|
Politifact on...
....Carson
Of the 19 claims of Carson the fact checking site PolitiFact has delved into, none have been ruled true and only one mostly true. Indeed most — like Carson’s claim that he “ ‘didn’t have an involvement with’ nutritional supplement company Mannatech” — have either been ruled false or what the site calls “pants on fire,” a statement the site rules as not only not accurate, but “ridiculous.” The 19 so far: http://www.politifact.com/personalit...on/statements/ |
Politifact on...
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 06:26:11 -0500, Keyser Sze wrote:
...Carson Of the 19 claims of Carson the fact checking site PolitiFact has delved into, none have been ruled true and only one mostly true. Indeed most like Carsons claim that he didnt have an involvement with nutritional supplement company Mannatech have either been ruled false or what the site calls pants on fire, a statement the site rules as not only not accurate, but ridiculous. The 19 so far: http://www.politifact.com/personalit...on/statements/ You reckon he's more of a liar than you are? -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
Politifact on...
John H.
- show quoted text - "You reckon he's more of a liar than you are?" Why the rancor, Johnny? If the facts are correct Harry is doing y'all repugnants a favour by bringing this to your attention. |
Politifact on...
On 11/9/2015 6:26 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
....Carson Of the 19 claims of Carson the fact checking site PolitiFact has delved into, none have been ruled true and only one mostly true. Indeed most — like Carson’s claim that he “ ‘didn’t have an involvement with’ nutritional supplement company Mannatech” — have either been ruled false or what the site calls “pants on fire,” a statement the site rules as not only not accurate, but “ridiculous.” The 19 so far: http://www.politifact.com/personalit...on/statements/ Pants on fire. That's our Krausie fer sure. Old smoldering butt Krause. |
Politifact on...
On 11/9/2015 7:03 AM, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 06:26:11 -0500, Keyser Sze wrote: ...Carson Of the 19 claims of Carson the fact checking site PolitiFact has delved into, none have been ruled true and only one mostly true. Indeed most like Carsons claim that he didnt have an involvement with nutritional supplement company Mannatech have either been ruled false or what the site calls pants on fire, a statement the site rules as not only not accurate, but ridiculous. The 19 so far: http://www.politifact.com/personalit...on/statements/ You reckon he's more of a liar than you are? -- Ban idiots, not guns! If old smouldering butt calls him a liar, he must be. |
Politifact on...
On 11/9/15 7:55 AM, True North wrote:
John H. - show quoted text - "You reckon he's more of a liar than you are?" Why the rancor, Johnny? If the facts are correct Harry is doing y'all repugnants a favour by bringing this to your attention. Oh, the evangelistic republican base doesn't care about Carson's mythical past or really bizarre beliefs and statements because, well, jesus. |
Politifact on...
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 04:55:24 -0800 (PST), True North wrote:
John H. - show quoted text - "You reckon he's more of a liar than you are?" Why the rancor, Johnny? If the facts are correct Harry is doing y'all repugnants a favour by bringing this to your attention. Did he call and ask for your support? -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
Politifact on...
The John flushes..
"Did he call and ask for your support?" No need to, I was glad to offer an independent assessment of your rancorous behaviour. |
Politifact on...
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 06:26:11 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:
...Carson Of the 19 claims of Carson the fact checking site PolitiFact has delved into, none have been ruled true and only one mostly true. Indeed most — like Carson’s claim that he “ ‘didn’t have an involvement with’ nutritional supplement company Mannatech” — have either been ruled false or what the site calls “pants on fire,” a statement the site rules as not only not accurate, but “ridiculous.” The 19 so far: http://www.politifact.com/personalit...on/statements/ If Carson was a democrat, you would be calling them racist. |
Politifact on...
On 11/9/2015 11:37 AM, True North wrote:
The John flushes.. "Did he call and ask for your support?" No need to, I was glad to offer an independent assessment of your rancorous behaviour. Independent, really? You've been leaning on your "Crown" benefactor all your adult life. |
Politifact on...
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 12:07:42 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote:
On 11/9/2015 11:37 AM, True North wrote: The John flushes.. "Did he call and ask for your support?" No need to, I was glad to offer an independent assessment of your rancorous behaviour. Independent, really? You've been leaning on your "Crown" benefactor all your adult life. Poor don. -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
Politifact on...
On 11/9/15 4:01 PM, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 12:07:42 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 11/9/2015 11:37 AM, True North wrote: The John flushes.. "Did he call and ask for your support?" No need to, I was glad to offer an independent assessment of your rancorous behaviour. Independent, really? You've been leaning on your "Crown" benefactor all your adult life. Poor don. -- Ban idiots, not guns! It's nice, I suppose, that you requote your bud, Fla Jim, without question, the dumbest poster in rec.boats. |
Politifact on...
