BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   Fools (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/162996-fools.html)

Boating All Out January 8th 15 12:02 AM

Fools
 

Harry has you guys pegged. Wayne, Herring, Jim, and whoever I forgot.
One post by him, with no particular target, gets your panties in a wad.
Gets you foaming at the mouth
I don't care what Harry says about religion - or anything else really.
But he sure has you all on a leash, and barking.

Wayne.B January 8th 15 12:49 AM

Fools
 
On Wed, 7 Jan 2015 18:02:32 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:


Harry has you guys pegged. Wayne, Herring, Jim, and whoever I forgot.
One post by him, with no particular target, gets your panties in a wad.
Gets you foaming at the mouth
I don't care what Harry says about religion - or anything else really.
But he sure has you all on a leash, and barking.


===

Well you're wrong about that, at least in my case. A good analogy is
the sly pleasure of pricking a gas bag and letting the air out.

Keyser Söze January 8th 15 02:29 AM

Fools
 
On 1/7/15 7:02 PM, Boating All Out wrote:

Harry has you guys pegged. Wayne, Herring, Jim, and whoever I forgot.
One post by him, with no particular target, gets your panties in a wad.
Gets you foaming at the mouth
I don't care what Harry says about religion - or anything else really.
But he sure has you all on a leash, and barking.


Sadly, their behavior reminds me of puppets on strings, except they're
pulling their own strings. Their choice: you can either control yourself
in here or...you can't.

KC January 8th 15 05:05 AM

Fools
 
On 1/7/2015 9:29 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/7/15 7:02 PM, Boating All Out wrote:

Harry has you guys pegged. Wayne, Herring, Jim, and whoever I forgot.
One post by him, with no particular target, gets your panties in a wad.
Gets you foaming at the mouth
I don't care what Harry says about religion - or anything else really.
But he sure has you all on a leash, and barking.


Sadly, their behavior reminds me of puppets on strings, except they're
pulling their own strings. Their choice: you can either control yourself
in here or...you can't.


Oh brother... lol...

Poquito Loco January 8th 15 02:50 PM

Fools
 
On Wed, 7 Jan 2015 18:02:32 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:


Harry has you guys pegged. Wayne, Herring, Jim, and whoever I forgot.
One post by him, with no particular target, gets your panties in a wad.
Gets you foaming at the mouth
I don't care what Harry says about religion - or anything else really.
But he sure has you all on a leash, and barking.


Actually, very few here think much of Harry. He apparently thought
that a couple weeks of 'niceness' would overcome his past behavior. He
was wrong. By throwing out another anti-religion post, he expressed
his desire to continue the crap.

One would not expect you, et al, to see that.

From a raping, baby killing, racist asshole.

Wayne.B January 8th 15 02:57 PM

Fools
 
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 09:50:47 -0500, Poquito Loco
wrote:

From a raping, baby killing, racist asshole.


===

Hair wee call you that ?

Califbill January 8th 15 05:18 PM

Fools
 
Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jan 2015 18:02:32 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:


Harry has you guys pegged. Wayne, Herring, Jim, and whoever I forgot.
One post by him, with no particular target, gets your panties in a wad.
Gets you foaming at the mouth
I don't care what Harry says about religion - or anything else really.
But he sure has you all on a leash, and barking.


Actually, very few here think much of Harry. He apparently thought
that a couple weeks of 'niceness' would overcome his past behavior. He
was wrong. By throwing out another anti-religion post, he expressed
his desire to continue the crap.

One would not expect you, et al, to see that.

From a raping, baby killing, racist asshole.


Actually harry stealing from someone else again. Luddite stated he was
studying Psyche and next thing this years of crap on newsgroups by Harry is
part of his study. Unbelievable.

Keyser Söze January 8th 15 06:04 PM

Fools
 
On 1/8/15 12:18 PM, Califbill wrote:
Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jan 2015 18:02:32 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:


Harry has you guys pegged. Wayne, Herring, Jim, and whoever I forgot.
One post by him, with no particular target, gets your panties in a wad.
Gets you foaming at the mouth
I don't care what Harry says about religion - or anything else really.
But he sure has you all on a leash, and barking.


