A bit of informal...
 

BAR wrote:
In article , says...
On 12/10/14 4:08 PM, Toad Gig wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:03:23 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/10/14 4:01 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...target shooting today:

http://tinyurl.com/q7lrxba


Holes at left from my .22LR S&W AR-15/22. Just ordinary LRN ammo, 40
grain. Sighting in scope from the top to the bottom, where I got a two
shot group of a hair more than an inch. 100 yards.

Holes on right from my 1892 Win carbine in .357 MAG. Already sighted in
with the red dot for 100 yards, so the two shot group was what I
expected to see. Just regular ball ammo.


Whoops...this is the back side of the chunk of cardboard. The other side
is just plain brown and the holes don't "pop" as well visually. :)
Wow. That's extremely impressive.

WAFJ!

Yeah, JohnnyTrash, if only you could see a small target at 100 yards,
eh? :)
What's the matter you cant hold a 1 inch group?

Nobody believe's you were shooting 100 yards.
100 feet is probable.

A bit of informal...
 

On Wednesday, December 10, 2014 4:07:58 PM UTC-5, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:03:23 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/10/14 4:01 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...target shooting today:

http://tinyurl.com/q7lrxba


Holes at left from my .22LR S&W AR-15/22. Just ordinary LRN ammo, 40
grain. Sighting in scope from the top to the bottom, where I got a two
shot group of a hair more than an inch. 100 yards.

Holes on right from my 1892 Win carbine in .357 MAG. Already sighted in
with the red dot for 100 yards, so the two shot group was what I
expected to see. Just regular ball ammo.



Whoops...this is the back side of the chunk of cardboard. The other side
is just plain brown and the holes don't "pop" as well visually. :)

Wow. That's extremely impressive.

WAFJ!


Ff sake herring, krause poked those holes through with his hand.
krause couldn't even see the ****ing target without a 10 power scope.

100 yards....what a joke.

A bit of informal...
 

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/10/14 6:36 PM, Califbill wrote:
BAR wrote:
In article , says...

On 12/10/14 4:08 PM, Toad Gig wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:03:23 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/10/14 4:01 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...target shooting today:

http://tinyurl.com/q7lrxba


Holes at left from my .22LR S&W AR-15/22. Just ordinary LRN ammo, 40
grain. Sighting in scope from the top to the bottom, where I got a two
shot group of a hair more than an inch. 100 yards.

Holes on right from my 1892 Win carbine in .357 MAG. Already sighted in
with the red dot for 100 yards, so the two shot group was what I
expected to see. Just regular ball ammo.



Whoops...this is the back side of the chunk of cardboard. The other side
is just plain brown and the holes don't "pop" as well visually. :)

Wow. That's extremely impressive.

WAFJ!


Yeah, JohnnyTrash, if only you could see a small target at 100 yards,
eh? :)

What's the matter you cant hold a 1 inch group?

Nobody believe's you were shooting 100 yards.

And with a scope? Either crappy firearm, or crappy shooter.



snerk How's your shooting with a non-target .22LR firearm at 100
yards, Bilious? I got on the paper with my first shot. Oh, and no scope
on the carbine...just a 3 MOA red dot.




I shoot that well with my 223 AR and no red dot or scope.

A bit of informal...
 

Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/10/14 6:36 PM, Califbill wrote:
BAR wrote:
In article , says...

On 12/10/14 4:08 PM, Toad Gig wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:03:23 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/10/14 4:01 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...target shooting today:

http://tinyurl.com/q7lrxba


Holes at left from my .22LR S&W AR-15/22. Just ordinary LRN ammo, 40
grain. Sighting in scope from the top to the bottom, where I got a two
shot group of a hair more than an inch. 100 yards.

Holes on right from my 1892 Win carbine in .357 MAG. Already sighted in
with the red dot for 100 yards, so the two shot group was what I
expected to see. Just regular ball ammo.



Whoops...this is the back side of the chunk of cardboard. The other side
is just plain brown and the holes don't "pop" as well visually. :)

Wow. That's extremely impressive.

