| Page 2 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
unqualified
On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 11:40:28 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 1/29/16 10:58 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 1/29/2016 9:47 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: Watched an hour of the GOP debate...all I could tolerate. Rubio and Cruz are just awful and the rest are worse. Jeb had a good night mainly because Trump wasn't there to pick on him. Indeed, Bush seemed the most reasonable of the bunch of coconuts, but that isn't saying much. Rubio brought up spending additional billions and billions of dollars "rebuilding the Navy" and on additional troops, a waste of money we don't have. He reminds me of a petulant little boy. And Cruz demonstrated why so many just plain despise him. The debate was better for Trump not being there, I think. At least the part of it I watched. I recorded it and went through with my finger on the forward button. Rubio is still a little to "frantic" for me, Cruz is smart but nuts, Jeb is like watching beige paint drying, Rand Paul makes sense about privacy and the debt but without the favors that come with massive government spending, he doesn't have a chance. I think he is wrong about choice. Kasich is polished but dull. I think Cristie looked like the best politician, even if I disagree with some of the things he said. I agree, it was better without Trump turning it into a carny show. I also watched a little of the JV debate. There is a reason why that bunch is not in the real show. |
unqualified
On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 11:51:23 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/29/16 11:47 AM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 11:40:28 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/29/16 10:58 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 1/29/2016 9:47 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: Watched an hour of the GOP debate...all I could tolerate. Rubio and Cruz are just awful and the rest are worse. Jeb had a good night mainly because Trump wasn't there to pick on him. Indeed, Bush seemed the most reasonable of the bunch of coconuts, but that isn't saying much. Rubio brought up spending additional billions and billions of dollars "rebuilding the Navy" and on additional troops, a waste of money we don't have. He reminds me of a petulant little boy. And Cruz demonstrated why so many just plain despise him. The debate was better for Trump not being there, I think. At least the part of it I watched. Maybe if the half of the country paying no taxes would get a job and pay some, we would have the money to counter threats. Wonder why China is spending so much on armament? -- Ban idiots, not guns! What percentage of what we spend on the military is China spending? Oh, and the threats we have to counter these days aren't really "counterable" by oversized military forces. They're beaten by human intel, which we sorely lack. Well shoot, let me just give ol' Xi Jinping a quick call on Skype and ask him how much China spends! -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
unqualified
On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 11:51:23 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote: What percentage of what we spend on the military is China spending? It is not really an even measurement. We also supply a lot of the arms for the rest of the world out of that budget and we pay our contractors union wages. (plus the waste and fraud) China still has coolies building their stuff and when the chinese catch a person scamming the government, they get shot. The family gets billed for the bullet. |
unqualified
On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 12:43:30 -0500, John H.
wrote: Well shoot, let me just give ol' Xi Jinping a quick call on Skype and ask him how much China spends! You do make a good point in your attempt at humor. We really have to guess what China spends because it is a closed society without any GAO reports to dissect. |
unqualified
On 1/29/2016 8:47 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
Watched an hour of the GOP debate...all I could tolerate. Rubio and Cruz are just awful and the rest are worse. What policy or ideas do you disagree with? Mikek |
unqualified
|
unqualified
On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 13:51:10 -0500, John H.
wrote: On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 13:29:33 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 11:51:23 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: What percentage of what we spend on the military is China spending? It is not really an even measurement. We also supply a lot of the arms for the rest of the world out of that budget and we pay our contractors union wages. (plus the waste and fraud) China still has coolies building their stuff and when the chinese catch a person scamming the government, they get shot. The family gets billed for the bullet. Wonder how the supply of .22 ammo is over there. I am sure they will use a 7.62x39 ... probably steel. At least that is what they sell us. |
unqualified
On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 13:51:10 -0500, John H.
wrote: On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 13:29:33 -0500, wrote: On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 11:51:23 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: What percentage of what we spend on the military is China spending? It is not really an even measurement. We also supply a lot of the arms for the rest of the world out of that budget and we pay our contractors union wages. (plus the waste and fraud) China still has coolies building their stuff and when the chinese catch a person scamming the government, they get shot. The family gets billed for the bullet. Wonder how the supply of .22 ammo is over there. === You can buy all you want on the internet assuming Virginia allows that sort of thing. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:06 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com