My first...
 

On 1/9/15 8:22 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On 9 Jan 2015 03:10:53 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 19:03:07 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/8/15 6:54 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 10:11:56 -0500, Poquito Loco
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:44:45 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/7/15 6:24 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:13:54 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:26:39 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 05:58:40 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Once again, you are wrong. A lunatic like Gohmert would have been a lot
of fun as speaker.

===

Have you ever, once, thought about what would be good for the country?

You should try it.

===

PS, I don't consider that post to be even the slightest bit snarly. In
light of your stated desire to have a lunatic as speaker just because
you'd consider it funny, I think it's a perfectly legitimate question.
Back up from your keyboard and read your own posts.

He, et al, consider his anti-religion crap to be 'normal, sociable'
behavior.



My positions on religion are not aimed at individuals here. I don't, for
example, claim you are a flaming asshole for being an adherent of the
Wiccan religion, for example. :)

If that is the case, why post them here?

You lay your own traps for yourself.

~~Crickets~~


Why do you think that when you ask a question of someone, you are
*entitled* to an answer? I don't know why you are coming to the defense
of religion. And no, I'm not asking.

No defense of anything. Nice try at an old dodge.

If your anti-religious posts are not aimed at anyone here, why post
them here?

It's all about behavior.

I suggest you take care of your own behavior, and stop trying to moderate
what others post. I am not insulting anyone personally and that is the end
of it. I don't answer to you. Got it? Hope so. Have a nice night.

Why, when you are asked a question about your motives for
anti-religious posts, are you too afraid to answer the question?


Why are you persisting with what you apparently believe is your
entitlement? I'm not afraid to answer the question...I simply choose not
to. Move on.

My first...
 

On Fri, 09 Jan 2015 09:32:31 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/9/15 8:22 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On 9 Jan 2015 03:10:53 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 19:03:07 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/8/15 6:54 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 10:11:56 -0500, Poquito Loco
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:44:45 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/7/15 6:24 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:13:54 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:26:39 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 05:58:40 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Once again, you are wrong. A lunatic like Gohmert would have been a lot
of fun as speaker.

===

Have you ever, once, thought about what would be good for the country?

You should try it.

===

PS, I don't consider that post to be even the slightest bit snarly. In
light of your stated desire to have a lunatic as speaker just because
you'd consider it funny, I think it's a perfectly legitimate question.
Back up from your keyboard and read your own posts.

He, et al, consider his anti-religion crap to be 'normal, sociable'
behavior.



My positions on religion are not aimed at individuals here. I don't, for
example, claim you are a flaming asshole for being an adherent of the
Wiccan religion, for example. :)

If that is the case, why post them here?

You lay your own traps for yourself.

~~Crickets~~


Why do you think that when you ask a question of someone, you are
*entitled* to an answer? I don't know why you are coming to the defense
of religion. And no, I'm not asking.

No defense of anything. Nice try at an old dodge.

If your anti-religious posts are not aimed at anyone here, why post
them here?

It's all about behavior.

I suggest you take care of your own behavior, and stop trying to moderate
what others post. I am not insulting anyone personally and that is the end
of it. I don't answer to you. Got it? Hope so. Have a nice night.

Why, when you are asked a question about your motives for
anti-religious posts, are you too afraid to answer the question?


Why are you persisting with what you apparently believe is your
entitlement? I'm not afraid to answer the question...I simply choose not
to. Move on.

It's a rough question, I'll admit. Kinda goes right to your motives.
--

Guns don't cause problems. The behavior
of certain gun owners causes problems.

My first...
 

On 1/9/15 9:30 AM, KC wrote:
On 1/9/2015 8:22 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On 9 Jan 2015 03:10:53 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 19:03:07 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/8/15 6:54 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 10:11:56 -0500, Poquito Loco
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:44:45 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/7/15 6:24 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:13:54 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:26:39 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 05:58:40 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Once again, you are wrong. A lunatic like Gohmert would have
been a lot
of fun as speaker.

===

Have you ever, once, thought about what would be good for the
country?

You should try it.

===

PS, I don't consider that post to be even the slightest bit
snarly. In
light of your stated desire to have a lunatic as speaker just
because
you'd consider it funny, I think it's a perfectly legitimate
question.
Back up from your keyboard and read your own posts.

He, et al, consider his anti-religion crap to be 'normal,
sociable'
behavior.



My positions on religion are not aimed at individuals here. I
don't, for
example, claim you are a flaming asshole for being an adherent
of the
Wiccan religion, for example. :)

If that is the case, why post them here?

You lay your own traps for yourself.

~~Crickets~~


Why do you think that when you ask a question of someone, you are
*entitled* to an answer? I don't know why you are coming to the
defense
of religion. And no, I'm not asking.

No defense of anything. Nice try at an old dodge.

If your anti-religious posts are not aimed at anyone here, why post
them here?

