| Page 2 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Overarmed, Undertrained, and Racist.
On 3/20/2015 10:05 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/20/15 10:02 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 3/20/2015 8:43 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 05:05:00 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Friday, March 20, 2015 at 4:40:28 AM UTC-7, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 7:27 AM, Tim wrote: Ha! Pokin' at the bear again. Yeah, I suppose it is *ok* with you righties that the police all across 'Merica are beating up and sometimes killing *unarmed* civilians. But, hey, why discuss it, eh? I mean, there are so many more important topics to discuss: golf, RV'ing, model airplanes, how much diesel fuel Wayne is buying, et cetera. -- Proud to be a Liberal. Ha! Pokin' at the bear again. === It would be interesting to hear Harry's version of how cops are supposed to handle unruly people who are resisting arrest. No ****. The kid at UVA was underage, trying to get into a bar, was reported to be intoxicated and belligerent and calling the arresting cops "****ing racists". Gets a bump on the head in the scuffle and needs some stitches. Whoopie. This is getting all kinds of media coverage and generating protests claiming police brutality. Meanwhile, you don't hear too much about the other recent incident in Ferguson. Punk shoots a .40 cal pistol out of his car window and hits two cops. First he admits firing the pistol but swears he wasn't aiming at the cops. He says it was a dispute with someone near his car. Then, that story was changed and he was "assaulted". He used his gun to defend himself under "stand your ground". But now, after lawyering up, he has recanted everything and claims he had nothing to do with it, didn't have or shoot the gun. But we don't hear much about this in the media. The kid didn't call the cops "****ing racists" until they beat the **** out of him and he was on the ground, bleeding. And it should get coverage and protests. Thug cops. The Ferguson shooting was all over "the media" I watch and read. The cops "beat the **** out of him'? I've seen the video of the arrest. I didn't see any "beating the **** out of him". They were doing what cops do to belligerent drunks to gain control of the situation. |
Overarmed, Undertrained, and Racist.
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 09:59:36 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/20/15 9:56 AM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 09:41:27 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 9:31 AM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 09:19:26 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 9:13 AM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 08:43:41 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 05:05:00 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Friday, March 20, 2015 at 4:40:28 AM UTC-7, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 7:27 AM, Tim wrote: Ha! Pokin' at the bear again. Yeah, I suppose it is *ok* with you righties that the police all across 'Merica are beating up and sometimes killing *unarmed* civilians. But, hey, why discuss it, eh? I mean, there are so many more important topics to discuss: golf, RV'ing, model airplanes, how much diesel fuel Wayne is buying, et cetera. -- Proud to be a Liberal. Ha! Pokin' at the bear again. === It would be interesting to hear Harry's version of how cops are supposed to handle unruly people who are resisting arrest. Start by saying, "Can't we all just be friends?" No surprise...Wayne is a fan of police beating up unarmed civilians, too. Answer his question, Mr. 'Rause. You think you have all the answers. Or is this one you'd choose to skip. A bit hard maybe, eh? If a gang of cops can't restrain an unarmed civilian without beating the crap out of him, they need more training or a different job. That's your answer, asswipe. Read the question. How are cops supposed to handle unruly people resisting arrest? You who think you have all the answers should be able to handle that. D'oh. They are supposed to *restrain*, not beat the **** out of or shoot. Restrain. Got it? Restrain. There are many ways to do this properly without inflicting undue physical punishment on a person. Amplify. You mean by wrapping arms around the hands and legs? Do they do this while the unruly individual is standing? Do you actually think that would be possible, unless the individual held his hands our to be cuffed? I didn't see any 'beating the **** out of' going on in the video I saw. He was on the sidewalk, face down, bumped his head on the concrete, and was then cuffed. Any cut on the forehead will bleed profusely. I don't know what transpired before he was on the sidewalk, or how much he resisted arrest. Do you? -- Guns don't cause problems. The behavior of the owner causes problems. |
Overarmed, Undertrained, and Racist.
On 3/20/2015 9:58 AM, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 09:48:57 -0400, Justan Olphart wrote: On 3/20/2015 9:42 AM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 09:35:28 -0400, Justan Olphart wrote: On 3/20/2015 9:19 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 9:14 AM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 09:10:26 -0400, Justan Olphart wrote: On 3/20/2015 7:40 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 7:27 AM, Tim wrote: Ha! Pokin' at the bear again. Yeah, I suppose it is *ok* with you righties that the police all across 'Merica are beating up and sometimes killing *unarmed* civilians. But, hey, why discuss it, eh? I mean, there are so many more important topics to discuss: golf, RV'ing, model airplanes, how much diesel fuel Wayne is buying, et cetera. The cops are doing a pretty good job of keeping a lid on the volcano that your boy created. Isn't it time for you to trade your boat before the warranty runs out? That would be a good topic to discuss. What boat? The one you'll never be invited out on a ride on. Let's be neighborly Krausie. I'd love to ride on your boat. What boat? Weren't you here when Harry told us about his twin screw Volvo powered Bayliner? Are you 'respectfully submitting' the implication that you actually *believed* that friggin' story? Remember, this is the guy that sailed around Cape Horn - twice. Then, I expect he's a very capable skipper. ;-) -- Respectfully submitted by Justan Laugh of the day from Krause "I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here. I've been "born again" as a nice guy." |
Overarmed, Undertrained, and Racist.
