We should not prosecute shoplifters at Walmart.""
 

Everett Mitchell: "I just don’t think they should be prosecuting cases
for people who steal from Wal-Mart. I don’t think that. I don’t think
that Target, and all them other places – the big boxes that have
insurance...

I doubt they have insurance for theft.
They lose $3 Billion a year to theft. (Walmart)
That would be a hefty insurance premium!

This guy thinks theft from Walmart should not be prosecuted.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T2OQ...ature=youtu.be

He has insurance on his home, but he didn't give out the address.

Mikek




---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

We should not prosecute shoplifters at Walmart.""
 

On 8/25/15 9:08 PM, amdx wrote:

Wal-Mart.
They lose $3 Billion a year to theft. (Walmart)

Mikek




---

Gosh, no wonder the economy of Communist China is collapsing...it's
because of theft losses at its biggest 'Merican customer!

We should not prosecute shoplifters at Walmart.""
 

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/25/15 9:08 PM, amdx wrote:

Wal-Mart.
They lose $3 Billion a year to theft. (Walmart)

Mikek




---

Gosh, no wonder the economy of Communist China is collapsing...it's
because of theft losses at its biggest 'Merican customer!

I can see you are financially challenged. That $3 billion has to both be
paid for by the rest of the customers and probably extra purchase from
China to replace part of the product.

We should not prosecute shoplifters at Walmart.""
 

On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 21:40:34 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 8/25/15 9:08 PM, amdx wrote:

Wal-Mart.
They lose $3 Billion a year to theft. (Walmart)

Mikek




---

Gosh, no wonder the economy of Communist China is collapsing...it's
because of theft losses at its biggest 'Merican customer!

China's problems are similar to ours. They are drowning in debt and
their productivity is not increasing fast enough to overcome it.
They are also suffering from cheap foreign labor. The Vietnamese and
others are now where people go for lower labor cost. Their efforts to
raise wages has priced them out of the market..

We should not prosecute shoplifters at Walmart.""
 

On 8/25/2015 8:40 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/25/15 9:08 PM, amdx wrote:

Wal-Mart.
They lose $3 Billion a year to theft. (Walmart)

Mikek




---

Gosh, no wonder the economy of Communist China is collapsing...it's
because of theft losses at its biggest 'Merican customer!

That would help the China economy. That shows your great understanding
of economics!
Are you endorsing the idea of not prosecuting shoplifters?

Mikek

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

We should not prosecute shoplifters at Walmart.""
 

On 8/26/15 10:25 AM, amdx wrote:
On 8/25/2015 8:40 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/25/15 9:08 PM, amdx wrote:

Wal-Mart.
They lose $3 Billion a year to theft. (Walmart)

Mikek




---

Gosh, no wonder the economy of Communist China is collapsing...it's
because of theft losses at its biggest 'Merican customer!

That would help the China economy. That shows your great understanding
of economics!
Are you endorsing the idea of not prosecuting shoplifters?

Mikek



Whoooooooosh...the sound irony makes as it whizzes between your ears.

We should not prosecute shoplifters at Walmart.""
 

On 8/26/2015 9:34 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/26/15 10:25 AM, amdx wrote:
On 8/25/2015 8:40 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/25/15 9:08 PM, amdx wrote:

Wal-Mart.
They lose $3 Billion a year to theft. (Walmart)

Mikek




---

Gosh, no wonder the economy of Communist China is collapsing...it's
because of theft losses at its biggest 'Merican customer!

That would help the China economy. That shows your great understanding
of economics!
Are you endorsing the idea of not prosecuting shoplifters?

Mikek



Whoooooooosh...the sound irony makes as it whizzes between your ears.

As usual, you won't commit to an answer.
You'll note I wasn't the only one commenting on your lack of economic logic.
Mikek

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

We should not prosecute shoplifters at Walmart.""
 

