On 1/21/15 3:05 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/21/15 1:58 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 13:24:07 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/21/15 1:10 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 12:28:19 -0500, Justan Olphart
wrote:

On 1/21/2015 11:32 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:


Another Conservative Icon Goes Down:
Holly ‘Hobby Lobby’ Fisher Admits To Cheating On Her Veteran Husband

Why would someone with an interest in promoting peace and tranquility in
this newsgroup post inflamatory crap like this?

===

Because he's an asshat.



Ahh, nice name calling, Wayne. And to your buddy, who resides in my
filter septic tank, I never said I was interested in "promoting peace
and tranquility" in this newsgroup.

Once again, for those who have problems understanding what they read:

I was told that *my* name-calling/alleged harassment of other posters in
this newsgroup was the cause of the vile atmosphere in here. So, about a
month ago, I stopped that, and I haven't resumed.

My experiment, simply stated, was that I was not *the* cause, and that
other posters would continue their name calling, no matter what.

I was correct.

If you don't like my posts or if you have no way to comment on them as
an adult, you can always *not* comment.

Or, as you two have done, you can continue to engage in name calling.

Have nice day.

===

"If you don't like my posts or if you have no way to comment on them
as an adult, you can always *not* comment."

If you continue to post inflamatory trolls for purely gratuitous
reasons on your part, expect to be called what you are.

Have nice day yourself.


Ahh, so you are the self-appointed arbiter of what is inflammatory. And
you think I post for gratuitous reasons.

Well, Wayne, you are not *the* arbiter and you don't know why I post some
of what I post here.

Perhaps you might expend some of your "deputy sheriff" time here
regularly going after a few of your right-wing buddies, who seemingly
never post anything but snarly remarks about other posters.

I'm sure it'll happen regularly when...

http://tinyurl.com/q6ldoue




If you act as an asshat in Wayne's opinion, he has the right to call you an
asshat.



The point is not the name or Wayne's opinion, Bill, it's the name
calling. There have been many pleas here to end the name calling,
including from those who are continuing to call names. Apparently, those
calls were little more than lip service, eh?

--
Proud to be a Liberal.

On Wednesday, January 21, 2015 at 3:08:10 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/21/15 3:05 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/21/15 1:58 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 13:24:07 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/21/15 1:10 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 12:28:19 -0500, Justan Olphart
wrote:

On 1/21/2015 11:32 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:


Another Conservative Icon Goes Down:
Holly 'Hobby Lobby' Fisher Admits To Cheating On Her Veteran Husband

Why would someone with an interest in promoting peace and tranquility in
this newsgroup post inflamatory crap like this?

===

Because he's an asshat.



Ahh, nice name calling, Wayne. And to your buddy, who resides in my
filter septic tank, I never said I was interested in "promoting peace
and tranquility" in this newsgroup.

Once again, for those who have problems understanding what they read:

I was told that *my* name-calling/alleged harassment of other posters in
this newsgroup was the cause of the vile atmosphere in here. So, about a
month ago, I stopped that, and I haven't resumed.

My experiment, simply stated, was that I was not *the* cause, and that
other posters would continue their name calling, no matter what.

I was correct.

If you don't like my posts or if you have no way to comment on them as
an adult, you can always *not* comment.

Or, as you two have done, you can continue to engage in name calling..

Have nice day.

===

"If you don't like my posts or if you have no way to comment on them
as an adult, you can always *not* comment."

If you continue to post inflamatory trolls for purely gratuitous
reasons on your part, expect to be called what you are.

Have nice day yourself.


Ahh, so you are the self-appointed arbiter of what is inflammatory. And
you think I post for gratuitous reasons.

Well, Wayne, you are not *the* arbiter and you don't know why I post some
of what I post here.

Perhaps you might expend some of your "deputy sheriff" time here
regularly going after a few of your right-wing buddies, who seemingly
never post anything but snarly remarks about other posters.

I'm sure it'll happen regularly when...

http://tinyurl.com/q6ldoue




If you act as an asshat in Wayne's opinion, he has the right to call you an
asshat.



The point is not the name or Wayne's opinion, Bill, it's the name
calling. There have been many pleas here to end the name calling,
including from those who are continuing to call names. Apparently, those
calls were little more than lip service, eh?

I suspect you'll be taken a little more seriously when you apply the same criticism to Don as you do to other posters here. As long as you give him a pass, you appear less than sincere.

Oh, and if you think that the name calling is the *only* thing you were/are doing that promotes the "vile" atmosphere in this NG, you'd be mistaken.

On 1/21/15 3:34 PM, wrote:
On Wednesday, January 21, 2015 at 3:08:10 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/21/15 3:05 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/21/15 1:58 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 13:24:07 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/21/15 1:10 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 12:28:19 -0500, Justan Olphart
wrote:

On 1/21/2015 11:32 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:


Another Conservative Icon Goes Down:
Holly 'Hobby Lobby' Fisher Admits To Cheating On Her Veteran Husband

Why would someone with an interest in promoting peace and tranquility in
this newsgroup post inflamatory crap like this?