On 3/20/2015 9:59 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/20/15 9:56 AM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 09:41:27 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 9:31 AM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 09:19:26 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 9:13 AM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 08:43:41 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 05:05:00 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Friday, March 20, 2015 at 4:40:28 AM UTC-7, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 7:27 AM, Tim wrote: Ha! Pokin' at the bear again. Yeah, I suppose it is *ok* with you righties that the police all across 'Merica are beating up and sometimes killing *unarmed* civilians. But, hey, why discuss it, eh? I mean, there are so many more important topics to discuss: golf, RV'ing, model airplanes, how much diesel fuel Wayne is buying, et cetera. -- Proud to be a Liberal. Ha! Pokin' at the bear again. === It would be interesting to hear Harry's version of how cops are supposed to handle unruly people who are resisting arrest. Start by saying, "Can't we all just be friends?" No surprise...Wayne is a fan of police beating up unarmed civilians, too. Answer his question, Mr. 'Rause. You think you have all the answers. Or is this one you'd choose to skip. A bit hard maybe, eh? If a gang of cops can't restrain an unarmed civilian without beating the crap out of him, they need more training or a different job. That's your answer, asswipe. Read the question. How are cops supposed to handle unruly people resisting arrest? You who think you have all the answers should be able to handle that. D'oh. They are supposed to *restrain*, not beat the **** out of or shoot. Restrain. Got it? Restrain. There are many ways to do this properly without inflicting undue physical punishment on a person. Like smashing an alleged burglar up against your driveway and breaking his legs with your Ford 150s chrome bumper? -- Respectfully submitted by Justan Laugh of the day from Krause "I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here. I've been "born again" as a nice guy." |
Overarmed, Undertrained, and Racist.
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 10:05:32 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/20/15 10:02 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 3/20/2015 8:43 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 05:05:00 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Friday, March 20, 2015 at 4:40:28 AM UTC-7, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 7:27 AM, Tim wrote: Ha! Pokin' at the bear again. Yeah, I suppose it is *ok* with you righties that the police all across 'Merica are beating up and sometimes killing *unarmed* civilians. But, hey, why discuss it, eh? I mean, there are so many more important topics to discuss: golf, RV'ing, model airplanes, how much diesel fuel Wayne is buying, et cetera. -- Proud to be a Liberal. Ha! Pokin' at the bear again. === It would be interesting to hear Harry's version of how cops are supposed to handle unruly people who are resisting arrest. No ****. The kid at UVA was underage, trying to get into a bar, was reported to be intoxicated and belligerent and calling the arresting cops "****ing racists". Gets a bump on the head in the scuffle and needs some stitches. Whoopie. This is getting all kinds of media coverage and generating protests claiming police brutality. Meanwhile, you don't hear too much about the other recent incident in Ferguson. Punk shoots a .40 cal pistol out of his car window and hits two cops. First he admits firing the pistol but swears he wasn't aiming at the cops. He says it was a dispute with someone near his car. Then, that story was changed and he was "assaulted". He used his gun to defend himself under "stand your ground". But now, after lawyering up, he has recanted everything and claims he had nothing to do with it, didn't have or shoot the gun. But we don't hear much about this in the media. The kid didn't call the cops "****ing racists" until they beat the **** out of him and he was on the ground, bleeding. And it should get coverage and protests. Thug cops. No beating took place. As usual you grossly overexagerate what transpired. We have a lot of Canada geese around here who are full of **** also. The Ferguson shooting was all over "the media" I watch and read. Yup, the initial shooting was all over the media. Then they caught a guy. Most of the articles I read didn't mention his race at all. Since then there's been almost nothing. It's obvious you've never engaged in enough activity to have cut your head. Then you'd know where all the blood came from. -- Guns don't cause problems. The behavior of the owner causes problems. |
Overarmed, Undertrained, and Racist.
On 3/20/2015 10:16 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/20/15 10:06 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 3/20/2015 9:41 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 9:31 AM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 09:19:26 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 9:13 AM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 08:43:41 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 05:05:00 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Friday, March 20, 2015 at 4:40:28 AM UTC-7, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 7:27 AM, Tim wrote: Ha! Pokin' at the bear again. Yeah, I suppose it is *ok* with you righties that the police all across 'Merica are beating up and sometimes killing *unarmed* civilians. But, hey, why discuss it, eh? I mean, there are so many more important topics to discuss: golf, RV'ing, model airplanes, how much diesel fuel Wayne is buying, et cetera. -- Proud to be a Liberal. Ha! Pokin' at the bear again. === It would be interesting to hear Harry's version of how cops are supposed to handle unruly people who are resisting arrest. Start by saying, "Can't we all just be friends?" No surprise...Wayne is a fan of police beating up unarmed civilians, too. Answer his question, Mr. 'Rause. You think you have all the answers. Or is this one you'd choose to skip. A bit hard maybe, eh? If a gang of cops can't restrain an unarmed civilian without beating the crap out of him, they need more training or a different job. That's your answer, asswipe. Sounds to me like you have never had to restrain a belligerent, 20 year old drunk while he's calling you a "****ing racist" over and over. Cops are trained to gain control of a situation as rapidly as possible to avoid injury to themselves, the person being arrested or to bystanders. Sorry the kid got a bump on the head in the process. My small wife was trained to restrain out of control mental health patients, and to do it with the help of one or two other mental healh professionals. She received this training at a large state mental hospital in Florida, where many dangerous "forensic" patients are housed and treated, people I suspect are far more dangerous than the average unarmed kid you find outside a college drinking joint. She's only had to do this twice in her career, thankfully. The cops use excess force because their training is not sufficient, the violent ones are not weeded out, and they know they can get away with it. You describe her as small? Did you forget you showed us the photo you took at her graduation. -- Respectfully submitted by Justan Laugh of the day from Krause "I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here. I've been "born again" as a nice guy." |
Overarmed, Undertrained, and Racist.
