10 Reasons Why...
 

....the flap over Hillary's emails will not result in Republicans winning
the 2016 presidential election:

http://tinyurl.com/prbmr9t
--
Proud to be a Liberal.

10 Reasons Why...
 

On Tuesday, March 3, 2015 at 7:32:11 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
...the flap over Hillary's emails will not result in Republicans winning
the 2016 presidential election:

http://tinyurl.com/prbmr9t
--
Proud to be a Liberal.

NO ONE CARES...**** OFF ****.

10 Reasons Why...
 

On Tue, 03 Mar 2015 19:32:07 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

...the flap over Hillary's emails will not result in Republicans winning
the 2016 presidential election:

http://tinyurl.com/prbmr9t

Huntin' attention Krause?
--

Guns don't cause problems. The behavior
of certain gun owners causes problems.

10 Reasons Why...
 

On 3/3/15 7:43 PM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 03 Mar 2015 19:32:07 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

...the flap over Hillary's emails will not result in Republicans winning
the 2016 presidential election:

http://tinyurl.com/prbmr9t

Huntin' attention Krause?


Go play with your new boat, Colonel Klink

http://tinyurl.com/mm2vfm4

--
Proud to be a Liberal.

10 Reasons Why...
 

On Tue, 03 Mar 2015 21:16:07 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 03 Mar 2015 19:32:07 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

...the flap over Hillary's emails will not result in Republicans winning
the 2016 presidential election:

http://tinyurl.com/prbmr9t

Unfortunately you are right. That is a pretty weak slate of candidates

but I don't see anything better from the democrats.

Another Clinton?
Shotgun Joe Biden?
Then it really goes down fast from there
Mary Landrieu ... really ?
The only hopeful more likely to do time is Menendez
Cuomo
Schumer
Warren
Warner
Nelson
Another Nixon??
Pretty weak stuff

I might be interested in Brian Schweitzer but I doubt he could get
the nomination because he has zero national name recignition and no
foreign policy cred.

===

I'm not a particularly big fan of Andrew Cuomo but he's probably the
pick of the litter.