|
Now I understand why Virginia resident...
....John Herring is a Repubican.
The Virginia GOP is pushing a bill that require schools to make sure that children are using the restroom corresponding to their “correct anatomical sex” — something that takes South Dakota state Representative Roger Hunt’s call for “genital inspections” before children are allowed to play sports to a whole new level. One in ten students reports sexual abuse at the hands of an educator between kindergarten and the end of high school — but in Virginia, we can expect this number to increase dramatically with a “free pass” being given to teachers to look at children’s private parts anytime they need to pee. House Bill 663, introduced by *Republican* Delegate Mark Cole, says that: Local school boards shall develop and implement policies that require every school restroom, locker room, or shower room that is designated for use by a specific gender to solely be used by individuals whose anatomical sex matches such gender designation. “Anatomical sex” is defined in the bill as “the physical condition of being male or female, which is determined by a person’s anatomy.” If it becomes law, any student violating these downright creepy rules would be fined $50 — though schools are given some leeway to allow students to use a “single stall restroom or shower” or have “controlled” access to an unoccupied restroom (yes, this means they would have a state-mandated “bathroom buddy” any time they wish to use the restroom). And, as civil rights advocate Tim Peacock points out, this means someone would have to physically inspect the child’s genitals: This is what the conservative movement has devolved into: forcing children to allow adults to examine their genitals out of misplaced fear that transgender kids and adults might commit a hypothetical never-before-seen act of violence or sexual aggression (that would still be against the law with or without transgender protections). The bill will also allow law enforcement to fine anyone who uses a public restroom that does not correspond to their “anatomical sex.” - - - I suspect a number of Republicans will soon be applying for those school restroom guardian jobs... |
Now I understand why Virginia resident...
On 1/12/2016 7:18 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...John Herring is a Repubican. The Virginia GOP is pushing a bill that require schools to make sure that children are using the restroom corresponding to their “correct anatomical sex” — something that takes South Dakota state Representative Roger Hunt’s call for “genital inspections” before children are allowed to play sports to a whole new level. One in ten students reports sexual abuse at the hands of an educator between kindergarten and the end of high school — but in Virginia, we can expect this number to increase dramatically with a “free pass” being given to teachers to look at children’s private parts anytime they need to pee. House Bill 663, introduced by *Republican* Delegate Mark Cole, says that: Local school boards shall develop and implement policies that require every school restroom, locker room, or shower room that is designated for use by a specific gender to solely be used by individuals whose anatomical sex matches such gender designation. “Anatomical sex” is defined in the bill as “the physical condition of being male or female, which is determined by a person’s anatomy.” If it becomes law, any student violating these downright creepy rules would be fined $50 — though schools are given some leeway to allow students to use a “single stall restroom or shower” or have “controlled” access to an unoccupied restroom (yes, this means they would have a state-mandated “bathroom buddy” any time they wish to use the restroom). And, as civil rights advocate Tim Peacock points out, this means someone would have to physically inspect the child’s genitals: This is what the conservative movement has devolved into: forcing children to allow adults to examine their genitals out of misplaced fear that transgender kids and adults might commit a hypothetical never-before-seen act of violence or sexual aggression (that would still be against the law with or without transgender protections). The bill will also allow law enforcement to fine anyone who uses a public restroom that does not correspond to their “anatomical sex.” - - - I suspect a number of Republicans will soon be applying for those school restroom guardian jobs... You really need therapy. Reading through what the bill actually says (which you put in quotes) interspersed with your interpretation of what it means will happen indicates a serious and distorted firing of your brain cells. A simple statement by the kid's doctor on his annual physical examination prior to the school year or immunization records will meet the requirements of the bill. Nobody has to be inspecting for genital evidence at the school and nobody is claiming it does .... except you. Get some help. |
Now I understand why Virginia resident...