WAFJ!


Yeah, JohnnyTrash, if only you could see a small target at 100 yards,
eh? :)

What's the matter you cant hold a 1 inch group?

Nobody believe's you were shooting 100 yards.

And with a scope? Either crappy firearm, or crappy shooter.



snerk How's your shooting with a non-target .22LR firearm at 100
yards, Bilious? I got on the paper with my first shot. Oh, and no scope
on the carbine...just a 3 MOA red dot.




I shoot that well with my 223 AR and no red dot or scope.

Bull****. You aren't shooting 1" groups at 100 yards on an ordinary AR15
with metal sights only. Bull****, bull****, bull****.
--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

A bit of informal...
 

Keyser Söze wrote:
Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/10/14 6:36 PM, Califbill wrote:
BAR wrote:
In article , says...

On 12/10/14 4:08 PM, Toad Gig wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:03:23 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/10/14 4:01 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...target shooting today:

http://tinyurl.com/q7lrxba


Holes at left from my .22LR S&W AR-15/22. Just ordinary LRN ammo, 40
grain. Sighting in scope from the top to the bottom, where I got a two
shot group of a hair more than an inch. 100 yards.

Holes on right from my 1892 Win carbine in .357 MAG. Already sighted in
with the red dot for 100 yards, so the two shot group was what I
expected to see. Just regular ball ammo.



Whoops...this is the back side of the chunk of cardboard. The other side
is just plain brown and the holes don't "pop" as well visually. :)

Wow. That's extremely impressive.

WAFJ!


Yeah, JohnnyTrash, if only you could see a small target at 100 yards,
eh? :)

What's the matter you cant hold a 1 inch group?

Nobody believe's you were shooting 100 yards.

And with a scope? Either crappy firearm, or crappy shooter.



snerk How's your shooting with a non-target .22LR firearm at 100
yards, Bilious? I got on the paper with my first shot. Oh, and no scope
on the carbine...just a 3 MOA red dot.




I shoot that well with my 223 AR and no red dot or scope.

Bull****. You aren't shooting 1" groups at 100 yards on an ordinary AR15
with metal sights only. Bull****, bull****, bull****.

You were not shooting 1" groups either. 2 holes next to each other are not
a group.

A bit of informal...
 

On Wednesday, December 10, 2014 11:05:45 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:


Bull****, bull****, bull****.

That's all you post here krause, everyone knows it.

A bit of informal...
 

On Wednesday, December 10, 2014 4:12:17 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/10/14 4:08 PM, Toad Gig wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:03:23 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/10/14 4:01 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...target shooting today:

http://tinyurl.com/q7lrxba


Holes at left from my .22LR S&W AR-15/22. Just ordinary LRN ammo, 40
grain. Sighting in scope from the top to the bottom, where I got a two
shot group of a hair more than an inch. 100 yards.

Holes on right from my 1892 Win carbine in .357 MAG. Already sighted in
with the red dot for 100 yards, so the two shot group was what I
expected to see. Just regular ball ammo.



Whoops...this is the back side of the chunk of cardboard. The other side
is just plain brown and the holes don't "pop" as well visually. :)

Wow. That's extremely impressive.

WAFJ!


Yeah, JohnnyTrash, if only you could see a small target at 100 yards,
eh? :)



--
I feel no need to explain my politics to stupid right-wingers.
After all, I am *not* the Jackass Whisperer.

Toad, I fairly regularly, on a good day, hit drives in excess of 200 yards. ( That sounds like bragging, but it's really not.) The point is that I can follow that little bugger, all 1 5/16ths inches of it.

Now don't you feel like a silly little toad, Toad?

A bit of informal...
 

On 12/10/2014 11:05 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/10/14 6:36 PM, Califbill wrote:
BAR wrote:
In article , says...

On 12/10/14 4:08 PM, Toad Gig wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:03:23 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/10/14 4:01 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...target shooting today:

http://tinyurl.com/q7lrxba


Holes at left from my .22LR S&W AR-15/22. Just ordinary LRN ammo, 40
grain. Sighting in scope from the top to the bottom, where I got a two
shot group of a hair more than an inch. 100 yards.

