|
Are there any ghettos...
....not run by Democrats?
-- Ban idiots, not guns! |
Are there any ghettos...
On 1/1/16 1:55 PM, John H. wrote:
...not run by Democrats? -- Did you get a new dog whistle for Christmas, or are you trying for a volunteer job in the Trump campaign? |
Are there any ghettos...
On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 09:10:34 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/1/16 1:55 PM, John H. wrote: ...not run by Democrats? -- Did you get a new dog whistle for Christmas, or are you trying for a volunteer job in the Trump campaign? You can't answer the question? -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
Are there any ghettos...
John H. wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 09:10:34 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/1/16 1:55 PM, John H. wrote: ...not run by Democrats? -- Did you get a new dog whistle for Christmas, or are you trying for a volunteer job in the Trump campaign? You can't answer the question? -- Ban idiots, not guns! I choose not to respond on point to your racist, dog whistle troll. -- Sent from my iPhone 6+ |
Are there any ghettos...
On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 10:32:57 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:
John H. wrote: On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 09:10:34 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/1/16 1:55 PM, John H. wrote: ...not run by Democrats? -- Did you get a new dog whistle for Christmas, or are you trying for a volunteer job in the Trump campaign? You can't answer the question? -- Ban idiots, not guns! I choose not to respond on point to your racist, dog whistle troll. Krause...you already did. Several times. Nothing racist about the question, unless racism is a feature of Democrat control (which, as you know, it is). -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
Are there any ghettos...
John H. wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 10:32:57 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: John H. wrote: On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 09:10:34 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/1/16 1:55 PM, John H. wrote: ...not run by Democrats? -- Did you get a new dog whistle for Christmas, or are you trying for a volunteer job in the Trump campaign? You can't answer the question? -- Ban idiots, not guns! I choose not to respond on point to your racist, dog whistle troll. Krause...you already did. Several times. Nothing racist about the question, unless racism is a feature of Democrat control (which, as you know, it is). -- Ban idiots, not guns! Tweet...tweet. Blow that whistle. -- Sent from my iPhone 6+ |
Are there any ghettos...
On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 10:32:57 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:
John H. wrote: On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 09:10:34 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/1/16 1:55 PM, John H. wrote: ...not run by Democrats? -- Did you get a new dog whistle for Christmas, or are you trying for a volunteer job in the Trump campaign? You can't answer the question? -- Ban idiots, not guns! I choose not to respond on point to your racist, dog whistle troll. I didn't know crime was a race issue. Maybe you are the racist. |
Are there any ghettos...
On 1/2/2016 11:26 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
John H. wrote: On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 10:32:57 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: John H. wrote: On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 09:10:34 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/1/16 1:55 PM, John H. wrote: ...not run by Democrats? -- Did you get a new dog whistle for Christmas, or are you trying for a volunteer job in the Trump campaign? You can't answer the question? -- Ban idiots, not guns! I choose not to respond on point to your racist, dog whistle troll. Krause...you already did. Several times. Nothing racist about the question, unless racism is a feature of Democrat control (which, as you know, it is). -- Ban idiots, not guns! Tweet...tweet. Blow that whistle. Wafa Wafa Wafa |
Are there any ghettos...
On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 09:11:39 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:
The person who robs Peter to pay Paul will always get Paul's vote. I see the pitch on herring's dog whistle was high enough to attract a woofer. BTW who ever said all of the welfare goes to poor people? Those folks in the ghetto, paying rent to a slum lord are subsidizing your mortgage. |
Are there any ghettos...
|
Are there any ghettos...
On 1/2/16 2:59 PM, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jan 2016 14:29:16 -0500, wrote: On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 09:11:39 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: The person who robs Peter to pay Paul will always get Paul's vote. I see the pitch on herring's dog whistle was high enough to attract a woofer. BTW who ever said all of the welfare goes to poor people? Those folks in the ghetto, paying rent to a slum lord are subsidizing your mortgage. It's most like rent he's paying. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Tweet...tweet...from John Herring, the dog whistle blower. |
Are there any ghettos...
On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 15:12:47 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/2/16 2:59 PM, John H. wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2016 14:29:16 -0500, wrote: On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 09:11:39 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: The person who robs Peter to pay Paul will always get Paul's vote. I see the pitch on herring's dog whistle was high enough to attract a woofer. BTW who ever said all of the welfare goes to poor people? Those folks in the ghetto, paying rent to a slum lord are subsidizing your mortgage. It's most like rent he's paying. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Tweet...tweet...from John Herring, the dog whistle blower. And look what answers. -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
Are there any ghettos...