It's all about behavior.

I suggest you take care of your own behavior, and stop trying to
moderate
what others post. I am not insulting anyone personally and that is
the end
of it. I don't answer to you. Got it? Hope so. Have a nice night.

Why, when you are asked a question about your motives for
anti-religious posts, are you too afraid to answer the question?


Or asked to explain why he was such a useless piece of **** here for
over ten years...


Thank you for helping prove my hypothesis...

My first...
 

On 1/9/2015 9:39 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/9/15 9:30 AM, KC wrote:
On 1/9/2015 8:22 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On 9 Jan 2015 03:10:53 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 19:03:07 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/8/15 6:54 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 10:11:56 -0500, Poquito Loco
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:44:45 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/7/15 6:24 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:13:54 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:26:39 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 05:58:40 -0500, Keyser Söze

wrote:

Once again, you are wrong. A lunatic like Gohmert would have
been a lot
of fun as speaker.

===

Have you ever, once, thought about what would be good for the
country?

You should try it.

===

PS, I don't consider that post to be even the slightest bit
snarly. In
light of your stated desire to have a lunatic as speaker just
because
you'd consider it funny, I think it's a perfectly legitimate
question.
Back up from your keyboard and read your own posts.

He, et al, consider his anti-religion crap to be 'normal,
sociable'
behavior.



My positions on religion are not aimed at individuals here. I
don't, for
example, claim you are a flaming asshole for being an adherent
of the
Wiccan religion, for example. :)

If that is the case, why post them here?

You lay your own traps for yourself.

~~Crickets~~


Why do you think that when you ask a question of someone, you are
*entitled* to an answer? I don't know why you are coming to the
defense
of religion. And no, I'm not asking.

No defense of anything. Nice try at an old dodge.

If your anti-religious posts are not aimed at anyone here, why post
them here?

It's all about behavior.

I suggest you take care of your own behavior, and stop trying to
moderate
what others post. I am not insulting anyone personally and that is
the end
of it. I don't answer to you. Got it? Hope so. Have a nice night.

Why, when you are asked a question about your motives for
anti-religious posts, are you too afraid to answer the question?


Or asked to explain why he was such a useless piece of **** here for
over ten years...


Thank you for helping prove my hypothesis...

You haven't proved anything. Nobody here but retard don and possibly
dick believes you...

My first...
 

On 1/9/2015 9:36 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Fri, 09 Jan 2015 09:32:31 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/9/15 8:22 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On 9 Jan 2015 03:10:53 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 19:03:07 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/8/15 6:54 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 10:11:56 -0500, Poquito Loco
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:44:45 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/7/15 6:24 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:13:54 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:26:39 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 05:58:40 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Once again, you are wrong. A lunatic like Gohmert would have been a lot
of fun as speaker.

===

Have you ever, once, thought about what would be good for the country?

You should try it.

===

PS, I don't consider that post to be even the slightest bit snarly. In
light of your stated desire to have a lunatic as speaker just because
you'd consider it funny, I think it's a perfectly legitimate question.
Back up from your keyboard and read your own posts.

He, et al, consider his anti-religion crap to be 'normal, sociable'
behavior.



My positions on religion are not aimed at individuals here. I don't, for
example, claim you are a flaming asshole for being an adherent of the
Wiccan religion, for example. :)

If that is the case, why post them here?

You lay your own traps for yourself.

~~Crickets~~


Why do you think that when you ask a question of someone, you are
*entitled* to an answer? I don't know why you are coming to the defense
of religion. And no, I'm not asking.

No defense of anything. Nice try at an old dodge.

If your anti-religious posts are not aimed at anyone here, why post
them here?

It's all about behavior.

I suggest you take care of your own behavior, and stop trying to moderate
what others post. I am not insulting anyone personally and that is the end
of it. I don't answer to you. Got it? Hope so. Have a nice night.

Why, when you are asked a question about your motives for
anti-religious posts, are you too afraid to answer the question?


Why are you persisting with what you apparently believe is your
entitlement? I'm not afraid to answer the question...I simply choose not
to. Move on.

It's a rough question, I'll admit. Kinda goes right to your motives.

It's not necessary for him to acknowledge. The fifth amendment says so.

--


I don't need anger management. I just need people to stop ****ing me off!
Respectfully submitted by Justan

My first...
 

On 1/9/2015 10:13 AM, KC wrote:
On 1/9/2015 9:39 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/9/15 9:30 AM, KC wrote:
On 1/9/2015 8:22 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On 9 Jan 2015 03:10:53 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 19:03:07 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/8/15 6:54 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 10:11:56 -0500, Poquito Loco
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:44:45 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/7/15 6:24 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:13:54 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:26:39 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 05:58:40 -0500, Keyser Söze

wrote:

Once again, you are wrong. A lunatic like Gohmert would have
been a lot
of fun as speaker.