Holes on right from my 1892 Win carbine in .357 MAG. Already sighted in
with the red dot for 100 yards, so the two shot group was what I
expected to see. Just regular ball ammo.



Whoops...this is the back side of the chunk of cardboard. The other side
is just plain brown and the holes don't "pop" as well visually. :)

Wow. That's extremely impressive.

WAFJ!


Yeah, JohnnyTrash, if only you could see a small target at 100 yards,
eh? :)

What's the matter you cant hold a 1 inch group?

Nobody believe's you were shooting 100 yards.

And with a scope? Either crappy firearm, or crappy shooter.



snerk How's your shooting with a non-target .22LR firearm at 100
yards, Bilious? I got on the paper with my first shot. Oh, and no scope
on the carbine...just a 3 MOA red dot.




I shoot that well with my 223 AR and no red dot or scope.

Bull****. You aren't shooting 1" groups at 100 yards on an ordinary AR15
with metal sights only. Bull****, bull****, bull****.

Neither are you. Bull**** Bull**** Bull****

A bit of informal...
 

On Wednesday, December 10, 2014 8:39:18 PM UTC-5, wrote:
On Wednesday, December 10, 2014 4:07:58 PM UTC-5, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:03:23 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/10/14 4:01 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...target shooting today:

http://tinyurl.com/q7lrxba


Holes at left from my .22LR S&W AR-15/22. Just ordinary LRN ammo, 40
grain. Sighting in scope from the top to the bottom, where I got a two
shot group of a hair more than an inch. 100 yards.

Holes on right from my 1892 Win carbine in .357 MAG. Already sighted in
with the red dot for 100 yards, so the two shot group was what I
expected to see. Just regular ball ammo.



Whoops...this is the back side of the chunk of cardboard. The other side
is just plain brown and the holes don't "pop" as well visually. :)

Wow. That's extremely impressive.

WAFJ!


Ff sake herring, krause poked those holes through with his hand.
krause couldn't even see the ****ing target without a 10 power scope.

100 yards....what a joke.

Hey - you're filtered (except on Google Groups), but - that was funny! Others are thinking the same thing!

A bit of informal...
 

On Wednesday, December 10, 2014 11:05:45 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/10/14 6:36 PM, Califbill wrote:
BAR wrote:
In article , says....

On 12/10/14 4:08 PM, Toad Gig wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:03:23 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/10/14 4:01 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...target shooting today:

http://tinyurl.com/q7lrxba


Holes at left from my .22LR S&W AR-15/22. Just ordinary LRN ammo, 40
grain. Sighting in scope from the top to the bottom, where I got a two
shot group of a hair more than an inch. 100 yards.

Holes on right from my 1892 Win carbine in .357 MAG. Already sighted in
with the red dot for 100 yards, so the two shot group was what I
expected to see. Just regular ball ammo.



Whoops...this is the back side of the chunk of cardboard. The other side
is just plain brown and the holes don't "pop" as well visually. :)

Wow. That's extremely impressive.

WAFJ!


Yeah, JohnnyTrash, if only you could see a small target at 100 yards,
eh? :)

What's the matter you cant hold a 1 inch group?

Nobody believe's you were shooting 100 yards.

And with a scope? Either crappy firearm, or crappy shooter.



snerk How's your shooting with a non-target .22LR firearm at 100
yards, Bilious? I got on the paper with my first shot. Oh, and no scope
on the carbine...just a 3 MOA red dot.




I shoot that well with my 223 AR and no red dot or scope.

Bull****. You aren't shooting 1" groups at 100 yards on an ordinary AR15
with metal sights only. Bull****, bull****, bull****.
--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

Toad, just for the record, were you using two hands or one? I know better than to ask if the rifle was supported. Are you sure you showed us the back side. Those holes look pretty clean for being on the back side of cardboard.. (Not that I'm doubting anything you say, mind you.)

BTW, do you own round pencils or hexagonal pencils? Just askin'.