On 1/2/2016 3:12 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/2/16 2:59 PM, John H. wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2016 14:29:16 -0500, wrote: On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 09:11:39 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: The person who robs Peter to pay Paul will always get Paul's vote. I see the pitch on herring's dog whistle was high enough to attract a woofer. BTW who ever said all of the welfare goes to poor people? Those folks in the ghetto, paying rent to a slum lord are subsidizing your mortgage. It's most like rent he's paying. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Tweet...tweet...from John Herring, the dog whistle blower. WAFA WAFA to the ranking asshole of rec.boats and likely all of south Maryland. |
Are there any ghettos...
Keyser Söze wrote:
John H. wrote: On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 09:10:34 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/1/16 1:55 PM, John H. wrote: ...not run by Democrats? -- Did you get a new dog whistle for Christmas, or are you trying for a volunteer job in the Trump campaign? You can't answer the question? -- Ban idiots, not guns! I choose not to respond on point to your racist, dog whistle troll. Yet you did respond, WAFA, and your omission says enough. You can't debate it because John is right. Move on, Krause... |
Are there any ghettos...
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/2/16 2:59 PM, John H. wrote: On Sat, 02 Jan 2016 14:29:16 -0500, wrote: On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 09:11:39 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: The person who robs Peter to pay Paul will always get Paul's vote. I see the pitch on herring's dog whistle was high enough to attract a woofer. BTW who ever said all of the welfare goes to poor people? Those folks in the ghetto, paying rent to a slum lord are subsidizing your mortgage. It's most like rent he's paying. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Tweet...tweet...from John Herring, the dog whistle blower. That is lame. You must have found that moronic meme on one of your daily Google searches. It's just dumb. |
Are there any ghettos...
On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 21:18:38 -0500, Alex wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote: John H. wrote: On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 09:10:34 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/1/16 1:55 PM, John H. wrote: ...not run by Democrats? -- Did you get a new dog whistle for Christmas, or are you trying for a volunteer job in the Trump campaign? You can't answer the question? -- Ban idiots, not guns! I choose not to respond on point to your racist, dog whistle troll. Yet you did respond, WAFA, and your omission says enough. You can't debate it because John is right. Move on, Krause... Appears he's 'seen the light'. -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
Are there any ghettos...
On 1/3/16 9:10 AM, John H. wrote:
I looked again, but could find nothing approaching 'racism' in the original question. Does Democrat control of ghettos automatically spell racism in some way? Perhaps some of the other experts on 'racism' could chime in. -- Blow that dog whistle, Herring. |
Are there any ghettos...
On 1/3/2016 9:08 AM, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 21:18:38 -0500, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: John H. wrote: On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 09:10:34 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/1/16 1:55 PM, John H. wrote: ...not run by Democrats? -- Did you get a new dog whistle for Christmas, or are you trying for a volunteer job in the Trump campaign? You can't answer the question? -- Ban idiots, not guns! I choose not to respond on point to your racist, dog whistle troll. Yet you did respond, WAFA, and your omission says enough. You can't debate it because John is right. Move on, Krause... Appears he's 'seen the light'. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Who's seen the light? Which light? The heavenly light or Lucifer's firelight? Or maybe some other light. Don't be obtuse like Krause. "-) |
Are there any ghettos...
On 1/3/2016 9:46 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/3/16 9:10 AM, John H. wrote: I looked again, but could find nothing approaching 'racism' in the original question. Does Democrat control of ghettos automatically spell racism in some way? Perhaps some of the other experts on 'racism' could chime in. -- Blow that dog whistle, Herring. Local democratic politicians presiding over every known large ghetto area in America should not be construed to relate Democrats to racism. It's just a coincidence. |
Are there any ghettos...
On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 11:09:22 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote:
On 1/3/2016 9:46 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/3/16 9:10 AM, John H. wrote: I looked again, but could find nothing approaching 'racism' in the original question. Does Democrat control of ghettos automatically spell racism in some way? Perhaps some of the other experts on 'racism' could chime in. -- Blow that dog whistle, Herring. Local democratic politicians presiding over every known large ghetto area in America should not be construed to relate Democrats to racism. It's just a coincidence. Oh. I would think that fostering policies which keep the ghettos full *could* be considered racism, especially if the ghetto occupants are black. I suppose Krause considers use of the words ghetto and Democrat together is automatic 'racism'. -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
Are there any ghettos...
