Ping: KC
 

On 11/24/2014 6:40 PM, wrote:
On Monday, November 24, 2014 6:04:52 PM UTC-5, KC wrote:
On 11/24/2014 4:03 PM, wrote:
On Monday, November 24, 2014 7:55:52 AM UTC-5, True North, harrys cock boy wrote:

Like you backpeddeled when I traveled up to your backyard and called you out, two years ago.

You were two HOURS away, mouthing off in a Strip Club, big man. What a joke you are.


Hey, he waited for 90 minutes :)

He probably contracted a Male Escort for the night.


Yeah, well we all know he was never there...

Ping: KC
 

KC
- show quoted text -
"Yeah, well we all know he was never there... "

You don't know ****, you little simpleton.

Ping: KC
 

On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 19:25:49 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

All I am advocating is background checks for all types of purchases or
transfers (FFL and private) and a record of who currently owns the gun.

Eventually it will happen. Just a matter of time.

===

What do you propose doing with existing firearms?

Ping: KC
 

On 11/24/2014 8:54 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 19:25:49 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

All I am advocating is background checks for all types of purchases or
transfers (FFL and private) and a record of who currently owns the gun.

Eventually it will happen. Just a matter of time.

===

What do you propose doing with existing firearms?



I'd go with grandfathered from registration until sold or transferred.

Ping: KC
 

On Monday, November 24, 2014 7:07:51 PM UTC-5, F*O*A*D wrote:

There's something stupefyingly synergistic about posts in which the two
Scotties give each other reach-arounds.


.....and you waiting to fluff.......

Ping: KC
 

On Monday, November 24, 2014 8:27:01 PM UTC-5, True North wrote:
KC
- show quoted text -
"Yeah, well we all know he was never there... "

You don't know ****, you little simpleton.

Looks like he struck a nerve, dicklicker.

Ping: KC
 

On Monday, November 24, 2014 8:28:47 PM UTC-5, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 11/24/14 8:27 PM, True North wrote:
KC
- show quoted text -
"Yeah, well we all know he was never there..."

You don't know ****, you little simpleton.



Actually, he knows nothing but ****.


Just like krause gets donnie to wipe the **** off of his prick after he pulls out of dicklickers ass.

Ping: KC
 

On 11/24/2014 10:11 PM, wrote:
On Monday, November 24, 2014 8:27:01 PM UTC-5, True North wrote:
KC
- show quoted text -
"Yeah, well we all know he was never there..."

You don't know ****, you little simpleton.

Looks like he struck a nerve, dicklicker.


Funny to hear donnie call someone simple. He is the only one here who
writes like he didn't finish high school...

Ping: KC
 

On Monday, November 24, 2014 8:20:26 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
I just think there should be a
chain of custody for something like a firearm that, if it falls into the
wrong hands could be used for purposes the original owner never
envisioned.

Can you tell us what you think that would accomplish preventing firearm deaths? Or maybe just clear up what that sentence was supposed to mean. :-)

Ping: KC
 

On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 21:02:43 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 11/24/2014 8:54 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 19:25:49 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

All I am advocating is background checks for all types of purchases or
transfers (FFL and private) and a record of who currently owns the gun.

Eventually it will happen. Just a matter of time.

===

What do you propose doing with existing firearms?



I'd go with grandfathered from registration until sold or transferred.

===

That might be a half reasonable approach, and avoids creating a lot of
felons, but it leads to all kinds of sticky issues with proving that
a gun is legally grandfathered.