![]() |
Another actual boat question
Hi Group, I'm presently looking at a 1977 28' Bayliner with a 350 Chevy
OMC engine and Volvo 270 drive. The owner says he has the same engine in his tournament ski boat which is a Mercruiser engine. I don't know if he's referring to the fact that they're both 350 Chevy's or Mercury built the OMC also. I haven't gone to see the boat yet. The picture of the engine shows that it's definitly a Chevy and OMC. Jim |
Another actual boat question
On 11/4/2014 5:35 PM, James wrote:
Hi Group, I'm presently looking at a 1977 28' Bayliner with a 350 Chevy OMC engine and Volvo 270 drive. The owner says he has the same engine in his tournament ski boat which is a Mercruiser engine. I don't know if he's referring to the fact that they're both 350 Chevy's or Mercury built the OMC also. I haven't gone to see the boat yet. The picture of the engine shows that it's definitly a Chevy and OMC. Jim If you are asking for general opinions on the boat, here's mine: That's a pretty old boat. A lot depends on how it was maintained, how many hours are on the engine, the condition of just about everything, and on and on and on. IIRC a marine gas engine, well maintained is good for about 1,000 to 1,500 hours of operation before a rebuild or repower typically becomes necessary. Do you know if it has been re-powered? How many hours are on it? Same with the outdrive. They need maintenance and rebuilds from time to time. Engine and outdrive rebuilds/replacements aren't cheap. Boats are money pits to begin with. Older ones with lots of hours on them are even more so. Don't ask how I know. Only other comment is that a Bayliner of that vintage isn't worth much. |
Another actual boat question
On Tuesday, November 4, 2014 2:35:36 PM UTC-8, James wrote:
Hi Group, I'm presently looking at a 1977 28' Bayliner with a 350 Chevy OMC engine and Volvo 270 drive. The owner says he has the same engine in his tournament ski boat which is a Mercruiser engine. I don't know if he's referring to the fact that they're both 350 Chevy's or Mercury built the OMC also. I haven't gone to see the boat yet. The picture of the engine shows that it's definitly a Chevy and OMC. Jim Mercury and OMC ar3e two diffreent inteties. The engine is a GM v-8 in both applications, and should serve you well. There were minor differences in the applications that really didn't have to do with the engine[s]. Like water manifolds, altrnator, etc. but the engines are about the same. I believe OMC did use the volvo outdrives for a while which is also a good lower unit.. . This is a far better choice than the old OMC stringer drives by far. In fact the Volvo outdrive is probably better built than the merceuisers. Parts availability is much easier for the Volvo than OMC, but they are pricey if parts are needed. Understand that you're looking at at cose to a 40 year old boat, that though it may have been maintained well, it could still have some hull/structure issues in which repair issues may be way more than the boat is worth. Not to be insulting, but just saying you need to be very cautious about it. If I was going to buy something like that, it's have to be just about scrap price and I'd have a very experienced boat mechanic look it over. It may cost you a couple hundred, but the mechanic can address some issues that you might not be aware of. Good luck! |
Another actual boat question
On Tuesday, November 4, 2014 3:18:47 PM UTC-8, Mr. Luddite wrote:
Boats are money pits to begin with. Older ones with lots of hours on them are even more so. Don't ask how I know. Only other comment is that a Bayliner of that vintage isn't worth much. I absolutely agree! One thing about the 70's Bayliners is that they were a lot better built then they were in the 90's when they started cutting corners and using substandard materials and went to heck in the proverbial hand basket. |
Another actual boat question
On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 16:35:34 -0600, "James"
wrote: Hi Group, I'm presently looking at a 1977 28' Bayliner with a 350 Chevy OMC engine and Volvo 270 drive. The owner says he has the same engine in his tournament ski boat which is a Mercruiser engine. I don't know if he's referring to the fact that they're both 350 Chevy's or Mercury built the OMC also. I haven't gone to see the boat yet. The picture of the engine shows that it's definitly a Chevy and OMC. Jim === Jim, I appreciate the fact that you are trying to find a bargain boat but trust me when I say that the purchase price is just the tip of the iceberg. When you buy a boat of that type that is 30 or 40 years old, it is a project boat at best, and without doubt a money pit. I owned a 1978 Winner 24 for a while that I bought back in the 90s. It had a 350 cid Mercruiser engine and outdrive. I got a few good years out of the boat and had a lot of fun with it, but eventually had to get rid of it because of perpetual maintenance issues. You can buy these boats for pennies on the dollar because their best years are behind them, and the current owner is no longer happy with their investment. Unless you are a marine mechanic with good access to old, obsolete spare parts, I'd look for something easier to maintain - maybe an outboard in the 17 or 18 foot range. |
Another actual boat question
Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 16:35:34 -0600, "James" wrote: Hi Group, I'm presently looking at a 1977 28' Bayliner with a 350 Chevy OMC engine and Volvo 270 drive. The owner says he has the same engine in his tournament ski boat which is a Mercruiser engine. I don't know if he's referring to the fact that they're both 350 Chevy's or Mercury built the OMC also. I haven't gone to see the boat yet. The picture of the engine shows that it's definitly a Chevy and OMC. Jim === Jim, I appreciate the fact that you are trying to find a bargain boat but trust me when I say that the purchase price is just the tip of the iceberg. When you buy a boat of that type that is 30 or 40 years old, it is a project boat at best, and without doubt a money pit. I owned a 1978 Winner 24 for a while that I bought back in the 90s. It had a 350 cid Mercruiser engine and outdrive. I got a few good years out of the boat and had a lot of fun with it, but eventually had to get rid of it because of perpetual maintenance issues. You can buy these boats for pennies on the dollar because their best years are behind them, and the current owner is no longer happy with their investment. Unless you are a marine mechanic