Actually, very few here think much of Harry. He apparently thought
that a couple weeks of 'niceness' would overcome his past behavior. He
was wrong. By throwing out another anti-religion post, he expressed
his desire to continue the crap.

One would not expect you, et al, to see that.

From a raping, baby killing, racist asshole.


Actually harry stealing from someone else again. Luddite stated he was
studying Psyche and next thing this years of crap on newsgroups by Harry is
part of his study. Unbelievable.



I'm sorry, Bill, but I can't parse your post. Luddite and I are not
conducting the same "experiment."

[email protected] January 8th 15 06:19 PM

Fools
 
On Thursday, January 8, 2015 1:04:49 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/8/15 12:18 PM, Califbill wrote:
Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jan 2015 18:02:32 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:


Harry has you guys pegged. Wayne, Herring, Jim, and whoever I forgot..
One post by him, with no particular target, gets your panties in a wad.
Gets you foaming at the mouth
I don't care what Harry says about religion - or anything else really..
But he sure has you all on a leash, and barking.

Actually, very few here think much of Harry. He apparently thought
that a couple weeks of 'niceness' would overcome his past behavior. He
was wrong. By throwing out another anti-religion post, he expressed
his desire to continue the crap.

One would not expect you, et al, to see that.

From a raping, baby killing, racist asshole.


Actually harry stealing from someone else again. Luddite stated he was
studying Psyche and next thing this years of crap on newsgroups by Harry is
part of his study. Unbelievable.



I'm sorry, Bill, but I can't parse your post. Luddite and I are not
conducting the same "experiment."


I beleive he's saying that you stole luddite's idea, but are doing the experiment in reverse.

Keyser Söze January 8th 15 07:09 PM

Fools
 
On 1/8/15 1:19 PM, wrote:
On Thursday, January 8, 2015 1:04:49 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/8/15 12:18 PM, Califbill wrote:
Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jan 2015 18:02:32 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:


Harry has you guys pegged. Wayne, Herring, Jim, and whoever I forgot.
One post by him, with no particular target, gets your panties in a wad.
Gets you foaming at the mouth
I don't care what Harry says about religion - or anything else really.
But he sure has you all on a leash, and barking.

Actually, very few here think much of Harry. He apparently thought
that a couple weeks of 'niceness' would overcome his past behavior. He
was wrong. By throwing out another anti-religion post, he expressed
his desire to continue the crap.

One would not expect you, et al, to see that.

From a raping, baby killing, racist asshole.

Actually harry stealing from someone else again. Luddite stated he was
studying Psyche and next thing this years of crap on newsgroups by Harry is
part of his study. Unbelievable.



I'm sorry, Bill, but I can't parse your post. Luddite and I are not
conducting the same "experiment."


I beleive he's saying that you stole luddite's idea, but are doing the experiment in reverse.



A little known codicil for double secret probation?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1tfK_3XK4CI

Poquito Loco January 8th 15 07:46 PM

Fools
 
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 09:57:49 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 09:50:47 -0500, Poquito Loco
wrote:

From a raping, baby killing, racist asshole.


===

Hair wee call you that ?


I think I should have added 'cunningly linguistic' in there, but that
wasn't really from him.

Califbill January 9th 15 03:13 AM

Fools
 
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/8/15 12:18 PM, Califbill wrote:
Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jan 2015 18:02:32 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:


Harry has you guys pegged. Wayne, Herring, Jim, and whoever I forgot.
One post by him, with no particular target, gets your panties in a wad.
Gets you foaming at the mouth
I don't care what Harry says about religion - or anything else really.
But he sure has you all on a leash, and barking.

Actually, very few here think much of Harry. He apparently thought
that a couple weeks of 'niceness' would overcome his past behavior. He
was wrong. By throwing out another anti-religion post, he expressed
his desire to continue the crap.

One would not expect you, et al, to see that.

From a raping, baby killing, racist asshole.