On 8/26/15 11:50 AM, amdx wrote:
On 8/26/2015 9:34 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/26/15 10:25 AM, amdx wrote:
On 8/25/2015 8:40 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/25/15 9:08 PM, amdx wrote:

Wal-Mart.
They lose $3 Billion a year to theft. (Walmart)

Mikek




---

Gosh, no wonder the economy of Communist China is collapsing...it's
because of theft losses at its biggest 'Merican customer!

That would help the China economy. That shows your great understanding
of economics!
Are you endorsing the idea of not prosecuting shoplifters?

Mikek



Whoooooooosh...the sound irony makes as it whizzes between your ears.

As usual, you won't commit to an answer.
You'll note I wasn't the only one commenting on your lack of economic
logic.
Mikek


My post was intended as humorous irony. Apparently you and at least one
other poster took it seriously. It's not my job to help you attain your
goal as newsgroup dimwit, because that would be unfair to Ingerfool,
Herring the Racist, and Bilious.

Oh, China's economy...two of the reasons for its problems...massive
overcapacity and slowing demand within the country and worldwide for
what it is producing.

I'm not really concerned about Walmart's problems operating its sleazy
stores. Perhaps if they hired better and smarter people, paid them more,
and had more of them on duty, they could get their "shrinkage" under
control. I do of course care when decent businesses have such problems,
and think shoplifters ought to be prosecuted.

We should not prosecute shoplifters at Walmart.""
 

On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 12:02:53 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 8/26/15 11:50 AM, amdx wrote:
On 8/26/2015 9:34 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/26/15 10:25 AM, amdx wrote:
On 8/25/2015 8:40 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/25/15 9:08 PM, amdx wrote:

Wal-Mart.
They lose $3 Billion a year to theft. (Walmart)

Mikek




---

Gosh, no wonder the economy of Communist China is collapsing...it's
because of theft losses at its biggest 'Merican customer!

That would help the China economy. That shows your great understanding
of economics!
Are you endorsing the idea of not prosecuting shoplifters?

Mikek



Whoooooooosh...the sound irony makes as it whizzes between your ears.

As usual, you won't commit to an answer.
You'll note I wasn't the only one commenting on your lack of economic
logic.
Mikek


My post was intended as humorous irony. Apparently you and at least one
other poster took it seriously. It's not my job to help you attain your
goal as newsgroup dimwit, because that would be unfair to Ingerfool,
Herring the Racist, and Bilious.

Oh, China's economy...two of the reasons for its problems...massive
overcapacity and slowing demand within the country and worldwide for
what it is producing.

I'm not really concerned about Walmart's problems operating its sleazy
stores. Perhaps if they hired better and smarter people, paid them more,
and had more of them on duty, they could get their "shrinkage" under
control. I do of course care when decent businesses have such problems,
and think shoplifters ought to be prosecuted.



Better and smarter? And you call me racist?

What a hypocrite, Krause.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

We should not prosecute shoplifters at Walmart.""
 

On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 12:02:53 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Oh, China's economy...two of the reasons for its problems...massive
overcapacity and slowing demand within the country and worldwide for
what it is producing.

I would not expect a democrat to think debt was an issue at all.

We should not prosecute shoplifters at Walmart.""
 

On 8/26/15 12:20 PM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 12:02:53 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 8/26/15 11:50 AM, amdx wrote:
On 8/26/2015 9:34 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/26/15 10:25 AM, amdx wrote:
On 8/25/2015 8:40 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/25/15 9:08 PM, amdx wrote:

Wal-Mart.
They lose $3 Billion a year to theft. (Walmart)

Mikek




---

Gosh, no wonder the economy of Communist China is collapsing...it's
because of theft losses at its biggest 'Merican customer!

That would help the China economy. That shows your great understanding
of economics!
Are you endorsing the idea of not prosecuting shoplifters?

Mikek



Whoooooooosh...the sound irony makes as it whizzes between your ears.