On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 11:01:27 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote:
On 1/3/2016 9:08 AM, John H. wrote: On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 21:18:38 -0500, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: John H. wrote: On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 09:10:34 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/1/16 1:55 PM, John H. wrote: ...not run by Democrats? -- Did you get a new dog whistle for Christmas, or are you trying for a volunteer job in the Trump campaign? You can't answer the question? -- Ban idiots, not guns! I choose not to respond on point to your racist, dog whistle troll. Yet you did respond, WAFA, and your omission says enough. You can't debate it because John is right. Move on, Krause... Appears he's 'seen the light'. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Who's seen the light? Which light? The heavenly light or Lucifer's firelight? Or maybe some other light. Don't be obtuse like Krause. "-) These: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2NSIW1QNMj4 Remember? -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
Are there any ghettos...
On 1/3/2016 12:48 PM, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 11:09:22 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 1/3/2016 9:46 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/3/16 9:10 AM, John H. wrote: I looked again, but could find nothing approaching 'racism' in the original question. Does Democrat control of ghettos automatically spell racism in some way? Perhaps some of the other experts on 'racism' could chime in. -- Blow that dog whistle, Herring. Local democratic politicians presiding over every known large ghetto area in America should not be construed to relate Democrats to racism. It's just a coincidence. Oh. I would think that fostering policies which keep the ghettos full *could* be considered racism, especially if the ghetto occupants are black. I suppose Krause considers use of the words ghetto and Democrat together is automatic 'racism'. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Probably Krause associates black and ghetto together. Whether that's racist, I don't know. |
Are there any ghettos...
On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 13:19:40 -0500, Justan Olphart
wrote: On 1/3/2016 12:48 PM, John H. wrote: On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 11:09:22 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 1/3/2016 9:46 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/3/16 9:10 AM, John H. wrote: I looked again, but could find nothing approaching 'racism' in the original question. Does Democrat control of ghettos automatically spell racism in some way? Perhaps some of the other experts on 'racism' could chime in. -- Blow that dog whistle, Herring. Local democratic politicians presiding over every known large ghetto area in America should not be construed to relate Democrats to racism. It's just a coincidence. Oh. I would think that fostering policies which keep the ghettos full *could* be considered racism, especially if the ghetto occupants are black. I suppose Krause considers use of the words ghetto and Democrat together is automatic 'racism'. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Probably Krause associates black and ghetto together. Whether that's racist, I don't know. Ironic since "ghetto" is an Italian word derived from latin |
Are there any ghettos...
|
Are there any ghettos...
On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:16:00 -0500, John H.
wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 15:57:37 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 13:29:02 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 13:19:40 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 1/3/2016 12:48 PM, John H. wrote: On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 11:09:22 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 1/3/2016 9:46 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/3/16 9:10 AM, John H. wrote: I looked again, but could find nothing approaching 'racism' in the original question. Does Democrat control of ghettos automatically spell racism in some way? Perhaps some of the other experts on 'racism' could chime in. -- Blow that dog whistle, Herring. Local democratic politicians presiding over every known large ghetto area in America should not be construed to relate Democrats to racism. It's just a coincidence. Oh. I would think that fostering policies which keep the ghettos full *could* be considered racism, especially if the ghetto occupants are black. I suppose Krause considers use of the words ghetto and Democrat together is automatic 'racism'. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Probably Krause associates black and ghetto together. Whether that's racist, I don't know. Ironic since "ghetto" is an Italian word derived from latin === Ghettos at varios times and various places have been associated with a lot of different ethnicities. One common definition goes like this: --- A section of a city, especially a thickly populated slum area, inhabited predominantly by members of an ethnic or other minority group, often as a result of social or economic restrictions, pressures, or hardships. --- The word seems to imply an economic distinction more than racial or ethnic. Since Democrats like to fancy themselves as champions of the downtrodden, it makes sense that they would identify with ghettos. Of course since the vast majority of working americans do not identify with ghettos it would seem to put democrats somewhere out in left field politically so to speak. Well, I'm guessing that the answer to my question is, "No". === Harry's opinions are just that. Which reminds me that opinions are like arse'ls, everybody has one. |
Are there any ghettos...
