On 7/8/15, 1:47 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 13:30:40 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 7/8/15, 11:52 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 11:28:13 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Just realized I was using F.O.A.D. on this machine, instead of Keyser
Söze. Fixed, I think.

Yeah, lionizing a homicidal maniac is better than a simple insult..
I guess Jeffrey Dahmer and Charles Manson were already taken. ;-)


An imaginary homicidal maniac in a work of fiction who became homicidal
after his family was attacked. Oh, wait, *you* thought Keyser Söze was a
real person, right?

So was Hannibal Lecter but I doubt anyone wants to identify with him
... even if he does have a great education.


Hannibal was a real imaginary fella. Keyser Söze was an imaginary
imaginary fella.

On 7/8/2015 1:35 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/8/15, 11:56 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 11:26:21 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 7/8/15, 11:15 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 11:04:01 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 7/8/15, 10:55 AM, wrote:
On 8 Jul 2015 11:56:55 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Enough time cruising on the floating RV for this month, so we are
heading
north and should be back sometime Friday or Saturday. And the
house sitter
is bored and wants to go home, too. Can't wait to read which of
the world's
problems the right wingers here have solved in our absence and
what The
Donald, The Cruz, The Jindal, and The Bush have said and done in our
absence to ratchet up the hate talk. ??

Your absence was a refreshing break from the rancor, ad hominem
attack
and off topic bull**** prevalent in your posts. In fact we didn't
hear
from "slammer" either which is curious in itself. Coincidence?
Probably not. I suspect it is just another of your many screen names.



assumptions about addictions that
have little basis in science (well, excluding yours...you're more
correct).

I am citing NIH and NIMH among several others with good credentials,
Richard hasn't cited anyone. Do you have a citation?


Read for content. Your assumptions about addictions, as I said, are more
correct than several of the others quoted here. I don't need "citations"
for knowledge about addictions. My wife has 25+ years of expert
knowledge in the field, and has researched, written, and testified in
court as an expert witness about addictions and the difficulties in
overcoming them, and we have discussed the horrors of substance abuse
and addictions many times.

Oh, and your comment that Slammer and I sometimes are here at the same
time is a pullback from your statement that you suspect Slammer is "just
another of (my) many screen names. Slammer is far more like some of your
trashy rightie buddies here than he is like me.

A few courses in college-level "Engrish" might do wonders for your
reading comprehension abilities and your abilities to write what you
mean, eh? It's never too late for formal edu-ma-cat-ion.



Like I said, the lack of rancor, ad hominem attack was refreshing.

How was your trip?
Did your boat perform as expected?
Anything unusual or interesting happen?





There's always rancor in here...where it is directed depends upon who is
present, eh? I saw plenty of rancor aimed at Greeks and those suffering
from various addictions and, of course, the usual suspects taking cheap
shots at Don.

Still on the trip...not back yet.

Apparently, the only thing of interest for Harry to talk about is rec.boats.

--

Respectfully submitted by Justan

Laugh of the day from Krause

"I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here.
I've been "born again" as a nice guy."

On 7/8/2015 1:37 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/8/15, 12:48 PM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 12:07:49 -0400, Justan Olphat
wrote:

On 7/8/2015 11:26 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 7/8/15, 11:15 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 11:04:01 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 7/8/15, 10:55 AM, wrote:
On 8 Jul 2015 11:56:55 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Enough time cruising on the floating RV for this month, so we are
heading
north and should be back sometime Friday or Saturday. And the house
sitter
is bored and wants to go home, too. Can't wait to read which of the
world's
problems the right wingers here have solved in our absence and what
The
Donald, The Cruz, The Jindal, and The Bush have said and done in
our
absence to ratchet up the hate talk. ??

Your absence was a refreshing break from the rancor, ad hominem
attack
and off topic bull**** prevalent in your posts. In fact we didn't
hear
from "slammer" either which is curious in itself. Coincidence?
Probably not. I suspect it is just another of your many screen
names.



assumptions about addictions that
have little basis in science (well, excluding yours...you're more
correct).

I am citing NIH and NIMH among several others with good credentials,
Richard hasn't cited anyone. Do you have a citation?


Read for content. Your assumptions about addictions, as I said, are
more
correct than several of the others quoted here. I don't need
"citations"
for knowledge about addictions. My wife has 25+ years of expert
knowledge in the field, and has researched, written, and testified in
court as an expert witness about addictions and the difficulties in
overcoming them, and we have discussed the horrors of substance abuse
and addictions many times.

Oh, and your comment that Slammer and I sometimes are here at the same
time is a pullback from your statement that you suspect Slammer is
"just
another of (my) many screen names. Slammer is far more like some of
your
trashy rightie buddies here than he is like me.

A few courses in college-level "Engrish" might do wonders for your
reading comprehension abilities and your abilities to write what you
mean, eh? It's never too late for formal edu-ma-cat-ion.



A friendly suggestion, F O A D. We should be so lucky.

Your wife of 25 years isn't any brighter than the thousands of other nut
cases pretending to be experts in the mental health field. The expertise
is in doling out behavior altering drugs at an alarming rate, when they
should be treating and curing patients. Your knowledge, gleaned from a
unqualified expert, is as useless as tits on a bull. Ya hear?

How many of those others are Dr. Dr.?


Your asshole Florida buddy has no formal education beyond high school,
if he even has that.

You're livid, aren't you? :-)

--

Respectfully submitted by Justan

Laugh of the day from Krause

"I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here.
I've been "born again" as a nice guy."

On 7/8/2015 1:37 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/8/2015 12:07 PM, Justan Olphat wrote:
On 7/8/2015 11:26 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 7/8/15, 11:15 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 11:04:01 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 7/8/15, 10:55 AM, wrote:
On 8 Jul 2015 11:56:55 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Enough time cruising on the floating RV for this month, so we are
heading
north and should be back sometime Friday or Saturday. And the house
sitter
is bored and wants to go home, too. Can't wait to read which of the
world's
problems the right wingers here have solved in our absence and what
The
Donald, The Cruz, The Jindal, and The Bush have said and done in our
absence to ratchet up the hate talk. ??

Your absence was a refreshing break from the rancor, ad hominem
attack
and off topic bull**** prevalent in your posts. In fact we didn't
hear
from "slammer" either which is curious in itself. Coincidence?
Probably not. I suspect it is just another of your many screen names.



assumptions about addictions that
have little basis in science (well, excluding yours...you're more
correct).

I am citing NIH and NIMH among several others with good credentials,
Richard hasn't cited anyone. Do you have a citation?


Read for content. Your assumptions about addictions, as I said, are more
correct than several of the others quoted here. I don't need "citations"
for knowledge about addictions. My wife has 25+ years of expert
knowledge in the field, and has researched, written, and testified in
court as an expert witness about addictions and the difficulties in
overcoming them, and we have discussed the horrors of substance abuse
and addictions many times.

Oh, and your comment that Slammer and I sometimes are here at the same
time is a pullback from your statement that you suspect Slammer is "just
another of (my) many screen names. Slammer is far more like some of your
trashy rightie buddies here than he is like me.

A few courses in college-level "Engrish" might do wonders for your
reading comprehension abilities and your abilities to write what you
mean, eh? It's never too late for formal edu-ma-cat-ion.



A friendly suggestion, F O A D. We should be so lucky.

Your wife of 25 years isn't any brighter than the thousands of other nut
cases pretending to be experts in the mental health field. The expertise
is in doling out behavior altering drugs at an alarming rate, when they
should be treating and curing patients. Your knowledge, gleaned from a
unqualified expert, is as useless as tits on a bull. Ya hear?


You are much better off simply asking the abuser if you want to get a
straight answer.


You're thinking about that wet back that snuck back over the border
after being deported 5 times only to murder a woman "by accident". This
was in the news recently.

--

Respectfully submitted by Justan

Laugh of the day from Krause

"I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here.
I've been "born again" as a nice guy."

On 7/8/2015 3:24 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 13:37:35 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 7/8/2015 12:07 PM, Justan Olphat wrote:
On 7/8/2015 11:26 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 7/8/15, 11:15 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 11:04:01 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 7/8/15, 10:55 AM, wrote:
On 8 Jul 2015 11:56:55 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Enough time cruising on the floating RV for this month, so we are
heading
north and should be back sometime Friday or Saturday. And the house
sitter
is bored and wants to go home, too. Can't wait to read which of the
world's
problems the right wingers here have solved in our absence and what
The
Donald, The Cruz, The Jindal, and The Bush have said and done in our
absence to ratchet up the hate talk. ??

Your absence was a refreshing break from the rancor, ad hominem attack
and off topic bull**** prevalent in your posts. In fact we didn't hear
from "slammer" either which is curious in itself. Coincidence?
Probably not. I suspect it is just another of your many screen names.



assumptions about addictions that
have little basis in science (well, excluding yours...you're more
correct).

I am citing NIH and NIMH among several others with good credentials,
Richard hasn't cited anyone. Do you have a citation?