Actually harry stealing from someone else again. Luddite stated he was
studying Psyche and next thing this years of crap on newsgroups by Harry is
part of his study. Unbelievable.



I'm sorry, Bill, but I can't parse your post. Luddite and I are not
conducting the same "experiment."


Admit was poorly written. Realized it as I hit send. But anybody with
half a brain could parse the post. You now claiming to be running a long
term experiment of your own on Usenet. Ha!

KC January 9th 15 03:31 AM

Fools
 
On 1/8/2015 10:13 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/8/15 12:18 PM, Califbill wrote:
Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jan 2015 18:02:32 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:


Harry has you guys pegged. Wayne, Herring, Jim, and whoever I forgot.
One post by him, with no particular target, gets your panties in a wad.
Gets you foaming at the mouth
I don't care what Harry says about religion - or anything else really.
But he sure has you all on a leash, and barking.

Actually, very few here think much of Harry. He apparently thought
that a couple weeks of 'niceness' would overcome his past behavior. He
was wrong. By throwing out another anti-religion post, he expressed
his desire to continue the crap.

One would not expect you, et al, to see that.

From a raping, baby killing, racist asshole.

Actually harry stealing from someone else again. Luddite stated he was
studying Psyche and next thing this years of crap on newsgroups by Harry is
part of his study. Unbelievable.



I'm sorry, Bill, but I can't parse your post. Luddite and I are not
conducting the same "experiment."


Admit was poorly written. Realized it as I hit send. But anybody with
half a brain could parse the post. You now claiming to be running a long
term experiment of your own on Usenet. Ha!


He's just a drunken fool...

Keyser Söze January 9th 15 11:24 AM

Fools
 
On 1/8/15 10:13 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/8/15 12:18 PM, Califbill wrote:
Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jan 2015 18:02:32 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:


Harry has you guys pegged. Wayne, Herring, Jim, and whoever I forgot.
One post by him, with no particular target, gets your panties in a wad.
Gets you foaming at the mouth
I don't care what Harry says about religion - or anything else really.
But he sure has you all on a leash, and barking.

Actually, very few here think much of Harry. He apparently thought
that a couple weeks of 'niceness' would overcome his past behavior. He
was wrong. By throwing out another anti-religion post, he expressed
his desire to continue the crap.

One would not expect you, et al, to see that.

From a raping, baby killing, racist asshole.

Actually harry stealing from someone else again. Luddite stated he was
studying Psyche and next thing this years of crap on newsgroups by Harry is
part of his study. Unbelievable.



I'm sorry, Bill, but I can't parse your post. Luddite and I are not
conducting the same "experiment."


Admit was poorly written. Realized it as I hit send. But anybody with
half a brain could parse the post. You now claiming to be running a long
term experiment of your own on Usenet. Ha!



No, I made no such claim. Actually, the "experiment" is pretty much
over. Part of my hypothesis was that there were at least a half dozen or
so posters here who couldn't/wouldn't stop personally insulting other
posters, no matter what. That part was proved correct. Another part was
that even if I stopped personally insulting other posters, the insulting
by others would continue. That part was proved correct. There are a few
other parts that include my guesses as to *who* would continue to
personally insult other posters, and that part has proved correct, too.

I wonder if I can get an NSF grant to formalize this study? :)

Justan Olphart January 9th 15 01:56 PM

Fools
 
On 1/9/2015 6:24 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/8/15 10:13 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/8/15 12:18 PM, Califbill wrote:
Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jan 2015 18:02:32 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:


Harry has you guys pegged. Wayne, Herring, Jim, and whoever I
forgot.
One post by him, with no particular target, gets your panties in a
wad.
Gets you foaming at the mouth
I don't care what Harry says about religion - or anything else
really.
But he sure has you all on a leash, and barking.

Actually, very few here think much of Harry. He apparently thought
that a couple weeks of 'niceness' would overcome his past behavior. He
was wrong. By throwing out another anti-religion post, he expressed
his desire to continue the crap.

One would not expect you, et al, to see that.

From a raping, baby killing, racist asshole.

Actually harry stealing from someone else again. Luddite stated he
was
studying Psyche and next thing this years of crap on newsgroups by
Harry is
part of his study. Unbelievable.



I'm sorry, Bill, but I can't parse your post. Luddite and I are not
conducting the same "experiment."


Admit was poorly written. Realized it as I hit send. But anybody with
half a brain could parse the post. You now claiming to be running a long
term experiment of your own on Usenet. Ha!



No, I made no such claim. Actually, the "experiment" is pretty much
over. Part of my hypothesis was that there were at least a half dozen or
so posters here who couldn't/wouldn't stop personally insulting other
posters, no matter what. That part was proved correct. Another part was
that even if I stopped personally insulting other posters, the insulting
by others would continue. That part was proved correct. There are a few
other parts that include my guesses as to *who* would continue to
personally insult other posters, and that part has proved correct, too.

I wonder if I can get an NSF grant to formalize this study? :)


Don't you have anything better to do?

--


I don't need anger management. I just need people to stop ****ing me off!
Respectfully submitted by Justan


[email protected] January 9th 15 03:37 PM

Fools
 
On Friday, January 9, 2015 at 6:24:33 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:

No, I made no such claim. Actually, the "experiment" is pretty much
over. Part of my hypothesis was that there were at least a half dozen or
so posters here who couldn't/wouldn't stop personally insulting other
posters, no matter what. That part was proved correct. Another part was
that even if I stopped personally insulting other posters, the insulting
by others would continue. That part was proved correct. There are a few
other parts that include my guesses as to *who* would continue to
personally insult other posters, and that part has proved correct, too.


Your numbers don't add up. Ignoring slammed, we have:

Don nipping at John's and Scot's heels.
Scot and Justan nipping at yours.
Luddite throwing out an occasional jab at John.
You and John being equally, but very mildly, snarky to each other.
Wayne calling you out on the obvious.
Maybe one or two other posters who rarely post anything, but when they do it's a snide comment.

OK, maybe it is around six. But since you claim that you don't read every post, skipping over many, your data set and research is incomplete and flawed. :-)

One thing is for sure... an unintentional result is the proof that you are one of the greatest drivers of the animosity that exists in this NG. During your "experiment", the overall tone of the posts greatly improved. And you proved that you can't wipe out 10 years of bad behavior with one week of relatively good behavior.

Justan Olphart January 9th 15 04:02 PM

Fools
 
On 1/9/2015 10:37 AM, wrote:
On Friday, January 9, 2015 at 6:24:33 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:

No, I made no such claim. Actually, the "experiment" is pretty much
over. Part of my hypothesis was that there were at least a half dozen or
so posters here who couldn't/wouldn't stop personally insulting other
posters, no matter what. That part was proved correct. Another part was
that even if I stopped personally insulting other posters, the insulting
by others would continue. That part was proved correct. There are a few
other parts that include my guesses as to *who* would continue to
personally insult other posters, and that part has proved correct, too.


Your numbers don't add up. Ignoring slammed, we have:

Don nipping at John's and Scot's heels.
Scot and Justan nipping at yours.
Luddite throwing out an occasional jab at John.
You and John being equally, but very mildly, snarky to each other.
Wayne calling you out on the obvious.
Maybe one or two other posters who rarely post anything, but when they do it's a snide comment.

OK, maybe it is around six. But since you claim that you don't read every post, skipping over many, your data set and research is incomplete and flawed. :-)

One thing is for sure... an unintentional result is the proof that you are one of the greatest drivers of the animosity that exists in this NG. During your "experiment", the overall tone of the posts greatly improved. And you proved that you can't wipe out 10 years of bad behavior with one week of relatively good behavior.


That pretty much sums it up.

--


I don't need anger management. I just need people to stop ****ing me off!
Respectfully submitted by Justan


Keyser Söze January 9th 15 04:51 PM

Fools
 
On 1/9/15 10:37 AM, wrote:
On Friday, January 9, 2015 at 6:24:33 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:

No, I made no such claim. Actually, the "experiment" is pretty much
over. Part of my hypothesis was that there were at least a half dozen or
so posters here who couldn't/wouldn't stop personally insulting other
posters, no matter what. That part was proved correct. Another part was
that even if I stopped personally insulting other posters, the insulting
by others would continue. That part was proved correct. There are a few
other parts that include my guesses as to *who* would continue to
personally insult other posters, and that part has proved correct, too.