with good access to old, obsolete spare parts, I'd look for something easier to maintain - maybe an outboard in the 17 or 18 foot range. Actually I'm a pretty good boat mechanic having owned and maintained a 28' sailboat which we trailer sailed. It had a Volvo-penta in it and no one around here could work on it so I learned how. Got to be a bit of an effort to step the mast as we got older so we decided to switch to a cabin cruiser. Chevy's are defiantly easier and there are a lot of boats with Volvo outdrives around here and several good dealers and mechanics. We're land locked so it has to have a trailer and will live at our house. I'm well aware that it depends on upkeep and maintenance. In some cases the boat is being sold because of too many boats, the owner moved up or down or has to move out of the area. Besides I like old boats and if I could afford it I'd buy a classic wooden Chriscraft runabout or similar but I'd hate to hang downriggers and rod holders on it. Jim |
Another actual boat question
Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/4/2014 5:35 PM, James wrote: Hi Group, I'm presently looking at a 1977 28' Bayliner with a 350 Chevy OMC engine and Volvo 270 drive. The owner says he has the same engine in his tournament ski boat which is a Mercruiser engine. I don't know if he's referring to the fact that they're both 350 Chevy's or Mercury built the OMC also. I haven't gone to see the boat yet. The picture of the engine shows that it's definitly a Chevy and OMC. Jim If you are asking for general opinions on the boat, here's mine: That's a pretty old boat. A lot depends on how it was maintained, how many hours are on the engine, the condition of just about everything, and on and on and on. IIRC a marine gas engine, well maintained is good for about 1,000 to 1,500 hours of operation before a rebuild or repower typically becomes necessary. Do you know if it has been re-powered? How many hours are on it? Same with the outdrive. They need maintenance and rebuilds from time to time. Engine and outdrive rebuilds/replacements aren't cheap. Boats are money pits to begin with. Older ones with lots of hours on them are even more so. Don't ask how I know. Only other comment is that a Bayliner of that vintage isn't worth much. Actually I was asking if Mercury had built or acquired OMC. I think what the owner was referring to was that both his boats had 350 Chevys. One is a OMC and the other is a Mercuiser. I also know that B.O.A.T means break out another thousand or Boat is a hole in the water surrounded by fiberglas. We're looking for a cabin cruiser that will fill our requirements and not brake the bank. A little work is ok. I've pass up several that need engines and major work. I'm looking for a happy medium and it's out there somewhere. I'm not in a major hurry. |
Another actual boat question
On 11/5/2014 10:56 AM, James wrote:
Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/4/2014 5:35 PM, James wrote: Hi Group, I'm presently looking at a 1977 28' Bayliner with a 350 Chevy OMC engine and Volvo 270 drive. The owner says he has the same engine in his tournament ski boat which is a Mercruiser engine. I don't know if he's referring to the fact that they're both 350 Chevy's or Mercury built the OMC also. I haven't gone to see the boat yet. The picture of the engine shows that it's definitly a Chevy and OMC. Jim If you are asking for general opinions on the boat, here's mine: That's a pretty old boat. A lot depends on how it was maintained, how many hours are on the engine, the condition of just about everything, and on and on and on. IIRC a marine gas engine, well maintained is good for about 1,000 to 1,500 hours of operation before a rebuild or repower typically becomes necessary. Do you know if it has been re-powered? How many hours are on it? Same with the outdrive. They need maintenance and rebuilds from time to time. Engine and outdrive rebuilds/replacements aren't cheap. Boats are money pits to begin with. Older ones with lots of hours on them are even more so. Don't ask how I know. Only other comment is that a Bayliner of that vintage isn't worth much. Actually I was asking if Mercury had built or acquired OMC. I think what the owner was referring to was that both his boats had 350 Chevys. One is a OMC and the other is a Mercuiser. I also know that B.O.A.T means break out another thousand or Boat is a hole in the water surrounded by fiberglas. We're looking for a cabin cruiser that will fill our requirements and not brake the bank. A little work is ok. I've pass up several that need engines and major work. I'm looking for a happy medium and it's out there somewhere. I'm not in a major hurry. The GM 350 is a very popular marine engine found in many boats of that size regardless of who manufactures the drive system. Based on past experience though, I'd never even consider on that has a carburetor. Fuel injection is the only way to go. If that is the original engine, most likely it has a carburetor. Just my opinion based on experience. My comment on engine hours still stands. Good engine but like all, it eventually needs a rebuild or replacement. You really don't want to find out while cruising with the family 5 or 10 miles offshore. One of my first boats that I bought back in mid 1990's was a 27' 1982 Century Express Cruiser. The engine had just been replaced with a rebuilt GM 350 and it had an Alpha One (Mercury) outdrive. Despite the rebuild, the engine was always problematic, mostly involving the Rochester "QuadraBog" 4 barrel carburetor. Despite several attempts at cleaning and rebuilds, it never ran right for very long. Then the rebuilt engine starting ****ing water out of one side. One of the plugs they use when casting rotted completely through. These things are usually discovered while underway. Then the Alpha drive started leaking with the oil becoming mixed with water. Rebuild time. Then the hydraulic lines that raise and lower the drive started leaking. If the engine's carburetor happened to be cooperating, I'd get the boat up on plane, trim the drive but it would slowly start to lower again due to the leak resulting in some scary and dangerous bow steering. Didn't have it too long. Gave it to my brother. If it happened to start, he'd just putt-putt around the harbor with it. Most of the time it sat at his slip as a floating bar. |
Another actual boat question
James, I'm liking your approach to this and it sounds more encouraging that you're up for the task and not a novice.
