|
Wow - Crazy
amdx wrote:
On 8/16/2015 10:40 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: amdx wrote: On 8/15/2015 2:27 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/15/15 2:47 PM, amdx wrote: On 8/14/2015 8:46 AM, Boating All Out wrote: I thought it was a case of temporary insanity, but Mika is REALLY against HRC. She gives no quarter and hasn't since it was revealed HRC had used a "personal" server at State. That has absolutely disqualified HRC. It's done. HRC can not be President. It's like watching Fox News, and she is just as transparent in her hatred for HRC. Almost as bad as Luddite. Look for some fireworks ahead. You can't be insane and have Democrat party guests. Doesn't mix well. She just may move to Fox. Why would she move to Fox? Just because she sees all the shenanigans that Hillary is trying to get away with and she's honest enough to call her on it? Fox has enough honest reporters, she can stay at MSNBC, maybe it's the start of an MSNBC turn around. She's become as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow. Ain't nobody as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow! Mikek Hahahahah...you're a pistol, Mikey. Rachel is hard for you to watch because, well, you'll figure it out or someone will tell you. Could it be the views she communicates, the manner in which she communicates them and the glee she gets communicating them. (often sarcastic) Ya, that's it. I didn't need any help figuring it out. What did you think it is that makes it hard to watch her? Mikek --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus You picked those reasons for your inability to comprehend. I had another reason for you in mind. At least when Rachel says something the subject is clear. You write but there is no subject, it's like you are keeping a secret. When someone asks, you have no response. Mikek --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus Mikey...you were the one who posted maddow was hard to watch and then you gave reasons. -- Sent from my iPhone 6+ |
Wow - Crazy
|
Wow - Crazy
On 8/16/2015 11:23 AM, amdx wrote:
On 8/15/2015 2:27 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/15/15 2:47 PM, amdx wrote: On 8/14/2015 8:46 AM, Boating All Out wrote: I thought it was a case of temporary insanity, but Mika is REALLY against HRC. She gives no quarter and hasn't since it was revealed HRC had used a "personal" server at State. That has absolutely disqualified HRC. It's done. HRC can not be President. It's like watching Fox News, and she is just as transparent in her hatred for HRC. Almost as bad as Luddite. Look for some fireworks ahead. You can't be insane and have Democrat party guests. Doesn't mix well. She just may move to Fox. Why would she move to Fox? Just because she sees all the shenanigans that Hillary is trying to get away with and she's honest enough to call her on it? Fox has enough honest reporters, she can stay at MSNBC, maybe it's the start of an MSNBC turn around. She's become as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow. Ain't nobody as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow! Mikek Hahahahah...you're a pistol, Mikey. Rachel is hard for you to watch because, well, you'll figure it out or someone will tell you. Could it be the views she communicates, the manner in which she communicates them and the glee she gets communicating them. (often sarcastic) Ya, that's it. I didn't need any help figuring it out. What did you think it is that makes it hard to watch her? Mikek --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus Oh! For a minute I thought you were talking about HRC. :-) -- Respectfully submitted by Justan Laugh of the day from Krause "I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here. I've been "born again" as a nice guy." |
Wow - Crazy
On 8/16/2015 11:52 AM, amdx wrote:
On 8/16/2015 10:40 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: amdx wrote: On 8/15/2015 2:27 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/15/15 2:47 PM, amdx wrote: On 8/14/2015 8:46 AM, Boating All Out wrote: I thought it was a case of temporary insanity, but Mika is REALLY against HRC. She gives no quarter and hasn't since it was revealed HRC had used a "personal" server at State. That has absolutely disqualified HRC. It's done. HRC can not be President. It's like watching Fox News, and she is just as transparent in her hatred for HRC. Almost as bad as Luddite. Look for some fireworks ahead. You can't be insane and have Democrat party guests. Doesn't mix well. She just may move to Fox. Why would she move to Fox? Just because she sees all the shenanigans that Hillary is trying to get away with and she's honest enough to call her on it? Fox has enough honest reporters, she can stay at MSNBC, maybe it's the start of an MSNBC turn around. She's become as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow. Ain't nobody as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow! Mikek Hahahahah...you're a pistol, Mikey. Rachel is hard for you to watch because, well, you'll figure it out or someone will tell you. Could it be the views she communicates, the manner in which she communicates them and the glee she gets communicating them. (often sarcastic) Ya, that's it. I didn't need any help figuring it out. What did you think it is that makes it hard to watch her? Mikek --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus You picked those reasons for your inability to comprehend. I had another reason for you in mind. At least when Rachel says something the subject is clear. You write but there is no subject, it's like you are keeping a secret. When someone asks, you have no response. Mikek --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus The mind is a terrible thing to waste; especially on a douchebag like KKKrause, -- Respectfully submitted by Justan Laugh of the day from Krause "I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here. I've been "born again" as a nice guy." |
Wow - Crazy
On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 11:26:10 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote: In article , says... Could it be the views she communicates, the manner in which she communicates them and the glee she gets communicating them. (often sarcastic) Ya, that's it. I didn't need any help figuring it out. What did you think it is that makes it hard to watch her? Nothing wrong with her "views," though I sometimes disagree with them. Just her expression of those views. She takes 5 minutes to express what should take 30 seconds. Only to hear the sound of her own voice. She's an obvious egomaniac. She's even more selfish that O'Donnell. At least he has some guests. Last I watched she's still beginning the show with a 15 minute monologue. Then if she has an expert guest on the subject of her monologue, she'll ask the guest to validate her monologue. Her guests get little time. She endlessly repeats the same phrases over and over. She - and others at MSNBC - touted "specials" last week, where she supposedly gathered old clips of candidates, which would be the main draw of the "specials." It was just another Maddow yakfest. She's simply a motormouth. I hardly watch the show any more. Every time I flip there she's yakking, usually with no substance to speak of. She's becoming, no, "become" a joke. Lyin' Brian will be a perfect addition to that cabal |