On 3/20/2015 10:16 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/20/15 10:06 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 3/20/2015 9:41 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 9:31 AM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 09:19:26 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 9:13 AM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 08:43:41 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 05:05:00 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Friday, March 20, 2015 at 4:40:28 AM UTC-7, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 7:27 AM, Tim wrote: Ha! Pokin' at the bear again. Yeah, I suppose it is *ok* with you righties that the police all across 'Merica are beating up and sometimes killing *unarmed* civilians. But, hey, why discuss it, eh? I mean, there are so many more important topics to discuss: golf, RV'ing, model airplanes, how much diesel fuel Wayne is buying, et cetera. -- Proud to be a Liberal. Ha! Pokin' at the bear again. === It would be interesting to hear Harry's version of how cops are supposed to handle unruly people who are resisting arrest. Start by saying, "Can't we all just be friends?" No surprise...Wayne is a fan of police beating up unarmed civilians, too. Answer his question, Mr. 'Rause. You think you have all the answers. Or is this one you'd choose to skip. A bit hard maybe, eh? If a gang of cops can't restrain an unarmed civilian without beating the crap out of him, they need more training or a different job. That's your answer, asswipe. Sounds to me like you have never had to restrain a belligerent, 20 year old drunk while he's calling you a "****ing racist" over and over. Cops are trained to gain control of a situation as rapidly as possible to avoid injury to themselves, the person being arrested or to bystanders. Sorry the kid got a bump on the head in the process. My small wife was trained to restrain out of control mental health patients, and to do it with the help of one or two other mental healh professionals. She received this training at a large state mental hospital in Florida, where many dangerous "forensic" patients are housed and treated, people I suspect are far more dangerous than the average unarmed kid you find outside a college drinking joint. She's only had to do this twice in her career, thankfully. The cops use excess force because their training is not sufficient, the violent ones are not weeded out, and they know they can get away with it. Sorry Harry. That's a bit too much to swallow. What does your wife use, the Vulcan nerve pinch made famous by Mr. Spock? |
Overarmed, Undertrained, and Racist.
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 10:16:04 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/20/15 10:06 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 3/20/2015 9:41 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 9:31 AM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 09:19:26 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 9:13 AM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 08:43:41 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 05:05:00 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Friday, March 20, 2015 at 4:40:28 AM UTC-7, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 7:27 AM, Tim wrote: Ha! Pokin' at the bear again. Yeah, I suppose it is *ok* with you righties that the police all across 'Merica are beating up and sometimes killing *unarmed* civilians. But, hey, why discuss it, eh? I mean, there are so many more important topics to discuss: golf, RV'ing, model airplanes, how much diesel fuel Wayne is buying, et cetera. -- Proud to be a Liberal. Ha! Pokin' at the bear again. === It would be interesting to hear Harry's version of how cops are supposed to handle unruly people who are resisting arrest. Start by saying, "Can't we all just be friends?" No surprise...Wayne is a fan of police beating up unarmed civilians, too. Answer his question, Mr. 'Rause. You think you have all the answers. Or is this one you'd choose to skip. A bit hard maybe, eh? If a gang of cops can't restrain an unarmed civilian without beating the crap out of him, they need more training or a different job. That's your answer, asswipe. Sounds to me like you have never had to restrain a belligerent, 20 year old drunk while he's calling you a "****ing racist" over and over. Cops are trained to gain control of a situation as rapidly as possible to avoid injury to themselves, the person being arrested or to bystanders. Sorry the kid got a bump on the head in the process. My small wife was trained to restrain out of control mental health patients, and to do it with the help of one or two other mental healh professionals. She received this training at a large state mental hospital in Florida, where many dangerous "forensic" patients are housed and treated, people I suspect are far more dangerous than the average unarmed kid you find outside a college drinking joint. How many times did she go around Cape Horn with you? And, in hospitals unruly patients are subdued with drugs or a straightjacket. Been there and helped with both. And, the floors are not concrete. Yes, 'Arry, I've seen patients taken down. She's only had to do this twice in her career, thankfully. The cops use excess force because their training is not sufficient, the violent ones are not weeded out, and they know they can get away with it. There you go, bringing up your wife again. Weren't you just whining about that a couple days ago? Where's Mr. BAO? -- Guns don't cause problems. The behavior of the owner causes problems. |
Overarmed, Undertrained, and Racist.
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 10:19:49 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 3/20/2015 10:05 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 10:02 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 3/20/2015 8:43 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 05:05:00 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Friday, March 20, 2015 at 4:40:28 AM UTC-7, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 7:27 AM, Tim wrote: Ha! Pokin' at the bear again. Yeah, I suppose it is *ok* with you righties that the police all across 'Merica are beating up and sometimes killing *unarmed* civilians. But, hey, why discuss it, eh? I mean, there are so many more important topics to discuss: golf, RV'ing, model airplanes, how much diesel fuel Wayne is buying, et cetera. -- Proud to be a Liberal. Ha! Pokin' at the bear again. === It would be interesting to hear Harry's version of how cops are supposed to handle unruly people who are resisting arrest. No ****. The kid at UVA was underage, trying to get into a bar, was reported to be intoxicated and belligerent and calling the arresting cops "****ing racists". Gets a bump on the head in the scuffle and needs some stitches. Whoopie. This is getting all kinds of media coverage and generating protests claiming police brutality. Meanwhile, you don't hear too much about the other recent incident in Ferguson. Punk shoots a .40 cal pistol out of his car window and hits two cops. First he admits firing the pistol but swears he wasn't aiming at the cops. He says it was a dispute with someone near his car. Then, that story was changed and he was "assaulted". He used his gun to defend himself under "stand your ground". But now, after lawyering up, he has recanted everything and claims he had nothing to do with it, didn't have or shoot the gun. But we don't hear much about this in the media. The kid didn't call the cops "****ing racists" until they beat the **** out of him and he was on the ground, bleeding. And it should get coverage and protests. Thug cops. The Ferguson shooting was all over "the media" I watch and read. The cops "beat the **** out of him'? I've seen the video of the arrest. I didn't see any "beating the **** out of him". They were doing what cops do to belligerent drunks to gain control of the situation. Gosh, sounds like we watched the same video. -- Guns don't cause problems. The behavior of the owner causes problems. |
Overarmed, Undertrained, and Racist.
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 10:24:17 -0400, Justan Olphart wrote:
On 3/20/2015 9:59 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 9:56 AM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 09:41:27 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 9:31 AM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 09:19:26 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 9:13 AM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 08:43:41 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 05:05:00 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Friday, March 20, 2015 at 4:40:28 AM UTC-7, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 7:27 AM, Tim wrote: Ha! Pokin' at the bear again. Yeah, I suppose it is *ok* with you righties that the police all across 'Merica are beating up and sometimes killing *unarmed* civilians. But, hey, why discuss it, eh? I mean, there are so many more important topics to discuss: golf, RV'ing, model airplanes, how much diesel fuel Wayne is buying, et cetera. -- Proud to be a Liberal. Ha! Pokin' at the bear again. === It would be interesting to hear Harry's version of how cops are supposed to handle unruly people who are resisting arrest. Start by saying, "Can't we all just be friends?" No surprise...Wayne is a fan of police beating up unarmed civilians, too. Answer his question, Mr. 'Rause. You think you have all the answers. Or is this one you'd choose to skip. A bit hard maybe, eh? If a gang of cops can't restrain an unarmed civilian without beating the crap out of him, they need more training or a different job. That's your answer, asswipe. Read the question. How are cops supposed to handle unruly people resisting arrest? You who think you have all the answers should be able to handle that. D'oh. They are supposed to *restrain*, not beat the **** out of or shoot. Restrain. Got it? Restrain. There are many ways to do this properly without inflicting undue physical punishment on a person. Like smashing an alleged burglar up against your driveway and breaking his legs with your Ford 150s chrome bumper? I seem to remember that story. Didn't 'the burglar' turn out to be a neighbor wanting to borrow a shovel or something? -- Guns don't cause problems. The behavior of the owner causes problems. |
Overarmed, Undertrained, and Racist.
On 3/20/2015 10:25 AM, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 10:05:32 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 10:02 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 3/20/2015 8:43 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 05:05:00 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Friday, March 20, 2015 at 4:40:28 AM UTC-7, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 7:27 AM, Tim wrote: Ha! Pokin' at the bear again. Yeah, I suppose it is *ok* with you righties that the police all across 'Merica are beating up and sometimes killing *unarmed* civilians. But, hey, why discuss it, eh? I mean, there are so many more important topics to discuss: golf, RV'ing, model airplanes, how much diesel fuel Wayne is buying, et cetera. -- Proud to be a Liberal. Ha! Pokin' at the bear again. === It would be interesting to hear Harry's version of how cops are supposed to handle unruly people who are resisting arrest. No ****. The kid at UVA was underage, trying to get into a bar, was reported to be intoxicated and belligerent and calling the arresting cops "****ing racists". Gets a bump on the head in the scuffle and needs some stitches. Whoopie. This is getting all kinds of media coverage and generating protests claiming police brutality. Meanwhile, you don't hear too much about the other recent incident in Ferguson. Punk shoots a .40 cal pistol out of his car window and hits two cops. First he admits firing the pistol but swears he wasn't aiming at the cops. He says it was a dispute with someone near his car. Then, that story was changed and he was "assaulted". He used his gun to defend himself under "stand your ground". But now, after lawyering up, he has recanted everything and claims he had nothing to do with it, didn't have or shoot the gun. But we don't hear much about this in the media. The kid didn't call the cops "****ing racists" until they beat the **** out of him and he was on the ground, bleeding. And it should get coverage and protests. Thug cops. No beating took place. As usual you grossly overexagerate what transpired. We have a lot of Canada geese around here who are full of **** also. The Ferguson shooting was all over "the media" I watch and read. Yup, the initial shooting was all over the media. Then they caught a guy. Most of the articles I read didn't mention his race at all. Since then there's been almost nothing. It's obvious you've never engaged in enough activity to have cut your head. Then you'd know where all the blood came from. Maybe it was ketchup. -- Respectfully submitted by Justan Laugh of the day from Krause "I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here. I've been "born again" as a nice guy." |
Overarmed, Undertrained, and Racist.
On 3/20/15 10:30 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 3/20/2015 10:16 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 10:06 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 3/20/2015 9:41 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 9:31 AM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 09:19:26 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 9:13 AM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 08:43:41 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 05:05:00 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Friday, March 20, 2015 at 4:40:28 AM UTC-7, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 7:27 AM, Tim wrote: Ha! Pokin' at the bear again. Yeah, I suppose it is *ok* with you righties that the police all across 'Merica are beating up and sometimes killing *unarmed* civilians. But, hey, why discuss it, eh? I mean, there are so many more important topics to discuss: golf, RV'ing, model airplanes, how much diesel fuel Wayne is buying, et cetera. -- Proud to be a Liberal. Ha! Pokin' at the bear again. === It would be interesting to hear Harry's version of how cops are supposed to handle unruly people who are resisting arrest. Start by saying, "Can't we all just be friends?" No surprise...Wayne is a fan of police beating up unarmed civilians, too. Answer his question, Mr. 'Rause. You think you have all the answers. Or is this one you'd choose to skip. A bit hard maybe, eh? If a gang of cops can't restrain an unarmed civilian without beating the crap out of him, they need more training or a different job. That's your answer, asswipe. Sounds to me like you have never had to restrain a belligerent, 20 year old drunk while he's calling you a "****ing racist" over and over. Cops are trained to gain control of a situation as rapidly as possible to avoid injury to themselves, the person being arrested or to bystanders. Sorry the kid got a bump on the head in the process. My small wife was trained to restrain out of control mental health patients, and to do it with the help of one or two other mental healh professionals. She received this training at a large state mental hospital in Florida, where many dangerous "forensic" patients are housed and treated, people I suspect are far more dangerous than the average unarmed kid you find outside a college drinking joint. She's only had to do this twice in her career, thankfully. The cops use excess force because their training is not sufficient, the violent ones are not weeded out, and they know they can get away with it. Sorry Harry. That's a bit too much to swallow. What does your wife use, the Vulcan nerve pinch made famous by Mr. Spock? I have no idea, but she and other workers did it twice, without injury to anyone. I do recall that one of the patients was a really large woman who had murdered someone, was judged insane, and managed to first slam a heavy steel door on a worker, cutting off one of the worker's fingers. Then my wife and two others restrained the woman, and got her under control. Without hitting her. It's always interesting to me that here on rec.boats those without any particular experience in matters such as I've described think they are experts. I'm confident that any two or three properly trained mental health workers could restrain just about any unarmed person without causing serious injury. You work in a forensic hospital, you get training. Lots of training. -- Proud to be a Liberal. |
Overarmed, Undertrained, and Racist.