Again the OMC and the Mercruiser are the same engines that you'd find in a comparable 3/4 ton Chevy pickup with the exception of a different cam shaft, steel stead of cast iron crankshaft. The freeze plugs are a non corrosive metal due to usually a raw water application as well as the water pump. The diffrence between an auto and a marine pump is the boat pump has special sealed bearings and usually powder coated inside to prevent water damage to the bearings and also prevent rust corrosion. The alternators and starters have spark resistant shielding as well. If a guy is handy with tools you shouldn't have any problem with maintainance. If you decide to persue. this project. It'd be worth getting a mercruiser shop manual. The book is extremely thourough and great to have around. You can get a complete shop manual for 20 -30 bucks on eBay. Keep us informed. Btw there's a lot of great archives in rec boats that a person can look up as well. |
Another actual boat question
Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/5/2014 10:56 AM, James wrote: Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/4/2014 5:35 PM, James wrote: Hi Group, I'm presently looking at a 1977 28' Bayliner with a 350 Chevy OMC engine and Volvo 270 drive. The owner says he has the same engine in his tournament ski boat which is a Mercruiser engine. I don't know if he's referring to the fact that they're both 350 Chevy's or Mercury built the OMC also. I haven't gone to see the boat yet. The picture of the engine shows that it's definitly a Chevy and OMC. Jim If you are asking for general opinions on the boat, here's mine: That's a pretty old boat. A lot depends on how it was maintained, how many hours are on the engine, the condition of just about everything, and on and on and on. IIRC a marine gas engine, well maintained is good for about 1,000 to 1,500 hours of operation before a rebuild or repower typically becomes necessary. Do you know if it has been re-powered? How many hours are on it? Same with the outdrive. They need maintenance and rebuilds from time to time. Engine and outdrive rebuilds/replacements aren't cheap. Boats are money pits to begin with. Older ones with lots of hours on them are even more so. Don't ask how I know. Only other comment is that a Bayliner of that vintage isn't worth much. Actually I was asking if Mercury had built or acquired OMC. I think what the owner was referring to was that both his boats had 350 Chevys. One is a OMC and the other is a Mercuiser. I also know that B.O.A.T means break out another thousand or Boat is a hole in the water surrounded by fiberglas. We're looking for a cabin cruiser that will fill our requirements and not brake the bank. A little work is ok. I've pass up several that need engines and major work. I'm looking for a happy medium and it's out there somewhere. I'm not in a major hurry. The GM 350 is a very popular marine engine found in many boats of that size regardless of who manufactures the drive system. Based on past experience though, I'd never even consider on that has a carburetor. Fuel injection is the only way to go. If that is the original engine, most likely it has a carburetor. Just my opinion based on experience. My comment on engine hours still stands. Good engine but like all, it eventually needs a rebuild or replacement. You really don't want to find out while cruising with the family 5 or 10 miles offshore. One of my first boats that I bought back in mid 1990's was a 27' 1982 Century Express Cruiser. The engine had just been replaced with a rebuilt GM 350 and it had an Alpha One (Mercury) outdrive. Despite the rebuild, the engine was always problematic, mostly involving the Rochester "QuadraBog" 4 barrel carburetor. Despite several attempts at cleaning and rebuilds, it never ran right for very long. Then the rebuilt engine starting ****ing water out of one side. One of the plugs they use when casting rotted completely through. These things are usually discovered while underway. Then the Alpha drive started leaking with the oil becoming mixed with water. Rebuild time. Then the hydraulic lines that raise and lower the drive started leaking. If the engine's carburetor happened to be cooperating, I'd get the boat up on plane, trim the drive but it would slowly start to lower again due to the leak resulting in some scary and dangerous bow steering. Didn't have it too long. Gave it to my brother. If it happened to start, he'd just putt-putt around the harbor with it. Most of the time it sat at his slip as a floating bar. I'm with you on Quadjet. Won't even make a good anchor. I used Holleys on my Chevy trucks except for the last one whiich was a 454 when I used an Edelbrok.That's mostly why I have a Ford diesel now about 3 times the milege. Jim |
Another actual boat question
Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/5/2014 10:56 AM, James wrote: Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/4/2014 5:35 PM, James wrote: Hi Group, I'm presently looking at a 1977 28' Bayliner with a 350 Chevy OMC engine and Volvo 270 drive. The owner says he has the same engine in his tournament ski boat which is a Mercruiser engine. I don't know if he's referring to the fact that they're both 350 Chevy's or Mercury built the OMC also. I haven't gone to see the boat yet. The picture of the engine shows that it's definitly a Chevy and OMC. Jim If you are asking for general opinions on the boat, here's mine: That's a pretty old boat. A lot depends on how it was maintained, how many hours are on the engine, the condition of just about everything, and on and on and on. IIRC a marine gas engine, well maintained is good for about 1,000 to 1,500 hours of operation before a rebuild or repower typically becomes necessary. Do you know if it