On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 17:12:11 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: I noticed something over the weekend that all you "southerners" don't have to deal with. Pretty much all traffic lights are now high output LEDs. Saves energy and they last a long time, but there's a problem. After a wind swept snow storm with heavy wet snow that then freezes like we had Friday, the lights become completely covered and you can't see which one is on. The LED's aren't hot enough to melt the snow away like the old fashioned incandescent types, so even 24 hours after the snow stopped flying you still can't see which of the lights are lit at many intersections. Causes quite a bit of confusion until people realize what the issue is. I suppose the trick would be to coat the lenses with something snow won't stick to. If that doesn't work I guess is that thermostatically controlled heater Don mentioned is the next step. This is not the first time I heard this story. I am surprised someone hasn't fixed it. Must be Bush's fault. I was just reading about it. The correction is to add heaters on the main lenses but it's an expensive process to convert them all. Some don't have the supplied power or wiring to run heaters because they were designed for low current, LED lights only. A coating on the main lens isn't really practical. The wind driven wet crap will stick to teflon with no problem and any coating that worked would have to be routinely redone. Here's a typical LED traffic light pretty much covered up: http://tinyurl.com/grjpr6t Strange transformer deal you got going there. I thought someone was getting 3p but I don't see a 3p drop. It looks like it is just 3 tiny (15-25kva?) transformers feeding 3 120/240 customers. FPL would have dropped a 50kva pig in there and be done with it. |
LED traffic lights
On 2/7/2016 8:52 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 19:08:27 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/7/2016 6:56 PM, wrote: On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 17:12:11 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: I noticed something over the weekend that all you "southerners" don't have to deal with. Pretty much all traffic lights are now high output LEDs. Saves energy and they last a long time, but there's a problem. After a wind swept snow storm with heavy wet snow that then freezes like we had Friday, the lights become completely covered and you can't see which one is on. The LED's aren't hot enough to melt the snow away like the old fashioned incandescent types, so even 24 hours after the snow stopped flying you still can't see which of the lights are lit at many intersections. Causes quite a bit of confusion until people realize what the issue is. I suppose the trick would be to coat the lenses with something snow won't stick to. If that doesn't work I guess is that thermostatically controlled heater Don mentioned is the next step. This is not the first time I heard this story. I am surprised someone hasn't fixed it. Must be Bush's fault. I was just reading about it. The correction is to add heaters on the main lenses but it's an expensive process to convert them all. Some don't have the supplied power or wiring to run heaters because they were designed for low current, LED lights only. A coating on the main lens isn't really practical. The wind driven wet crap will stick to teflon with no problem and any coating that worked would have to be routinely redone. Here's a typical LED traffic light pretty much covered up: http://tinyurl.com/grjpr6t Strange transformer deal you got going there. I thought someone was getting 3p but I don't see a 3p drop. It looks like it is just 3 tiny (15-25kva?) transformers feeding 3 120/240 customers. FPL would have dropped a 50kva pig in there and be done with it. Looks like 208 wye to me. |
LED traffic lights
On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 01:51:30 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: On 2/7/2016 8:52 PM, wrote: On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 19:08:27 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/7/2016 6:56 PM, wrote: On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 17:12:11 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: I noticed something over the weekend that all you "southerners" don't have to deal with. Pretty much all traffic lights are now high output LEDs. Saves energy and they last a long time, but there's a problem. After a wind swept snow storm with heavy wet snow that then freezes like we had Friday, the lights become completely covered and you can't see which one is on. The LED's aren't hot enough to melt the snow away like the old fashioned incandescent types, so even 24 hours after the snow stopped flying you still can't see which of the lights are lit at many intersections. Causes quite a bit of confusion until people realize what the issue is. I suppose the trick would be to coat the lenses with something snow won't stick to. If that doesn't work I guess is that thermostatically controlled heater Don mentioned is the next step. This is not the first time I heard this story. I am surprised someone hasn't fixed it. Must be Bush's fault. I was just reading about it. The correction is to add heaters on the main lenses but it's an expensive process to convert them all. Some don't have the supplied power or wiring to run heaters because they were designed for low current, LED lights only. A coating on the main lens isn't really practical. The wind driven wet crap will stick to teflon with no problem and any coating that worked would have to be routinely redone. Here's a typical LED traffic light pretty much covered up: http://tinyurl.com/grjpr6t Strange transformer deal you got going there. I thought someone was getting 3p but I don't see a 3p drop. It looks like it is just 3 tiny (15-25kva?) transformers feeding 3 120/240 customers. FPL would have dropped a 50kva pig in there and be done with it. Looks like 208 wye to me. That is what I thought but the drops look like triplex, 2 hots and the bare messenger/neutral |
LED traffic lights
True North wrote:
Oh oh! We build them up here in the Amherst area so the push is on for the city and province to convert. They might have to add a heating element controlled automatically or from the ground to use when needed. Maybe a ray gun to blast the snow from them from the ground? |
LED traffic lights
On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 20:38:46 -0500, Alex wrote:
True North wrote: Oh oh! We build them up here in the Amherst area so the push is on for the city and province to convert. They might have to add a heating element controlled automatically or from the ground to use when needed. Maybe a ray gun to blast the snow from them from the ground? === Or an invisible protective force field? |
LED traffic lights
|
LED traffic lights
On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 08:28:57 -0500, Justan Olphart
wrote: On 2/8/2016 10:49 PM, wrote: On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 20:38:46 -0500, Alex wrote: True North wrote: Oh oh! We build them up here in the Amherst area so the push is on for the city and province to convert. They might have to add a heating element controlled automatically or from the ground to use when needed. Maybe a ray gun to blast the snow from them from the ground? === Or an invisible protective force field? Or even a visor over the lights. === Wind driven snow will get under the visor. |
LED traffic lights
On 2/9/2016 11:10 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 08:28:57 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 2/8/2016 10:49 PM, wrote: On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 20:38:46 -0500, Alex wrote: True North wrote: Oh oh! We build them up here in the Amherst area so the push is on for the city and province to convert. They might have to add a heating element controlled automatically or from the ground to use when needed. Maybe a ray gun to blast the snow from them from the ground? === Or an invisible protective force field? Or even a visor over the lights. === Wind driven snow will get under the visor. I guess the only solution is to not be trapped in a place where it snows. |
LED traffic lights
On 2/9/2016 11:10 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 08:28:57 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 2/8/2016 10:49 PM, wrote: On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 20:38:46 -0500, Alex wrote: True North wrote: Oh oh! We build them up here in the Amherst area so the push is on for the city and province to convert. They might have to add a heating element controlled automatically or from the ground to use when needed. Maybe a ray gun to blast the snow from them from the ground? === Or an invisible protective force field? Or even a visor over the lights. === Wind driven snow will get under the visor. They have visors. Bottom is open. Doesn't work for wind driven, wet snow. |
The laws of unintended consequences is in play here. A good idea to save energy that does not work as intended in a cold climate.
|
LED traffic lights
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 04:30:58 +0000, RGrew176
wrote: The laws of unintended consequences is in play here. A good idea to save energy that does not work as intended in a cold climate. My DOT buddy told me this is not as much about saving energy as saving maintenance. The LEDs are supposed to last a whole lot longer. A heater running at a low power would last virtually forever too and they can be controlled thermostatically so they would not run at ambients over 40 or so. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:18 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com