Read for content. Your assumptions about addictions, as I said, are more
correct than several of the others quoted here. I don't need "citations"
for knowledge about addictions. My wife has 25+ years of expert
knowledge in the field, and has researched, written, and testified in
court as an expert witness about addictions and the difficulties in
overcoming them, and we have discussed the horrors of substance abuse
and addictions many times.

Oh, and your comment that Slammer and I sometimes are here at the same
time is a pullback from your statement that you suspect Slammer is "just
another of (my) many screen names. Slammer is far more like some of your
trashy rightie buddies here than he is like me.

A few courses in college-level "Engrish" might do wonders for your
reading comprehension abilities and your abilities to write what you
mean, eh? It's never too late for formal edu-ma-cat-ion.



A friendly suggestion, F O A D. We should be so lucky.

Your wife of 25 years isn't any brighter than the thousands of other nut
cases pretending to be experts in the mental health field. The expertise
is in doling out behavior altering drugs at an alarming rate, when they
should be treating and curing patients. Your knowledge, gleaned from a
unqualified expert, is as useless as tits on a bull. Ya hear?


You are much better off simply asking the abuser if you want to get a
straight answer.


If addicts had the answer, they would stop



They "chose" not to. It's the feel good thing. Just ask 'em.

On Wednesday, July 8, 2015 at 11:04:03 AM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:

There's no "refreshing break" in this crapper of a newsgroup.

Why the **** are you here then?

On Wednesday, July 8, 2015 at 11:56:23 AM UTC-4, wrote:

How was your trip?
Did your boat perform as expected?
Anything unusual or interesting happen?

krause doesnt HAVE a Boat.

On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 13:37:34 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/8/15, 12:48 PM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 12:07:49 -0400, Justan Olphat wrote:

On 7/8/2015 11:26 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 7/8/15, 11:15 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 11:04:01 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 7/8/15, 10:55 AM, wrote:
On 8 Jul 2015 11:56:55 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Enough time cruising on the floating RV for this month, so we are
heading
north and should be back sometime Friday or Saturday. And the house
sitter
is bored and wants to go home, too. Can't wait to read which of the
world's
problems the right wingers here have solved in our absence and what
The
Donald, The Cruz, The Jindal, and The Bush have said and done in our
absence to ratchet up the hate talk. ??

Your absence was a refreshing break from the rancor, ad hominem attack
and off topic bull**** prevalent in your posts. In fact we didn't hear
from "slammer" either which is curious in itself. Coincidence?
Probably not. I suspect it is just another of your many screen names.



assumptions about addictions that
have little basis in science (well, excluding yours...you're more
correct).

I am citing NIH and NIMH among several others with good credentials,
Richard hasn't cited anyone. Do you have a citation?


Read for content. Your assumptions about addictions, as I said, are more
correct than several of the others quoted here. I don't need "citations"
for knowledge about addictions. My wife has 25+ years of expert
knowledge in the field, and has researched, written, and testified in
court as an expert witness about addictions and the difficulties in
overcoming them, and we have discussed the horrors of substance abuse
and addictions many times.

Oh, and your comment that Slammer and I sometimes are here at the same
time is a pullback from your statement that you suspect Slammer is "just
another of (my) many screen names. Slammer is far more like some of your
trashy rightie buddies here than he is like me.

A few courses in college-level "Engrish" might do wonders for your
reading comprehension abilities and your abilities to write what you
mean, eh? It's never too late for formal edu-ma-cat-ion.



A friendly suggestion, F O A D. We should be so lucky.

Your wife of 25 years isn't any brighter than the thousands of other nut
cases pretending to be experts in the mental health field. The expertise
is in doling out behavior altering drugs at an alarming rate, when they
should be treating and curing patients. Your knowledge, gleaned from a
unqualified expert, is as useless as tits on a bull. Ya hear?

How many of those others are Dr. Dr.?


Your asshole Florida buddy has no formal education beyond high school,
if he even has that.

How would you know? You're always complaining about the lack of information provided
by some folks here.

If you wish, just let me know, and I'll gladly provide any information you need.
--

Guns don't cause problems.
Gun owner behavior causes problems.

On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 15:24:49 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 13:37:35 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 7/8/2015 12:07 PM, Justan Olphat wrote:
On 7/8/2015 11:26 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 7/8/15, 11:15 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 11:04:01 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 7/8/15, 10:55 AM, wrote:
On 8 Jul 2015 11:56:55 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Enough time cruising on the floating RV for this month, so we are
heading
north and should be back sometime Friday or Saturday. And the house
sitter
is bored and wants to go home, too. Can't wait to read which of the
world's
problems the right wingers here have solved in our absence and what
The
Donald, The Cruz, The Jindal, and The Bush have said and done in our
absence to ratchet up the hate talk. ??

