I see conflicting reports
 

Who really won?

http://nvonews.com/who-won-iowa-cauc...final-results/

I see conflicting reports
 

On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 13:50:56 -0500, Justan Olphart
wrote:

Who really won?

http://nvonews.com/who-won-iowa-cauc...final-results/

I heard my news saying Hilly and Bernie could toss a coin and be as
decisive.

I see conflicting reports
 

On 2/2/2016 2:18 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 13:50:56 -0500, Justan Olphart
wrote:

Who really won?

http://nvonews.com/who-won-iowa-cauc...final-results/

I heard my news saying Hilly and Bernie could toss a coin and be as
decisive.



In certain circumstances they actually *do* flip a coin at the Iowa
Democratic caucus to award delegates:

http://tinyurl.com/zsa9kxw

I see conflicting reports
 

On 2/2/16 4:41 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/2/2016 2:18 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 13:50:56 -0500, Justan Olphart
wrote:

Who really won?

http://nvonews.com/who-won-iowa-cauc...final-results/


I heard my news saying Hilly and Bernie could toss a coin and be as
decisive.



In certain circumstances they actually *do* flip a coin at the Iowa
Democratic caucus to award delegates:

http://tinyurl.com/zsa9kxw



So? Under the described circumstances, it seems perfectly reasonable and
certainly better than going to court.

Meanwhile, I'm still waiting to read how General/Admiral Marco plans to
pay for his greatly increased military budget. I suppose he can always
cut out the supplemental food program for hungry children and park their
emaciated carcasses on the curb for the privatized trash collectors to
haul away.

I see conflicting reports
 

On 2/2/2016 4:47 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/2/16 4:41 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/2/2016 2:18 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 13:50:56 -0500, Justan Olphart
wrote:

Who really won?

http://nvonews.com/who-won-iowa-cauc...final-results/



I heard my news saying Hilly and Bernie could toss a coin and be as
decisive.



In certain circumstances they actually *do* flip a coin at the Iowa
Democratic caucus to award delegates:

http://tinyurl.com/zsa9kxw



So? Under the described circumstances, it seems perfectly reasonable and
certainly better than going to court.

Meanwhile, I'm still waiting to read how General/Admiral Marco plans to
pay for his greatly increased military budget. I suppose he can always
cut out the supplemental food program for hungry children and park their
emaciated carcasses on the curb for the privatized trash collectors to
haul away.

I am waiting for the official Iowa caucus results that may very likely
declare Sanders as the actual winner instead of Hillary. Love to see
her have to eat her premature declaration of "victory". Saw her doing
this first thing in New Hampshire this morning. My God. Are we going
to have to listen to her cackle for the next 4 years as POTUS? If so,
I am stocking up on batteries for my Bose noise cancellation headphones.

I see conflicting reports
 

In article ,
says...

On 2/2/16 6:05 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/2/2016 6:03 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:

I'm sorry, I forgot...who is *your* candidate for POTUS?


"What? Did you say something? I thought I saw your lips move".



Richard doesn't like Hillary, which is his privilege, but his
Republicans have no one but crazies/racists/religious fruitcakes in a
position to with their primary. Perhaps he has switched from Jeb to
Marco...which is funny, because as bad as Jeb might be, Marco is more of
a horse's ass.

Simply put, it's easier slinging **** than being its target.

I see conflicting reports
 

On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 16:47:50 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 2/2/16 4:41 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/2/2016 2:18 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 13:50:56 -0500, Justan Olphart
wrote:

Who really won?

http://nvonews.com/who-won-iowa-cauc...final-results/


I heard my news saying Hilly and Bernie could toss a coin and be as
decisive.



In certain circumstances they actually *do* flip a coin at the Iowa
Democratic caucus to award delegates:

http://tinyurl.com/zsa9kxw



So? Under the described circumstances, it seems perfectly reasonable and
certainly better than going to court.

Meanwhile, I'm still waiting to read how General/Admiral Marco plans to
pay for his greatly increased military budget. I suppose he can always
cut out the supplemental food program for hungry children and park their
emaciated carcasses on the curb for the privatized trash collectors to
haul away.

How about putting folks to work and collecting taxes instead of paying welfare.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

I see conflicting reports
 

On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 19:08:31 -0600, Boating All Out wrote:

In article ,
says...

On 2/2/16 6:05 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/2/2016 6:03 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:

I'm sorry, I forgot...who is *your* candidate for POTUS?


"What? Did you say something? I thought I saw your lips move".