===

Have you ever, once, thought about what would be good for the
country?

You should try it.

===

PS, I don't consider that post to be even the slightest bit
snarly. In
light of your stated desire to have a lunatic as speaker just
because
you'd consider it funny, I think it's a perfectly legitimate
question.
Back up from your keyboard and read your own posts.

He, et al, consider his anti-religion crap to be 'normal,
sociable'
behavior.



My positions on religion are not aimed at individuals here. I
don't, for
example, claim you are a flaming asshole for being an adherent
of the
Wiccan religion, for example. :)

If that is the case, why post them here?

You lay your own traps for yourself.

~~Crickets~~


Why do you think that when you ask a question of someone, you are
*entitled* to an answer? I don't know why you are coming to the
defense
of religion. And no, I'm not asking.

No defense of anything. Nice try at an old dodge.

If your anti-religious posts are not aimed at anyone here, why post
them here?

It's all about behavior.

I suggest you take care of your own behavior, and stop trying to
moderate
what others post. I am not insulting anyone personally and that is
the end
of it. I don't answer to you. Got it? Hope so. Have a nice night.

Why, when you are asked a question about your motives for
anti-religious posts, are you too afraid to answer the question?


Or asked to explain why he was such a useless piece of **** here for
over ten years...


Thank you for helping prove my hypothesis...

You haven't proved anything. Nobody here but retard don and possibly
dick believes you...

Dick doesn't believe him.

--


I don't need anger management. I just need people to stop ****ing me off!
Respectfully submitted by Justan

My first...
 

On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 10:11:56 -0500, Poquito Loco wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:44:45 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/7/15 6:24 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:13:54 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:26:39 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 05:58:40 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Once again, you are wrong. A lunatic like Gohmert would have been a lot
of fun as speaker.

===

Have you ever, once, thought about what would be good for the country?

You should try it.

===

PS, I don't consider that post to be even the slightest bit snarly. In
light of your stated desire to have a lunatic as speaker just because
you'd consider it funny, I think it's a perfectly legitimate question.
Back up from your keyboard and read your own posts.

He, et al, consider his anti-religion crap to be 'normal, sociable'
behavior.



My positions on religion are not aimed at individuals here. I don't, for
example, claim you are a flaming asshole for being an adherent of the
Wiccan religion, for example. :)

If that is the case, why post them here?

You lay your own traps for yourself.

~cricketts~
--

Guns don't cause problems. The behavior
of certain gun owners causes problems.

My first...
 

On 2/8/15 1:09 PM, Abit Loco wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 10:11:56 -0500, Poquito Loco wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:44:45 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/7/15 6:24 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:13:54 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:26:39 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 05:58:40 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Once again, you are wrong. A lunatic like Gohmert would have been a lot
of fun as speaker.

===

Have you ever, once, thought about what would be good for the country?

You should try it.

===

PS, I don't consider that post to be even the slightest bit snarly. In
light of your stated desire to have a lunatic as speaker just because
you'd consider it funny, I think it's a perfectly legitimate question.
Back up from your keyboard and read your own posts.

He, et al, consider his anti-religion crap to be 'normal, sociable'
behavior.



My positions on religion are not aimed at individuals here. I don't, for
example, claim you are a flaming asshole for being an adherent of the
Wiccan religion, for example. :)

If that is the case, why post them here?

You lay your own traps for yourself.

~cricketts~


Your sense of entitlement is humorous. You think that because you post a
question, you are entitled to an answer.


--
Proud to be a Liberal.

My first...
 

On Friday, January 9, 2015 at 10:14:36 AM UTC-5, KC wrote:

You haven't proved anything. Nobody here but retard don and possibly
dick believes you...

"retard don"....Paaaaahahahahahahahahahahaha

My first...
 

On Sun, 08 Feb 2015 14:08:12 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 2/8/15 1:09 PM, Abit Loco wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 10:11:56 -0500, Poquito Loco wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:44:45 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/7/15 6:24 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:13:54 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:26:39 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 05:58:40 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Once again, you are wrong. A lunatic like Gohmert would have been a lot
of fun as speaker.

===

Have you ever, once, thought about what would be good for the country?

You should try it.

===

PS, I don't consider that post to be even the slightest bit snarly. In
light of your stated desire to have a lunatic as speaker just because
you'd consider it funny, I think it's a perfectly legitimate question.
Back up from your keyboard and read your own posts.

He, et al, consider his anti-religion crap to be 'normal, sociable'
behavior.



My positions on religion are not aimed at individuals here. I don't, for
example, claim you are a flaming asshole for being an adherent of the
Wiccan religion, for example. :)

If that is the case, why post them here?

You lay your own traps for yourself.

~cricketts~


Your sense of entitlement is humorous. You think that because you post a
question, you are entitled to an answer.

Never...for those hard questions.
--

Guns don't cause problems. The behavior
of certain gun owners causes problems.