On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:30:17 -0500, wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:16:00 -0500, John H. wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 15:57:37 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 13:29:02 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 13:19:40 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 1/3/2016 12:48 PM, John H. wrote: On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 11:09:22 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 1/3/2016 9:46 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/3/16 9:10 AM, John H. wrote: I looked again, but could find nothing approaching 'racism' in the original question. Does Democrat control of ghettos automatically spell racism in some way? Perhaps some of the other experts on 'racism' could chime in. -- Blow that dog whistle, Herring. Local democratic politicians presiding over every known large ghetto area in America should not be construed to relate Democrats to racism. It's just a coincidence. Oh. I would think that fostering policies which keep the ghettos full *could* be considered racism, especially if the ghetto occupants are black. I suppose Krause considers use of the words ghetto and Democrat together is automatic 'racism'. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Probably Krause associates black and ghetto together. Whether that's racist, I don't know. Ironic since "ghetto" is an Italian word derived from latin === Ghettos at varios times and various places have been associated with a lot of different ethnicities. One common definition goes like this: --- A section of a city, especially a thickly populated slum area, inhabited predominantly by members of an ethnic or other minority group, often as a result of social or economic restrictions, pressures, or hardships. --- The word seems to imply an economic distinction more than racial or ethnic. Since Democrats like to fancy themselves as champions of the downtrodden, it makes sense that they would identify with ghettos. Of course since the vast majority of working americans do not identify with ghettos it would seem to put democrats somewhere out in left field politically so to speak. Well, I'm guessing that the answer to my question is, "No". === Harry's opinions are just that. Which reminds me that opinions are like arse'ls, everybody has one. Harry never showed the balls to answer the question. -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
Are there any ghettos...
On 1/3/16 4:52 PM, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:30:17 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:16:00 -0500, John H. wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 15:57:37 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 13:29:02 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 13:19:40 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 1/3/2016 12:48 PM, John H. wrote: On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 11:09:22 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 1/3/2016 9:46 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/3/16 9:10 AM, John H. wrote: I looked again, but could find nothing approaching 'racism' in the original question. Does Democrat control of ghettos automatically spell racism in some way? Perhaps some of the other experts on 'racism' could chime in. -- Blow that dog whistle, Herring. Local democratic politicians presiding over every known large ghetto area in America should not be construed to relate Democrats to racism. It's just a coincidence. Oh. I would think that fostering policies which keep the ghettos full *could* be considered racism, especially if the ghetto occupants are black. I suppose Krause considers use of the words ghetto and Democrat together is automatic 'racism'. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Probably Krause associates black and ghetto together. Whether that's racist, I don't know. Ironic since "ghetto" is an Italian word derived from latin === Ghettos at varios times and various places have been associated with a lot of different ethnicities. One common definition goes like this: --- A section of a city, especially a thickly populated slum area, inhabited predominantly by members of an ethnic or other minority group, often as a result of social or economic restrictions, pressures, or hardships. --- The word seems to imply an economic distinction more than racial or ethnic. Since Democrats like to fancy themselves as champions of the downtrodden, it makes sense that they would identify with ghettos. Of course since the vast majority of working americans do not identify with ghettos it would seem to put democrats somewhere out in left field politically so to speak. Well, I'm guessing that the answer to my question is, "No". === Harry's opinions are just that. Which reminds me that opinions are like arse'ls, everybody has one. Harry never showed the balls to answer the question. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Once again, it has nothing to do with balls or anything other than my refusal to play your stupid trolling games. |
Are there any ghettos...