has been re-powered? How many hours are on it? Same with the outdrive. They need maintenance and rebuilds from time to time. Engine and outdrive rebuilds/replacements aren't cheap. Boats are money pits to begin with. Older ones with lots of hours on them are even more so. Don't ask how I know. Only other comment is that a Bayliner of that vintage isn't worth much. Actually I was asking if Mercury had built or acquired OMC. I think what the owner was referring to was that both his boats had 350 Chevys. One is a OMC and the other is a Mercuiser. I also know that B.O.A.T means break out another thousand or Boat is a hole in the water surrounded by fiberglas. We're looking for a cabin cruiser that will fill our requirements and not brake the bank. A little work is ok. I've pass up several that need engines and major work. I'm looking for a happy medium and it's out there somewhere. I'm not in a major hurry. The GM 350 is a very popular marine engine found in many boats of that size regardless of who manufactures the drive system. Based on past experience though, I'd never even consider on that has a carburetor. Fuel injection is the only way to go. If that is the original engine, most likely it has a carburetor. Just my opinion based on experience. My comment on engine hours still stands. Good engine but like all, it eventually needs a rebuild or replacement. You really don't want to find out while cruising with the family 5 or 10 miles offshore. One of my first boats that I bought back in mid 1990's was a 27' 1982 Century Express Cruiser. The engine had just been replaced with a rebuilt GM 350 and it had an Alpha One (Mercury) outdrive. Despite the rebuild, the engine was always problematic, mostly involving the Rochester "QuadraBog" 4 barrel carburetor. Despite several attempts at cleaning and rebuilds, it never ran right for very long. Then the rebuilt engine starting ****ing water out of one side. One of the plugs they use when casting rotted completely through. These things are usually discovered while underway. Then the Alpha drive started leaking with the oil becoming mixed with water. Rebuild time. Then the hydraulic lines that raise and lower the drive started leaking. If the engine's carburetor happened to be cooperating, I'd get the boat up on plane, trim the drive but it would slowly start to lower again due to the leak resulting in some scary and dangerous bow steering. Didn't have it too long. Gave it to my brother. If it happened to start, he'd just putt-putt around the harbor with it. Most of the time it sat at his slip as a floating bar. |
Another actual boat question
Tim wrote:
James, I'm liking your approach to this and it sounds more encouraging that you're up for the task and not a novice. Again the OMC and the Mercruiser are the same engines that you'd find in a comparable 3/4 ton Chevy pickup with the exception of a different cam shaft, steel stead of cast iron crankshaft. The freeze plugs are a non corrosive metal due to usually a raw water application as well as the water pump. The diffrence between an auto and a marine pump is the boat pump has special sealed bearings and usually powder coated inside to prevent water damage to the bearings and also prevent rust corrosion. The alternators and starters have spark resistant shielding as well. If a guy is handy with tools you shouldn't have any problem with maintainance. If you decide to persue. this project. It'd be worth getting a mercruiser shop manual. The book is extremely thourough and great to have around. You can get a complete shop manual for 20 -30 bucks on eBay. Keep us informed. Btw there's a lot of great archives in rec boats that a person can look up as well. This particular boat has a closed cooling system (fresh water). Our sailboat was raw water kind of pita to winterize but I just pumped Rv anti-freeze through it. I had a '67 3/4 ton Chevy 4X4 with a 327 in it that I rebuilt ran good. Then I got an '81 Chevy 1 ton with a 454 now I have a Superduty 7.3L which gets a whole lot better mileage.Jim |
Another actual boat question
On 11/5/2014 7:08 PM, James wrote:
Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/5/2014 10:56 AM, James wrote: Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/4/2014 5:35 PM, James wrote: Hi Group, I'm presently looking at a 1977 28' Bayliner with a 350 Chevy OMC engine and Volvo 270 drive. The owner says he has the same engine in his tournament ski boat which is a Mercruiser engine. I don't know if he's referring to the fact that they're both 350 Chevy's or Mercury built the OMC also. I haven't gone to see the boat yet. The picture of the engine shows that it's definitly a Chevy and OMC. Jim If you are asking for general opinions on the boat, here's mine: That's a pretty old boat. A lot depends on how it was maintained, how many hours are on the engine, the condition of just about everything, and on and on and on. IIRC a marine gas engine, well maintained is good for about 1,000 to 1,500 hours of operation before a rebuild or repower typically becomes necessary. Do you know if it has been re-powered? How many hours are on it? Same with the outdrive. They need maintenance and rebuilds from time to time. Engine and outdrive rebuilds/replacements aren't cheap. Boats are money pits to begin with. Older ones with lots of hours on them are even more so. Don't ask how I know. Only other comment is that a Bayliner of that vintage isn't worth much. Actually I was asking if Mercury had built or acquired OMC. I think what the owner was referring to was that both his boats had 350 Chevys. One is a OMC and the other is a Mercuiser. I also know that B.O.A.T means break out another thousand or Boat is a hole in the water surrounded by fiberglas. We're looking for a cabin cruiser