On 1/12/2016 7:50 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 1/12/2016 7:18 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: ...John Herring is a Repubican. The Virginia GOP is pushing a bill that require schools to make sure that children are using the restroom corresponding to their “correct anatomical sex” — something that takes South Dakota state Representative Roger Hunt’s call for “genital inspections” before children are allowed to play sports to a whole new level. One in ten students reports sexual abuse at the hands of an educator between kindergarten and the end of high school — but in Virginia, we can expect this number to increase dramatically with a “free pass” being given to teachers to look at children’s private parts anytime they need to pee. House Bill 663, introduced by *Republican* Delegate Mark Cole, says that: Local school boards shall develop and implement policies that require every school restroom, locker room, or shower room that is designated for use by a specific gender to solely be used by individuals whose anatomical sex matches such gender designation. “Anatomical sex” is defined in the bill as “the physical condition of being male or female, which is determined by a person’s anatomy.” If it becomes law, any student violating these downright creepy rules would be fined $50 — though schools are given some leeway to allow students to use a “single stall restroom or shower” or have “controlled” access to an unoccupied restroom (yes, this means they would have a state-mandated “bathroom buddy” any time they wish to use the restroom). And, as civil rights advocate Tim Peacock points out, this means someone would have to physically inspect the child’s genitals: This is what the conservative movement has devolved into: forcing children to allow adults to examine their genitals out of misplaced fear that transgender kids and adults might commit a hypothetical never-before-seen act of violence or sexual aggression (that would still be against the law with or without transgender protections). The bill will also allow law enforcement to fine anyone who uses a public restroom that does not correspond to their “anatomical sex.” - - - I suspect a number of Republicans will soon be applying for those school restroom guardian jobs... You really need therapy. Reading through what the bill actually says (which you put in quotes) interspersed with your interpretation of what it means will happen indicates a serious and distorted firing of your brain cells. A simple statement by the kid's doctor on his annual physical examination prior to the school year or immunization records will meet the requirements of the bill. Nobody has to be inspecting for genital evidence at the school and nobody is claiming it does .... except you. Get some help. Harry is trying real hard to outperform Slammer. |
Now I understand why Virginia resident...
On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 19:50:37 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: On 1/12/2016 7:18 PM, Keyser Sze wrote: ...John Herring is a Repubican. The Virginia GOP is pushing a bill that require schools to make sure that children are using the restroom corresponding to their correct anatomical sex something that takes South Dakota state Representative Roger Hunts call for genital inspections before children are allowed to play sports to a whole new level. One in ten students reports sexual abuse at the hands of an educator between kindergarten and the end of high school but in Virginia, we can expect this number to increase dramatically with a free pass being given to teachers to look at childrens private parts anytime they need to pee. House Bill 663, introduced by *Republican* Delegate Mark Cole, says that: Local school boards shall develop and implement policies that require every school restroom, locker room, or shower room that is designated for use by a specific gender to solely be used by individuals whose anatomical sex matches such gender designation. Anatomical sex is defined in the bill as the physical condition of being male or female, which is determined by a persons anatomy. If it becomes law, any student violating these downright creepy rules would be fined $50 though schools are given some leeway to allow students to use a single stall restroom or shower or have controlled access to an unoccupied restroom (yes, this means they would have a state-mandated bathroom buddy any time they wish to use the restroom). And, as civil rights advocate Tim Peacock points out, this means someone would have to physically inspect the childs genitals: This is what the conservative movement has devolved into: forcing children to allow adults to examine their genitals out of misplaced fear that transgender kids and adults might commit a hypothetical never-before-seen act of violence or sexual aggression (that would still be against the law with or without transgender protections). The bill will also allow law enforcement to fine anyone who uses a public restroom that does not correspond to their anatomical sex. - - - I suspect a number of Republicans will soon be applying for those school restroom guardian jobs... You really need therapy. Reading through what the bill actually says (which you put in quotes) interspersed with your interpretation of what it means will happen indicates a serious and distorted firing of your brain cells. A simple statement by the kid's doctor on his annual physical examination prior to the school year or immunization records will meet the requirements of the bill. Nobody has to be inspecting for genital evidence at the school and nobody is claiming it does .... except you. Get some help. === Supposedly his wife is a mental health professional. I wonder if they're still together? If so, all he'd need to do is go upstairs for a little counseling session. |
Now I understand why Virginia resident...
