....Carson


Of the 19 claims of Carson the fact checking site PolitiFact has delved
into, none have been ruled true and only one mostly true. Indeed most —
like Carson’s claim that he “ ‘didn’t have an involvement with’
nutritional supplement company Mannatech� — have either been ruled false
or what the site calls “pants on fire,� a statement the site rules as
not only not accurate, but “ridiculous.�

The 19 so far:

http://www.politifact.com/personalit...on/statements/

On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 06:26:11 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

...Carson


Of the 19 claims of Carson the fact checking site PolitiFact has delved
into, none have been ruled true and only one mostly true. Indeed most —
like Carson’s claim that he “ ‘didn’t have an involvement with’
nutritional supplement company Mannatech” — have either been ruled false
or what the site calls “pants on fire,” a statement the site rules as
not only not accurate, but “ridiculous.”

The 19 so far:

http://www.politifact.com/personalit...on/statements/

You reckon he's more of a liar than you are?
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

John H.
- show quoted text -
"You reckon he's more of a liar than you are?"


Why the rancor, Johnny?
If the facts are correct Harry is doing y'all repugnants a favour by bringing this to your attention.

On 11/9/15 7:55 AM, True North wrote:
John H.
- show quoted text -
"You reckon he's more of a liar than you are?"


Why the rancor, Johnny?
If the facts are correct Harry is doing y'all repugnants a favour by bringing this to your attention.



Oh, the evangelistic republican base doesn't care about Carson's
mythical past or really bizarre beliefs and statements because, well,
jesus.

On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 04:55:24 -0800 (PST), True North wrote:

John H.
- show quoted text -
"You reckon he's more of a liar than you are?"


Why the rancor, Johnny?
If the facts are correct Harry is doing y'all repugnants a favour by bringing this to your attention.

Did he call and ask for your support?
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

The John flushes..
"Did he call and ask for your support?"


No need to, I was glad to offer an independent assessment of your rancorous behaviour.

On 11/9/2015 11:37 AM, True North wrote:
The John flushes..
"Did he call and ask for your support?"


No need to, I was glad to offer an independent assessment of your rancorous behaviour.


Independent, really? You've been leaning on your "Crown" benefactor all
your adult life.

John H. wrote:
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 04:55:24 -0800 (PST), True North wrote:

John H.
- show quoted text -
"You reckon he's more of a liar than you are?"


Why the rancor, Johnny?
If the facts are correct Harry is doing y'all repugnants a favour by bringing this to your attention.
Did he call and ask for your support?
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


He likely emailed him. His landlord wouldn't allow an international
phone call.

Ditzy Dan Kruger upchucks...

"He likely emailed him. *His landlord wouldn't allow an international
phone call."



Why are you hiding Ditzy?
Afraid the Boogyman is coming to take away a few of your guns?

On 11/9/2015 7:03 AM, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 06:26:11 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

...Carson


Of the 19 claims of Carson the fact checking site PolitiFact has delved
into, none have been ruled true and only one mostly true. Indeed most —
like Carson’s claim that he “ ‘didn’t have an involvement with’
nutritional supplement company Mannatech” — have either been ruled false
or what the site calls “pants on fire,” a statement the site rules as
not only not accurate, but “ridiculous.”

The 19 so far:

http://www.politifact.com/personalit...on/statements/

You reckon he's more of a liar than you are?
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


If old smouldering butt calls him a liar, he must be.