that will fill our requirements and not brake the bank. A little work is ok. I've pass up several that need engines and major work. I'm looking for a happy medium and it's out there somewhere. I'm not in a major hurry. The GM 350 is a very popular marine engine found in many boats of that size regardless of who manufactures the drive system. Based on past experience though, I'd never even consider on that has a carburetor. Fuel injection is the only way to go. If that is the original engine, most likely it has a carburetor. Just my opinion based on experience. My comment on engine hours still stands. Good engine but like all, it eventually needs a rebuild or replacement. You really don't want to find out while cruising with the family 5 or 10 miles offshore. One of my first boats that I bought back in mid 1990's was a 27' 1982 Century Express Cruiser. The engine had just been replaced with a rebuilt GM 350 and it had an Alpha One (Mercury) outdrive. Despite the rebuild, the engine was always problematic, mostly involving the Rochester "QuadraBog" 4 barrel carburetor. Despite several attempts at cleaning and rebuilds, it never ran right for very long. Then the rebuilt engine starting ****ing water out of one side. One of the plugs they use when casting rotted completely through. These things are usually discovered while underway. Then the Alpha drive started leaking with the oil becoming mixed with water. Rebuild time. Then the hydraulic lines that raise and lower the drive started leaking. If the engine's carburetor happened to be cooperating, I'd get the boat up on plane, trim the drive but it would slowly start to lower again due to the leak resulting in some scary and dangerous bow steering. Didn't have it too long. Gave it to my brother. If it happened to start, he'd just putt-putt around the harbor with it. Most of the time it sat at his slip as a floating bar. I'm with you on Quadjet. Won't even make a good anchor. I used Holleys on my Chevy trucks except for the last one whiich was a 454 when I used an Edelbrok.That's mostly why I have a Ford diesel now about 3 times the milege. Jim Heh. The problem with boats is you get two-foot-itis every year or two. One benefit though is that at some point your boat gets big enough to warrant diesel power. It's hard to go back to gas after that. |
Another actual boat question
On 11/5/2014 7:16 PM, James wrote:
Tim wrote: James, I'm liking your approach to this and it sounds more encouraging that you're up for the task and not a novice. Again the OMC and the Mercruiser are the same engines that you'd find in a comparable 3/4 ton Chevy pickup with the exception of a different cam shaft, steel stead of cast iron crankshaft. The freeze plugs are a non corrosive metal due to usually a raw water application as well as the water pump. The diffrence between an auto and a marine pump is the boat pump has special sealed bearings and usually powder coated inside to prevent water damage to the bearings and also prevent rust corrosion. The alternators and starters have spark resistant shielding as well. If a guy is handy with tools you shouldn't have any problem with maintainance. If you decide to persue. this project. It'd be worth getting a mercruiser shop manual. The book is extremely thourough and great to have around. You can get a complete shop manual for 20 -30 bucks on eBay. Keep us informed. Btw there's a lot of great archives in rec boats that a person can look up as well. This particular boat has a closed cooling system (fresh water). Our sailboat was raw water kind of pita to winterize but I just pumped Rv anti-freeze through it. I had a '67 3/4 ton Chevy 4X4 with a 327 in it that I rebuilt ran good. Then I got an '81 Chevy 1 ton with a 454 now I have a Superduty 7.3L which gets a whole lot better mileage.Jim Too bad Ford could not have kept using the 7.3L diesel. It's replacement (the 6.0L) was terrible in terms of reliability. I had a 2005 F-350 with the 6.0L and the high pressure pump failed twice leaving me stranded while traveling, once in Georgia and then a few months later in Virginia. Then, the turbo failed. All of this happened within the first 11,000 miles. I took it back to the dealer and told them I didn't want it. Don't know much about the latest Ford 6.7L diesel. I like Ford trucks but had bad experiences with that engine. |
Another actual boat question
On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 16:35:34 -0600, "James"
wrote: Hi Group, I'm presently looking at a 1977 28' Bayliner with a 350 Chevy OMC engine and Volvo 270 drive. The owner says he has the same engine in his tournament ski boat which is a Mercruiser engine. I don't know if he's referring to the fact that they're both 350 Chevy's or Mercury built the OMC also. I haven't gone to see the boat yet. The picture of the engine shows that it's definitly a Chevy and OMC. Jim === It's important to understand that boats that age develop issues other than the engine and outdrive. Frequent failure points are rot in the transom, cockpit floors and stringers. Any one of those problems puts the boat into the negative value category meaning that it is more expensive to fix than the boat is worth. The electrical system is another area that is frequently deteriorated beyond repair. Spending a few hundred bucks for a good surveyor can be the best investment you ever make. |
Another actual boat question