As usual, you won't commit to an answer.
You'll note I wasn't the only one commenting on your lack of economic
logic.
Mikek


My post was intended as humorous irony. Apparently you and at least one
other poster took it seriously. It's not my job to help you attain your
goal as newsgroup dimwit, because that would be unfair to Ingerfool,
Herring the Racist, and Bilious.

Oh, China's economy...two of the reasons for its problems...massive
overcapacity and slowing demand within the country and worldwide for
what it is producing.

I'm not really concerned about Walmart's problems operating its sleazy
stores. Perhaps if they hired better and smarter people, paid them more,
and had more of them on duty, they could get their "shrinkage" under
control. I do of course care when decent businesses have such problems,
and think shoplifters ought to be prosecuted.



Better and smarter? And you call me racist?

What a hypocrite, Krause.
--


Oh, did I point out a particular race, or is it your implication that
Walmart only hires people of a particular race? That seems unlikely.

We should not prosecute shoplifters at Walmart.""
 

On 8/26/15 12:20 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 12:02:53 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Oh, China's economy...two of the reasons for its problems...massive
overcapacity and slowing demand within the country and worldwide for
what it is producing.

I would not expect a democrat to think debt was an issue at all.


I stated "two of the reasons." There are others, of course.

We should not prosecute shoplifters at Walmart.""
 

On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 12:25:31 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 8/26/15 12:20 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 12:02:53 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Oh, China's economy...two of the reasons for its problems...massive
overcapacity and slowing demand within the country and worldwide for
what it is producing.

I would not expect a democrat to think debt was an issue at all.


I stated "two of the reasons." There are others, of course.

All of the other reasons only contribute to the problems but the debt
makes it an immediate concern. The whole world has been kicking that
can down the road for 40 years and it is going to overwhelm us some
day. That day may not be that far off. It might be as simple as the
Saudis deciding to turn off the oil tap. They have gotten us addicted
to cheap oil again and we saw how that worked in the 70s when they
choked off supply. Guys like Bernie say the middle class never
recovered from the Ford/Carter crash and we are in a lot worse shape
now. The whole world is.

We should not prosecute shoplifters at Walmart.""
 

On 8/26/15 12:47 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 12:25:31 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 8/26/15 12:20 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 12:02:53 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Oh, China's economy...two of the reasons for its problems...massive
overcapacity and slowing demand within the country and worldwide for
what it is producing.

I would not expect a democrat to think debt was an issue at all.


I stated "two of the reasons." There are others, of course.

All of the other reasons only contribute to the problems but the debt
makes it an immediate concern. The whole world has been kicking that
can down the road for 40 years and it is going to overwhelm us some
day. That day may not be that far off. It might be as simple as the
Saudis deciding to turn off the oil tap. They have gotten us addicted
to cheap oil again and we saw how that worked in the 70s when they
choked off supply. Guys like Bernie say the middle class never
recovered from the Ford/Carter crash and we are in a lot worse shape
now. The whole world is.



And your solution to the debt mess that includes mass numbers of people
not starving and otherwise suffering horrifically while your solution is
underway...

We should not prosecute shoplifters at Walmart.""
 

On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 12:53:40 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 8/26/15 12:47 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 12:25:31 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 8/26/15 12:20 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 12:02:53 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Oh, China's economy...two of the reasons for its problems...massive
overcapacity and slowing demand within the country and worldwide for
what it is producing.

I would not expect a democrat to think debt was an issue at all.


I stated "two of the reasons." There are others, of course.

All of the other reasons only contribute to the problems but the debt
makes it an immediate concern. The whole world has been kicking that
can down the road for 40 years and it is going to overwhelm us some
day. That day may not be that far off. It might be as simple as the
Saudis deciding to turn off the oil tap. They have gotten us addicted
to cheap oil again and we saw how that worked in the 70s when they
choked off supply. Guys like Bernie say the middle class never
recovered from the Ford/Carter crash and we are in a lot worse shape
now. The whole world is.



