F*O*A*D wrote:
On 10/7/14 2:37 PM, Poco Loco wrote:


I don't really hate you Harry, and pity is not the right word either
but it is closer. It would be good for the group however if you'd
stop trying to insult people who don't agree with all of your
political views. You've driven off a lot of good people with the
hostile atmosphere that you have created here.

'Hate' is an emotion that takes work. Krause is definitely not worth
it. 'Pity' is probably closer, but I think the feeling is more like
that experienced upon seeing a pile of dog poop on the sidewalk.


It's really a giggle when you right-wingers hook up.

Didn't Donnie want to get out of bed today to fire up the Playbook and
defend you?

On 10/7/2014 8:04 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 19:34:35 -0400, Poco Loco
wrote:

On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 19:30:33 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 17:38:16 -0400, KC wrote:

On 10/7/2014 4:43 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 16:11:57 -0400, KC wrote:

mocking gays....

Is that a Hunger Games reference?


Not from this end, I didn't read the book or see the movie...

It was big with my grand daughter.

Mine is now taking archery lessons, and the instructor thinks she's
good enough to go to the state meet. Next she'll be trying to talk me
out of my Kimber.

She's 11.

I know it is not exactly Katnip stuff but the Rural King has a pretty
nice looking crossbow for $30 (pistol style). It is 80# I think.


I have one of those, not allowed to put them together and shoot them in
our state but if we could it would be good for targets at about 25 feet,
and would be very hard for a 10 year old to cock... I would also say
either get a metal detector, or an extra package of bolts... if I had
ever shot ours...

On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 19:34:35 -0400, Poco Loco
wrote:

Mine is now taking archery lessons, and the instructor thinks she's
good enough to go to the state meet. Next she'll be trying to talk me
out of my Kimber.


===

Now wait just a minute.

I want the Kimber. :-)

On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 20:04:31 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 19:34:35 -0400, Poco Loco
wrote:

On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 19:30:33 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 17:38:16 -0400, KC wrote:

On 10/7/2014 4:43 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 16:11:57 -0400, KC wrote:

mocking gays....

Is that a Hunger Games reference?


Not from this end, I didn't read the book or see the movie...

It was big with my grand daughter.

Mine is now taking archery lessons, and the instructor thinks she's
good enough to go to the state meet. Next she'll be trying to talk me
out of my Kimber.

She's 11.

I know it is not exactly Katnip stuff but the Rural King has a pretty
nice looking crossbow for $30 (pistol style). It is 80# I think.

Mine is using a compound bow. Don't know the draw weight.

On 10/8/14 12:49 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 15:57:25 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

...sad about The Supreme's ruling to let gay marriages in five states stand.


If you are paying attention, you will know the difference between
"ruling" on and rejecting a case

Some people in Idaho are not all that happy today.



By refusing to cert, the Supremes have now made it possible for gays to
marry in 30 states. The door against gay marriage, if not slammed shut,
is pretty close to it.

--
“My heart goes out to the people of Ebola.”
Sarah Palin

On 10/8/2014 12:55 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 10/8/14 12:49 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 15:57:25 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

...sad about The Supreme's ruling to let gay marriages in five states
stand.


If you are paying attention, you will know the difference between
"ruling" on and rejecting a case

Some people in Idaho are not all that happy today.



By refusing to cert, the Supremes have now made it possible for gays to
marry in 30 states. The door against gay marriage, if not slammed shut,
is pretty close to it.


That's one interpretation. The other is that it was a calculated way to
keep options open for another day.

On 10/8/14 1:17 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/8/2014 12:55 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 10/8/14 12:49 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 15:57:25 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

...sad about The Supreme's ruling to let gay marriages in five states
stand.


If you are paying attention, you will know the difference between
"ruling" on and rejecting a case

Some people in Idaho are not all that happy today.



By refusing to cert, the Supremes have now made it possible for gays to
marry in 30 states. The door against gay marriage, if not slammed shut,
is pretty close to it.


That's one interpretation. The other is that it was a calculated way to
keep options open for another day.




Anything that really ****es off right-wing lunatics is worth doing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmicU9uxYsM



--
“My heart goes out to the people of Ebola.”
Sarah Palin

F*O*A*D wrote:
On 10/7/14 6:11 PM, Califbill wrote:
F*O*A*D wrote:
On 10/7/14 5:42 PM, Califbill wrote:
F*O*A*D wrote:
On 10/7/14 2:32 PM, Poco Loco wrote:


What hate? I have changed my whole attitude with regard to gay
'marriage'. I'm all for their unions. And if they want to use the word
'marriage', that's fine too. I don't consider it a marriage, but if it
curbs population growth, it can't be too bad.


"If you are black, get back."

John Herring, aka Poco Loco, a self-confessed racist.


I never saw John state that, but racist Harry has a couple times.



Ahh, the usual bull**** from you, eh, Bilious.


You continue to lie.


Sorry, Bilious, but I don't go after minorities because of their race or
ethnic background. Your boy John Herring does, though.


But you state racist statements.

On 10/8/2014 12:55 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 10/8/14 12:49 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 15:57:25 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

...sad about The Supreme's ruling to let gay marriages in five states
stand.


If you are paying attention, you will know the difference between
"ruling" on and rejecting a case

Some people in Idaho are not all that happy today.



By refusing to cert, the Supremes have now made it possible for gays to
marry in 30 states. The door against gay marriage, if not slammed shut,
is pretty close to it.


They're going to cornhole each other whether its legal or not.

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 08 Oct 2014 12:55:40 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 10/8/14 12:49 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 15:57:25 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

...sad about The Supreme's ruling to let gay marriages in five states stand.


If you are paying attention, you will know the difference between
"ruling" on and rejecting a case

Some people in Idaho are not all that happy today.



By refusing to cert, the Supremes have now made it possible for gays to
marry in 30 states. The door against gay marriage, if not slammed shut,
is pretty close to it.

The point is that you said they ruled and they did exactly the
opposite. In fact Kennedy (not one of the conservatives) wrote a brief
today informing Idaho that they could not avail themselves of the
Virginia court decision.
It is now up to the 9th circuit to decide.
They will probably knock down the Idaho ban but you never can tell.
It is clear that the SC really wants this to be decided in the lower
courts so they won't have to take a stand on it.
Maybe the liberals are afraid that it might go 5-4 the wrong way if
the case is not made in a way 5 can agree on.

I doubt the SCOTUS will take a case until one of the conservative
courts actually upholds a ban. It would force them to take the case.
A ruling on that would be significant.

Do you see the difference yet?

Only technically. The court can't decide against gay marriage.
Given the widespread acceptance of its "morality," they'd cause no end
of unrest. They've made other bad decisions, but they probably won't
make this mistake.
I don't understand "gayness," but I see the gay point in this matter.
Hell, I don't know any gay people. Of course you don't know what you
don't know.
But I think this is a done deal.