![]() |
Cat lovers heed this
http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=...4FC81F00FC4CF5
-- Respectfully submitted by Justan Laugh of the day from Krause "I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here. I've been "born again" as a nice guy." |
Cat lovers heed this
On Sat, 11 Apr 2015 07:22:31 -0400, Justan Olphart
wrote: http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=...4FC81F00FC4CF5 === Truth is that cat owners should not allow them outdoors. Outdoor cats kill millions of birds every year. |
Cat lovers heed this
On 4/11/2015 8:06 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 11 Apr 2015 07:22:31 -0400, Justan Olphart wrote: http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=...4FC81F00FC4CF5 === Truth is that cat owners should not allow them outdoors. Outdoor cats kill millions of birds every year. I could never figure out why cats can roam free and destroy others' property, while dogs have to be on leash. -- Respectfully submitted by Justan Laugh of the day from Krause "I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here. I've been "born again" as a nice guy." |
Cat lovers heed this
On Sat, 11 Apr 2015 08:13:41 -0400, Justan Olphart
wrote: On 4/11/2015 8:06 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 11 Apr 2015 07:22:31 -0400, Justan Olphart wrote: http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=...4FC81F00FC4CF5 === Truth is that cat owners should not allow them outdoors. Outdoor cats kill millions of birds every year. I could never figure out why cats can roam free and destroy others' property, while dogs have to be on leash. === I think the reasons have to do with public safety. Dogs tend to be very territorial, and they are also capable of inflicting severe injuries. People are becoming more aware of the environmental damage caused by free roaming cats however. |
Every cat I have ever owned was an indoor cat. They never were allowed outside. I think if I lived in Florida and I saw one of those lizards I would shoot it since its not native to the area. Same would go for the pythons that are overtaking the area.
|
Cat lovers heed this
On 4/12/2015 2:15 AM, RGrew176 wrote:
Every cat I have ever owned was an indoor cat. They never were allowed outside. I think if I lived in Florida and I saw one of those lizards I would shoot it since its not native to the area. Same would go for the pythons that are overtaking the area. Well bless your heart. C'mon down. -- Respectfully submitted by Justan Laugh of the day from Krause "I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here. I've been "born again" as a nice guy." |
Quote:
I am planning a trip to Florida for December of 2016. |
Cat lovers heed this
On 4/12/2015 10:45 PM, RGrew176 wrote:
Justan Olphart;1032272 Wrote: On 4/12/2015 2:15 AM, RGrew176 wrote:- Every cat I have ever owned was an indoor cat. They never were allowed outside. I think if I lived in Florida and I saw one of those lizards I would shoot it since its not native to the area. Same would go for the pythons that are overtaking the area. - Well bless your heart. C'mon down. -- Respectfully submitted by Justan Laugh of the day from Krause "I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here. I've been "born again" as a nice guy." Hey, thanks for the invite. I think I will stay here in Michigan for now where we do not have to worry about monitor lizards or pythons. I am planning a trip to Florida for December of 2016. Make sure you bring your snake boots. Those lizards are pretty aggressive from what I can see. You can't do much about the pythons though. They'll just swalla yer up boots and all. If you could pick one camping stop to see and tour nearby in Michigan, what would it be? -- Respectfully submitted by Justan Laugh of the day from Krause "I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here. I've been "born again" as a nice guy." |
Cat lovers heed this
On Monday, 13 April 2015 09:33:23 UTC-3, Justan Olphart wrote:
On 4/12/2015 10:45 PM, RGrew176 wrote: Justan Olphart;1032272 Wrote: On 4/12/2015 2:15 AM, RGrew176 wrote:- Every cat I have ever owned was an indoor cat. They never were allowed outside. I think if I lived in Florida and I saw one of those lizards I would shoot it since its not native to the area. Same would go for the pythons that are overtaking the area. - Well bless your heart. C'mon down. -- Respectfully submitted by Justan Laugh of the day from Krause "I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here. I've been "born again" as a nice guy." Hey, thanks for the invite. I think I will stay here in Michigan for now where we do not have to worry about monitor lizards or pythons. I am planning a trip to Florida for December of 2016. Make sure you bring your snake boots. Those lizards are pretty aggressive from what I can see. You can't do much about the pythons though. They'll just swalla yer up boots and all. If you could pick one camping stop to see and tour nearby in Michigan, what would it be? -- Respectfully submitted by Justan Laugh of the day from Krause "I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here. I've been "born again" as a nice guy." I hear Detroit has lots of open spaces these days...you could probably just park your camper anywhere for free. |
Cat lovers heed this
True North wrote:
On Monday, 13 April 2015 09:33:23 UTC-3, Justan Olphart wrote: On 4/12/2015 10:45 PM, RGrew176 wrote: Justan Olphart;1032272 Wrote: On 4/12/2015 2:15 AM, RGrew176 wrote:- Every cat I have ever owned was an indoor cat. They never were allowed outside. I think if I lived in Florida and I saw one of those lizards I would shoot it since its not native to the area. Same would go for the pythons that are overtaking the area. - Well bless your heart. C'mon down. -- Respectfully submitted by Justan Laugh of the day from Krause "I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here. I've been "born again" as a nice guy." Hey, thanks for the invite. I think I will stay here in Michigan for now where we do not have to worry about monitor lizards or pythons. I am planning a trip to Florida for December of 2016. Make sure you bring your snake boots. Those lizards are pretty aggressive from what I can see. You can't do much about the pythons though. They'll just swalla yer up boots and all. If you could pick one camping stop to see and tour nearby in Michigan, what would it be? -- Respectfully submitted by Justan Laugh of the day from Krause "I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here. I've been "born again" as a nice guy." I hear Detroit has lots of open spaces these days...you could probably just park your camper anywhere for free. You are correct. The Democrats continue to run that city into the ground. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://www.michcampgrounds.com/ |
Religious crackposts redux
On 4/14/15 3:49 AM, RGrew176 wrote:
You mean that the woman was not bright enough to go to another pharmacy where she could have found a more liberal pharmacist. Hmmmmm, OK. D'oh... "Her doctor recommended she take the drug *after she miscarried* about five weeks into her pregnancy, enabling her to avoid undergoing a more invasive procedure. But Misoprostol can also be used with Mifepristone to end a pregnancy in its early stages. She suspects that it was for that reason that the store refused her prescription without providing a reason. While she was able to obtain the medication somewhere else, she brought the issue up again when visiting the store to fill out a separate prescription. She looks at my name and she says Oh, well, I couldnt think of a valid reason why you would need this prescription, Cartrett said. I tell her my reasons for needing it, and she says Well, I dont feel like there is a reason why you would need it, so we refused to fill it. A pharmacist for the store, Sandip Patel, told WGXA that under state law, pharmacists are able to turn down prescriptions. A Walmart spokesperson said the company encourages its pharmacists to use their professional judgement on a case-by-case basis." - - - Try reading for comprehension. The pharmacist had no valid reason for denying her the medication. She had already suffered a miscarriage...and she did obtain the Rx elsewhere. Religious crackpots...they're destroying this country. |
Religious crackposts redux
On 4/14/2015 8:33 AM, Keyser Sze wrote:
On 4/14/15 3:49 AM, RGrew176 wrote: You mean that the woman was not bright enough to go to another pharmacy where she could have found a more liberal pharmacist. Hmmmmm, OK. D'oh... "Her doctor recommended she take the drug *after she miscarried* about five weeks into her pregnancy, enabling her to avoid undergoing a more invasive procedure. But Misoprostol can also be used with Mifepristone to end a pregnancy in its early stages. She suspects that it was for that reason that the store refused her prescription without providing a reason. While she was able to obtain the medication somewhere else, she brought the issue up again when visiting the store to fill out a separate prescription. She looks at my name and she says Oh, well, I couldnt think of a valid reason why you would need this prescription, Cartrett said. I tell her my reasons for needing it, and she says Well, I dont feel like there is a reason why you would need it, so we refused to fill it. A pharmacist for the store, Sandip Patel, told WGXA that under state law, pharmacists are able to turn down prescriptions. A Walmart spokesperson said the company encourages its pharmacists to use their professional judgement on a case-by-case basis." - - - Try reading for comprehension. The pharmacist had no valid reason for denying her the medication. She had already suffered a miscarriage...and she did obtain the Rx elsewhere. Religious crackpots...they're destroying this country.\ This is nothing but hype. There are 4,177 Walmart stores in the USA Each one employs 3 or 4 pharmacists. That's somewhere between 12,531 and 16,798 pharmacists. To suggest that because one used his/her lawful discretion in the filling of one prescription .. for any reason ... means that religious crackpots are destroying this country is simply absurd. |
Religious crackposts redux
On 4/14/15 9:44 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/14/2015 8:33 AM, Keyser Sze wrote: On 4/14/15 3:49 AM, RGrew176 wrote: You mean that the woman was not bright enough to go to another pharmacy where she could have found a more liberal pharmacist. Hmmmmm, OK. D'oh... "Her doctor recommended she take the drug *after she miscarried* about five weeks into her pregnancy, enabling her to avoid undergoing a more invasive procedure. But Misoprostol can also be used with Mifepristone to end a pregnancy in its early stages. She suspects that it was for that reason that the store refused her prescription without providing a reason. While she was able to obtain the medication somewhere else, she brought the issue up again when visiting the store to fill out a separate prescription. She looks at my name and she says Oh, well, I couldnt think of a valid reason why you would need this prescription, Cartrett said. I tell her my reasons for needing it, and she says Well, I dont feel like there is a reason why you would need it, so we refused to fill it. A pharmacist for the store, Sandip Patel, told WGXA that under state law, pharmacists are able to turn down prescriptions. A Walmart spokesperson said the company encourages its pharmacists to use their professional judgement on a case-by-case basis." - - - Try reading for comprehension. The pharmacist had no valid reason for denying her the medication. She had already suffered a miscarriage...and she did obtain the Rx elsewhere. Religious crackpots...they're destroying this country.\ This is nothing but hype. There are 4,177 Walmart stores in the USA Each one employs 3 or 4 pharmacists. That's somewhere between 12,531 and 16,798 pharmacists. To suggest that because one used his/her lawful discretion in the filling of one prescription .. for any reason .. means that religious crackpots are destroying this country is simply absurd. It's just part of a spreading disease, and the "lawful discretion" was built upon religious creepitude, to coin a phrase. The Walmart pharmacist is just one example of this. There are many others. This sort of insanity is reason enough to not vote for ultra-conservative Republicans, who will only further this nonsense agenda. And what if the woman in question was impoverished and had a beg a ride to get to the only pharmacy around, and it happened to be that Walmart pharmacy where the pharmacist was a hyper-religious moron? Then what? Do without the needed medication? |
Religious crackposts redux
On 4/14/2015 9:56 AM, Keyser Sze wrote:
On 4/14/15 9:44 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/14/2015 8:33 AM, Keyser Sze wrote: On 4/14/15 3:49 AM, RGrew176 wrote: You mean that the woman was not bright enough to go to another pharmacy where she could have found a more liberal pharmacist. Hmmmmm, OK. D'oh... "Her doctor recommended she take the drug *after she miscarried* about five weeks into her pregnancy, enabling her to avoid undergoing a more invasive procedure. But Misoprostol can also be used with Mifepristone to end a pregnancy in its early stages. She suspects that it was for that reason that the store refused her prescription without providing a reason. While she was able to obtain the medication somewhere else, she brought the issue up again when visiting the store to fill out a separate prescription. She looks at my name and she says Oh, well, I couldnt think of a valid reason why you would need this prescription, Cartrett said. I tell her my reasons for needing it, and she says Well, I dont feel like there is a reason why you would need it, so we refused to fill it. A pharmacist for the store, Sandip Patel, told WGXA that under state law, pharmacists are able to turn down prescriptions. A Walmart spokesperson said the company encourages its pharmacists to use their professional judgement on a case-by-case basis." - - - Try reading for comprehension. The pharmacist had no valid reason for denying her the medication. She had already suffered a miscarriage...and she did obtain the Rx elsewhere. Religious crackpots...they're destroying this country.\ This is nothing but hype. There are 4,177 Walmart stores in the USA Each one employs 3 or 4 pharmacists. That's somewhere between 12,531 and 16,798 pharmacists. To suggest that because one used his/her lawful discretion in the filling of one prescription .. for any reason .. means that religious crackpots are destroying this country is simply absurd. It's just part of a spreading disease, and the "lawful discretion" was built upon religious creepitude, to coin a phrase. The Walmart pharmacist is just one example of this. There are many others. This sort of insanity is reason enough to not vote for ultra-conservative Republicans, who will only further this nonsense agenda. And what if the woman in question was impoverished and had a beg a ride to get to the only pharmacy around, and it happened to be that Walmart pharmacy where the pharmacist was a hyper-religious moron? Then what? Do without the needed medication? "What ifs". What if the woman trying to get the prescription filled at Walmart was an obnoxious, demanding and foul mouthed customer? You don't know that she wasn't. I don't know if she was. I am convinced that we have a whole generation of people ... (particularly the "Y" generation) who have been bombarded by the liberal media, blogs and social media sources to consider themselves victims rather than citizens. The media hype pushes entitlement philosophies based on the well established "rich getting richer" mentality. Personal responsibility and accountability don't play much of a role anymore. It's political brainwashing. The fact that you single out a single person out of many thousands doing the same jobs who is an aberration only serves to further the political hype. People are smarter than that, thankfully. |
Religious crackposts redux
On Tuesday, April 14, 2015 at 10:11:39 AM UTC-4, Mr. Luddite wrote:
I am convinced that we have a whole generation of people ... (particularly the "Y" generation) who have been bombarded by the liberal media, blogs and social media sources to consider themselves victims rather than citizens. The media hype pushes entitlement philosophies based on the well established "rich getting richer" mentality. Personal responsibility and accountability don't play much of a role anymore. It's political brainwashing. The fact that you single out a single person out of many thousands doing the same jobs who is an aberration only serves to further the political hype. People are smarter than that, thankfully. Many of the smart ones are right here in SC. They "get it". Here's one smart young guy that does... http://www.wistv.com/story/28772115/mans-candid-honest-video-about-race-and-traffic-stops-is-going-viral?clienttype=generic&utm_source=site&utm_mediu m=homepage&utm_campaign=3x2 |
Religious crackposts redux
"Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 4/14/2015 9:56 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 4/14/15 9:44 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 4/14/2015 8:33 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 4/14/15 3:49 AM, RGrew176 wrote: You mean that the woman was not bright enough to go to another pharmacy where she could have found a more liberal pharmacist. Hmmmmm, OK. D'oh... "Her doctor recommended she take the drug *after she miscarried* about five weeks into her pregnancy, enabling her to avoid undergoing a more invasive procedure. But Misoprostol can also be used with Mifepristone to end a pregnancy in its early stages. She suspects that it was for that reason that the store refused her prescription without providing a reason. While she was able to obtain the medication somewhere else, she brought the issue up again when visiting the store to fill out a separate prescription. “She looks at my name and she says ‘Oh, well, I couldn’t think of a valid reason why you would need this prescription,’” Cartrett said. “I tell her my reasons for needing it, and she says ‘Well, I don’t feel like there is a reason why you would need it, so we refused to fill it.’” A pharmacist for the store, Sandip Patel, told WGXA that under state law, pharmacists are able to turn down prescriptions. A Walmart spokesperson said the company encourages its pharmacists to “use their professional judgement” on a case-by-case basis." - - - Try reading for comprehension. The pharmacist had no valid reason for denying her the medication. She had already suffered a miscarriage...and she did obtain the Rx elsewhere. Religious crackpots...they're destroying this country.\ This is nothing but hype. There are 4,177 Walmart stores in the USA Each one employs 3 or 4 pharmacists. That's somewhere between 12,531 and 16,798 pharmacists. To suggest that because one used his/her lawful discretion in the filling of one prescription .. for any reason .. means that religious crackpots are destroying this country is simply absurd. It's just part of a spreading disease, and the "lawful discretion" was built upon religious creepitude, to coin a phrase. The Walmart pharmacist is just one example of this. There are many others. This sort of insanity is reason enough to not vote for ultra-conservative Republicans, who will only further this nonsense agenda. And what if the woman in question was impoverished and had a beg a ride to get to the only pharmacy around, and it happened to be that Walmart pharmacy where the pharmacist was a hyper-religious moron? Then what? Do without the needed medication? "What ifs". What if the woman trying to get the prescription filled at Walmart was an obnoxious, demanding and foul mouthed customer? You don't know that she wasn't. I don't know if she was. I am convinced that we have a whole generation of people ... (particularly the "Y" generation) who have been bombarded by the liberal media, blogs and social media sources to consider themselves victims rather than citizens. The media hype pushes entitlement philosophies based on the well established "rich getting richer" mentality. Personal responsibility and accountability don't play much of a role anymore. It's political brainwashing. The fact that you single out a single person out of many thousands doing the same jobs who is an aberration only serves to further the political hype. People are smarter than that, thankfully. There are all manor of religious bigots harming society, such as the clown car occupants seeking the GOP nomination. -- Sent from my iPhone 6+ |
Religious crackposts redux
|
Religious crackposts redux
On 4/14/2015 12:50 PM, wrote:
On Tuesday, April 14, 2015 at 11:29:23 AM UTC-4, Justan Olphart wrote: On 4/14/2015 10:33 AM, wrote: On Tuesday, April 14, 2015 at 10:11:39 AM UTC-4, Mr. Luddite wrote: I am convinced that we have a whole generation of people ... (particularly the "Y" generation) who have been bombarded by the liberal media, blogs and social media sources to consider themselves victims rather than citizens. The media hype pushes entitlement philosophies based on the well established "rich getting richer" mentality. Personal responsibility and accountability don't play much of a role anymore. It's political brainwashing. The fact that you single out a single person out of many thousands doing the same jobs who is an aberration only serves to further the political hype. People are smarter than that, thankfully. Many of the smart ones are right here in SC. They "get it". Here's one smart young guy that does... http://www.wistv.com/story/28772115/mans-candid-honest-video-about-race-and-traffic-stops-is-going-viral?clienttype=generic&utm_source=site&utm_mediu m=homepage&utm_campaign=3x2 Absolutely. As has been pointed out, Krause is part of the problem, not the solution. His use of profiling, name calling and negative stereotyping, to paint an ugly portrait of anyone who doesn't line up with his point of view, amounts to abysmal ignorance. -- Respectfully submitted by Justan Laugh of the day from Krause "I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here. I've been "born again" as a nice guy." I have to disagree. In the past, I beleive it was a conscience choice on his part to be the way he was, but he could still occasionally be somewhat thoughtful about a subject. Now he's appearing to be more down the path of senility/alzhiemers, where he's surrounded himself with CNN, Maddow, and Borowitz for so long that he's no longer in touch with the real world and unable to grasp it when he sees it. He used to be able to turn a phrase, but now his fallbacks are "D'oh, you're a racist". If he weren't such an asshole, it would be sad. It's probably a combination of all of the above. -- Respectfully submitted by Justan Laugh of the day from Krause "I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here. I've been "born again" as a nice guy." |
Religious crackposts redux
On Tuesday, April 14, 2015 at 9:56:17 AM UTC-4, Keyser Sze wrote:
It's just part of a spreading disease, YOU...are the spreading disease. |
Religious crackposts redux
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:02:26 -0400, Justan Olphart wrote:
On 4/14/2015 12:50 PM, wrote: On Tuesday, April 14, 2015 at 11:29:23 AM UTC-4, Justan Olphart wrote: On 4/14/2015 10:33 AM, wrote: On Tuesday, April 14, 2015 at 10:11:39 AM UTC-4, Mr. Luddite wrote: I am convinced that we have a whole generation of people ... (particularly the "Y" generation) who have been bombarded by the liberal media, blogs and social media sources to consider themselves victims rather than citizens. The media hype pushes entitlement philosophies based on the well established "rich getting richer" mentality. Personal responsibility and accountability don't play much of a role anymore. It's political brainwashing. The fact that you single out a single person out of many thousands doing the same jobs who is an aberration only serves to further the political hype. People are smarter than that, thankfully. Many of the smart ones are right here in SC. They "get it". Here's one smart young guy that does... http://www.wistv.com/story/28772115/mans-candid-honest-video-about-race-and-traffic-stops-is-going-viral?clienttype=generic&utm_source=site&utm_mediu m=homepage&utm_campaign=3x2 Absolutely. As has been pointed out, Krause is part of the problem, not the solution. His use of profiling, name calling and negative stereotyping, to paint an ugly portrait of anyone who doesn't line up with his point of view, amounts to abysmal ignorance. -- Respectfully submitted by Justan Laugh of the day from Krause "I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here. I've been "born again" as a nice guy." I have to disagree. In the past, I beleive it was a conscience choice on his part to be the way he was, but he could still occasionally be somewhat thoughtful about a subject. Now he's appearing to be more down the path of senility/alzhiemers, where he's surrounded himself with CNN, Maddow, and Borowitz for so long that he's no longer in touch with the real world and unable to grasp it when he sees it. He used to be able to turn a phrase, but now his fallbacks are "D'oh, you're a racist". If he weren't such an asshole, it would be sad. It's probably a combination of all of the above. Yup. -- Guns don't cause problems. Gun owner behavior causes problems. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:28 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com