On Sat, 3 Oct 2015 18:04:23 -0700, Califbill billnews wrote:

wrote:
On Sat, 3 Oct 2015 14:20:18 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:



We were talking about "illegal" possession. If a state has no permit
requirements to own a firearm, then it isn't illegal to have one.


If the gun was purchased legally by a legally qualified buyer, why
should it be illegal to own? You are talking about making it illegal,
ex post facto.
That is yet another constitutional violation.


You could have purchased it legally, but then met requirements to get rid
of your weapons. Convicted of a felony, domestic violence, not a felony,
etc. not a Constitutional violation. Just enforcement of laws governing
who can possess a firearm.

That involves "Due Process", one of the things that the constitution
says can trump your rights.