![]() |
Some Virginians are...
F*O*A*D wrote:
On 10/7/14 2:37 PM, Poco Loco wrote: I don't really hate you Harry, and pity is not the right word either but it is closer. It would be good for the group however if you'd stop trying to insult people who don't agree with all of your political views. You've driven off a lot of good people with the hostile atmosphere that you have created here. 'Hate' is an emotion that takes work. Krause is definitely not worth it. 'Pity' is probably closer, but I think the feeling is more like that experienced upon seeing a pile of dog poop on the sidewalk. It's really a giggle when you right-wingers hook up. Didn't Donnie want to get out of bed today to fire up the Playbook and defend you? |
Some Virginians are...
On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 19:34:35 -0400, Poco Loco
wrote: Mine is now taking archery lessons, and the instructor thinks she's good enough to go to the state meet. Next she'll be trying to talk me out of my Kimber. === Now wait just a minute. I want the Kimber. :-) |
Some Virginians are...
On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 20:04:31 -0400, wrote:
On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 19:34:35 -0400, Poco Loco wrote: On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 19:30:33 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 17:38:16 -0400, KC wrote: On 10/7/2014 4:43 PM, wrote: On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 16:11:57 -0400, KC wrote: mocking gays.... Is that a Hunger Games reference? Not from this end, I didn't read the book or see the movie... It was big with my grand daughter. Mine is now taking archery lessons, and the instructor thinks she's good enough to go to the state meet. Next she'll be trying to talk me out of my Kimber. She's 11. I know it is not exactly Katnip stuff but the Rural King has a pretty nice looking crossbow for $30 (pistol style). It is 80# I think. Mine is using a compound bow. Don't know the draw weight. |
Some Virginians are...
|
Some Virginians are...
On 10/8/2014 12:55 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 10/8/14 12:49 PM, wrote: On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 15:57:25 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: ...sad about The Supreme's ruling to let gay marriages in five states stand. If you are paying attention, you will know the difference between "ruling" on and rejecting a case Some people in Idaho are not all that happy today. By refusing to cert, the Supremes have now made it possible for gays to marry in 30 states. The door against gay marriage, if not slammed shut, is pretty close to it. That's one interpretation. The other is that it was a calculated way to keep options open for another day. |
Some Virginians are...
On 10/8/14 1:17 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/8/2014 12:55 PM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 10/8/14 12:49 PM, wrote: On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 15:57:25 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: ...sad about The Supreme's ruling to let gay marriages in five states stand. If you are paying attention, you will know the difference between "ruling" on and rejecting a case Some people in Idaho are not all that happy today. By refusing to cert, the Supremes have now made it possible for gays to marry in 30 states. The door against gay marriage, if not slammed shut, is pretty close to it. That's one interpretation. The other is that it was a calculated way to keep options open for another day. Anything that really ****es off right-wing lunatics is worth doing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmicU9uxYsM -- “My heart goes out to the people of Ebola.” Sarah Palin |
Some Virginians are...
F*O*A*D wrote:
On 10/7/14 6:11 PM, Califbill wrote: F*O*A*D wrote: On 10/7/14 5:42 PM, Califbill wrote: F*O*A*D wrote: On 10/7/14 2:32 PM, Poco Loco wrote: What hate? I have changed my whole attitude with regard to gay 'marriage'. I'm all for their unions. And if they want to use the word 'marriage', that's fine too. I don't consider it a marriage, but if it curbs population growth, it can't be too bad. "If you are black, get back." John Herring, aka Poco Loco, a self-confessed racist. I never saw John state that, but racist Harry has a couple times. Ahh, the usual bull**** from you, eh, Bilious. You continue to lie. Sorry, Bilious, but I don't go after minorities because of their race or ethnic background. Your boy John Herring does, though. But you state racist statements. |
Some Virginians are...
On 10/8/2014 12:55 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 10/8/14 12:49 PM, wrote: On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 15:57:25 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: ...sad about The Supreme's ruling to let gay marriages in five states stand. If you are paying attention, you will know the difference between "ruling" on and rejecting a case Some people in Idaho are not all that happy today. By refusing to cert, the Supremes have now made it possible for gays to marry in 30 states. The door against gay marriage, if not slammed shut, is pretty close to it. They're going to cornhole each other whether its legal or not. |
Some Virginians are...
In article ,
says... On Wed, 08 Oct 2014 12:55:40 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: On 10/8/14 12:49 PM, wrote: On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 15:57:25 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: ...sad about The Supreme's ruling to let gay marriages in five states stand. If you are paying attention, you will know the difference between "ruling" on and rejecting a case Some people in Idaho are not all that happy today. By refusing to cert, the Supremes have now made it possible for gays to marry in 30 states. The door against gay marriage, if not slammed shut, is pretty close to it. The point is that you said they ruled and they did exactly the opposite. In fact Kennedy (not one of the conservatives) wrote a brief today informing Idaho that they could not avail themselves of the Virginia court decision. It is now up to the 9th circuit to decide. They will probably knock down the Idaho ban but you never can tell. It is clear that the SC really wants this to be decided in the lower courts so they won't have to take a stand on it. Maybe the liberals are afraid that it might go 5-4 the wrong way if the case is not made in a way 5 can agree on. I doubt the SCOTUS will take a case until one of the conservative courts actually upholds a ban. It would force them to take the case. A ruling on that would be significant. Do you see the difference yet? Only technically. The court can't decide against gay marriage. Given the widespread acceptance of its "morality," they'd cause no end of unrest. They've made other bad decisions, but they probably won't make this mistake. I don't understand "gayness," but I see the gay point in this matter. Hell, I don't know any gay people. Of course you don't know what you don't know. But I think this is a done deal. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:28 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com