Your absence was a refreshing break from the rancor, ad hominem attack
and off topic bull**** prevalent in your posts. In fact we didn't hear
from "slammer" either which is curious in itself. Coincidence?
Probably not. I suspect it is just another of your many screen names.



assumptions about addictions that
have little basis in science (well, excluding yours...you're more
correct).

I am citing NIH and NIMH among several others with good credentials,
Richard hasn't cited anyone. Do you have a citation?


Read for content. Your assumptions about addictions, as I said, are more
correct than several of the others quoted here. I don't need "citations"
for knowledge about addictions. My wife has 25+ years of expert
knowledge in the field, and has researched, written, and testified in
court as an expert witness about addictions and the difficulties in
overcoming them, and we have discussed the horrors of substance abuse
and addictions many times.

Oh, and your comment that Slammer and I sometimes are here at the same
time is a pullback from your statement that you suspect Slammer is "just
another of (my) many screen names. Slammer is far more like some of your
trashy rightie buddies here than he is like me.

A few courses in college-level "Engrish" might do wonders for your
reading comprehension abilities and your abilities to write what you
mean, eh? It's never too late for formal edu-ma-cat-ion.



A friendly suggestion, F O A D. We should be so lucky.

Your wife of 25 years isn't any brighter than the thousands of other nut
cases pretending to be experts in the mental health field. The expertise
is in doling out behavior altering drugs at an alarming rate, when they
should be treating and curing patients. Your knowledge, gleaned from a
unqualified expert, is as useless as tits on a bull. Ya hear?


You are much better off simply asking the abuser if you want to get a
straight answer.


If addicts had the answer, they would stop

It is possible if they work at it. No one said it was easy.
--

Guns don't cause problems.
Gun owner behavior causes problems.

On 7/8/2015 4:49 PM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 15:24:49 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 13:37:35 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 7/8/2015 12:07 PM, Justan Olphat wrote:
On 7/8/2015 11:26 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 7/8/15, 11:15 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 11:04:01 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 7/8/15, 10:55 AM, wrote:
On 8 Jul 2015 11:56:55 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Enough time cruising on the floating RV for this month, so we are
heading
north and should be back sometime Friday or Saturday. And the house
sitter
is bored and wants to go home, too. Can't wait to read which of the
world's
problems the right wingers here have solved in our absence and what
The
Donald, The Cruz, The Jindal, and The Bush have said and done in our
absence to ratchet up the hate talk. ??

Your absence was a refreshing break from the rancor, ad hominem attack
and off topic bull**** prevalent in your posts. In fact we didn't hear
from "slammer" either which is curious in itself. Coincidence?
Probably not. I suspect it is just another of your many screen names.



assumptions about addictions that
have little basis in science (well, excluding yours...you're more
correct).

I am citing NIH and NIMH among several others with good credentials,
Richard hasn't cited anyone. Do you have a citation?


Read for content. Your assumptions about addictions, as I said, are more
correct than several of the others quoted here. I don't need "citations"
for knowledge about addictions. My wife has 25+ years of expert
knowledge in the field, and has researched, written, and testified in
court as an expert witness about addictions and the difficulties in
overcoming them, and we have discussed the horrors of substance abuse
and addictions many times.

Oh, and your comment that Slammer and I sometimes are here at the same
time is a pullback from your statement that you suspect Slammer is "just
another of (my) many screen names. Slammer is far more like some of your
trashy rightie buddies here than he is like me.

A few courses in college-level "Engrish" might do wonders for your
reading comprehension abilities and your abilities to write what you
mean, eh? It's never too late for formal edu-ma-cat-ion.



A friendly suggestion, F O A D. We should be so lucky.

Your wife of 25 years isn't any brighter than the thousands of other nut
cases pretending to be experts in the mental health field. The expertise
is in doling out behavior altering drugs at an alarming rate, when they
should be treating and curing patients. Your knowledge, gleaned from a
unqualified expert, is as useless as tits on a bull. Ya hear?


You are much better off simply asking the abuser if you want to get a
straight answer.


If addicts had the answer, they would stop

It is possible if they work at it. No one said it was easy.



According to the CDC the rate of heroin abuse or dependence has jumped
90% between 2002 and 2013.

I guess Greg would claim it was a bad decade for genes.

More like a social phenomena based on peer pressure and choices.