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 16:07:19 -0500, Keyser Sze wrote:
On 11/9/15 4:01 PM, John H. wrote: On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 12:07:42 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 11/9/2015 11:37 AM, True North wrote: The John flushes.. "Did he call and ask for your support?" No need to, I was glad to offer an independent assessment of your rancorous behaviour. Independent, really? You've been leaning on your "Crown" benefactor all your adult life. Poor don. -- Ban idiots, not guns! It's nice, I suppose, that you requote your bud, Fla Jim, without question, the dumbest poster in rec.boats. You're welcome, even if very wrong. -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
Politifact on...
On 11/9/15 4:12 PM, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 16:07:19 -0500, Keyser Sze wrote: On 11/9/15 4:01 PM, John H. wrote: On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 12:07:42 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 11/9/2015 11:37 AM, True North wrote: The John flushes.. "Did he call and ask for your support?" No need to, I was glad to offer an independent assessment of your rancorous behaviour. Independent, really? You've been leaning on your "Crown" benefactor all your adult life. Poor don. -- Ban idiots, not guns! It's nice, I suppose, that you requote your bud, Fla Jim, without question, the dumbest poster in rec.boats. You're welcome, even if very wrong. -- Ban idiots, not guns! I can't recall a regular poster here who is as dumb as FlaJim. |
Politifact on...
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 16:38:46 -0500, Keyser Sze wrote:
On 11/9/15 4:12 PM, John H. wrote: On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 16:07:19 -0500, Keyser Sze wrote: On 11/9/15 4:01 PM, John H. wrote: On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 12:07:42 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 11/9/2015 11:37 AM, True North wrote: The John flushes.. "Did he call and ask for your support?" No need to, I was glad to offer an independent assessment of your rancorous behaviour. Independent, really? You've been leaning on your "Crown" benefactor all your adult life. Poor don. -- Ban idiots, not guns! It's nice, I suppose, that you requote your bud, Fla Jim, without question, the dumbest poster in rec.boats. You're welcome, even if very wrong. -- Ban idiots, not guns! I can't recall a regular poster here who is as dumb as FlaJim. Do you have a mirror in that basement cave of yours? Use it. -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
Politifact on...
On 11/9/2015 4:07 PM, Keyser Sze wrote:
On 11/9/15 4:01 PM, John H. wrote: On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 12:07:42 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 11/9/2015 11:37 AM, True North wrote: The John flushes.. "Did he call and ask for your support?" No need to, I was glad to offer an independent assessment of your rancorous behaviour. Independent, really? You've been leaning on your "Crown" benefactor all your adult life. Poor don. -- Ban idiots, not guns! It's nice, I suppose, that you requote your bud, Fla Jim, without question, the dumbest poster in rec.boats. Ooooo that smarts. |
Politifact on...
On 11/9/2015 4:55 PM, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 16:38:46 -0500, Keyser Sze wrote: On 11/9/15 4:12 PM, John H. wrote: On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 16:07:19 -0500, Keyser Sze wrote: On 11/9/15 4:01 PM, John H. wrote: On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 12:07:42 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 11/9/2015 11:37 AM, True North wrote: The John flushes.. "Did he call and ask for your support?" No need to, I was glad to offer an independent assessment of your rancorous behaviour. Independent, really? You've been leaning on your "Crown" benefactor all your adult life. Poor don. -- Ban idiots, not guns! It's nice, I suppose, that you requote your bud, Fla Jim, without question, the dumbest poster in rec.boats. You're welcome, even if very wrong. -- Ban idiots, not guns! I can't recall a regular poster here who is as dumb as FlaJim. Do you have a mirror in that basement cave of yours? Use it. -- Ban idiots, not guns! If he does have a mirror, it's likely it's crudded up with all manner of nasty things. IOW he wouldn't even see his reflection. |
Politifact on...
John H. wrote:
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 04:55:24 -0800 (PST), True North wrote: John H. - show quoted text - "You reckon he's more of a liar than you are?" Why the rancor, Johnny? If the facts are correct Harry is doing y'all repugnants a favour by bringing this to your attention. Did he call and ask for your support? -- Ban idiots, not guns! He likely emailed him. His landlord wouldn't allow an international phone call. |
Politifact on...
Ditzy Dan Kruger upchucks...
"He likely emailed him. *His landlord wouldn't allow an international phone call." Why are you hiding Ditzy? Afraid the Boogyman is coming to take away a few of your guns? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:44 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com