On 11/5/2014 9:40 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 16:35:34 -0600, "James" wrote: Hi Group, I'm presently looking at a 1977 28' Bayliner with a 350 Chevy OMC engine and Volvo 270 drive. The owner says he has the same engine in his tournament ski boat which is a Mercruiser engine. I don't know if he's referring to the fact that they're both 350 Chevy's or Mercury built the OMC also. I haven't gone to see the boat yet. The picture of the engine shows that it's definitly a Chevy and OMC. Jim === It's important to understand that boats that age develop issues other than the engine and outdrive. Frequent failure points are rot in the transom, cockpit floors and stringers. Any one of those problems puts the boat into the negative value category meaning that it is more expensive to fix than the boat is worth. The electrical system is another area that is frequently deteriorated beyond repair. Spending a few hundred bucks for a good surveyor can be the best investment you ever make. Oh yeah. Rot. That '82 Century I owned had rotted stringers running port to starboard just forward of the engine. I put some pressure treated "sister" stringers attached to the solid sections on each end of the rotted ones and then soaked the rotted sections with anti-freeze. |
Another actual boat question
Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 16:35:34 -0600, "James" wrote: Hi Group, I'm presently looking at a 1977 28' Bayliner with a 350 Chevy OMC engine and Volvo 270 drive. The owner says he has the same engine in his tournament ski boat which is a Mercruiser engine. I don't know if he's referring to the fact that they're both 350 Chevy's or Mercury built the OMC also. I haven't gone to see the boat yet. The picture of the engine shows that it's definitly a Chevy and OMC. Jim === It's important to understand that boats that age develop issues other than the engine and outdrive. Frequent failure points are rot in the transom, cockpit floors and stringers. Any one of those problems puts the boat into the negative value category meaning that it is more expensive to fix than the boat is worth. The electrical system is another area that is frequently deteriorated beyond repair. Spending a few hundred bucks for a good surveyor can be the best investment you ever make. Some boats worth more as scrap. Needed some lead for crab pot weights. Local Craigslist ad for lead. Guy delivered as he was coming to town. Has a ranch in the Livermore hills, and scraps out old boats. He had just done an Islander 35? And had a 5500 pound lead keel. Costs $100 a ton to get rid of the left overs at the Cogeneration plant. |
Another actual boat question
Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/5/2014 7:16 PM, James wrote: Tim wrote: James, I'm liking your approach to this and it sounds more encouraging that you're up for the task and not a novice. Again the OMC and the Mercruiser are the same engines that you'd find in a comparable 3/4 ton Chevy pickup with the exception of a different cam shaft, steel stead of cast iron crankshaft. The freeze plugs are a non corrosive metal due to usually a raw water application as well as the water pump. The diffrence between an auto and a marine pump is the boat pump has special sealed bearings and usually powder coated inside to prevent water damage to the bearings and also prevent rust corrosion. The alternators and starters have spark resistant shielding as well. If a guy is handy with tools you shouldn't have any problem with maintainance. If you decide to persue. this project. It'd be worth getting a mercruiser shop manual. The book is extremely thourough and great to have around. You can get a complete shop manual for 20 -30 bucks on eBay. Keep us informed. Btw there's a lot of great archives in rec boats that a person can look up as well. This particular boat has a closed cooling system (fresh water). Our sailboat was raw water kind of pita to winterize but I just pumped Rv anti-freeze through it. I had a '67 3/4 ton Chevy 4X4 with a 327 in it that I rebuilt ran good. Then I got an '81 Chevy 1 ton with a 454 now I have a Superduty 7.3L which gets a whole lot better mileage.Jim Too bad Ford could not have kept using the 7.3L diesel. It's replacement (the 6.0L) was terrible in terms of reliability. I had a 2005 F-350 with the 6.0L and the high pressure pump failed twice leaving me stranded while traveling, once in Georgia and then a few months later in Virginia. Then, the turbo failed. All of this happened within the first 11,000 miles. I took it back to the dealer and told them I didn't want it. Don't know much about the latest Ford 6.7L diesel. I like Ford trucks but had bad experiences with that engine. The new 6.7L seems to be a good engine. Built by Ford in Brazil I believe. Haven't heard any big complaints yet. |
Another actual boat question
Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 16:35:34 -0600, "James" wrote: Hi Group, I'm presently looking at a 1977 28' Bayliner with a 350 Chevy OMC engine and Volvo 270 drive. The owner says he has the same engine in his tournament ski boat which is a Mercruiser engine. I don't know if he's referring to the fact that they're both 350 Chevy's or Mercury built the OMC also. I haven't gone to see the boat yet. The picture of the engine shows that it's definitly a Chevy and OMC. Jim === It's important to understand that boats that age develop issues other than the engine and outdrive. Frequent failure points are rot in the transom, cockpit floors and stringers. Any one of those problems puts the boat into the negative value category meaning that it is more expensive to fix than the boat is worth. The electrical system is another area that is frequently deteriorated beyond repair. Spending a few hundred bucks for a good surveyor can be the best investment you ever make. Ya, I'm familiar with rot. Our sailboat was '75 and it had a little rot. I've worked with Fiberglas, electrical, carpentry and I'm a certified welder both structural steel and aluminium. My fishing partner has an Alumaweld jet boat and I build things for it all the time. |
Another actual boat question
Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/5/2014 9:40 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 16:35:34 -0600, "James" wrote: Hi Group, I'm presently looking at a 1977 28' Bayliner with a 350 Chevy OMC engine and Volvo 270 drive. The owner says he has the same engine in his tournament ski boat which is a Mercruiser engine. I don't know if he's referring to the fact that they're both 350 Chevy's or Mercury built the OMC also. I haven't gone to see the boat yet. The picture of the engine shows that it's definitly a Chevy and OMC. Jim === It's important to understand that boats that age develop issues other than the engine and outdrive. Frequent failure points are rot in the transom, cockpit floors and stringers. Any one of those problems puts the boat into the negative value category meaning that it is more expensive to fix than the boat is worth. The electrical system is another area that is frequently deteriorated beyond repair. Spending a few hundred bucks for a good surveyor can be the best investment you ever make. Oh yeah. Rot. That '82 Century I owned had rotted stringers running port to starboard just forward of the engine. I put some pressure treated "sister" stringers attached to the solid sections on each end of the rotted ones and then soaked the rotted sections with anti-freeze. I've fixed rotted stringers in our pickup campers with System 3 Fixrot. Great stuff makes rotted eood really strong. |
Another actual boat question
On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 09:38:25 -0600, "James"
wrote: Wayne.B wrote: On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 16:35:34 -0600, "James" wrote: Hi Group, I'm presently looking at a 1977 28' Bayliner with a 350 Chevy OMC engine and Volvo 270 drive. The owner says he has the same engine in his tournament ski boat which is a Mercruiser engine. I don't know if he's referring to the fact that they're both 350 Chevy's or Mercury built the OMC also. I haven't gone to see the boat yet. The picture of the engine shows that it's definitly a Chevy and OMC. Jim === It's important to understand that boats that age develop issues other than the engine and outdrive. Frequent failure points are rot in the transom, cockpit floors and stringers. Any one of those problems puts the boat into the negative value category meaning that it is more expensive to fix than the boat is worth. The electrical system is another area that is frequently deteriorated beyond repair. Spending a few hundred bucks for a good surveyor can be the best investment you ever make. Ya, I'm familiar with rot. Our sailboat was '75 and it had a little rot. I've worked with Fiberglas, electrical, carpentry and I'm a certified welder both structural steel and aluminium. My fishing partner has an Alumaweld jet boat and I build things for it all the time. Sounds like you should be giving the advice to us! |
Another actual boat question
On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 09:41:33 -0600, "James"
wrote: Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/5/2014 9:40 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 16:35:34 -0600, "James" wrote: Hi Group, I'm presently looking at a 1977 28' Bayliner with a 350 Chevy OMC engine and Volvo 270 drive. The owner says he has the same engine in his tournament ski boat which is a Mercruiser engine. I don't know if he's referring to the fact that they're both 350 Chevy's or Mercury built the OMC also. I haven't gone to see the boat yet. The picture of the engine shows that it's definitly a Chevy and OMC. Jim === It's important to understand that boats that age develop issues other than the engine and outdrive. Frequent failure points are rot in the transom, cockpit floors and stringers. Any one of those problems puts the boat into the negative value category meaning that it is more expensive to fix than the boat is worth. The electrical system is another area that is frequently deteriorated beyond repair. Spending a few hundred bucks for a good surveyor can be the best investment you ever make. Oh yeah. Rot. That '82 Century I owned had rotted stringers running port to starboard just forward of the engine. I put some pressure treated "sister" stringers attached to the solid sections on each end of the rotted ones and then soaked the rotted sections with anti-freeze. I've fixed rotted stringers in our pickup campers with System 3 Fixrot. Great stuff makes rotted eood really strong. === I would not recommend fixing rotted stringers with epoxy. It's a band aid cure at best. Stringers on a boat are subject to a lot more stress than stringers on a camper, and if your camper breaks in half after hitting a pot hole, it is not nearly as serious as your boat breaking up after hitting a wave. There was an incident near here a few years ago where a boat broke up after hitting a wave. There was one fatality and a bunch of serious injuries. |
Another actual boat question