On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 19:18:21 -0500, Keyser Sze wrote:
...John Herring is a Repubican. The Virginia GOP is pushing a bill that require schools to make sure that children are using the restroom corresponding to their correct anatomical sex something that takes South Dakota state Representative Roger Hunts call for genital inspections before children are allowed to play sports to a whole new level. One in ten students reports sexual abuse at the hands of an educator between kindergarten and the end of high school but in Virginia, we can expect this number to increase dramatically with a free pass being given to teachers to look at childrens private parts anytime they need to pee. House Bill 663, introduced by *Republican* Delegate Mark Cole, says that: Local school boards shall develop and implement policies that require every school restroom, locker room, or shower room that is designated for use by a specific gender to solely be used by individuals whose anatomical sex matches such gender designation. Anatomical sex is defined in the bill as the physical condition of being male or female, which is determined by a persons anatomy. If it becomes law, any student violating these downright creepy rules would be fined $50 though schools are given some leeway to allow students to use a single stall restroom or shower or have controlled access to an unoccupied restroom (yes, this means they would have a state-mandated bathroom buddy any time they wish to use the restroom). And, as civil rights advocate Tim Peacock points out, this means someone would have to physically inspect the childs genitals: This is what the conservative movement has devolved into: forcing children to allow adults to examine their genitals out of misplaced fear that transgender kids and adults might commit a hypothetical never-before-seen act of violence or sexual aggression (that would still be against the law with or without transgender protections). The bill will also allow law enforcement to fine anyone who uses a public restroom that does not correspond to their anatomical sex. - - - I suspect a number of Republicans will soon be applying for those school restroom guardian jobs... Talk about Krausescheie! This one takes the cake. It exemplifies stupidity, although the author is not stupid. Must be something else. -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
Now I understand why Virginia resident...
On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 20:28:06 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote:
On 1/12/2016 7:50 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 1/12/2016 7:18 PM, Keyser Sze wrote: ...John Herring is a Repubican. The Virginia GOP is pushing a bill that require schools to make sure that children are using the restroom corresponding to their correct anatomical sex something that takes South Dakota state Representative Roger Hunts call for genital inspections before children are allowed to play sports to a whole new level. One in ten students reports sexual abuse at the hands of an educator between kindergarten and the end of high school but in Virginia, we can expect this number to increase dramatically with a free pass being given to teachers to look at childrens private parts anytime they need to pee. House Bill 663, introduced by *Republican* Delegate Mark Cole, says that: Local school boards shall develop and implement policies that require every school restroom, locker room, or shower room that is designated for use by a specific gender to solely be used by individuals whose anatomical sex matches such gender designation. Anatomical sex is defined in the bill as the physical condition of being male or female, which is determined by a persons anatomy. If it becomes law, any student violating these downright creepy rules would be fined $50 though schools are given some leeway to allow students to use a single stall restroom or shower or have controlled access to an unoccupied restroom (yes, this means they would have a state-mandated bathroom buddy any time they wish to use the restroom). And, as civil rights advocate Tim Peacock points out, this means someone would have to physically inspect the childs genitals: This is what the conservative movement has devolved into: forcing children to allow adults to examine their genitals out of misplaced fear that transgender kids and adults might commit a hypothetical never-before-seen act of violence or sexual aggression (that would still be against the law with or without transgender protections). The bill will also allow law enforcement to fine anyone who uses a public restroom that does not correspond to their anatomical sex. - - - I suspect a number of Republicans will soon be applying for those school restroom guardian jobs... You really need therapy. Reading through what the bill actually says (which you put in quotes) interspersed with your interpretation of what it means will happen indicates a serious and distorted firing of your brain cells. A simple statement by the kid's doctor on his annual physical examination prior to the school year or immunization records will meet the requirements of the bill. Nobody has to be inspecting for genital evidence at the school and nobody is claiming it does .... except you. Get some help. Harry is trying real hard to outperform Slammer. I think you've hit the nail on the head. -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
Now I understand why Virginia resident...