On 3/20/15 10:34 AM, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 10:24:17 -0400, Justan Olphart wrote: On 3/20/2015 9:59 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 9:56 AM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 09:41:27 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 9:31 AM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 09:19:26 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 9:13 AM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 08:43:41 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 05:05:00 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Friday, March 20, 2015 at 4:40:28 AM UTC-7, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 7:27 AM, Tim wrote: Ha! Pokin' at the bear again. Yeah, I suppose it is *ok* with you righties that the police all across 'Merica are beating up and sometimes killing *unarmed* civilians. But, hey, why discuss it, eh? I mean, there are so many more important topics to discuss: golf, RV'ing, model airplanes, how much diesel fuel Wayne is buying, et cetera. -- Proud to be a Liberal. Ha! Pokin' at the bear again. === It would be interesting to hear Harry's version of how cops are supposed to handle unruly people who are resisting arrest. Start by saying, "Can't we all just be friends?" No surprise...Wayne is a fan of police beating up unarmed civilians, too. Answer his question, Mr. 'Rause. You think you have all the answers. Or is this one you'd choose to skip. A bit hard maybe, eh? If a gang of cops can't restrain an unarmed civilian without beating the crap out of him, they need more training or a different job. That's your answer, asswipe. Read the question. How are cops supposed to handle unruly people resisting arrest? You who think you have all the answers should be able to handle that. D'oh. They are supposed to *restrain*, not beat the **** out of or shoot. Restrain. Got it? Restrain. There are many ways to do this properly without inflicting undue physical punishment on a person. Like smashing an alleged burglar up against your driveway and breaking his legs with your Ford 150s chrome bumper? I seem to remember that story. Didn't 'the burglar' turn out to be a neighbor wanting to borrow a shovel or something? You should get yourself tested for Alzheimer's. -- Proud to be a Liberal. |
Overarmed, Undertrained, and Racist.
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 10:50:32 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/20/15 10:30 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 3/20/2015 10:16 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 10:06 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 3/20/2015 9:41 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 9:31 AM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 09:19:26 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 9:13 AM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 08:43:41 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 05:05:00 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Friday, March 20, 2015 at 4:40:28 AM UTC-7, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 7:27 AM, Tim wrote: Ha! Pokin' at the bear again. Yeah, I suppose it is *ok* with you righties that the police all across 'Merica are beating up and sometimes killing *unarmed* civilians. But, hey, why discuss it, eh? I mean, there are so many more important topics to discuss: golf, RV'ing, model airplanes, how much diesel fuel Wayne is buying, et cetera. -- Proud to be a Liberal. Ha! Pokin' at the bear again. === It would be interesting to hear Harry's version of how cops are supposed to handle unruly people who are resisting arrest. Start by saying, "Can't we all just be friends?" No surprise...Wayne is a fan of police beating up unarmed civilians, too. Answer his question, Mr. 'Rause. You think you have all the answers. Or is this one you'd choose to skip. A bit hard maybe, eh? If a gang of cops can't restrain an unarmed civilian without beating the crap out of him, they need more training or a different job. That's your answer, asswipe. Sounds to me like you have never had to restrain a belligerent, 20 year old drunk while he's calling you a "****ing racist" over and over. Cops are trained to gain control of a situation as rapidly as possible to avoid injury to themselves, the person being arrested or to bystanders. Sorry the kid got a bump on the head in the process. My small wife was trained to restrain out of control mental health patients, and to do it with the help of one or two other mental healh professionals. She received this training at a large state mental hospital in Florida, where many dangerous "forensic" patients are housed and treated, people I suspect are far more dangerous than the average unarmed kid you find outside a college drinking joint. She's only had to do this twice in her career, thankfully. The cops use excess force because their training is not sufficient, the violent ones are not weeded out, and they know they can get away with it. Sorry Harry. That's a bit too much to swallow. What does your wife use, the Vulcan nerve pinch made famous by Mr. Spock? I have no idea, but she and other workers did it twice, without injury to anyone. I do recall that one of the patients was a really large woman who had murdered someone, was judged insane, and managed to first slam a heavy steel door on a worker, cutting off one of the worker's fingers. Then my wife and two others restrained the woman, and got her under control. Without hitting her. I did not see the cops striking the kid. Did you? If you are saying the orderlies did not take the woman to the ground, after she cut off a finger with a door, then I believe you are telling another lie. It's always interesting to me that here on rec.boats those without any particular experience in matters such as I've described think they are experts. I'm confident that any two or three properly trained mental health workers could restrain just about any unarmed person without causing serious injury. You work in a forensic hospital, you get training. Lots of training. Unarmed? Did the cops know the kid was unarmed? Should cops treat all unruly individuals as 'unarmed'? Do you have any idea how full of **** you sound? Ah yes, all law enforcement officers should have a bachelors degree in social work as part of their training to become qualified. -- Guns don't cause problems. The behavior of the owner causes problems. |
Overarmed, Undertrained, and Racist.