===

Because he's an asshat.



Ahh, nice name calling, Wayne. And to your buddy, who resides in my
filter septic tank, I never said I was interested in "promoting peace
and tranquility" in this newsgroup.

Once again, for those who have problems understanding what they read:

I was told that *my* name-calling/alleged harassment of other posters in
this newsgroup was the cause of the vile atmosphere in here. So, about a
month ago, I stopped that, and I haven't resumed.

My experiment, simply stated, was that I was not *the* cause, and that
other posters would continue their name calling, no matter what.

I was correct.

If you don't like my posts or if you have no way to comment on them as
an adult, you can always *not* comment.

Or, as you two have done, you can continue to engage in name calling.

Have nice day.

===

"If you don't like my posts or if you have no way to comment on them
as an adult, you can always *not* comment."

If you continue to post inflamatory trolls for purely gratuitous
reasons on your part, expect to be called what you are.

Have nice day yourself.


Ahh, so you are the self-appointed arbiter of what is inflammatory. And
you think I post for gratuitous reasons.

Well, Wayne, you are not *the* arbiter and you don't know why I post some
of what I post here.

Perhaps you might expend some of your "deputy sheriff" time here
regularly going after a few of your right-wing buddies, who seemingly
never post anything but snarly remarks about other posters.

I'm sure it'll happen regularly when...

http://tinyurl.com/q6ldoue




If you act as an asshat in Wayne's opinion, he has the right to call you an
asshat.



The point is not the name or Wayne's opinion, Bill, it's the name
calling. There have been many pleas here to end the name calling,
including from those who are continuing to call names. Apparently, those
calls were little more than lip service, eh?

I suspect you'll be taken a little more seriously when you apply the same criticism to Don as you do to other posters here. As long as you give him a pass, you appear less than sincere.

Oh, and if you think that the name calling is the *only* thing you were/are doing that promotes the "vile" atmosphere in this NG, you'd be mistaken.


You are of course free to ignore or to avoid responding to any posts of
mine you don't like.

I have from time to time suggested to Don that he ignore the jerks whose
main purpose here seems to be to see if their can bait him. I have
several of those fellas down in my bozo bin, because, aside from their
constant insults, they have nothing to offer.

--
Proud to be a Liberal.

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/21/15 3:05 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/21/15 1:58 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 13:24:07 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/21/15 1:10 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 12:28:19 -0500, Justan Olphart
wrote:

On 1/21/2015 11:32 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:


Another Conservative Icon Goes Down:
Holly ‘Hobby Lobby’ Fisher Admits To Cheating On Her Veteran Husband

Why would someone with an interest in promoting peace and tranquility in
this newsgroup post inflamatory crap like this?

===

Because he's an asshat.



Ahh, nice name calling, Wayne. And to your buddy, who resides in my
filter septic tank, I never said I was interested in "promoting peace
and tranquility" in this newsgroup.

Once again, for those who have problems understanding what they read:

I was told that *my* name-calling/alleged harassment of other posters in
this newsgroup was the cause of the vile atmosphere in here. So, about a
month ago, I stopped that, and I haven't resumed.

My experiment, simply stated, was that I was not *the* cause, and that
other posters would continue their name calling, no matter what.

I was correct.

If you don't like my posts or if you have no way to comment on them as
an adult, you can always *not* comment.

Or, as you two have done, you can continue to engage in name calling.

Have nice day.

===

"If you don't like my posts or if you have no way to comment on them
as an adult, you can always *not* comment."

If you continue to post inflamatory trolls for purely gratuitous
reasons on your part, expect to be called what you are.

Have nice day yourself.


Ahh, so you are the self-appointed arbiter of what is inflammatory. And
you think I post for gratuitous reasons.

Well, Wayne, you are not *the* arbiter and you don't know why I post some
of what I post here.

Perhaps you might expend some of your "deputy sheriff" time here
regularly going after a few of your right-wing buddies, who seemingly
never post anything but snarly remarks about other posters.

I'm sure it'll happen regularly when...

http://tinyurl.com/q6ldoue




If you act as an asshat in Wayne's opinion, he has the right to call you an
asshat.



The point is not the name or Wayne's opinion, Bill, it's the name
calling. There have been many pleas here to end the name calling,
including from those who are continuing to call names. Apparently, those
calls were little more than lip service, eh?


And you seem to not be increasing the kumbaya here.

On 1/21/15 4:20 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/21/15 3:05 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/21/15 1:58 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 13:24:07 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/21/15 1:10 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 12:28:19 -0500, Justan Olphart
wrote:

On 1/21/2015 11:32 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:


Another Conservative Icon Goes Down:
Holly ‘Hobby Lobby’ Fisher Admits To Cheating On Her Veteran Husband

Why would someone with an interest in promoting peace and tranquility in
this newsgroup post inflamatory crap like this?

===

Because he's an asshat.



Ahh, nice name calling, Wayne. And to your buddy, who resides in my
filter septic tank, I never said I was interested in "promoting peace
and tranquility" in this newsgroup.