On 1/3/2016 4:52 PM, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:30:17 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:16:00 -0500, John H. wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 15:57:37 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 13:29:02 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 13:19:40 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 1/3/2016 12:48 PM, John H. wrote: On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 11:09:22 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 1/3/2016 9:46 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/3/16 9:10 AM, John H. wrote: I looked again, but could find nothing approaching 'racism' in the original question. Does Democrat control of ghettos automatically spell racism in some way? Perhaps some of the other experts on 'racism' could chime in. -- Blow that dog whistle, Herring. Local democratic politicians presiding over every known large ghetto area in America should not be construed to relate Democrats to racism. It's just a coincidence. Oh. I would think that fostering policies which keep the ghettos full *could* be considered racism, especially if the ghetto occupants are black. I suppose Krause considers use of the words ghetto and Democrat together is automatic 'racism'. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Probably Krause associates black and ghetto together. Whether that's racist, I don't know. Ironic since "ghetto" is an Italian word derived from latin === Ghettos at varios times and various places have been associated with a lot of different ethnicities. One common definition goes like this: --- A section of a city, especially a thickly populated slum area, inhabited predominantly by members of an ethnic or other minority group, often as a result of social or economic restrictions, pressures, or hardships. --- The word seems to imply an economic distinction more than racial or ethnic. Since Democrats like to fancy themselves as champions of the downtrodden, it makes sense that they would identify with ghettos. Of course since the vast majority of working americans do not identify with ghettos it would seem to put democrats somewhere out in left field politically so to speak. Well, I'm guessing that the answer to my question is, "No". === Harry's opinions are just that. Which reminds me that opinions are like arse'ls, everybody has one. Harry never showed the balls to answer the question. -- Ban idiots, not guns! He can't show what he doesn't have. |
Are there any ghettos...
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/3/16 4:52 PM, John H. wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:30:17 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:16:00 -0500, John H. wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 15:57:37 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 13:29:02 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 13:19:40 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 1/3/2016 12:48 PM, John H. wrote: On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 11:09:22 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 1/3/2016 9:46 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/3/16 9:10 AM, John H. wrote: I looked again, but could find nothing approaching 'racism' in the original question. Does Democrat control of ghettos automatically spell racism in some way? Perhaps some of the other experts on 'racism' could chime in. -- Blow that dog whistle, Herring. Local democratic politicians presiding over every known large ghetto area in America should not be construed to relate Democrats to racism. It's just a coincidence. Oh. I would think that fostering policies which keep the ghettos full *could* be considered racism, especially if the ghetto occupants are black. I suppose Krause considers use of the words ghetto and Democrat together is automatic 'racism'. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Probably Krause associates black and ghetto together. Whether that's racist, I don't know. Ironic since "ghetto" is an Italian word derived from latin === Ghettos at varios times and various places have been associated with a lot of different ethnicities. One common definition goes like this: --- A section of a city, especially a thickly populated slum area, inhabited predominantly by members of an ethnic or other minority group, often as a result of social or economic restrictions, pressures, or hardships. --- The word seems to imply an economic distinction more than racial or ethnic. Since Democrats like to fancy themselves as champions of the downtrodden, it makes sense that they would identify with ghettos. Of course since the vast majority of working americans do not identify with ghettos it would seem to put democrats somewhere out in left field politically so to speak. Well, I'm guessing that the answer to my question is, "No". === Harry's opinions are just that. Which reminds me that opinions are like arse'ls, everybody has one. Harry never showed the balls to answer the question. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Once again, it has nothing to do with balls or anything other than my refusal to play your stupid trolling games. ....says the troll king and master of debt avoidance. |
Are there any ghettos...
On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 19:58:21 -0500, Alex wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/3/16 4:52 PM, John H. wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:30:17 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:16:00 -0500, John H. wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 15:57:37 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 13:29:02 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 13:19:40 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 1/3/2016 12:48 PM, John H. wrote: On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 11:09:22 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 1/3/2016 9:46 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/3/16 9:10 AM, John H. wrote: I looked again, but could find nothing approaching 'racism' in the original question. Does Democrat control of ghettos automatically spell racism in some way? Perhaps some of the other experts on 'racism' could chime in. -- Blow that dog whistle, Herring. Local democratic politicians presiding over every known large ghetto area in America should not be construed to relate Democrats to racism. It's just a coincidence. Oh. I would think that fostering policies which keep the ghettos full *could* be considered racism, especially if the ghetto occupants are black. I suppose Krause considers use of the words ghetto and Democrat together is automatic 'racism'. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Probably Krause associates black and ghetto together. Whether that's racist, I don't know. Ironic since "ghetto" is an Italian word derived from latin === Ghettos at varios times and various places have been associated with a lot of different ethnicities. One common definition goes like this: --- A section of a city, especially a thickly populated slum area, inhabited predominantly by members of an ethnic or other minority group, often as a result of social or economic restrictions, pressures, or hardships. --- The word seems to imply an economic distinction more than racial or ethnic. Since Democrats like to fancy themselves as champions of the downtrodden, it makes sense that they would identify with ghettos. Of course since the vast majority of working americans do not identify with ghettos it would seem to put democrats somewhere out in left field politically so to speak. Well, I'm guessing that the answer to my question is, "No". === Harry's opinions are just that. Which reminds me that opinions are like arse'ls, everybody has one. Harry never showed the balls to answer the question. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Once again, it has nothing to do with balls or anything other than my refusal to play your stupid trolling games. ...says the troll king and master of debt avoidance. :) -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
Are there any ghettos...
