About Us

Justan Olphart[_2_]

On 1/4/2016 8:28 PM, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 19:58:21 -0500, Alex wrote:

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/3/16 4:52 PM, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:30:17 -0500,
wrote:

On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 16:16:00 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 15:57:37 -0500,
wrote:

On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 13:29:02 -0500, wrote:

On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 13:19:40 -0500, Justan Olphart

wrote:

On 1/3/2016 12:48 PM, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 11:09:22 -0500, Justan Olphart
wrote:

On 1/3/2016 9:46 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/3/16 9:10 AM, John H. wrote:

I looked again, but could find nothing approaching 'racism'
in the
original question.
Does Democrat control of ghettos automatically spell racism
in some
way? Perhaps some
of the other experts on 'racism' could chime in.
--

Blow that dog whistle, Herring.

Local democratic politicians presiding over every known large
ghetto
area in America should not be construed to relate Democrats to
racism.
It's just a coincidence.

Oh. I would think that fostering policies which keep the
ghettos full *could* be
considered racism, especially if the ghetto occupants are
black. I suppose Krause
considers use of the words ghetto and Democrat together is
automatic 'racism'.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

Probably Krause associates black and ghetto together. Whether
that's
racist, I don't know.

Ironic since "ghetto" is an Italian word derived from latin

===

Ghettos at varios times and various places have been associated
with a
lot of different ethnicities. One common definition goes like this:

---
A section of a city, especially a thickly populated slum area,
inhabited predominantly by members of an ethnic or other minority
group, often as a result of social or economic restrictions,
pressures, or hardships.
---

The word seems to imply an economic distinction more than racial or
ethnic. Since Democrats like to fancy themselves as champions of the
downtrodden, it makes sense that they would identify with
ghettos. Of
course since the vast majority of working americans do not identify
with ghettos it would seem to put democrats somewhere out in left
field politically so to speak.

Well, I'm guessing that the answer to my question is, "No".

===

Harry's opinions are just that.

Which reminds me that opinions are like arse'ls, everybody has one.

Harry never showed the balls to answer the question.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

Once again, it has nothing to do with balls or anything other than my
refusal to play your stupid trolling games.

...says the troll king and master of debt avoidance.

:)
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

Speaking of Harry's balls. Did he ever tell you the story about the time
he TRIED to beat up on a short scrawny guy because the little guy was
allegedly harassing his wife or girlfriend? Unfortunately that heroic
venture ended up with Harry getting medical attention for broken bones.
Wouldn't you have liked to be a fly on the wall at the mall when Harry
swung with all his might and couldn't knock the little guy down.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Cruisers vs liveaboards and sailboat ghettos	[email protected]	Cruising	16	April 19th 05 07:04 PM

Menu

About Us