Your numbers don't add up. Ignoring slammed, we have:

Don nipping at John's and Scot's heels.
Scot and Justan nipping at yours.
Luddite throwing out an occasional jab at John.
You and John being equally, but very mildly, snarky to each other.
Wayne calling you out on the obvious.
Maybe one or two other posters who rarely post anything, but when they do it's a snide comment.

OK, maybe it is around six. But since you claim that you don't read every post, skipping over many, your data set and research is incomplete and flawed. :-)

One thing is for sure... an unintentional result is the proof that you are one of the greatest drivers of the animosity that exists in this NG. During your "experiment", the overall tone of the posts greatly improved. And you proved that you can't wipe out 10 years of bad behavior with one week of relatively good behavior.


My experiment showed that for the last three weeks or so, without my
making a single derogatory post about other posters here, there were and
are at least a half dozen posters whose snarly behavior continued.

It was a limited experiment, and it proved what I suspected.

KC January 9th 15 05:01 PM

Fools
 
On 1/9/2015 11:51 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/9/15 10:37 AM, wrote:
On Friday, January 9, 2015 at 6:24:33 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:

No, I made no such claim. Actually, the "experiment" is pretty much
over. Part of my hypothesis was that there were at least a half dozen or
so posters here who couldn't/wouldn't stop personally insulting other
posters, no matter what. That part was proved correct. Another part was
that even if I stopped personally insulting other posters, the insulting
by others would continue. That part was proved correct. There are a few
other parts that include my guesses as to *who* would continue to
personally insult other posters, and that part has proved correct, too.


Your numbers don't add up. Ignoring slammed, we have:

Don nipping at John's and Scot's heels.
Scot and Justan nipping at yours.
Luddite throwing out an occasional jab at John.
You and John being equally, but very mildly, snarky to each other.
Wayne calling you out on the obvious.
Maybe one or two other posters who rarely post anything, but when they
do it's a snide comment.

OK, maybe it is around six. But since you claim that you don't read
every post, skipping over many, your data set and research is
incomplete and flawed. :-)

One thing is for sure... an unintentional result is the proof that you
are one of the greatest drivers of the animosity that exists in this
NG. During your "experiment", the overall tone of the posts greatly
improved. And you proved that you can't wipe out 10 years of bad
behavior with one week of relatively good behavior.


My experiment showed that for the last three weeks or so, without my
making a single derogatory post about other posters here, there were and
are at least a half dozen posters whose snarly behavior continued.

It was a limited experiment, and it proved what I suspected.


Yeah, that nobody here cares that you are being nice for a week, and you
deserve no respect from anybody here? Yup, you nailed it.

Mr. Luddite January 9th 15 05:01 PM

Fools
 
On 1/9/2015 11:51 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/9/15 10:37 AM, wrote:
On Friday, January 9, 2015 at 6:24:33 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:

No, I made no such claim. Actually, the "experiment" is pretty much
over. Part of my hypothesis was that there were at least a half dozen or
so posters here who couldn't/wouldn't stop personally insulting other
posters, no matter what. That part was proved correct. Another part was
that even if I stopped personally insulting other posters, the insulting
by others would continue. That part was proved correct. There are a few
other parts that include my guesses as to *who* would continue to
personally insult other posters, and that part has proved correct, too.


Your numbers don't add up. Ignoring slammed, we have:

Don nipping at John's and Scot's heels.
Scot and Justan nipping at yours.
Luddite throwing out an occasional jab at John.
You and John being equally, but very mildly, snarky to each other.
Wayne calling you out on the obvious.
Maybe one or two other posters who rarely post anything, but when they
do it's a snide comment.