And your solution to the debt mess that includes mass numbers of people
not starving and otherwise suffering horrifically while your solution is
underway...

"Starving" may make a good bumper sticker but it is not really that
much of an issue in the US. We do need to stop borrowing money tho.
This "zero interest rate" can't go on forever and when inflation
cranks up again, that debt will be unsustainable pretty quickly.
We haven't been able to count on China to buy our debt for several
years so the fed is just printing money to cover the shortfall. We
have gotten away from it so far but that will not last forever either.

Remember Weimar Germany

If starving is an issue, think about what will happen when the dollar
crashes and brings down the whole world economy.
You might even reconsider your stance on hunting when chicken costs
$150 a pound .. if you could find it and had $150.

We should not prosecute shoplifters at Walmart.""
 

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/26/15 11:50 AM, amdx wrote:
On 8/26/2015 9:34 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/26/15 10:25 AM, amdx wrote:
On 8/25/2015 8:40 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/25/15 9:08 PM, amdx wrote:

Wal-Mart.
They lose $3 Billion a year to theft. (Walmart)

Mikek




---

Gosh, no wonder the economy of Communist China is collapsing...it's
because of theft losses at its biggest 'Merican customer!

That would help the China economy. That shows your great understanding
of economics!
Are you endorsing the idea of not prosecuting shoplifters?

Mikek



Whoooooooosh...the sound irony makes as it whizzes between your ears.

As usual, you won't commit to an answer.
You'll note I wasn't the only one commenting on your lack of economic
logic.
Mikek


My post was intended as humorous irony. Apparently you and at least one
other poster took it seriously. It's not my job to help you attain your
goal as newsgroup dimwit, because that would be unfair to Ingerfool,
Herring the Racist, and Bilious.

Oh, China's economy...two of the reasons for its problems...massive
overcapacity and slowing demand within the country and worldwide for what it is producing.

I'm not really concerned about Walmart's problems operating its sleazy
stores. Perhaps if they hired better and smarter people, paid them more,
and had more of them on duty, they could get their "shrinkage" under
control. I do of course care when decent businesses have such problems,
and think shoplifters ought to be prosecuted.

No your reply showed why you have had to file multiple bankruptcies.

We should not prosecute shoplifters at Walmart.""
 

On 8/26/2015 2:59 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/26/15 11:50 AM, amdx wrote:
On 8/26/2015 9:34 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/26/15 10:25 AM, amdx wrote:
On 8/25/2015 8:40 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/25/15 9:08 PM, amdx wrote:

Wal-Mart.
They lose $3 Billion a year to theft. (Walmart)

Mikek




---

Gosh, no wonder the economy of Communist China is collapsing...it's
because of theft losses at its biggest 'Merican customer!

That would help the China economy. That shows your great understanding
of economics!
Are you endorsing the idea of not prosecuting shoplifters?

Mikek



Whoooooooosh...the sound irony makes as it whizzes between your ears.

As usual, you won't commit to an answer.
You'll note I wasn't the only one commenting on your lack of economic
logic.
Mikek


My post was intended as humorous irony. Apparently you and at least one
other poster took it seriously. It's not my job to help you attain your
goal as newsgroup dimwit, because that would be unfair to Ingerfool,
Herring the Racist, and Bilious.

Oh, China's economy...two of the reasons for its problems...massive
overcapacity and slowing demand within the country and worldwide for what it is producing.

I'm not really concerned about Walmart's problems operating its sleazy
stores. Perhaps if they hired better and smarter people, paid them more,
and had more of them on duty, they could get their "shrinkage" under
control. I do of course care when decent businesses have such problems,
and think shoplifters ought to be prosecuted.

No your reply showed why you have had to file multiple bankruptcies.

Deadbeats ought to be prosecuted too. I can't remember the last time
KKKrause said something funny, intentionally.