On 1/4/2016 8:28 PM, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 19:58:21 -0500, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/3/16 4:52 PM, John H. wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:30:17 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:16:00 -0500, John H. wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 15:57:37 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 13:29:02 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 13:19:40 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 1/3/2016 12:48 PM, John H. wrote: On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 11:09:22 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 1/3/2016 9:46 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/3/16 9:10 AM, John H. wrote: I looked again, but could find nothing approaching 'racism' in the original question. Does Democrat control of ghettos automatically spell racism in some way? Perhaps some of the other experts on 'racism' could chime in. -- Blow that dog whistle, Herring. Local democratic politicians presiding over every known large ghetto area in America should not be construed to relate Democrats to racism. It's just a coincidence. Oh. I would think that fostering policies which keep the ghettos full *could* be considered racism, especially if the ghetto occupants are black. I suppose Krause considers use of the words ghetto and Democrat together is automatic 'racism'. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Probably Krause associates black and ghetto together. Whether that's racist, I don't know. Ironic since "ghetto" is an Italian word derived from latin === Ghettos at varios times and various places have been associated with a lot of different ethnicities. One common definition goes like this: --- A section of a city, especially a thickly populated slum area, inhabited predominantly by members of an ethnic or other minority group, often as a result of social or economic restrictions, pressures, or hardships. --- The word seems to imply an economic distinction more than racial or ethnic. Since Democrats like to fancy themselves as champions of the downtrodden, it makes sense that they would identify with ghettos. Of course since the vast majority of working americans do not identify with ghettos it would seem to put democrats somewhere out in left field politically so to speak. Well, I'm guessing that the answer to my question is, "No". === Harry's opinions are just that. Which reminds me that opinions are like arse'ls, everybody has one. Harry never showed the balls to answer the question. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Once again, it has nothing to do with balls or anything other than my refusal to play your stupid trolling games. ...says the troll king and master of debt avoidance. :) -- Ban idiots, not guns! Speaking of Harry's balls. Did he ever tell you the story about the time he TRIED to beat up on a short scrawny guy because the little guy was allegedly harassing his wife or girlfriend? Unfortunately that heroic venture ended up with Harry getting medical attention for broken bones. Wouldn't you have liked to be a fly on the wall at the mall when Harry swung with all his might and couldn't knock the little guy down. |
Are there any ghettos...
On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 06:30:20 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote:
On 1/4/2016 8:28 PM, John H. wrote: On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 19:58:21 -0500, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/3/16 4:52 PM, John H. wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:30:17 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:16:00 -0500, John H. wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 15:57:37 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 13:29:02 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 13:19:40 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 1/3/2016 12:48 PM, John H. wrote: On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 11:09:22 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 1/3/2016 9:46 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/3/16 9:10 AM, John H. wrote: I looked again, but could find nothing approaching 'racism' in the original question. Does Democrat control of ghettos automatically spell racism in some way? Perhaps some of the other experts on 'racism' could chime in. -- Blow that dog whistle, Herring. Local democratic politicians presiding over every known large ghetto area in America should not be construed to relate Democrats to racism. It's just a coincidence. Oh. I would think that fostering policies which keep the ghettos full *could* be considered racism, especially if the ghetto occupants are black. I suppose Krause considers use of the words ghetto and Democrat together is automatic 'racism'. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Probably Krause associates black and ghetto together. Whether that's racist, I don't know. Ironic since "ghetto" is an Italian word derived from latin === Ghettos at varios times and various places have been associated with a lot of different ethnicities. One common definition goes like this: --- A section of a city, especially a thickly populated slum area, inhabited predominantly by members of an ethnic or other minority group, often as a result of social or economic restrictions, pressures, or hardships. --- The word seems to imply an economic distinction more than racial or ethnic. Since Democrats like to fancy themselves as champions of the downtrodden, it makes sense that they would identify with ghettos. Of course since the vast majority of working americans do not identify with ghettos it would seem to put democrats somewhere out in left field politically so to speak. Well, I'm guessing that the answer to my question is, "No". === Harry's opinions are just that. Which reminds me that opinions are like arse'ls, everybody has one. Harry never showed the balls to answer the question. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Once again, it has nothing to do with balls or anything other than my refusal to play your stupid trolling games. ...says the troll king and master of debt avoidance. :) -- Ban idiots, not guns! Speaking of Harry's balls. Did he ever tell you the story about the time he TRIED to beat up on a short scrawny guy because the little guy was allegedly harassing his wife or girlfriend? Unfortunately that heroic venture ended up with Harry getting medical attention for broken bones. Wouldn't you have liked to be a fly on the wall at the mall when Harry swung with all his might and couldn't knock the little guy down. I'd love to hear the little guy's side of that 'story'. -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
Are there any ghettos...
