On 12/4/2014 3:12 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 11:06:37 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 12/4/2014 10:28 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 10:12:57 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 12/4/2014 10:08 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 09:11:46 -0500, Let it snowe
wrote:

On 12/4/2014 8:20 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
Since a city is being compared to a country, the population density is
immaterial.

If that is so try comparing Detroit or Chicago or Washington DC or LA to
all of the Us.

Then Luddite and Toad would call me an ingrained racist. I'd bet that
if you took the homicides in our 8-10 largest cities there would be
more than in the entire rest of the US (and Canada combined).


Putting words in other people's mouths again, huh Clara?

You sure like to gossip.


The 'then' part was out of the question, which made the 'call me' part
not applicable, therefore no words in anyone's mouth.


Cute wiggle.

BTW ... please cite where I have accused you of being a racist?

Where did I say you've done so? Putting words in my mourth again, eh
Dep'ty?

You may be. Or maybe your're not. I don't know and have never
made any accusations.

I think the word 'ingrained' was added to one of Toad's comments.

You're hung up on the "ingrained" thing. You don't think that the way
people think, talk or express themselves isn't due to some ingrained
thought process, learning experience or conditioning?

I absolutely believe that those things 'can' be due to some ingrained
thought processes, etc.

But, that's where education and experience come into play. What may
have been ingrained at age 10 could well be enhanced or deleted by age
70. Or, do you not think that a person's attitudes and behaviors can
be changed?



So, are you are saying that you are changing?