|
It's so...uplifting...
On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 11:17:41 -0400, wrote:
Oh, and not to mention... once Iran gets it's nukes and it will, those Israeli nukes will be the *only* thing slowing Iran down on using it on them.... period. Then why does Iran want a nuke? === Because it lessens the risk of a pre-emptive strike by a western power. |
It's so...uplifting...
On 8/22/2014 2:15 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:44:51 -0400, KC wrote: On 8/22/2014 11:17 AM, wrote: On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 10:44:37 -0400, KC wrote: Oh, and not to mention... once Iran gets it's nukes and it will, those Israeli nukes will be the *only* thing slowing Iran down on using it on them.... period. Then why does Iran want a nuke? Oh brother.... It is a valid question. If Israelis nukes are such a deferent, why would Iran want one ... unless it was seen as defensive for them. You seem to want this both ways. Why are you being so closed minded, black and white.. I never said the deterrent was the end all, just a deterrent... Might work, might give the rest of the world time to stop things, the only thing black and white here is Iran's clearly stated intent to "wipe Israel into the sea"... that is well documented, and they are working hard at that end every day... |
It's so...uplifting...
On 8/22/2014 2:16 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 13:43:37 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 11:17:41 -0400, wrote: Oh, and not to mention... once Iran gets it's nukes and it will, those Israeli nukes will be the *only* thing slowing Iran down on using it on them.... period. Then why does Iran want a nuke? === Because it lessens the risk of a pre-emptive strike by a western power. At last an honest answer although I really believe it is just a prestige thing. So you think my answer was "dishonest" because it wasn't your answer... oh brother... |
It's so...uplifting...
On 8/22/2014 2:38 PM, KC wrote:
On 8/22/2014 2:16 PM, wrote: On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 13:43:37 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 11:17:41 -0400, wrote: Oh, and not to mention... once Iran gets it's nukes and it will, those Israeli nukes will be the *only* thing slowing Iran down on using it on them.... period. Then why does Iran want a nuke? === Because it lessens the risk of a pre-emptive strike by a western power. At last an honest answer although I really believe it is just a prestige thing. So you think my answer was "dishonest" because it wasn't your answer... oh brother... Paranoia strikes again. |
It's so...uplifting...
|
It's so...uplifting...
On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 10:08:13 -0400, wrote:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 08:15:57 -0400, Poco Loco wrote: On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 00:34:52 -0400, wrote: There is no such thing as a defensive nuke As a matter of fact, part of the planning to stop a Soviet Invasion of Europe through the Fulda Gap included the use of defensive nukes to form barriers. That was insanity not strategy. It sounds like the same people who described Europe as a place where towns were 2 kilotons apart. These would have been between 10 tons and 1 kiloton. Itty bitty nukes. Here's some info on same. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special...ition_Munition We actually had those down at the Engineer Battalion level. |
It's so...uplifting...
On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 11:17:41 -0400, wrote:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 10:44:37 -0400, KC wrote: On 8/22/2014 10:42 AM, KC wrote: On 8/22/2014 10:08 AM, wrote: On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:51:39 -0400, KC wrote: There is no such thing as a defensive nuke Ok, deterrent nukes.. How has that been working out for them? Pretty good, I haven't seen any of the surrounding armies/nations try to take the land by military force, no invasion, so I say it's working perfectly. Oh, and not to mention... once Iran gets it's nukes and it will, those Israeli nukes will be the *only* thing slowing Iran down on using it on them.... period. Then why does Iran want a nuke? To make a fortune selling it to ISIS/ISIL. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:10 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com