On 1/5/16 9:47 AM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 06:30:20 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 1/4/2016 8:28 PM, John H. wrote: On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 19:58:21 -0500, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/3/16 4:52 PM, John H. wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:30:17 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:16:00 -0500, John H. wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 15:57:37 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 13:29:02 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 13:19:40 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 1/3/2016 12:48 PM, John H. wrote: On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 11:09:22 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 1/3/2016 9:46 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/3/16 9:10 AM, John H. wrote: I looked again, but could find nothing approaching 'racism' in the original question. Does Democrat control of ghettos automatically spell racism in some way? Perhaps some of the other experts on 'racism' could chime in. -- Blow that dog whistle, Herring. Local democratic politicians presiding over every known large ghetto area in America should not be construed to relate Democrats to racism. It's just a coincidence. Oh. I would think that fostering policies which keep the ghettos full *could* be considered racism, especially if the ghetto occupants are black. I suppose Krause considers use of the words ghetto and Democrat together is automatic 'racism'. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Probably Krause associates black and ghetto together. Whether that's racist, I don't know. Ironic since "ghetto" is an Italian word derived from latin === Ghettos at varios times and various places have been associated with a lot of different ethnicities. One common definition goes like this: --- A section of a city, especially a thickly populated slum area, inhabited predominantly by members of an ethnic or other minority group, often as a result of social or economic restrictions, pressures, or hardships. --- The word seems to imply an economic distinction more than racial or ethnic. Since Democrats like to fancy themselves as champions of the downtrodden, it makes sense that they would identify with ghettos. Of course since the vast majority of working americans do not identify with ghettos it would seem to put democrats somewhere out in left field politically so to speak. Well, I'm guessing that the answer to my question is, "No". === Harry's opinions are just that. Which reminds me that opinions are like arse'ls, everybody has one. Harry never showed the balls to answer the question. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Once again, it has nothing to do with balls or anything other than my refusal to play your stupid trolling games. ...says the troll king and master of debt avoidance. :) -- Ban idiots, not guns! Speaking of Harry's balls. Did he ever tell you the story about the time he TRIED to beat up on a short scrawny guy because the little guy was allegedly harassing his wife or girlfriend? Unfortunately that heroic venture ended up with Harry getting medical attention for broken bones. Wouldn't you have liked to be a fly on the wall at the mall when Harry swung with all his might and couldn't knock the little guy down. I'd love to hear the little guy's side of that 'story'. -- Ban idiots, not guns! He assuredly would have beaten the crap out of you two ex-military pansies, and probably both at the same time. |
Are there any ghettos...