On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 19:18:21 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote: ...John Herring is a Repubican. The Virginia GOP is pushing a bill that require schools to make sure that children are using the restroom corresponding to their “correct anatomical sex” — something that takes South Dakota state Representative Roger Hunt’s call for “genital inspections” before children are allowed to play sports to a whole new level. One in ten students reports sexual abuse at the hands of an educator between kindergarten and the end of high school — but in Virginia, we can expect this number to increase dramatically with a “free pass” being given to teachers to look at children’s private parts anytime they need to pee. House Bill 663, introduced by *Republican* Delegate Mark Cole, says that: Local school boards shall develop and implement policies that require every school restroom, locker room, or shower room that is designated for use by a specific gender to solely be used by individuals whose anatomical sex matches such gender designation. “Anatomical sex” is defined in the bill as “the physical condition of being male or female, which is determined by a person’s anatomy.” If it becomes law, any student violating these downright creepy rules would be fined $50 — though schools are given some leeway to allow students to use a “single stall restroom or shower” or have “controlled” access to an unoccupied restroom (yes, this means they would have a state-mandated “bathroom buddy” any time they wish to use the restroom). And, as civil rights advocate Tim Peacock points out, this means someone would have to physically inspect the child’s genitals: This is what the conservative movement has devolved into: forcing children to allow adults to examine their genitals out of misplaced fear that transgender kids and adults might commit a hypothetical never-before-seen act of violence or sexual aggression (that would still be against the law with or without transgender protections). The bill will also allow law enforcement to fine anyone who uses a public restroom that does not correspond to their “anatomical sex.” - - - I suspect a number of Republicans will soon be applying for those school restroom guardian jobs... I understand those union protected teachers have almost as bad a reputation for pedophilia as Catholic priests but they should get a break here. The idea that the teachers will be doing a "genitalia" check is just irrational hysteria. The school board will know what a student's anatomy is when they see the birth certificate at registration. I do understand the parent's concerns when they have to try to explain to their daughters why little Jenny has a dick. |
Now I understand why Virginia resident...
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 08:04:10 -0500, John H.
wrote: On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 19:18:21 -0500, Keyser Sze wrote: ...John Herring is a Repubican. The Virginia GOP is pushing a bill that require schools to make sure that children are using the restroom corresponding to their correct anatomical sex something that takes South Dakota state Representative Roger Hunts call for genital inspections before children are allowed to play sports to a whole new level. One in ten students reports sexual abuse at the hands of an educator between kindergarten and the end of high school but in Virginia, we can expect this number to increase dramatically with a free pass being given to teachers to look at childrens private parts anytime they need to pee. House Bill 663, introduced by *Republican* Delegate Mark Cole, says that: Local school boards shall develop and implement policies that require every school restroom, locker room, or shower room that is designated for use by a specific gender to solely be used by individuals whose anatomical sex matches such gender designation. Anatomical sex is defined in the bill as the physical condition of being male or female, which is determined by a persons anatomy. If it becomes law, any student violating these downright creepy rules would be fined $50 though schools are given some leeway to allow students to use a single stall restroom or shower or have controlled access to an unoccupied restroom (yes, this means they would have a state-mandated bathroom buddy any time they wish to use the restroom). And, as civil rights advocate Tim Peacock points out, this means someone would have to physically inspect the childs genitals: This is what the conservative movement has devolved into: forcing children to allow adults to examine their genitals out of misplaced fear that transgender kids and adults might commit a hypothetical never-before-seen act of violence or sexual aggression (that would still be against the law with or without transgender protections). The bill will also allow law enforcement to fine anyone who uses a public restroom that does not correspond to their anatomical sex. - - - I suspect a number of Republicans will soon be applying for those school restroom guardian jobs... Talk about Krausescheie! This one takes the cake. It exemplifies stupidity, although the author is not stupid. Must be something else. === It exemplifies a disturbed and twisted mind. I think we all kind of knew that but now Harry is documenting it for the record. It will help with his pending certification. |
Now I understand why Virginia resident...
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:03 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com