Richard doesn't like Hillary, which is his privilege, but his
Republicans have no one but crazies/racists/religious fruitcakes in a
position to with their primary. Perhaps he has switched from Jeb to
Marco...which is funny, because as bad as Jeb might be, Marco is more of
a horse's ass.

Simply put, it's easier slinging **** than being its target.

You're responding to an expert on both ends.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

I see conflicting reports
 

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 16:47:50 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 2/2/16 4:41 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/2/2016 2:18 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 13:50:56 -0500, Justan Olphart
wrote:

Who really won?

http://nvonews.com/who-won-iowa-cauc...final-results/


I heard my news saying Hilly and Bernie could toss a coin and be as
decisive.



In certain circumstances they actually *do* flip a coin at the Iowa
Democratic caucus to award delegates:

http://tinyurl.com/zsa9kxw



So? Under the described circumstances, it seems perfectly reasonable and
certainly better than going to court.

Meanwhile, I'm still waiting to read how General/Admiral Marco plans to
pay for his greatly increased military budget. I suppose he can always
cut out the supplemental food program for hungry children and park their
emaciated carcasses on the curb for the privatized trash collectors to
haul away.

How about putting folks to work and collecting taxes instead of paying welfare.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


How about taking care of the kids, and make the parents work. CCC or job
Corp type, even if it is cleaning up neighborhoods. Show up at 9 am to a
facility and either get educated, or sent on work crews. Then you get your
welfare payment. And why is the Federal Government all reaching these
days? We seem to do better at educating our children before the Federal
Dept. of Education was brought in to existence.

I see conflicting reports
 

On 2/3/2016 9:59 AM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 19:08:31 -0600, Boating All Out wrote:

In article ,
says...

On 2/2/16 6:05 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/2/2016 6:03 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:

I'm sorry, I forgot...who is *your* candidate for POTUS?


"What? Did you say something? I thought I saw your lips move".



Richard doesn't like Hillary, which is his privilege, but his
Republicans have no one but crazies/racists/religious fruitcakes in a
position to with their primary. Perhaps he has switched from Jeb to
Marco...which is funny, because as bad as Jeb might be, Marco is more of
a horse's ass.

Simply put, it's easier slinging **** than being its target.

You're responding to an expert on both ends.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


He doesn't handle being **** upon, very well.

I see conflicting reports
 

On Wed, 03 Feb 2016 09:57:39 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 16:47:50 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 2/2/16 4:41 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/2/2016 2:18 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 13:50:56 -0500, Justan Olphart
wrote:

Who really won?

http://nvonews.com/who-won-iowa-cauc...final-results/


I heard my news saying Hilly and Bernie could toss a coin and be as
decisive.



In certain circumstances they actually *do* flip a coin at the Iowa
Democratic caucus to award delegates:

http://tinyurl.com/zsa9kxw



So? Under the described circumstances, it seems perfectly reasonable and
certainly better than going to court.

Meanwhile, I'm still waiting to read how General/Admiral Marco plans to
pay for his greatly increased military budget. I suppose he can always
cut out the supplemental food program for hungry children and park their
emaciated carcasses on the curb for the privatized trash collectors to
haul away.

How about putting folks to work and collecting taxes instead of paying welfare.

I hear DC is paying the people an extra $9K not to commit crimes

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...it-crimes.html

I see conflicting reports
 

On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 07:14:46 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote:

We seem to do better at educating our children before the Federal
Dept. of Education was brought in to existence.

Splitting HEW into 3 separate agencies just tripled the bureaucracy
without actually adding any benefit. Thanks Jimmy.

I see conflicting reports
 

On Wed, 03 Feb 2016 12:04:45 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 03 Feb 2016 09:57:39 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 16:47:50 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 2/2/16 4:41 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/2/2016 2:18 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 13:50:56 -0500, Justan Olphart
wrote:

Who really won?

http://nvonews.com/who-won-iowa-cauc...final-results/


I heard my news saying Hilly and Bernie could toss a coin and be as
decisive.



In certain circumstances they actually *do* flip a coin at the Iowa
Democratic caucus to award delegates:

http://tinyurl.com/zsa9kxw



So? Under the described circumstances, it seems perfectly reasonable and
certainly better than going to court.

Meanwhile, I'm still waiting to read how General/Admiral Marco plans to
pay for his greatly increased military budget. I suppose he can always
cut out the supplemental food program for hungry children and park their
emaciated carcasses on the curb for the privatized trash collectors to
haul away.

How about putting folks to work and collecting taxes instead of paying welfare.

I hear DC is paying the people an extra $9K not to commit crimes

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...it-crimes.html

Soon the f'ing Democrats will be paying kids not to go to school.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!