Wow - Crazy
On 8/16/15 1:47 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 11:26:10 -0500, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... Could it be the views she communicates, the manner in which she communicates them and the glee she gets communicating them. (often sarcastic) Ya, that's it. I didn't need any help figuring it out. What did you think it is that makes it hard to watch her? Nothing wrong with her "views," though I sometimes disagree with them. Just her expression of those views. She takes 5 minutes to express what should take 30 seconds. Only to hear the sound of her own voice. She's an obvious egomaniac. She's even more selfish that O'Donnell. At least he has some guests. Last I watched she's still beginning the show with a 15 minute monologue. Then if she has an expert guest on the subject of her monologue, she'll ask the guest to validate her monologue. Her guests get little time. She endlessly repeats the same phrases over and over. She - and others at MSNBC - touted "specials" last week, where she supposedly gathered old clips of candidates, which would be the main draw of the "specials." It was just another Maddow yakfest. She's simply a motormouth. I hardly watch the show any more. Every time I flip there she's yakking, usually with no substance to speak of. She's becoming, no, "become" a joke. Lyin' Brian will be a perfect addition to that cabal Your Faux Channel was full up on lying broadcasters? Frankly, my disappointment is with the promotions of Chuck Todd. What a marshmellowed moron. |
Wow - Crazy
On 8/16/2015 11:18 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
amdx wrote: On 8/16/2015 10:40 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: amdx wrote: On 8/15/2015 2:27 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/15/15 2:47 PM, amdx wrote: On 8/14/2015 8:46 AM, Boating All Out wrote: I thought it was a case of temporary insanity, but Mika is REALLY against HRC. She gives no quarter and hasn't since it was revealed HRC had used a "personal" server at State. That has absolutely disqualified HRC. It's done. HRC can not be President. It's like watching Fox News, and she is just as transparent in her hatred for HRC. Almost as bad as Luddite. Look for some fireworks ahead. You can't be insane and have Democrat party guests. Doesn't mix well. She just may move to Fox. Why would she move to Fox? Just because she sees all the shenanigans that Hillary is trying to get away with and she's honest enough to call her on it? Fox has enough honest reporters, she can stay at MSNBC, maybe it's the start of an MSNBC turn around. She's become as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow. Ain't nobody as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow! Mikek Hahahahah...you're a pistol, Mikey. Rachel is hard for you to watch because, well, you'll figure it out or someone will tell you. Could it be the views she communicates, the manner in which she communicates them and the glee she gets communicating them. (often sarcastic) Ya, that's it. I didn't need any help figuring it out. What did you think it is that makes it hard to watch her? Mikek --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus You picked those reasons for your inability to comprehend. I had another reason for you in mind. At least when Rachel says something the subject is clear. You write but there is no subject, it's like you are keeping a secret. When someone asks, you have no response. Mikek --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus Mikey...you were the one who posted maddow was hard to watch and then you gave reasons. And your point? --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com |
Wow - Crazy
On 8/16/15 3:51 PM, amdx wrote:
On 8/16/2015 11:18 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: amdx wrote: On 8/16/2015 10:40 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: amdx wrote: On 8/15/2015 2:27 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 8/15/15 2:47 PM, amdx wrote: On 8/14/2015 8:46 AM, Boating All Out wrote: I thought it was a case of temporary insanity, but Mika is REALLY against HRC. She gives no quarter and hasn't since it was revealed HRC had used a "personal" server at State. That has absolutely disqualified HRC. It's done. HRC can not be President. It's like watching Fox News, and she is just as transparent in her hatred for HRC. Almost as bad as Luddite. Look for some fireworks ahead. You can't be insane and have Democrat party guests. Doesn't mix well. She just may move to Fox. Why would she move to Fox? Just because she sees all the shenanigans that Hillary is trying to get away with and she's honest enough to call her on it? Fox has enough honest reporters, she can stay at MSNBC, maybe it's the start of an MSNBC turn around. She's become as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow. Ain't nobody as hard to watch as Rachel Maddow! Mikek Hahahahah...you're a pistol, Mikey. Rachel is hard for you to watch because, well, you'll figure it out or someone will tell you. Could it be the views she communicates, the manner in which she communicates them and the glee she gets communicating them. (often sarcastic) Ya, that's it. I didn't need any help figuring it out. What did you think it is that makes it hard to watch her? Mikek --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus You picked those reasons for your inability to comprehend. I had another reason for you in mind. At least when Rachel says something the subject is clear. You write but there is no subject, it's like you are keeping a secret. When someone asks, you have no response. Mikek --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus Mikey...you were the one who posted maddow was hard to watch and then you gave reasons. And your point? Gee, Mikey, I guess I just don't understand your problem. I watch Ms. Maddow about once or maybe twice a week, and I don't find it hard, difficult or confusing. |
Wow - Crazy
On 8/16/2015 3:33 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
I watch Ms.Maddow about once or maybe twice a week, and I don't find it hard, difficult or confusing. There is no surprise there. Is it your contention I would believe otherwise? Mikek --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:03 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com