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 10:38:16 -0400, Justan Olphart wrote:
On 3/20/2015 10:25 AM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 10:05:32 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 10:02 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 3/20/2015 8:43 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 05:05:00 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Friday, March 20, 2015 at 4:40:28 AM UTC-7, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 7:27 AM, Tim wrote: Ha! Pokin' at the bear again. Yeah, I suppose it is *ok* with you righties that the police all across 'Merica are beating up and sometimes killing *unarmed* civilians. But, hey, why discuss it, eh? I mean, there are so many more important topics to discuss: golf, RV'ing, model airplanes, how much diesel fuel Wayne is buying, et cetera. -- Proud to be a Liberal. Ha! Pokin' at the bear again. === It would be interesting to hear Harry's version of how cops are supposed to handle unruly people who are resisting arrest. No ****. The kid at UVA was underage, trying to get into a bar, was reported to be intoxicated and belligerent and calling the arresting cops "****ing racists". Gets a bump on the head in the scuffle and needs some stitches. Whoopie. This is getting all kinds of media coverage and generating protests claiming police brutality. Meanwhile, you don't hear too much about the other recent incident in Ferguson. Punk shoots a .40 cal pistol out of his car window and hits two cops. First he admits firing the pistol but swears he wasn't aiming at the cops. He says it was a dispute with someone near his car. Then, that story was changed and he was "assaulted". He used his gun to defend himself under "stand your ground". But now, after lawyering up, he has recanted everything and claims he had nothing to do with it, didn't have or shoot the gun. But we don't hear much about this in the media. The kid didn't call the cops "****ing racists" until they beat the **** out of him and he was on the ground, bleeding. And it should get coverage and protests. Thug cops. No beating took place. As usual you grossly overexagerate what transpired. We have a lot of Canada geese around here who are full of **** also. The Ferguson shooting was all over "the media" I watch and read. Yup, the initial shooting was all over the media. Then they caught a guy. Most of the articles I read didn't mention his race at all. Since then there's been almost nothing. It's obvious you've never engaged in enough activity to have cut your head. Then you'd know where all the blood came from. Maybe it was ketchup. One article said he got ten stitches 'the next morning'. Wonder why he waited? Don't reckon his lawyer had anything to do with the stitches. -- Guns don't cause problems. The behavior of the owner causes problems. |
Overarmed, Undertrained, and Racist.
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 10:43:06 -0400, wrote:
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 06:37:58 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Colonel Klink's boys? http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/...review-n326226 I am waiting to find out what really happened. Here's the best video I've seen yet. https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...&v=0faIzE0TSJA -- Guns don't cause problems. The behavior of the owner causes problems. |
Overarmed, Undertrained, and Racist.
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 09:19:26 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 3/20/15 9:13 AM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 08:43:41 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 05:05:00 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Friday, March 20, 2015 at 4:40:28 AM UTC-7, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 7:27 AM, Tim wrote: Ha! Pokin' at the bear again. Yeah, I suppose it is *ok* with you righties that the police all across 'Merica are beating up and sometimes killing *unarmed* civilians. But, hey, why discuss it, eh? I mean, there are so many more important topics to discuss: golf, RV'ing, model airplanes, how much diesel fuel Wayne is buying, et cetera. -- Proud to be a Liberal. Ha! Pokin' at the bear again. === It would be interesting to hear Harry's version of how cops are supposed to handle unruly people who are resisting arrest. Start by saying, "Can't we all just be friends?" No surprise...Wayne is a fan of police beating up unarmed civilians, too. === No, Wayne is a fan of the police doing their job. Anyone who resists arrest should expect to have a bad day. That's just the way it works. |
Overarmed, Undertrained, and Racist.
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 10:02:50 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: Meanwhile, you don't hear too much about the other recent incident in Ferguson. Punk shoots a .40 cal pistol out of his car window and hits two cops. First he admits firing the pistol but swears he wasn't aiming at the cops. He says it was a dispute with someone near his car. Then, that story was changed and he was "assaulted". He used his gun to defend himself under "stand your ground". But now, after lawyering up, he has recanted everything and claims he had nothing to do with it, didn't have or shoot the gun. But we don't hear much about this in the media. === Garden variety liars don't make for an interesting story on the news. |
Overarmed, Undertrained, and Racist.
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 09:19:51 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: Isn't it time for you to trade your boat before the warranty runs out? That would be a good topic to discuss. What boat? The one you'll never be invited out on a ride on. === The nice thing about imaginary boats is that they are very economical to opertate and maintain. |
Overarmed, Undertrained, and Racist.
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 09:34:40 -0400, John H.
wrote: I don't whine, asswipe. I simply point out the bad behavior of you and your fellow conservatrashers. TOAD, you're nothing but a whiner. A lying whiner to boot. === A lying deadbeat, tax cheat, fraud artist, double bankrupt whiner. |
Overarmed, Undertrained, and Racist.
