On 9/17/14 10:40 PM, Califbill wrote:

And if we can prove some guy is daddy to 3 or more kids and does
not provide any support. Mandatory vasectomy.



Sieg Heil!

wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 06:25:29 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 9/17/14 10:40 PM, Califbill wrote:

And if we can prove some guy is daddy to 3 or more kids and does
not provide any support. Mandatory vasectomy.



Sieg Heil!

Maybe we should just be more aggressive about making people pay child
support.

That makes sense.
--
Posted from my iPhone

On 9/18/2014 11:46 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 06:25:29 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 9/17/14 10:40 PM, Califbill wrote:

And if we can prove some guy is daddy to 3 or more kids and does
not provide any support. Mandatory vasectomy.



Sieg Heil!

Maybe we should just be more aggressive about making people pay child
support.

That makes sense.

Easier said than done. Most of these gals don't know who the daddy is.

On Thursday, September 18, 2014 10:24:31 AM UTC-4, wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 06:25:29 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:



On 9/17/14 10:40 PM, Califbill wrote:



And if we can prove some guy is daddy to 3 or more kids and does

not provide any support. Mandatory vasectomy.







Sieg Heil!



Maybe we should just be more aggressive about making people pay child
support.

If someone doesn't have a job and is living off the gov dole, where is that money going to come from? After all, if they aren't responsible enough to take care of the children they sire, a job would be a stretch.

So who's paying for that baby again? Oh yeah... taxpayers.

On Wednesday, September 17, 2014 7:35:11 AM UTC-4, Harrold wrote:
On 9/17/2014 6:43 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:




Liberals should accept and teach personal responsibility instead of

asking the government to coddle them birth to grave.

Personal responsibility is not in the liberal vocabulary?

F.O.A.D. wrote:
wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 06:25:29 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 9/17/14 10:40 PM, Califbill wrote:

And if we can prove some guy is daddy to 3 or more kids and does
not provide any support. Mandatory vasectomy.



Sieg Heil!

Maybe we should just be more aggressive about making people pay child
support.

That makes sense.

And how are they going to pay child support. They are on welfare, and
instead of going to work for money, they go to work nailing the local
beaver.

F*O*A*D wrote:
On 9/17/14 10:40 PM, Califbill wrote:

And if we can prove some guy is daddy to 3 or more kids and does
not provide any support. Mandatory vasectomy.



Sieg Heil!

Maybe if you paid your taxes, you might be concerned.

On 9/18/14, 12:43 PM, wrote:
On 18 Sep 2014 15:46:31 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 06:25:29 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 9/17/14 10:40 PM, Califbill wrote:

And if we can prove some guy is daddy to 3 or more kids and does
not provide any support. Mandatory vasectomy.



Sieg Heil!

Maybe we should just be more aggressive about making people pay child
support.

That makes sense.

The problem is you would oppose any effective measures in that
direction. Throwing them in jail is no help, it is just another person
on the public dole.


There's plenty of cleanup work not being done in most cities...trashed
up lots, abandoned houses, derelict factories...good honest work and if
the hourly rate is decent, it will support the daddy and help out his kids.

"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 9/18/14, 12:43 PM, wrote:
On 18 Sep 2014 15:46:31 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 06:25:29 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 9/17/14 10:40 PM, Califbill wrote:

And if we can prove some guy is daddy to 3 or more kids and does
not provide any support. Mandatory vasectomy.



Sieg Heil!

Maybe we should just be more aggressive about making people pay child
support.

That makes sense.

The problem is you would oppose any effective measures in that
direction. Throwing them in jail is no help, it is just another person
on the public dole.


There's plenty of cleanup work not being done in most cities...trashed up
lots, abandoned houses, derelict factories...good honest work and if the
hourly rate is decent, it will support the daddy and help out his kids.

And the unions oppose using conscripted labor. Since they seem to own the
state houses, they get what they bought.