future history
 

Was wondering what future researchers will think when researching Usenet in
a few centuries and look at both Slammers and Harry's posts.

future history
 

On 6/6/2015 3:58 PM, Califbill wrote:

Was wondering what future researchers will think when researching Usenet in
a few centuries and look at both Slammers and Harry's posts.


This morning I found an old laptop that I used in both the RV's and the
boats. It's the first one I had with Windows XP.

I was going through it deleting a bunch
of stuff and found a folder in Outlook Express with saved posts to and
from rec.boats. Some dated back to 2002 and many involved debates with
Harry on several subjects.

I have to admit. I made more sense back then.

I don't see anything from slammer unless someone quotes him and then I
just ignore and delete anything he has to say. From what I saw from him
in the past (before I filtered him) I became convinced that he has
some serious mental health issues.

future history
 

On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 3:58:19 PM UTC-4, Califbill wrote:
Was wondering what future researchers will think when researching Usenet in
a few centuries and look at both Slammers and Harry's posts.

No one ****ing cares.

future history
 

On Saturday, June 6, 2015 at 4:39:54 PM UTC-4, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/6/2015 3:58 PM, Califbill wrote:

Was wondering what future researchers will think when researching Usenet in
a few centuries and look at both Slammers and Harry's posts.


This morning I found an old laptop that I used in both the RV's and the
boats. It's the first one I had with Windows XP.

I was going through it deleting a bunch
of stuff and found a folder in Outlook Express with saved posts to and
from rec.boats. Some dated back to 2002 and many involved debates with
Harry on several subjects.

I have to admit. I made more sense back then.

I don't see anything from slammer unless someone quotes him and then I
just ignore and delete anything he has to say. From what I saw from him
in the past (before I filtered him) I became convinced that he has
some serious mental health issues.

Good for you, Silver-Spoon cocksucker. Now that you're also fighting over harrys cock with dicklicker, it must be tough.

future history
 

On Saturday, 6 June 2015 16:58:19 UTC-3, Califbill wrote:
Was wondering what future researchers will think when researching Usenet in
a few centuries and look at both Slammers and Harry's posts.


In Harry's case, they would probably look at him like a canary in a coal mine...trying to call out to warn people of impending disaster looming just out of sight....and that would be personal greed and corruption.
In Dickson's case...they would see him exactly as he is..a pathetic pervert desperate for attention...any attention.
What side do you want to be seen on, Kalif??

future history
 

True North wrote:
On Saturday, 6 June 2015 16:58:19 UTC-3, Califbill wrote:
Was wondering what future researchers will think when researching Usenet in
a few centuries and look at both Slammers and Harry's posts.


In Harry's case, they would probably look at him like a canary in a coal
mine...trying to call out to warn people of impending disaster looming
just out of sight....and that would be personal greed and corruption.
In Dickson's case...they would see him exactly as he is..a pathetic
pervert desperate for attention...any attention.
What side do you want to be seen on, Kalif??

Scott Adams misspelled Harry's moniker to, June 7.
http://dilbert.com

future history
 

On Sun, 07 Jun 2015 10:57:29 -0500, Califbill
wrote:

True North wrote:
On Saturday, 6 June 2015 16:58:19 UTC-3, Califbill wrote:
Was wondering what future researchers will think when researching Usenet in
a few centuries and look at both Slammers and Harry's posts.


In Harry's case, they would probably look at him like a canary in a coal
mine...trying to call out to warn people of impending disaster looming
just out of sight....and that would be personal greed and corruption.
In Dickson's case...they would see him exactly as he is..a pathetic
pervert desperate for attention...any attention.
What side do you want to be seen on, Kalif??

Scott Adams misspelled Harry's moniker to, June 7.
http://dilbert.com

===

Funny stuff, thanks. Of course greed and corruption are brand new
vices that were undiscovered until Harry and the internet came along.
How perceptive of him, and how useful if you're looking for some
excuse to default on your loans and taxes.

Don, my advice is to pick your heros carefully.

future history
 

I don't have any hero's, Wayne.

future history
 

On 6/7/2015 2:05 PM, True North wrote:
I don't have any hero's, Wayne.


SNERK!

--

Respectfully submitted by Justan

Laugh of the day from Krause

"I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here.
I've been "born again" as a nice guy."

future history
 

True North wrote:
I don't have any hero's, Wayne.

Always a problem. We need heroes.