On 3/20/2015 10:50 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/20/15 10:30 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 3/20/2015 10:16 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 10:06 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 3/20/2015 9:41 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 9:31 AM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 09:19:26 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 9:13 AM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 08:43:41 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 05:05:00 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Friday, March 20, 2015 at 4:40:28 AM UTC-7, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 7:27 AM, Tim wrote: Ha! Pokin' at the bear again. Yeah, I suppose it is *ok* with you righties that the police all across 'Merica are beating up and sometimes killing *unarmed* civilians. But, hey, why discuss it, eh? I mean, there are so many more important topics to discuss: golf, RV'ing, model airplanes, how much diesel fuel Wayne is buying, et cetera. -- Proud to be a Liberal. Ha! Pokin' at the bear again. === It would be interesting to hear Harry's version of how cops are supposed to handle unruly people who are resisting arrest. Start by saying, "Can't we all just be friends?" No surprise...Wayne is a fan of police beating up unarmed civilians, too. Answer his question, Mr. 'Rause. You think you have all the answers. Or is this one you'd choose to skip. A bit hard maybe, eh? If a gang of cops can't restrain an unarmed civilian without beating the crap out of him, they need more training or a different job. That's your answer, asswipe. Sounds to me like you have never had to restrain a belligerent, 20 year old drunk while he's calling you a "****ing racist" over and over. Cops are trained to gain control of a situation as rapidly as possible to avoid injury to themselves, the person being arrested or to bystanders. Sorry the kid got a bump on the head in the process. My small wife was trained to restrain out of control mental health patients, and to do it with the help of one or two other mental healh professionals. She received this training at a large state mental hospital in Florida, where many dangerous "forensic" patients are housed and treated, people I suspect are far more dangerous than the average unarmed kid you find outside a college drinking joint. She's only had to do this twice in her career, thankfully. The cops use excess force because their training is not sufficient, the violent ones are not weeded out, and they know they can get away with it. Sorry Harry. That's a bit too much to swallow. What does your wife use, the Vulcan nerve pinch made famous by Mr. Spock? I have no idea, but she and other workers did it twice, without injury to anyone. I do recall that one of the patients was a really large woman who had murdered someone, was judged insane, and managed to first slam a heavy steel door on a worker, cutting off one of the worker's fingers. Then my wife and two others restrained the woman, and got her under control. Without hitting her. It's always interesting to me that here on rec.boats those without any particular experience in matters such as I've described think they are experts. I'm confident that any two or three properly trained mental health workers could restrain just about any unarmed person without causing serious injury. You work in a forensic hospital, you get training. Lots of training. Does your wife bite? ;) -- Respectfully submitted by Justan Laugh of the day from Krause "I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here. I've been "born again" as a nice guy." |
Overarmed, Undertrained, and Racist.
On 3/20/15 1:38 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 12:41:30 -0400, John H. wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 12:24:30 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 11:30:11 -0400, John H. wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 10:43:06 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 06:37:58 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Colonel Klink's boys? http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/...review-n326226 I am waiting to find out what really happened. Here's the best video I've seen yet. https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...&v=0faIzE0TSJA We still have no actual story about what got the kid arrested in the first place. His lawyer says he was not drunk but I haven't seen any report of his actual BAC and we do not know if other drugs are involved. Wait and see what happened before we jump to any conclusions. I trust this will be investigated like the Kennedy assassination and it will all come out soon enough. Until then, isn't there something more important we should be obsessing about? There is always Benghazi ;-) Can you just imagine what a story this would have been had the kid been white? The lefties here would be saying he got what he deserved for opposing government authority. If he were white, he probably wouldn't have been assaulted by the booze cops. -- Proud to be a Liberal. |
Overarmed, Undertrained, and Racist.
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 14:16:57 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: If he were white, he probably wouldn't have been assaulted by the booze cops. === If he were white and behaving just as badly he would have been treated the same way. You should try it for yourself and report back to us. |
Overarmed, Undertrained, and Racist.
On 3/20/2015 2:16 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/20/15 1:38 PM, wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 12:41:30 -0400, John H. wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 12:24:30 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 11:30:11 -0400, John H. wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 10:43:06 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 06:37:58 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Colonel Klink's boys? http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/...review-n326226 I am waiting to find out what really happened. Here's the best video I've seen yet. https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...&v=0faIzE0TSJA We still have no actual story about what got the kid arrested in the first place. His lawyer says he was not drunk but I haven't seen any report of his actual BAC and we do not know if other drugs are involved. Wait and see what happened before we jump to any conclusions. I trust this will be investigated like the Kennedy assassination and it will all come out soon enough. Until then, isn't there something more important we should be obsessing about? There is always Benghazi ;-) Can you just imagine what a story this would have been had the kid been white? The lefties here would be saying he got what he deserved for opposing government authority. If he were white, he probably wouldn't have been assaulted by the booze cops. Funny stuff. Drunk whites are restrained by cops every day. Just doesn't make the national news and generate protests. |
Overarmed, Undertrained, and Racist.
On 3/20/15 2:46 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 3/20/2015 2:16 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 1:38 PM, wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 12:41:30 -0400, John H. wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 12:24:30 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 11:30:11 -0400, John H. wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 10:43:06 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 06:37:58 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Colonel Klink's boys? http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/...review-n326226 I am waiting to find out what really happened. Here's the best video I've seen yet. https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...&v=0faIzE0TSJA We still have no actual story about what got the kid arrested in the first place. His lawyer says he was not drunk but I haven't seen any report of his actual BAC and we do not know if other drugs are involved. Wait and see what happened before we jump to any conclusions. I trust this will be investigated like the Kennedy assassination and it will all come out soon enough. Until then, isn't there something more important we should be obsessing about? There is always Benghazi ;-) Can you just imagine what a story this would have been had the kid been white? The lefties here would be saying he got what he deserved for opposing government authority. If he were white, he probably wouldn't have been assaulted by the booze cops. Funny stuff. Drunk whites are restrained by cops every day. Just doesn't make the national news and generate protests. We're not talking about restraining...we're talking about a gang of thug cops beating up a college kid. -- Proud to be a Liberal. |
Overarmed, Undertrained, and Racist.
