About Us

Keyser SÃ¶ze

On 9/3/15 10:56 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 06:32:41 -0400, Keyser SÃ¶ze wrote:

On 9/3/15 1:39 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 15:22:01 -0400, Keyser SÃ¶ze wrote:

I wonder how many of those supporting Kentucky clerk Kim Davisâ€™s refusal
to issue a marriage license to a gay couple based upon her religious
objection to same-sex couples marrying would support her if she were
empowered to issue gun permits but refused to do so based upon a
religious commitment to pacifism?

It should be noted that she is not issuing ANY marriage licenses.

Willful nonfeasance by a public official. I hope the federal judge
throws the book at her. These efforts of bat**** crazy "religious" folks
to turn this country into an ayatollahville need to be stopped.

I suppose the question is whether a marriage license is a
constitutionally mandated service from a local government.
Marriage is a religious ceremony, not a listed constitutional right.
It is just a government overreach that put them together in the first
place..
Usually when the government starts getting into religious dogma you
are opposed to it.
They simply got out of the marriage business. Good for them.

At the moment there are legal reasons aplenty to have a marriage license
and marriage. Now, if that were changed countrywide so that the license
application says "Marriage License/Civil Union License," and there were
no legal differences anywhere in this country between the two, then...

But we aren't there.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode