harry
 

Harry is a Nobody.

Nobody is Perfect.

Therefore Harry is Perfect.

harry
 

On 12/29/15 7:57 PM, Califbill wrote:


Harry is a Nobody.

Nobody is Perfect.

Therefore Harry is Perfect.



Thank goodness you're not trying to be original or clever with
syllogisms, eh, Bilious?

harry
 

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/29/15 7:57 PM, Califbill wrote:


Harry is a Nobody.

Nobody is Perfect.

Therefore Harry is Perfect.



Thank goodness you're not trying to be original or clever with
syllogisms, eh, Bilious?


I though the syllogism was Raheem appropriate, with a little modification.

harry
 

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/29/15 7:57 PM, Califbill wrote:


Harry is a Nobody.

Nobody is Perfect.

Therefore Harry is Perfect.



Thank goodness you're not trying to be original or clever with
syllogisms, eh, Bilious?


I though the syllogism was Raheem appropriate, with a little modification.

harry
 

On 12/29/15 9:03 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/29/15 7:57 PM, Califbill wrote:


Harry is a Nobody.

Nobody is Perfect.

Therefore Harry is Perfect.



Thank goodness you're not trying to be original or clever with
syllogisms, eh, Bilious?


I though the syllogism was Raheem appropriate, with a little modification.


Who or what is "Raheem"?

harry
 

On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 16:57:09 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote:



Harry is a Nobody.

Nobody is Perfect.

Therefore Harry is Perfect.

Harry will argue that conclusion, fitting though it may be.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

harry
 

On 12/30/15 9:26 AM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 16:57:09 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote:



Harry is a Nobody.

Nobody is Perfect.

Therefore Harry is Perfect.

Harry will argue that conclusion, fitting though it may be.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


No wonder we lost that war in Vietnam.

harry
 

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:28:10 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 12/30/15 9:26 AM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 16:57:09 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote:



Harry is a Nobody.

Nobody is Perfect.

Therefore Harry is Perfect.

Harry will argue that conclusion, fitting though it may be.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


No wonder we lost that war in Vietnam.

Perhaps if you'd done your job over there a bit better?
:)
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

harry
 

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:28:10 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

No wonder we lost that war in Vietnam.

===

If you'd been there Harry we might have turned it around. You could
have headed up the disinformation corps.

harry
 

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:41:49 -0500, Wayne.B wrote:

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:28:10 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

No wonder we lost that war in Vietnam.

===

If you'd been there Harry we might have turned it around. You could
have headed up the disinformation corps.

He says he was there, but that may have been disinformation.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

harry
 

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:55:06 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:41:49 -0500, Wayne.B wrote:

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:28:10 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

No wonder we lost that war in Vietnam.

===

If you'd been there Harry we might have turned it around. You could
have headed up the disinformation corps.

He says he was there, but that may have been disinformation.

===

No question. He's the perfect candidate for the job in my mind.

harry
 

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 11:13:59 -0500, Wayne.B wrote:

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:55:06 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:41:49 -0500, Wayne.B wrote:

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:28:10 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

No wonder we lost that war in Vietnam.

===

If you'd been there Harry we might have turned it around. You could
have headed up the disinformation corps.

He says he was there, but that may have been disinformation.

===

No question. He's the perfect candidate for the job in my mind.

CB already proved his perfection.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

harry
 

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:41:49 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:28:10 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

No wonder we lost that war in Vietnam.

===

If you'd been there Harry we might have turned it around. You could
have headed up the disinformation corps.

If you look closely you will see him on the other side of that AA gun
Jane was sitting on.

harry
 

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/29/15 9:03 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/29/15 7:57 PM, Califbill wrote:


Harry is a Nobody.

Nobody is Perfect.

Therefore Harry is Perfect.



Thank goodness you're not trying to be original or clever with
syllogisms, eh, Bilious?


I though the syllogism was Raheem appropriate, with a little modification.


Who or what is "Raheem"?


He is a Rather, spell correctors brother.

harry
 

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/30/15 9:26 AM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 16:57:09 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote:



Harry is a Nobody.