On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 09:50:45 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/5/16 9:47 AM, John H. wrote: On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 06:30:20 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 1/4/2016 8:28 PM, John H. wrote: On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 19:58:21 -0500, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/3/16 4:52 PM, John H. wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:30:17 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:16:00 -0500, John H. wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 15:57:37 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 13:29:02 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 13:19:40 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 1/3/2016 12:48 PM, John H. wrote: On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 11:09:22 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 1/3/2016 9:46 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/3/16 9:10 AM, John H. wrote: I looked again, but could find nothing approaching 'racism' in the original question. Does Democrat control of ghettos automatically spell racism in some way? Perhaps some of the other experts on 'racism' could chime in. -- Blow that dog whistle, Herring. Local democratic politicians presiding over every known large ghetto area in America should not be construed to relate Democrats to racism. It's just a coincidence. Oh. I would think that fostering policies which keep the ghettos full *could* be considered racism, especially if the ghetto occupants are black. I suppose Krause considers use of the words ghetto and Democrat together is automatic 'racism'. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Probably Krause associates black and ghetto together. Whether that's racist, I don't know. Ironic since "ghetto" is an Italian word derived from latin === Ghettos at varios times and various places have been associated with a lot of different ethnicities. One common definition goes like this: --- A section of a city, especially a thickly populated slum area, inhabited predominantly by members of an ethnic or other minority group, often as a result of social or economic restrictions, pressures, or hardships. --- The word seems to imply an economic distinction more than racial or ethnic. Since Democrats like to fancy themselves as champions of the downtrodden, it makes sense that they would identify with ghettos. Of course since the vast majority of working americans do not identify with ghettos it would seem to put democrats somewhere out in left field politically so to speak. Well, I'm guessing that the answer to my question is, "No". === Harry's opinions are just that. Which reminds me that opinions are like arse'ls, everybody has one. Harry never showed the balls to answer the question. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Once again, it has nothing to do with balls or anything other than my refusal to play your stupid trolling games. ...says the troll king and master of debt avoidance. :) -- Ban idiots, not guns! Speaking of Harry's balls. Did he ever tell you the story about the time he TRIED to beat up on a short scrawny guy because the little guy was allegedly harassing his wife or girlfriend? Unfortunately that heroic venture ended up with Harry getting medical attention for broken bones. Wouldn't you have liked to be a fly on the wall at the mall when Harry swung with all his might and couldn't knock the little guy down. I'd love to hear the little guy's side of that 'story'. -- Ban idiots, not guns! He assuredly would have beaten the crap out of you two ex-military pansies, and probably both at the same time. No doubt. You definitely displayed your manhood and courage in the telling of *that* story! -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
Are there any ghettos...
On 1/5/2016 9:50 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/5/16 9:47 AM, John H. wrote: On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 06:30:20 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 1/4/2016 8:28 PM, John H. wrote: On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 19:58:21 -0500, Alex wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/3/16 4:52 PM, John H. wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:30:17 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:16:00 -0500, John H. wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 15:57:37 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 13:29:02 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 13:19:40 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 1/3/2016 12:48 PM, John H. wrote: On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 11:09:22 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 1/3/2016 9:46 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/3/16 9:10 AM, John H. wrote: I looked again, but could find nothing approaching 'racism' in the original question. Does Democrat control of ghettos automatically spell racism in some way? Perhaps some of the other experts on 'racism' could chime in. -- Blow that dog whistle, Herring. Local democratic politicians presiding over every known large ghetto area in America should not be construed to relate Democrats to racism. It's just a coincidence. Oh. I would think that fostering policies which keep the ghettos full *could* be considered racism, especially if the ghetto occupants are black. I suppose Krause considers use of the words ghetto and Democrat together is automatic 'racism'. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Probably Krause associates black and ghetto together. Whether that's racist, I don't know. Ironic since "ghetto" is an Italian word derived from latin === Ghettos at varios times and various places have been associated with a lot of different ethnicities. One common definition goes like this: --- A section of a city, especially a thickly populated slum area, inhabited predominantly by members of an ethnic or other minority group, often as a result of social or economic restrictions, pressures, or hardships. --- The word seems to imply an economic distinction more than racial or ethnic. Since Democrats like to fancy themselves as champions of the downtrodden, it makes sense that they would identify with ghettos. Of course since the vast majority of working americans do not identify with ghettos it would seem to put democrats somewhere out in left field politically so to speak. Well, I'm guessing that the answer to my question is, "No". === Harry's opinions are just that. Which reminds me that opinions are like arse'ls, everybody has one. Harry never showed the balls to answer the question. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Once again, it has nothing to do with balls or anything other than my refusal to play your stupid trolling games. ...says the troll king and master of debt avoidance. :) -- Ban idiots, not guns! Speaking of Harry's balls. Did he ever tell you the story about the time he TRIED to beat up on a short scrawny guy because the little guy was allegedly harassing his wife or girlfriend? Unfortunately that heroic venture ended up with Harry getting medical attention for broken bones. Wouldn't you have liked to be a fly on the wall at the mall when Harry swung with all his might and couldn't knock the little guy down. I'd love to hear the little guy's side of that 'story'. -- Ban idiots, not guns! He assuredly would have beaten the crap out of you two ex-military pansies, and probably both at the same time. You sure did pick on the wrong little guy, eh? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:37 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com