Once again, for those who have problems understanding what they read:

I was told that *my* name-calling/alleged harassment of other posters in
this newsgroup was the cause of the vile atmosphere in here. So, about a
month ago, I stopped that, and I haven't resumed.

My experiment, simply stated, was that I was not *the* cause, and that
other posters would continue their name calling, no matter what.

I was correct.

If you don't like my posts or if you have no way to comment on them as
an adult, you can always *not* comment.

Or, as you two have done, you can continue to engage in name calling.

Have nice day.

===

"If you don't like my posts or if you have no way to comment on them
as an adult, you can always *not* comment."

If you continue to post inflamatory trolls for purely gratuitous
reasons on your part, expect to be called what you are.

Have nice day yourself.


Ahh, so you are the self-appointed arbiter of what is inflammatory. And
you think I post for gratuitous reasons.

Well, Wayne, you are not *the* arbiter and you don't know why I post some
of what I post here.

Perhaps you might expend some of your "deputy sheriff" time here
regularly going after a few of your right-wing buddies, who seemingly
never post anything but snarly remarks about other posters.

I'm sure it'll happen regularly when...

http://tinyurl.com/q6ldoue




If you act as an asshat in Wayne's opinion, he has the right to call you an
asshat.



The point is not the name or Wayne's opinion, Bill, it's the name
calling. There have been many pleas here to end the name calling,
including from those who are continuing to call names. Apparently, those
calls were little more than lip service, eh?


And you seem to not be increasing the kumbaya here.


This is not a friendly place for those who do not adhere to or respect
right-wing ideology.


--
Proud to be a Liberal.

On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 16:29:57 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

This is not a friendly place for those who do not adhere to or respect
right-wing ideology.

===

Other than you, very few make a point of advocating their political
ideology or lack thereof. No one can stop you but if you'd really
like a friendlier newsgroup, you should reconsider. On the other
hand, if your main interest is to be the center of attention, then
carry on and live with the consequences.

On 1/21/15 4:45 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 16:29:57 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

This is not a friendly place for those who do not adhere to or respect
right-wing ideology.

===

Other than you, very few make a point of advocating their political
ideology or lack thereof. No one can stop you but if you'd really
like a friendlier newsgroup, you should reconsider. On the other
hand, if your main interest is to be the center of attention, then
carry on and live with the consequences.


Once again, Wayne, my experiment was not to see if this could be a
friendlier newsgroup, but to see if posters could control themselves and
their nastiness towards other posters. My personal nastiness towards
others here went on hiatus more than a month ago. Yours did not, and
neither did the nastiness of several of your buddies who share your
political ideology.

I have no interest in being the center of attention here. I think you,
the two Scotties, FlaJim, and Herring share that honor.




--
Proud to be a Liberal.

On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 16:29:57 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 1/21/15 4:20 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/21/15 3:05 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/21/15 1:58 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 13:24:07 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/21/15 1:10 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 12:28:19 -0500, Justan Olphart
wrote:

On 1/21/2015 11:32 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:


Another Conservative Icon Goes Down:
Holly ‘Hobby Lobby’ Fisher Admits To Cheating On Her Veteran Husband

Why would someone with an interest in promoting peace and tranquility in
this newsgroup post inflamatory crap like this?

===

Because he's an asshat.



Ahh, nice name calling, Wayne. And to your buddy, who resides in my
filter septic tank, I never said I was interested in "promoting peace
and tranquility" in this newsgroup.

Once again, for those who have problems understanding what they read:

I was told that *my* name-calling/alleged harassment of other posters in
this newsgroup was the cause of the vile atmosphere in here. So, about a
month ago, I stopped that, and I haven't resumed.

My experiment, simply stated, was that I was not *the* cause, and that
other posters would continue their name calling, no matter what.

I was correct.

If you don't like my posts or if you have no way to comment on them as
an adult, you can always *not* comment.

Or, as you two have done, you can continue to engage in name calling.

Have nice day.

===

"If you don't like my posts or if you have no way to comment on them
as an adult, you can always *not* comment."

If you continue to post inflamatory trolls for purely gratuitous
reasons on your part, expect to be called what you are.

Have nice day yourself.


Ahh, so you are the self-appointed arbiter of what is inflammatory. And
you think I post for gratuitous reasons.

Well, Wayne, you are not *the* arbiter and you don't know why I post some
of what I post here.

Perhaps you might expend some of your "deputy sheriff" time here
regularly going after a few of your right-wing buddies, who seemingly
never post anything but snarly remarks about other posters.

I'm sure it'll happen regularly when...

http://tinyurl.com/q6ldoue




If you act as an asshat in Wayne's opinion, he has the right to call you an
asshat.



The point is not the name or Wayne's opinion, Bill, it's the name
calling. There have been many pleas here to end the name calling,
including from those who are continuing to call names. Apparently, those
calls were little more than lip service, eh?


And you seem to not be increasing the kumbaya here.


This is not a friendly place for those who do not adhere to or respect
right-wing ideology.

Who is the one making the inflammatory political posts, Krause?
--

Guns don't cause problems. The behavior
of certain gun owners causes problems.