We should not prosecute shoplifters at Walmart.""
 

On 8/26/2015 11:02 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/26/15 11:50 AM, amdx wrote:
On 8/26/2015 9:34 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/26/15 10:25 AM, amdx wrote:
On 8/25/2015 8:40 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/25/15 9:08 PM, amdx wrote:

Wal-Mart.
They lose $3 Billion a year to theft. (Walmart)

Mikek




---

Gosh, no wonder the economy of Communist China is collapsing...it's
because of theft losses at its biggest 'Merican customer!

That would help the China economy. That shows your great
understanding
of economics!
Are you endorsing the idea of not prosecuting shoplifters?

Mikek



Whoooooooosh...the sound irony makes as it whizzes between your ears.

As usual, you won't commit to an answer.
You'll note I wasn't the only one commenting on your lack of economic
logic.
Mikek


My post was intended as humorous irony. Apparently you and at least one
other poster took it seriously.

In your mind it may have been humorous irony, but it was neither.
You might reread what was said and you will see, your response was
senseless.
Mike


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

We should not prosecute shoplifters at Walmart.""
 

On 8/26/15 4:37 PM, amdx wrote:
On 8/26/2015 11:02 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:


As usual, you won't commit to an answer.
You'll note I wasn't the only one commenting on your lack of economic
logic.
Mikek


My post was intended as humorous irony. Apparently you and at least one
other poster took it seriously.

In your mind it may have been humorous irony, but it was neither.
You might reread what was said and you will see, your response was
senseless.
Mike



Oh, okay, Mikey. Call back when the fog lifts. If it ever lifts.

We should not prosecute shoplifters at Walmart.""
 

On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 15:37:56 -0500, amdx wrote:

On 8/26/2015 11:02 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/26/15 11:50 AM, amdx wrote:
On 8/26/2015 9:34 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/26/15 10:25 AM, amdx wrote:
On 8/25/2015 8:40 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/25/15 9:08 PM, amdx wrote:

Wal-Mart.
They lose $3 Billion a year to theft. (Walmart)

Mikek




---

Gosh, no wonder the economy of Communist China is collapsing...it's
because of theft losses at its biggest 'Merican customer!

That would help the China economy. That shows your great
understanding
of economics!
Are you endorsing the idea of not prosecuting shoplifters?

Mikek



Whoooooooosh...the sound irony makes as it whizzes between your ears.

As usual, you won't commit to an answer.
You'll note I wasn't the only one commenting on your lack of economic
logic.
Mikek


My post was intended as humorous irony. Apparently you and at least one
other poster took it seriously.

In your mind it may have been humorous irony, but it was neither.
You might reread what was said and you will see, your response was
senseless.
Mike


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

Yeah, but he does a great tap dance!
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

We should not prosecute shoplifters at Walmart.""
 

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/26/15 4:37 PM, amdx wrote:
On 8/26/2015 11:02 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:


As usual, you won't commit to an answer.
You'll note I wasn't the only one commenting on your lack of economic
logic.
Mikek


My post was intended as humorous irony. Apparently you and at least one
other poster took it seriously.

In your mind it may have been humorous irony, but it was neither.
You might reread what was said and you will see, your response was
senseless.
Mike



Oh, okay, Mikey. Call back when the fog lifts. If it ever lifts.

Maybe you should notice the fog surrounding yourself.

We should not prosecute shoplifters at Walmart.""
 

Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/25/15 9:08 PM, amdx wrote:
Wal-Mart.
They lose $3 Billion a year to theft. (Walmart)
Mikek




---
Gosh, no wonder the economy of Communist China is collapsing...it's
because of theft losses at its biggest 'Merican customer!
I can see you are financially challenged. That $3 billion has to both be
paid for by the rest of the customers and probably extra purchase from
China to replace part of the product.

He's financially challenged for sure. He thinks taxes are optional.