![]() |
Holder is resigning
On 9/26/2014 9:24 AM, Tim wrote:
Stupid people is right, Richard. Kinda like "we nerd to pass this bill so we can see what's in it" or something to that effect... Nothing wrong with protesting something as long as you know what you are protesting about. The people Maddow interviewed didn't have a clue why they were there. |
Holder is resigning
On 9/26/14 9:24 AM, Tim wrote:
Stupid people is right, Richard. Kinda like "we nerd to pass this bill so we can see what's in it" or something to that effect... Did Cheney ever find those WMD's? |
Holder is resigning
On 9/26/2014 9:32 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 9/26/2014 9:24 AM, Tim wrote: Stupid people is right, Richard. Kinda like "we nerd to pass this bill so we can see what's in it" or something to that effect... Nothing wrong with protesting something as long as you know what you are protesting about. The people Maddow interviewed didn't have a clue why they were there. In all fairness, did you expect anything different from MSNBC? I am sure there were plenty of good solid people there, they just don't fit the MSNBC agenda of making conservatives look stupid so they were left on the cutting room floor... |
Holder is resigning
|
Holder is resigning
On 9/26/14 9:43 AM, KC wrote:
On 9/26/2014 9:32 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 9/26/2014 9:24 AM, Tim wrote: Stupid people is right, Richard. Kinda like "we nerd to pass this bill so we can see what's in it" or something to that effect... Nothing wrong with protesting something as long as you know what you are protesting about. The people Maddow interviewed didn't have a clue why they were there. In all fairness, did you expect anything different from MSNBC? I am sure there were plenty of good solid people there, they just don't fit the MSNBC agenda of making conservatives look stupid so they were left on the cutting room floor... On the other hand, if you were interviewed, no effort would be required to make you look stupid. |
Holder is resigning
Harry did you press changes on Cheaney for war crimes? If not then why? Anybody can...
|
Holder is resigning
Harry did you press changes on Cheaney for war crimes? If not then why? Anybody can...
|
Holder is resigning
On 9/26/14 10:06 AM, Tim wrote:
Harry did you press changes on Cheaney for war crimes? If not then why? Anybody can... It's Cheney, not Cheaney. Cheney ought to be arrested and prosecuted for war crimes. |
Holder is resigning
|
Holder is resigning
So I can't type well Harry. Why haven't you pressed a civil suit against him for war crimes?
Interesting watching you twist a thread |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:43 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com