A bit of satire...
 

On Sun, 07 Dec 2014 12:38:47 -0500, wrote:

On Sun, 07 Dec 2014 12:20:47 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:


There you go again, into hyperbole-ville, attempting to argue your
points beyond the onset of absurdity.

You just deny things that the courts say are true.
That is simply a fact. You do not believe Martin attacked Zimmerman,
You don't believe Brown charged Wilson and you still think Panteleo
choked Garner.


Wrong again. You are drowning in your own hyperbole.

So Zimmerman was responding to an attack, Wilson was being charged by
Brown and Garner was not choked

Keyser seems to be smarter than FOAD

Hey, they share some attributes:

"A. O. Scott of The New York Times called him the "perfect postmodern
sociopath" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keyser_S%C3%B6ze)

--

"When your argument has backed a liberal into a corner,
expect to be called a racist."

A bit of satire...
 

On 12/7/14 12:48 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 07 Dec 2014 12:24:03 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/7/14 12:19 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 07 Dec 2014 08:54:27 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

As for Greg, I see no reason to respond to his off the charts hyperbole.
I don't have to like a verdict, and I am free to say so. That doesn't
make those of us who disgree with these verdicts "mobs" in the street. I
didn't like the OJ verdict in his murder trial. Did you?

OJ simply proved the LA prosecutors and LAPD were so incompetent that
they couldn't frame a guilty man.
I didn't think they made the case "beyond a reasonable doubt" and OJ
had a good enough legal staff to make that apparent to the jury.
Allegations of past racism by LAPD got OJ a walk.


You're obfuscating. The question was, Did you like the verdict in that
OJ case?

I understood and accepted the verdict. Maybe I am more pragmatic about
the ramifications of a fair trial. The prosecution has to make their
case without any reasonable doubt and in all of these cases, there is
far more reasonable doubt than the lynch mob is willing to accept.

If you want to complain that poor people don't get as good a chance to
show reasonable doubt because they are outgunned by the government, I
agree. I doubt any of us have the money to hire OJ's dream team. He
didn't after the first trial either.In that regard the system favors
the rich but that is not necessarily racist. OJ is black. When he was
rich, he beat a murder rap. When he was poor, he ended up in jail for
a questionable robbery rap.

Let's see how Cosby makes out.


Once again, the question was "Did you like the verdict?" That is not the
same as accepting the verdict. I accepted the verdict in the Missouri
case, but I didn't like it.


--
I feel no need to explain my politics to stupid right-wingers.
After all, I am *not* the Jackass Whisperer.

A bit of satire...
 

On 12/7/14 12:51 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 07 Dec 2014 12:38:47 -0500, wrote:

On Sun, 07 Dec 2014 12:20:47 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:


There you go again, into hyperbole-ville, attempting to argue your
points beyond the onset of absurdity.

You just deny things that the courts say are true.
That is simply a fact. You do not believe Martin attacked Zimmerman,
You don't believe Brown charged Wilson and you still think Panteleo
choked Garner.


Wrong again. You are drowning in your own hyperbole.

So Zimmerman was responding to an attack, Wilson was being charged by
Brown and Garner was not choked

Keyser seems to be smarter than FOAD

Hey, they share some attributes:

"A. O. Scott of The New York Times called him the "perfect postmodern
sociopath" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keyser_S%C3%B6ze)


And therefore perfect for a newsgroup full of right-wing sociopaths.

--
I feel no need to explain my politics to stupid right-wingers.
After all, I am *not* the Jackass Whisperer.

A bit of satire...
 

On 12/7/2014 12:51 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 07 Dec 2014 12:38:47 -0500, wrote:

On Sun, 07 Dec 2014 12:20:47 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:


There you go again, into hyperbole-ville, attempting to argue your
points beyond the onset of absurdity.

You just deny things that the courts say are true.
That is simply a fact. You do not believe Martin attacked Zimmerman,
You don't believe Brown charged Wilson and you still think Panteleo
choked Garner.


Wrong again. You are drowning in your own hyperbole.

So Zimmerman was responding to an attack, Wilson was being charged by
Brown and Garner was not choked

Keyser seems to be smarter than FOAD

Hey, they share some attributes:

"A. O. Scott of The New York Times called him the "perfect postmodern
sociopath" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keyser_S%C3%B6ze)


Oh my Gawd. Next he will be asking us to call him batman... lol. He
wishes he was a cool as all he dreams.

A bit of satire...
 

On Sun, 07 Dec 2014 13:01:26 -0500, KC wrote:

On 12/7/2014 12:51 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 07 Dec 2014 12:38:47 -0500, wrote:

On Sun, 07 Dec 2014 12:20:47 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:


There you go again, into hyperbole-ville, attempting to argue your
points beyond the onset of absurdity.

You just deny things that the courts say are true.
That is simply a fact. You do not believe Martin attacked Zimmerman,
You don't believe Brown charged Wilson and you still think Panteleo
choked Garner.


Wrong again. You are drowning in your own hyperbole.

So Zimmerman was responding to an attack, Wilson was being charged by
Brown and Garner was not choked

Keyser seems to be smarter than FOAD

Hey, they share some attributes:

"A. O. Scott of The New York Times called him the "perfect postmodern
sociopath" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keyser_S%C3%B6ze)


Oh my Gawd. Next he will be asking us to call him batman... lol. He
wishes he was a cool as all he dreams.

'Toad' still works well. Easy to type also.
--

"When your argument has backed a liberal into a corner,
expect to be called a racist."

A bit of satire...
 

On Sun, 07 Dec 2014 12:44:36 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Again, *you* think I have to agree with juries. Says who? You?

--
I feel no need to explain my politics to stupid right-wingers.
After all, I am *not* the Jackass Whisperer.

===

The Toad has morphed into a Geezer.

Who wudda thunk?

A bit of satire...
 

On Sun, 07 Dec 2014 13:01:03 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

And therefore perfect for a newsgroup full of right-wing sociopaths.

===

If you are seeing sociopaths everywhere, you should spend less time in
front of the mirror.

A bit of satire...
 

On 12/7/14 1:43 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 07 Dec 2014 13:01:03 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

And therefore perfect for a newsgroup full of right-wing sociopaths.

===

If you are seeing sociopaths everywhere, you should spend less time in
front of the mirror.


The late, lamented Skipper, a right-winger, would have known the
difference between a newsgroup "full" of right-wing sociopaths and
"seeing sociopaths everywhere."

You don't.

--
I feel no need to explain my politics to stupid right-wingers.
After all, I am *not* the Jackass Whisperer.

A bit of satire...
 

On 12/7/2014 1:43 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 07 Dec 2014 13:01:03 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

And therefore perfect for a newsgroup full of right-wing sociopaths.

===

If you are seeing sociopaths everywhere, you should spend less time in
front of the mirror.


I see a lot of the late Skipper's final newsgroup demeanor, in Krause.
Is that behaviour common among folks who are about to do the big sleep?
Should we start saying our goodbys now?

A bit of satire...
 

On Sun, 07 Dec 2014 15:07:18 -0500, Let it snowe
wrote:

On 12/7/2014 1:43 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 07 Dec 2014 13:01:03 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

And therefore perfect for a newsgroup full of right-wing sociopaths.

===

If you are seeing sociopaths everywhere, you should spend less time in
front of the mirror.


I see a lot of the late Skipper's final newsgroup demeanor, in Krause.
Is that behaviour common among folks who are about to do the big sleep?
Should we start saying our goodbys now?

===

We'll see. He may not be getting enough oxygen.