On 11/6/2014 1:34 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 09:41:33 -0600, "James" wrote: Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/5/2014 9:40 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 16:35:34 -0600, "James" wrote: Hi Group, I'm presently looking at a 1977 28' Bayliner with a 350 Chevy OMC engine and Volvo 270 drive. The owner says he has the same engine in his tournament ski boat which is a Mercruiser engine. I don't know if he's referring to the fact that they're both 350 Chevy's or Mercury built the OMC also. I haven't gone to see the boat yet. The picture of the engine shows that it's definitly a Chevy and OMC. Jim === It's important to understand that boats that age develop issues other than the engine and outdrive. Frequent failure points are rot in the transom, cockpit floors and stringers. Any one of those problems puts the boat into the negative value category meaning that it is more expensive to fix than the boat is worth. The electrical system is another area that is frequently deteriorated beyond repair. Spending a few hundred bucks for a good surveyor can be the best investment you ever make. Oh yeah. Rot. That '82 Century I owned had rotted stringers running port to starboard just forward of the engine. I put some pressure treated "sister" stringers attached to the solid sections on each end of the rotted ones and then soaked the rotted sections with anti-freeze. I've fixed rotted stringers in our pickup campers with System 3 Fixrot. Great stuff makes rotted eood really strong. === I would not recommend fixing rotted stringers with epoxy. It's a band aid cure at best. Stringers on a boat are subject to a lot more stress than stringers on a camper, and if your camper breaks in half after hitting a pot hole, it is not nearly as serious as your boat breaking up after hitting a wave. There was an incident near here a few years ago where a boat broke up after hitting a wave. There was one fatality and a bunch of serious injuries. Sounds like this guy knows his stuff, they do make "epoxy" mixes that are specifically made for the purpose of fixing rot. With laminates (shredded glass, kevlar, etc) mixed in, I believe these products may be up to the task of repairing rot on a boat... They even make stuff to fill in a rotted transom... |
Another actual boat question
On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 14:22:27 -0500, KC wrote:
Sounds like this guy knows his stuff, they do make "epoxy" mixes that are specifically made for the purpose of fixing rot. === It's generally regarded as more of a cosmetic, temporary fix unless you put some new wood in at the same time. Luddite described a repair to an older boat that he owned where they paired up new lumber with the old, rotted stringer. That's usually called "sistering" and is a time honored way of making a permanent repair. |
Another actual boat question
On 11/6/2014 3:50 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 14:22:27 -0500, KC wrote: Sounds like this guy knows his stuff, they do make "epoxy" mixes that are specifically made for the purpose of fixing rot. === It's generally regarded as more of a cosmetic, temporary fix unless you put some new wood in at the same time. Luddite described a repair to an older boat that he owned where they paired up new lumber with the old, rotted stringer. That's usually called "sistering" and is a time honored way of making a permanent repair. I was told that products like "Dr. Rot" (an epoxy) is good for low stress repairs like areas where screws are needed for rod holders, etc., but not for a structural component like a stringer. Anti-freeze will kill the mold spores that are causing the rot, preventing it from continuing. |
Another actual boat question
KC wrote:
On 11/6/2014 1:34 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 09:41:33 -0600, "James" wrote: Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/5/2014 9:40 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 16:35:34 -0600, "James" wrote: Hi Group, I'm presently looking at a 1977 28' Bayliner with a 350 Chevy OMC engine and Volvo 270 drive. The owner says he has the same engine in his tournament ski boat which is a Mercruiser engine. I don't know if he's referring to the fact that they're both 350 Chevy's or Mercury built the OMC also. I haven't gone to see the boat yet. The picture of the engine shows that it's definitly a Chevy and OMC. Jim === It's important to understand that boats that age develop issues other than the engine and outdrive. Frequent failure points are rot in the transom, cockpit floors and stringers. Any one of those problems puts the boat into the negative value category meaning that it is more expensive to fix than the boat is worth. The electrical system is another area that is frequently deteriorated beyond repair. Spending a few hundred bucks for a good surveyor can be the best investment you ever make. Oh yeah. Rot. That '82 Century I owned had rotted stringers running port to starboard just forward of the engine. I put some pressure treated "sister" stringers attached to the solid sections on each end of the rotted ones and then soaked the rotted sections with anti-freeze. I've fixed rotted stringers in our pickup campers with System 3 Fixrot. Great stuff makes rotted eood really strong. === I would not recommend fixing rotted stringers with epoxy. It's a band aid cure at best. Stringers on a boat are subject to a lot more stress than stringers on a camper, and if your camper breaks in half after hitting a pot hole, it is not nearly as serious as your boat breaking up after hitting a wave. There was an incident near here a few years ago where a boat broke up after hitting a wave. There was one fatality and a bunch of serious injuries. Sounds like this guy knows his stuff, they do make "epoxy" mixes that are specifically made for the purpose of fixing rot. With laminates (shredded glass, kevlar, etc) mixed in, I believe these products may be up to the task of repairing rot on a boat... They even make stuff to fill in a rotted transom... And it is a marginal repair at best. The rotted wood has no strength as a filler fiber. I tried gitrot on my camper where the back corner where the jack attaches was rotted. After a couple days, I figured the strength was nil. So I ripped out the rotted area and fitted in sealed wood piece. After seeing the results, I would use an epoxy filler like rod doctor, etc. only in a dire case. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:18 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com