Thinking about something:

For years you have advocated for and supported the roles of labor
unions. You recently defined the purposes of a labor union to include
looking out for the the interests of it's members in terms of
wages, working conditions and to protect against unreasonable
actions of management (paraphrasing). You indicated that in the
event of the termination of a union member by management, the union's
procedure is to file a grievance and fight or defend against the
termination for the benefit of the union member.

You also have very opposed to the strong armed actions and militaristic
tactics of police department policies and of the actions of police
officers, especially in light of the multiple killings of unarmed
civilians.

The police union is one of the strongest unions in the USA, if not the
strongest.

Doesn't this present somewhat of a conundrum for you?

It seems you support union efforts to protect the cops whose actions you
are so opposed to.