Nobody is Perfect.

Therefore Harry is Perfect.

Harry will argue that conclusion, fitting though it may be.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


No wonder we lost that war in Vietnam.


We lost t because of LBJ, a democrat, running the war. Actually
micromanaging.

harry
 

Califbill billnews wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/29/15 9:03 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/29/15 7:57 PM, Califbill wrote:


Harry is a Nobody.

Nobody is Perfect.

Therefore Harry is Perfect.



Thank goodness you're not trying to be original or clever with
syllogisms, eh, Bilious?


I though the syllogism was Raheem appropriate, with a little modification.


Who or what is "Raheem"?


He is a Rather, spell correctors brother.



Try English.

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

harry
 

Keyser Söze wrote:
Califbill billnews wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/29/15 9:03 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/29/15 7:57 PM, Califbill wrote:


Harry is a Nobody.

Nobody is Perfect.

Therefore Harry is Perfect.



Thank goodness you're not trying to be original or clever with
syllogisms, eh, Bilious?


I though the syllogism was Raheem appropriate, with a little modification.


Who or what is "Raheem"?


He is a Rather, spell correctors brother.



Try English.


Try thinking.

harry
 

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 09:45:26 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote:

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/30/15 9:26 AM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 16:57:09 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote:



Harry is a Nobody.

Nobody is Perfect.

Therefore Harry is Perfect.

Harry will argue that conclusion, fitting though it may be.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


No wonder we lost that war in Vietnam.


We lost t because of LBJ, a democrat, running the war. Actually
micromanaging.

===

The same democrat who escalated the conflict into a full blown war by
lying about the Gulf of Tonkin incidents. Maybe Harry *was* there.

harry
 

Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 09:45:26 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote:

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/30/15 9:26 AM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 16:57:09 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote:



Harry is a Nobody.

Nobody is Perfect.

Therefore Harry is Perfect.

Harry will argue that conclusion, fitting though it may be.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


No wonder we lost that war in Vietnam.


We lost t because of LBJ, a democrat, running the war. Actually
micromanaging.

===

The same democrat who escalated the conflict into a full blown war by
lying about the Gulf of Tonkin incidents. Maybe Harry *was* there.


Harry was probably the Presidents personal representative on the warship.

harry
 

On 12/30/15 1:06 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
Califbill billnews wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/29/15 9:03 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/29/15 7:57 PM, Califbill wrote:


Harry is a Nobody.

Nobody is Perfect.

Therefore Harry is Perfect.



Thank goodness you're not trying to be original or clever with
syllogisms, eh, Bilious?


I though the syllogism was Raheem appropriate, with a little modification.


Who or what is "Raheem"?


He is a Rather, spell correctors brother.



Try English.


Try thinking.


I do think. Your comment still makes no sense. Are you trying to say
your comment was "rather appropriate," and a spell checker changed
rather to Raheem? That seems a stretch.

harry
 

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/30/15 1:06 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
Califbill billnews wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/29/15 9:03 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/29/15 7:57 PM, Califbill wrote:


Harry is a Nobody.

Nobody is Perfect.

Therefore Harry is Perfect.



Thank goodness you're not trying to be original or clever with
syllogisms, eh, Bilious?


I though the syllogism was Raheem appropriate, with a little modification.


Who or what is "Raheem"?


He is a Rather, spell correctors brother.



Try English.


Try thinking.


I do think. Your comment still makes no sense. Are you trying to say
your comment was "rather appropriate," and a spell checker changed
rather to Raheem? That seems a stretch.


See, I knew you could think somewhat.

harry
 

On Wednesday, December 30, 2015 at 10:28:12 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:

No wonder we lost that war in Vietnam.

The one YOU evaded, COWARD?

harry
 

On Wednesday, December 30, 2015 at 1:14:09 PM UTC-5, wrote:

-- The best way to beat communism is to stand back and watch it fall from it's own weight. --

Why hasn't Russia "collapsed ", genius?