On 3/20/2015 2:50 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/20/15 2:46 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 3/20/2015 2:16 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/20/15 1:38 PM, wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 12:41:30 -0400, John H. wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 12:24:30 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 11:30:11 -0400, John H. wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 10:43:06 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 06:37:58 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Colonel Klink's boys? http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/...review-n326226 I am waiting to find out what really happened. Here's the best video I've seen yet. https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...&v=0faIzE0TSJA We still have no actual story about what got the kid arrested in the first place. His lawyer says he was not drunk but I haven't seen any report of his actual BAC and we do not know if other drugs are involved. Wait and see what happened before we jump to any conclusions. I trust this will be investigated like the Kennedy assassination and it will all come out soon enough. Until then, isn't there something more important we should be obsessing about? There is always Benghazi ;-) Can you just imagine what a story this would have been had the kid been white? The lefties here would be saying he got what he deserved for opposing government authority. If he were white, he probably wouldn't have been assaulted by the booze cops. Funny stuff. Drunk whites are restrained by cops every day. Just doesn't make the national news and generate protests. We're not talking about restraining...we're talking about a gang of thug cops beating up a college kid. Sorry. I left out the adjective, "forcibly" before "restraining". There's no evidence anyone was "beat up" in this instance. |
Overarmed, Undertrained, and Racist.
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 14:50:52 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: We're not talking about restraining...we're talking about a gang of thug cops beating up a college kid. === That's nonsense and you know it. |
Overarmed, Undertrained, and Racist.
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 17:49:21 -0400, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 14:50:52 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: We're not talking about restraining...we're talking about a gang of thug cops beating up a college kid. === That's nonsense and you know it. Not according to these folks: "His treatment was unprovoked as he did not resist questioning or arrest. In confusion, with blood painting his face and creating a pool on the bricks of the corner, he yelled out for mercy. Though he lay bleeding and crying out, officers continued to hold him to the pavement, pinning him down, twisting his arm, with knees to his back until he was handcuffed." http://www.theroot.com/articles/news..._officers.html He wasn't calling anyone a '****ing racist', he was simply asking for mercy. -- Guns don't cause problems. The behavior of the owner causes problems. |
Overarmed, Undertrained, and Racist.
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 21:37:36 -0400, wrote:
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 18:14:49 -0400, John H. wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 17:49:21 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 14:50:52 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: We're not talking about restraining...we're talking about a gang of thug cops beating up a college kid. === That's nonsense and you know it. Not according to these folks: "His treatment was unprovoked as he did not resist questioning or arrest. In confusion, with blood painting his face and creating a pool on the bricks of the corner, he yelled out for mercy. Though he lay bleeding and crying out, officers continued to hold him to the pavement, pinning him down, twisting his arm, with knees to his back until he was handcuffed." http://www.theroot.com/articles/news..._officers.html He wasn't calling anyone a '****ing racist', he was simply asking for mercy. Well we have the video of him calling the cops ****ing racists so that is debunked a bit. I suppose he might have said "freakin" but CNN beeped it anyway. Hell, the video was in the same article. He was clearly saying '****ing racists' over and over. -- Guns don't cause problems. The behavior of the owner causes problems. |
Overarmed, Undertrained, and Racist.
On 3/21/2015 7:43 AM, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 21:37:36 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 18:14:49 -0400, John H. wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 17:49:21 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 14:50:52 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: We're not talking about restraining...we're talking about a gang of thug cops beating up a college kid. === That's nonsense and you know it. Not according to these folks: "His treatment was unprovoked as he did not resist questioning or arrest. In confusion, with blood painting his face and creating a pool on the bricks of the corner, he yelled out for mercy. Though he lay bleeding and crying out, officers continued to hold him to the pavement, pinning him down, twisting his arm, with knees to his back until he was handcuffed." http://www.theroot.com/articles/news..._officers.html He wasn't calling anyone a '****ing racist', he was simply asking for mercy. Well we have the video of him calling the cops ****ing racists so that is debunked a bit. I suppose he might have said "freakin" but CNN beeped it anyway. Hell, the video was in the same article. He was clearly saying '****ing racists' over and over. Why should we form an opinion based on a video presented by CNN if they edit out key evidence? -- Respectfully submitted by Justan Laugh of the day from Krause "I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here. I've been "born again" as a nice guy." |
Overarmed, Undertrained, and Racist.
On Sat, 21 Mar 2015 07:48:56 -0400, Justan Olphart wrote:
On 3/21/2015 7:43 AM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 21:37:36 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 18:14:49 -0400, John H. wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 17:49:21 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 14:50:52 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: We're not talking about restraining...we're talking about a gang of thug cops beating up a college kid. === That's nonsense and you know it. Not according to these folks: "His treatment was unprovoked as he did not resist questioning or arrest. In confusion, with blood painting his face and creating a pool on the bricks of the corner, he yelled out for mercy. Though he lay bleeding and crying out, officers continued to hold him to the pavement, pinning him down, twisting his arm, with knees to his back until he was handcuffed." http://www.theroot.com/articles/news..._officers.html He wasn't calling anyone a '****ing racist', he was simply asking for mercy. Well we have the video of him calling the cops ****ing racists so that is debunked a bit. I suppose he might have said "freakin" but CNN beeped it anyway. Hell, the video was in the same article. He was clearly saying '****ing racists' over and over. Why should we form an opinion based on a video presented by CNN if they edit out key evidence? Check out this video, taken by the guy who wants to become famous for saying 'he's bleeding'. https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...&v=0faIzE0TSJA Note also the number of students, black and white, who walk on by as though this were a pretty regular occurrence. -- Guns don't cause problems. The behavior of the owner causes problems. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:12 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com