OK, maybe it is around six. But since you claim that you don't read
every post, skipping over many, your data set and research is
incomplete and flawed. :-)

One thing is for sure... an unintentional result is the proof that you
are one of the greatest drivers of the animosity that exists in this
NG. During your "experiment", the overall tone of the posts greatly
improved. And you proved that you can't wipe out 10 years of bad
behavior with one week of relatively good behavior.


My experiment showed that for the last three weeks or so, without my
making a single derogatory post about other posters here, there were and
are at least a half dozen posters whose snarly behavior continued.

It was a limited experiment, and it proved what I suspected.



Ingrained rather than thoughtful behavior.



KC January 9th 15 05:05 PM

Fools
 
On 1/9/2015 12:01 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 1/9/2015 11:51 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/9/15 10:37 AM, wrote:
On Friday, January 9, 2015 at 6:24:33 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:

No, I made no such claim. Actually, the "experiment" is pretty much
over. Part of my hypothesis was that there were at least a half
dozen or
so posters here who couldn't/wouldn't stop personally insulting other
posters, no matter what. That part was proved correct. Another part was
that even if I stopped personally insulting other posters, the
insulting
by others would continue. That part was proved correct. There are a few
other parts that include my guesses as to *who* would continue to
personally insult other posters, and that part has proved correct, too.

Your numbers don't add up. Ignoring slammed, we have:

Don nipping at John's and Scot's heels.
Scot and Justan nipping at yours.
Luddite throwing out an occasional jab at John.
You and John being equally, but very mildly, snarky to each other.
Wayne calling you out on the obvious.
Maybe one or two other posters who rarely post anything, but when they
do it's a snide comment.

OK, maybe it is around six. But since you claim that you don't read
every post, skipping over many, your data set and research is
incomplete and flawed. :-)

One thing is for sure... an unintentional result is the proof that you
are one of the greatest drivers of the animosity that exists in this
NG. During your "experiment", the overall tone of the posts greatly
improved. And you proved that you can't wipe out 10 years of bad
behavior with one week of relatively good behavior.


My experiment showed that for the last three weeks or so, without my
making a single derogatory post about other posters here, there were and
are at least a half dozen posters whose snarly behavior continued.

It was a limited experiment, and it proved what I suspected.



Ingrained rather than thoughtful behavior.



Earned...

Keyser Söze January 9th 15 05:12 PM

Fools
 
On 1/9/15 12:01 PM, KC wrote:
On 1/9/2015 11:51 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/9/15 10:37 AM, wrote:
On Friday, January 9, 2015 at 6:24:33 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:

No, I made no such claim. Actually, the "experiment" is pretty much
over. Part of my hypothesis was that there were at least a half
dozen or
so posters here who couldn't/wouldn't stop personally insulting other
posters, no matter what. That part was proved correct. Another part was
that even if I stopped personally insulting other posters, the
insulting
by others would continue. That part was proved correct. There are a few
other parts that include my guesses as to *who* would continue to
personally insult other posters, and that part has proved correct, too.

Your numbers don't add up. Ignoring slammed, we have:

Don nipping at John's and Scot's heels.
Scot and Justan nipping at yours.
Luddite throwing out an occasional jab at John.
You and John being equally, but very mildly, snarky to each other.
Wayne calling you out on the obvious.
Maybe one or two other posters who rarely post anything, but when they
do it's a snide comment.

OK, maybe it is around six. But since you claim that you don't read
every post, skipping over many, your data set and research is
incomplete and flawed. :-)

One thing is for sure... an unintentional result is the proof that you
are one of the greatest drivers of the animosity that exists in this
NG. During your "experiment", the overall tone of the posts greatly
improved. And you proved that you can't wipe out 10 years of bad
behavior with one week of relatively good behavior.


My experiment showed that for the last three weeks or so, without my
making a single derogatory post about other posters here, there were and
are at least a half dozen posters whose snarly behavior continued.

It was a limited experiment, and it proved what I suspected.


Yeah, that nobody here cares that you are being nice for a week, and you
deserve no respect from anybody here? Yup, you nailed it.



