| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
I wonder...
On Thursday, September 3, 2015 at 10:56:43 AM UTC-4, wrote:
On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 06:32:41 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 9/3/15 1:39 AM, wrote: On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 15:22:01 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: I wonder how many of those supporting Kentucky clerk Kim Davis's refusal to issue a marriage license to a gay couple based upon her religious objection to same-sex couples marrying would support her if she were empowered to issue gun permits but refused to do so based upon a religious commitment to pacifism? It should be noted that she is not issuing ANY marriage licenses. Willful nonfeasance by a public official. I hope the federal judge throws the book at her. These efforts of bat**** crazy "religious" folks to turn this country into an ayatollahville need to be stopped. I suppose the question is whether a marriage license is a constitutionally mandated service from a local government. Marriage is a religious ceremony, not a listed constitutional right. It is just a government overreach that put them together in the first place.. Usually when the government starts getting into religious dogma you are opposed to it. They simply got out of the marriage business. Good for them. As I believe you have pointed out before, the gov shouldn't even be in the marriage business. To them, marriage is just a contract that two folks enter into, and when they do, a set of laws govern how the parties interact. Leave it at that, problem solved. Want to be "married"? Find a church that will do it in the eyes of God. Why can't someone in DC figure that out? |
Threaded Mode