Proverbs 17:28

Poquito Loco January 9th 15 05:34 PM

Fools
 
On Fri, 09 Jan 2015 12:01:55 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 1/9/2015 11:51 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/9/15 10:37 AM, wrote:
On Friday, January 9, 2015 at 6:24:33 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:

No, I made no such claim. Actually, the "experiment" is pretty much
over. Part of my hypothesis was that there were at least a half dozen or
so posters here who couldn't/wouldn't stop personally insulting other
posters, no matter what. That part was proved correct. Another part was
that even if I stopped personally insulting other posters, the insulting
by others would continue. That part was proved correct. There are a few
other parts that include my guesses as to *who* would continue to
personally insult other posters, and that part has proved correct, too.

Your numbers don't add up. Ignoring slammed, we have:

Don nipping at John's and Scot's heels.
Scot and Justan nipping at yours.
Luddite throwing out an occasional jab at John.
You and John being equally, but very mildly, snarky to each other.
Wayne calling you out on the obvious.
Maybe one or two other posters who rarely post anything, but when they
do it's a snide comment.

OK, maybe it is around six. But since you claim that you don't read
every post, skipping over many, your data set and research is
incomplete and flawed. :-)

One thing is for sure... an unintentional result is the proof that you
are one of the greatest drivers of the animosity that exists in this
NG. During your "experiment", the overall tone of the posts greatly
improved. And you proved that you can't wipe out 10 years of bad
behavior with one week of relatively good behavior.


My experiment showed that for the last three weeks or so, without my
making a single derogatory post about other posters here, there were and
are at least a half dozen posters whose snarly behavior continued.

It was a limited experiment, and it proved what I suspected.



Ingrained rather than thoughtful behavior.


Harry has definitely been horribly mistreated. His 'nasty 8' must have
some real ingrained prejudices against the poor guy. But, as you've
suggested in the past, there is no reason for such.
--

Guns don't cause problems. The behavior
of certain gun owners causes problems.

Califbill January 9th 15 06:01 PM

Fools
 
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/8/15 10:13 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/8/15 12:18 PM, Califbill wrote:
Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jan 2015 18:02:32 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:


Harry has you guys pegged. Wayne, Herring, Jim, and whoever I forgot.
One post by him, with no particular target, gets your panties in a wad.
Gets you foaming at the mouth
I don't care what Harry says about religion - or anything else really.
But he sure has you all on a leash, and barking.

Actually, very few here think much of Harry. He apparently thought
that a couple weeks of 'niceness' would overcome his past behavior. He
was wrong. By throwing out another anti-religion post, he expressed
his desire to continue the crap.

One would not expect you, et al, to see that.

From a raping, baby killing, racist asshole.

Actually harry stealing from someone else again. Luddite stated he was
studying Psyche and next thing this years of crap on newsgroups by Harry is
part of his study. Unbelievable.



I'm sorry, Bill, but I can't parse your post. Luddite and I are not
conducting the same "experiment."


Admit was poorly written. Realized it as I hit send. But anybody with
half a brain could parse the post. You now claiming to be running a long
term experiment of your own on Usenet. Ha!



No, I made no such claim. Actually, the "experiment" is pretty much over.
Part of my hypothesis was that there were at least a half dozen or so
posters here who couldn't/wouldn't stop personally insulting other
posters, no matter what. That part was proved correct. Another part was
that even if I stopped personally insulting other posters, the insulting
by others would continue. That part was proved correct. There are a few
other parts that include my guesses as to *who* would continue to
personally insult other posters, and that part has proved correct, too.

I wonder if I can get an NSF grant to formalize this study? :)


You are absolute full of ****.

[email protected] January 10th 15 10:36 AM

Fools
 
On Friday, January 9, 2015 at 10:37:29 AM UTC-5, wrote:

Your numbers don't add up. Ignoring slammed, we have:

Don nipping at John's and Scot's heels.
Scot and Justan nipping at yours.
Luddite throwing out an occasional jab at John.
You and John being equally, but very mildly, snarky to each other.
Wayne calling you out on the obvious.


You forgot krause seeing how far he can stick his cock down dicklicker whites throat, while attempting to give him a reach down.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com